Connect with us

News

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Published

on

Twelve jurors selected to hear Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Twelve New Yorkers who represent a cross-section of Manhattan residents have been sworn in as jurors for Donald Trump’s “hush money” case, after three days of selection in which almost 200 candidates were vetted for political bias by the court.

The panel — which includes a female physical therapist, a retired male wealth manager, a male investment banker, a male security engineer, two male attorneys, a female English teacher and an Irish-born salesman from Harlem — was finalised just after 4:30pm local time on Thursday. The court also selected the first of likely six alternate jurors.

Opening arguments in the criminal trial, the first against a former US president, are expected to commence on Monday morning.

Advertisement

Trump is facing trial on 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records for alleged payments made in the run-up to the 2016 election to buy the silence of a porn actor who claimed she had an affair with him 10 years prior. He has pleaded not guilty in the case, which is one of four criminal indictments he is facing.

Trump, a New York native and real estate tycoon, must be present in the Lower Manhattan courtroom throughout the six-week trial. Leaving the courthouse, he complained that the proceedings were preventing him from hitting the campaign trail as the presumptive Republican nominee in November’s election.

“I’m supposed to be in New Hampshire. I’m supposed to be in Georgia. I’m supposed to be in North Carolina, South Carolina,” he told reporters. He clutched a stack of paper he said were printouts of news articles criticising the indictment, which he once again decried as a “hoax”.

The third day of jury selection in a Manhattan criminal court had earlier got off to a rocky start. Two previously selected jurors were excused by the court after one woman’s identity was pieced together by family and friends from publicly reported details, and another man was connected to an arrest for ripping down rightwing posters in the 1990s.

Over the course of the week, dozens of potential jurors were dismissed for claiming they could not set aside their bias when it came to determining Trump’s fate.

Advertisement

Soon after court resumed on Thursday morning, an oncology nurse from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, who had been seated late on Tuesday, told Justice Juan Merchan that she had “friends, family and colleagues” contact her after piecing together from press reports that she had been chosen as a juror in the trial.

She added that as a result of the external pressure, she no longer felt she could be fair and unbiased, and was promptly excused.

Minutes later, lawyers for the Manhattan district attorney, who brought the case, revealed their research had uncovered that a male juror may not have been truthful about his past, and had been arrested for ripping down rightwing political posters in the Westchester County area of New York State in the 1990s. His wife may have been “previously accused or involved in a corruption inquiry”, the district attorney’s office said.

Merchan later excused him without further explanation.

Although prospective jurors’ names and addresses have been kept private for fear of reprisals, Merchan admonished the press for publishing “so much information” about their physical attributes and professional lives that some had become “very, very easy to identify”.

Advertisement

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

Prosecutors on Thursday also renewed their request for Merchan to hold Trump in contempt for violating a gag order that prevents him from talking about many of the people involved in the case, pointing specifically to a social media post shared by the former president that seemed to imply some prospective jurors were “undercover Liberal Activists”.

Merchan said he would rule after oral arguments on the issue, which are scheduled for Tuesday.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Live news: Sell-off in cruise operators creates choppy conditions ahead of Viking IPO

Published

on

Live news: Sell-off in cruise operators creates choppy conditions ahead of Viking IPO

Fed decision: The US Federal Reserve is expected to keep the federal funds rate on hold at the conclusion of its two-day meeting. After a series of hotter than expected employment and inflation figures, investors will be listening for clues on when the central bank expects to cut interest rates.

US employment: US government data is expected to show that job openings in March edged down to 8.69mn from 8.75mn in February. Separately, ADP will release its US employment report for April, which will give some insight into the labour market before the official government figures on Friday. Private payrolls are expected to have added 175,000 jobs in April, compared with the 184,000 jobs added in March.

Pfizer: The pharmaceutical company is expected to report that quarterly revenue declined 23.4 per cent from the same period last year to $14bn, according to LSEG, as the company faces weak demand for its Covid-19 vaccine and antiviral medicine.

Other companies: CVS Health, KKR, Marriott International, Estée Lauder, Kraft Heinz, Yum Brands, and Norwegian Cruise Line will report earnings before the bell. DoorDash, eBay and Etsy will report after the markets close.

