Connect with us

News

Turkey is blocking NATO’s expansion. It could backfire and hand Putin a propaganda coup | CNN

Published

on

Turkey is blocking NATO’s expansion. It could backfire and hand Putin a propaganda coup | CNN



CNN
 — 

When Sweden and Finland declared their intention to affix NATO final Might, it was seen by many as a poke within the eye for Russia and proof of a shift in European considering. Traditionally, each nations had dedicated to non-alignment with NATO as a method of avoiding scary Moscow. The invasion of Ukraine modified that. 

Each Finland and Sweden – together with the overwhelming majority of NATO allies – wish to see the nations formally be part of the alliance at a NATO summit on July 11. Nonetheless, a major hurdle stands in the way in which of this turning into a actuality: Turkey has but to present the plan its formal and official blessing. 

Turkey just isn’t the one nation blocking the transfer: Hungary has additionally did not ratify the Nordics’ accession which additional muddies the waters. Nonetheless, proper now getting Turkey on facet is taken into account the precedence. 

Sadly for the pro-NATO gang, Western officers are more and more pessimistic that Turkey will budge.

Advertisement

Formally, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan objects to Sweden and Finland’s membership on what he claims are safety grounds. Turkey claims that each nations, although significantly Sweden, are harboring militants from the banned Kurdistan Employees Celebration (PKK), a chosen terror group in Turkey, Sweden, america and Europe. Erdogan says he would love these people to be extradited; Sweden has made clear this received’t occur. 

NATO diplomats are break up on whether or not they assume Turkey will budge earlier than the July summit. Central to each faculties of thought is this 12 months’s Turkish election, perceived as the largest political menace Erdogan has confronted in years. 

“The picture he has created of a strongman who will get outcomes for the Turkish individuals has been shattered,” explains Gonul Tol of the Center East Institute’s Turkey program. “There may be loads of anti-West and anti-Kurd sentiment in Turkey in the intervening time. It is a good matter for him to bang his drum and a dramatic U-turn would solely make him look weaker.”

Tol believes there are different causes that Erdogan doesn’t wish to upset Russia’s President Vladimir Putin. 

Advertisement

“Russia has been a lifeline economically for Turkey after different nations imposed sanctions for his or her actions in Syria, their cooperation militarily with Russia and different hostile exercise,” Tol explains. “With out Russian cash, Erdogan wouldn’t have been in a position to elevate wages or present monetary help to college students. He’s now promising mass rebuilding, post-earthquake. So Russia remains to be a beautiful companion for Erdogan.” 

Like many Western officers, Tol believes the Turkish claims about Sweden and Finland harboring terrorists present good cowl for Erdogan to not interact at a politically inconvenient time on the NATO query.

Whereas nothing might come from the talks due between the three events on Thursday, a dialog is happening about how a lot political capital Erdogan may need to spend after the election, ought to he win. 

First, the optimists. 

This group contains Sweden, Finland and a few of the states that border Russia or used to reside below the Soviet sphere. They consider that Turkey, which advantages vastly from being a part of NATO, will finally do what’s in its finest curiosity and drop objections.

Advertisement

For this to occur, officers are bracing for Turkey to make extra practical calls for than the handing over of people it deems to be terrorists, such because the lifting of sanctions or the US permitting Turkey to purchase the fighter jets that the nation badly must hold its air drive updated.

In the end, the optimists consider there’s a compromise that vastly favors NATO. The alliance, Sweden and Finland have made their case and NATO has an open-door coverage for any nation wanting to affix. Sweden and Finland have greater than met the standards, so not becoming a member of makes a mockery of the alliance – an alliance that Turkey advantages from being a member. One NATO official instructed CNN that they assumed Erdogan would anticipate the summit earlier than conceding in order that he can bask within the “reward of all his Western allies.” 

The far bigger group amongst officers who spoke with CNN are pessimists. They assume the probabilities of Erdogan shifting his place earlier than July 11 are pretty much as good as zero and are already considering past that summit. 

“I believe it’s more and more doubtless that Finland breaks from Sweden and goes for membership alone,” one NATO diplomat instructed CNN. 

Different members of the alliance nonetheless see an actual prospect of each nations being blocked and are contemplating how finest NATO can deal with such a situation. 

Advertisement

A number of NATO officers and diplomats instructed CNN that the hazard right here is Turkey’s block feeding the Kremlin narrative that the West and NATO are divided. The alliance’s job at that time shall be to clarify that even when they don’t seem to be members, Finland and Sweden are actually successfully in lockstep with NATO. They may not be members, however they’re as shut companions because it’s doable to be – and they don’t seem to be impartial any extra. 

