Connect with us

News

Twitter employees head for the exits after Elon Musk’ ‘extremely hardcore’ work ultimatum | CNN Business

Published

on

Twitter employees head for the exits after Elon Musk’ ‘extremely hardcore’ work ultimatum | CNN Business


New York
CNN Enterprise
 — 

One other worker exodus seems to be underway at Twitter as many employees rejected Elon Musk’s ultimatum to work “extraordinarily hardcore,” selecting as a substitute to depart the corporate, in accordance with a number of present and former workers.

Because the deadline approached for Twitter workers to reply to Elon Musk’s ultimatum to decide to working in an “extraordinarily hardcore” vogue on the firm or depart, some workers appeared to publicly point out that they had chosen the latter possibility. On Thursday afternoon, Twitter staffers started posting the salute emoji, which has change into a sign that somebody is exiting the corporate. One Twitter worker stated in a tweet that deciding to affix the corporate was “one of many best choices ever made. Deciding to go away right this moment was 100% the alternative.”

In the meantime, an inside Slack channel on the firm was full of workers posting the salute emoji after the 5pm ET deadline, indicating that they had chosen to not signal Musk’s pledge and depart the corporate, workers advised CNN.

Advertisement

Twitter’s remaining workforce had till 5 p.m. ET on Thursday to resolve whether or not they needed to be part of the tradition Musk needs to implement on the social media firm, or else successfully resign, in accordance with an e mail he despatched to employees Wednesday.

A former Twitter government who not too long ago exited the corporate described Thursday’s worker exits as a “mass exodus.”

Two Twitter workers advised CNN forward of the deadline on Thursday that they deliberate to reject the ultimatum, citing a poisonous work setting they are saying the billionaire has launched. One other Twitter worker advised CNN Wednesday they had been nonetheless weighing the choice, saying the e-mail from Musk “felt like a punch within the intestine as a result of regardless of the way you felt about wanting to remain or eager to go, you had been pressured to decide and really feel such as you’re up towards the time clock to make the most effective resolution for you and your loved ones.”

The worker added: “These choices are extra than simply 24 hours.”

Musk advised workers on Wednesday that his aim is to construct “Twitter 2.0” and that workers who select to remain will likely be required to decide to working “lengthy hours at excessive depth” and presumably agreeing to Musk’s demand for Twitter workers, who’ve been largely working remotely, to return to in-office work. As of noon Thursday, workers nonetheless didn’t have readability on which remote-work exceptions could be granted in the event that they resolve to remain, one worker stated.

Advertisement

In a while Thursday, amid an obvious scramble by administration to keep away from dropping too many employees to the ultimatum, Musk despatched an e mail to employees trying to make clear his place on distant work, in accordance with textual content of the e-mail obtained by CNN from a Twitter worker who requested to not be recognized.

“Concerning distant work, all that’s required for approval is that your supervisor takes duty for guaranteeing that you’re making a wonderful contribution,” Musk stated within the e mail, including that employees could be anticipated to attend in-person conferences at least as soon as a month.

Twenty minutes later, Musk despatched a observe up e mail saying: “Liable to stating the plain, any supervisor who falsely claims that somebody reporting to them is doing wonderful work or {that a} given function is crucial, whether or not distant or not, will likely be exited from the corporate.”

The choice to situation an ultimatum got here after Musk earlier this month fired half of Twitter’s employees, decreasing its workforce to round 3,700 workers, and in addition reportedly reduce lots of Twitter’s contract employees. He additionally pushed out its high management and dissolved the board of administrators. Musk additionally not too long ago fired some workers for criticizing him in tweets or on inside Slack channels.

“I don’t need to stick round to construct a product that’s being poisoned from the in and out,” stated one of many workers who plans to reject the ultimatum, however requested anonymity to keep away from placing the severance in danger. “Everybody has a value to a sure diploma and this severance offers me some consolation into on the lookout for a greater setting in the timeframe regardless of the economic system.”

Advertisement

That worker stated administration now seems to have grown involved in regards to the variety of individuals planning to depart and are “scrambling” to persuade expertise to remain. Twitter, which has reportedly eradicated most of its public relations workforce, didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

One other Twitter worker, who requested to not be quoted, shared related considerations and stated they deliberate to additionally exit the corporate.

A not too long ago laid off worker who stays in contact with former coworkers advised CNN that everybody that they had spoken to plans to reject Musk’s ultimatum and exit the corporate. “Individuals can’t overlook the general public mockery and firing of different workers,” the previous worker advised CNN. “In the identical vein, they’ll’t overlook or really feel comfy working for somebody who has dealt with the previous few weeks in the best way Elon has.”