Manufacturing: Activity in the US manufacturing sector is expected to have remained in expansion territory, but April’s reading is forecast to have ticked down 0.3 percentage points to a reading of 50.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Some Republicans expected to join Arizona Democrats to pass repeal of 1864 abortion ban

Published

on

Some Republicans expected to join Arizona Democrats to pass repeal of 1864 abortion ban

Two Republican state senators are expected to join Democrats in Arizona on Wednesday to pass a bill to repeal the state’s Civil War-era near-total abortion ban — three weeks after the state Supreme Court ruled the law was enforceable and one week after the House passed its own legislation to roll back the restrictions that have stirred widespread controversy.

GOP state Sens. T.J. Shope and Shawnna Bolick have both indicated they will support the Democratic-led repeal effort, giving Democrats the necessary votes in the chamber.

Notably, Bolick is married to one of the state Supreme Court justices who voted to reinstate the 1864 law, which supersedes a 15-week abortion ban that was enacted in 2022 and which blocks all abortions except to save the life of the pregnant woman.

While Republicans in the state Senate could delay the repeal vote with procedural hurdles, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, has expressed confidence the repeal bill will pass Wednesday.

Hobbs has also expressed frustration that the Legislature didn’t take action sooner, noting that unless the courts impose a pause on the 1864 abortion ban, there could be a monthslong gap between when it goes into effect and then its repeal kicks in.

Advertisement

As of Tuesday morning, the office of Attorney General Kris Mayes said the effective date for the ban has been pushed from June 8 to June 27, after the state Supreme Court rejected a motion to reconsider. If the ban is repealed by the Legislature, that move wouldn’t take effect until 90 days after the legislative session ends, which must be by June 30, meaning the repeal of the 1864 law may not take effect until around Oct. 1.

Some Democrats have acknowledged “uncertainty” that at least two GOP senators will vote for repeal on Wednesday “because the Republican Party has moved to the extremes since Trump first got elected,” Sen. Priya Sundareshan, a Democrat, said on a call with reporters on Tuesday.

People protest after Arizona’s Supreme Court revived a law dating to 1864 that bans abortion in virtually all instances, in Peoria, AZ, April 14, 2024.

Caitlin O’Hara/Reuters

Conservatives in the state House initially resisted efforts to fast-track legislation to undo the ban.

Advertisement

“Legislatures are not built for knee-jerk reactions,” state House Speaker Ben Toma said during one floor session.

He has also said that “abortion is a complicated topic — it is ethically, morally complex. I understand that we have deeply held beliefs, and I would ask everyone in this chamber to respect the fact that some of us who believe that abortion is in fact the murder of children.”

Anti-abortion groups have also rallied around the state Capitol seeking to urge lawmakers to stick by the ban. Arizona voter Desiree Mayes, a Republican, told ABC News last mont that “if you really if you really believe that babies in the womb are precious and valuable, they deserve equal protection,” she said, explaining she doesn’t support exceptions for rape or incest.

But Democrats, locally and across the country have called out the ban — as have some Republicans who otherwise say they oppose abortion, like Donald Trump. Three Republicans in the state House ultimately joined the Democratic minority to repeal the law.

“This is a stain on history that this ban even exists — from a time when the age of consent was 10, from a time when women didn’t have the right to vote,” Arizona state Sen. Eva Burch, a Democrat, previously told ABC News’ Elizabeth Schulze.

Advertisement

Anti-abortion groups are encouraging supporters of the near-total ban to again gather on the Capitol grounds on Wednesday to pressure Republicans to stick together and not join Democrats. Meanwhile, Arizona for Abortion Access organizers continue to gather signatures for a potential ballot initiative that would go before voters in November and would protect abortion up to the point of fetal viability, around 24 weeks into pregnancy.

House Republicans are considering proposing their own ballot measures for November to counter the pro-abortion access initiative.

“We don’t deserve to win the legislature if we cannot get it right on the basic tenets of our Republican platform, which is life,” said state GOP Sen. Anthony Kern.

If the repeal bill does not pass the state Senate, Democratic Sen. Sundareshan said her party would “keep fighting” by reintroducing bills or motions.

“We’ll do whatever is available to us to continue to fight to repeal this ban,” she told reporters on Tuesday. “And we will continue fighting to repeal all of the bans that remain on the books.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

Published

on

Video: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

new video loaded: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

transcript

transcript

Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

Officers entered the building through a second-floor window using a bridge on top of an emergency service vehicle.

“The people united will never be defeated.” “So, we have hundreds of police officers, they’re surrounding the perimeter of the encampment. Most of them, well, actually, not all of them — some of them have their body camera lights flashing. They have club sticks, riot gear, handcuffs.” “There’s a student knocked unconscious. “We are all Palestinian.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in New York

Continue Reading

Trending