“Individuals don’t need to sacrifice their psychological well being and household lives to make the richest man on the planet richer,” the previous worker added.

However the resolution will not be really easy for others. The ultimatum comes throughout a tough interval for the tech trade, following mass layoffs and hiring freeze bulletins at many main corporations together with Meta, Amazon, Lyft and others. Staff working in the USA from different international locations may additionally threat dropping their work visas in the event that they depart the corporate.

Advertisement

A fourth worker advised CNN Thursday they plan to remain on the firm “as a result of change is never influenced from the surface.”

The shakeup more likely to come on account of the ultimatum would be the final factor of the “basic organizational restructuring” following Musk’s takeover, he advised a Delaware court docket Wednesday throughout a trial over his Tesla pay bundle.

Musk stated within the Wednesday e mail that the “new Twitter” will likely be “way more engineering-driven,” leaving some non-engineering employees questioning whether or not their jobs might be in danger even when they decide to remain.

“There’s no assurance on this, you’re identical to, ‘I would be capable of advocate for myself, I may not,’” the worker who expressed uncertainty in regards to the resolution stated. “What’s behind this door? You don’t know. The one door you realize that’s sure is the exit door.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Live news: Singapore upgrades economic forecasts after growth outpaces expectations

Published

on

Live news: Singapore upgrades economic forecasts after growth outpaces expectations

Australian logistics company WiseTech has cut its revenue and profit forecasts after a series of allegations about its founder and chief executive Richard White disrupted its development and product release plans. 

WiseTech stock fell 14 per cent on Friday after the company cut its revenue forecast for the current financial year to between A$1.2bn ($780mn) and A$1.3bn from A$1.3bn-A$1.35bn.

Earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation is now forecast to be between A$600mn and A$660mn, down from as high as A$700mn previously. 

White, the 69-year old co-founder, has faced accusations of bullying and the non-disclosure of relationships with employees. The company released an independent report into the accusations on Friday that found that there had been “no impropriety”.

Continue Reading

News

Smollett's attorneys praise overturn of actor's conviction

Published

on

Smollett's attorneys praise overturn of actor's conviction

It was a decision that Jussie Smollett’s lead attorney said was no surprise, but it still took nearly six years to arrive at Thursday’s conclusion.

The Illinois Supreme court ruled Thursday that the case against the “Empire” actor never should have been brought in the first place, with the main argument centering around Smollett striking a deal with the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office to drop charges in 2019.

“This was a vindictive persecution,” said Nenye Uche, Smollett’s lead attorney. “This was not a prosecution.”

Smollett’s attorneys had argued that a deal existed between their client and Cook County States Attorney Kim Foxx’s office when initial charges were dropped in the case in March 2019, three weeks after the actor had officially been charged and accused with staging a racist, homophobic attack in Chicago’s Streeterville neighborhood earlier that winter.

According to defense attorneys, the agreement held that there would be no prosecution if Smollett did community service and paid a $10,000 fine. However, they said the deal was upended by public reaction to the plea bargain, which Foxx said is common in misdemeanor cases like Smollett’s.

Advertisement

“You almost never see these cases end up in a courtroom,” she said.

A special prosecutor was later hired in the case and ultimately brought new charges against Smollett, which resulted in a conviction and a prison sentence of 150 days.

Smollett’s attorneys said everyone from the office of the Special Prosecutor on down should have known better than to pursue the new charges, arguing that a contract existed by way of that plea agreement, and that trying the case exposed their client to double jeopardy.

“None of us wants that to happen to us, to have a deal and they take that agreement back,” said attorney Shay Allen.

In their 32-page ruling, the Illinois high court agreed with that assessment. In the 5-0 majority opinion penned by Justice Elizabeth Rochford, the justices acknowledged that many in the public thought the initial deal clearing Smollett was unjust.

Advertisement

“What would be more unjust than the resolution of any one criminal case would be a holding from this court that the State was not bound to honor agreements upon which people have detrimentally relied,” she said.

But while appointed special prosecutor Dan Webb said he disagreed with the Supreme Court’s finding, faulting its factual and legal reasoning, Uche called the ruling a victory, especially in the age of social media.

“The big challenge is holding the line for the rule of law,” Uche said. “That’s exactly what the court did today.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

ICC issues arrest warrant for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu

Published

on

ICC issues arrest warrant for Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu

The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant “for crimes against humanity and war crimes”.

The move is a dramatic escalation of legal proceedings over Israel’s offensive in Gaza, and marks the first time that the court, which was set up in 2002, has issued a warrant for a western-backed leader.

It means that the ICC’s 124 member states — which include most European and Latin American countries and many in Africa and Asia — would be obliged to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they entered their territory. But the court has no means of enforcing the warrants if they do not.

The warrants, however, will reinforce the sense that Israel has become increasingly isolated internationally over the conduct of its war against Hamas in the besieged Gaza strip.

Announcing the decision on Thursday, the court said there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that Netanyahu and Gallant bear criminal responsibility for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts”.

Advertisement

It said there were reasonable grounds to believe the pair bear criminal responsibility “for the war crime of intentionally directing an attack against the civilian population”, and had “intentionally and knowingly deprived” Gaza’s civilians of food, water, medical supplies, fuel and electricity.

The court said it had unanimously decided to reject Israel’s appeal against the ICC’s jurisdiction. Neither Israel nor its largest ally the US are members of the court.

The Israeli prime minister’s office branded the warrants “antisemitic” and said Israel “rejects with disgust the absurd and false actions and charges against it”, calling the ICC “a biased and discriminatory political body”.

“No anti-Israel resolution will prevent the state of Israel from protecting its citizens,” it said. “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will not give in to pressure, will not flinch and will not retreat until all the war goals set by Israel . . . are achieved.”

Palestinian officials welcomed the ICC’s announcement. Husam Zomlot, Palestinian ambassador to the UK, said the warrants were “not only a step towards accountability and justice in Palestine but also a step to restore the credibility of the rules-based international order”. Hamas called on the court to expand the warrants to other Israeli officials.

Advertisement
Yoav Gallant at an observation post overseeing southern Lebanon last month © Ariel Hermoni/GPO/dpa
Mohammed Deif
The ICC has also issued an arrest warrant for Mohammed Deif, who Israel in August said it had killed © Israel Defense Forces

The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas leader Mohammed Deif for crimes against humanity and war crimes over the militant group’s October 7 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the war in Gaza. Israel said in August it had killed Deif in an air strike in Gaza a month earlier.

In the US, figures from both the Biden White House and incoming Republican administration condemned the warrants. The White House said it “fundamentally rejects” the ICC’s decision.

“We remain deeply concerned by the prosecutor’s rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that led to this decision,” said the US National Security Council.

Mike Waltz, who will serve as national security adviser when Donald Trump’s administration takes office next year, said the ICC had “no credibility”. “You can expect a strong response to the antisemitic bias of the ICC and UN come January,” he wrote on X.

Senator Lindsey Graham, a close Trump ally, called for fresh sanctions against the court. Trump’s previous administration imposed sanctions on top ICC officials, including then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, over its probe into allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan. The Biden administration later lifted them.

“The court is a dangerous joke. It is now time for the US Senate to act and sanction this irresponsible body,” Graham said.

Advertisement

Republicans will control all three branches of government next year, raising the likelihood that the US will bring in new sanctions against the ICC.

However, the EU’s top diplomat, Josep Borrell, said the warrants were not political, and that the court’s decision should be respected and implemented.

The Dutch foreign minister, Caspar Veldkamp, said the Netherlands “will act on the arrest warrants”, but other European countries struck a more equivocal line.

A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said “we respect the independence of the International Criminal Court” and added: “There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy, and Hamas and Lebanese Hizbollah, which are terrorist organisations.”

ICC prosecutor Karim Khan originally sought the warrants in May for Netanyahu, Gallant, Deif and two other Hamas leaders, Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, both of whom Israel has since killed.

Advertisement

The ICC’s move comes as Israel faces intense criticism over the toll of its offensive in Gaza.

The hostilities began when Hamas militants stormed into Israel in October 2023, rampaging through communities, killing 1,200 people, according to Israeli officials, and taking another 250 hostage.

In response, Israel launched a ferocious assault on Gaza, with Gallant announcing a “complete siege” of the strip. Israel’s offensive has killed almost 44,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, displaced 1.9mn of the enclave’s 2.3mn inhabitants and reduced most of it to rubble.

The UN and aid agencies have criticised Israel for restricting the delivery of aid, while warning of the threat of famine and disease.

The fighting has also triggered legal proceedings at the International Court of Justice, which deals with cases against countries.

Advertisement

That court, the highest in the UN system, is hearing a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza, which Israel has vehemently denied.

Additional reporting by Anna Gross

Continue Reading

Trending