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is considered to be the EU leader closest to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Even when Turkey may be squared off, there may be the separate, albeit simpler subject of Hungary. 

Prime Minister Viktor Orban has publicly indicated he isn’t against the Nordic nations becoming a member of, however retains discovering methods to stall a choice turning into official. 

There are just a few causes Orban would wish to drag his ft. Finland and Sweden have each criticized Hungary for its rule of regulation document. He addressed this in a current interview, asking how “can anybody wish to be our ally in a army system whereas they’re shamelessly spreading lies about Hungary?” 

Orban is taken into account to be the EU chief closest to Putin. Katalin Cseh, a Hungarian Member of the European Parliament, describes Orban’s blocking of the Sweden and Finland bids as “fairly merely, one other favor to Vladimir Putin.” She believes that Orban, who has been accused of drifting in the direction of autocratic management, has “invested over a decade to repeat his insurance policies and construct up a Putinist mannequin,” and that any perceived NATO victory over Putin “places his complete regime in jeopardy.”

Advertisement

It’s doable that Orban is hanging on in an effort to get concessions from different EU member states, the place Hungary has been accused of violating all method of EU legal guidelines. The end result has been withholding of EU funds and scorn from the bloc. Whereas NATO and the EU are separate entities, they share many members and it’s believable that bilateral diplomacy may see some give-and-take between Hungary and its EU counterparts. 

For all Orban’s foot-dragging, although, it’s broadly assumed that if Turkey may be squared off, Hungary will drop its opposition to Finland and Sweden becoming a member of NATO. 

The irony isn’t misplaced on many who one of many important causes Putin gave for invading Ukraine was to place a cease to what he claimed was NATO enlargement. The truth that his aggression may need pushed a traditionally unaligned nation into NATO remains to be seen by most within the West as an enormous personal aim by the Kremlin.

Till an settlement is reached, nonetheless, the way forward for the alliance stays considerably up within the air. Finland and Sweden have successfully picked a facet because the begin of the Ukraine battle. It appears unlikely that they may return to a place of neutrality if the struggle had been to out of the blue finish. 

The danger for NATO and the broader Western alliance comes in the event that they fail to affix the alliance in any respect and the Kremlin can use it for propaganda functions. If that occurs, even when the struggle out of the blue ends, the narrative of a divided West will proceed to be the drum that NATO’s opponents can bang. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

TikTok tells US users it is shutting down ‘temporarily’

Published

on

TikTok tells US users it is shutting down ‘temporarily’

Stay informed with free updates

TikTok told its 170mn US users on Saturday that it will not be available “temporarily” after the expiry of a midnight deadline requiring its Chinese parent company ByteDance either to sell its stake in the app or face a ban.

In a pop up that appeared as users opened the short-form video app, the company wrote: “We regret that a U.S. law banning TikTok will take effect on January 19 and force us to make our services temporarily unavailable.”

It added: “We’re working to restore our service in the U.S. as soon as possible, and we appreciate your support. Please stay tuned.” The app otherwise is still working for users. 

Advertisement

On Friday, the US Supreme Court upheld a law passed by Congress last year that requires ByteDance to sell the platform or face a nationwide ban on Sunday, spurred by concerns the platform could be wielded by Beijing for espionage or to spread propaganda. TikTok has denied that the Chinese government has any influence over the app.

On Saturday, president-elect Donald Trump said he would “most likely” issue a 90-day extension to the deadline when he comes into the White House on Monday.

However, the law will from midnight ban companies such as Apple, Google and Oracle from providing services to distribute or host the video app, or face fines of $5,000 per user – leaving them to decide whether to risk violating the law between the midnight deadline and Trump’s inauguration on Monday. Apple and Oracle declined to comment, while Google did not immediately respond.

Late on Friday, TikTok said that statements from the White House as well as from the Department of Justice had “failed to provide the necessary clarity and assurance to the service providers that are integral to maintaining TikTok’s availability” in the US, and that without “a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, TikTok would be forced to go dark on January 19”.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Saturday said in a statement there was “no reason for TikTok or other companies to take actions in the next few days before the Trump administration takes office on Monday”.

Advertisement

The imminent shutdown caps a week in which TikTok and ByteDance executives have tried to hash out a plan to avoid closure, according to several people familiar with the matter.

On Friday, Trump said he had spoken to President Xi Jinping and discussed TikTok with the Chinese leader. Chinese state media said the two leaders had spoken but did not specify if TikTok was part of the conversation.

TikTok has said that a spin-off was not technologically feasible, while Beijing has previously indicated that it would oppose any sale. 

Instead, the company had pinned its hopes on Trump, who during his campaign promised to “save” TikTok.

The uncertainty has prompted chaos inside the company itself. In the days leading up to the vote, the company rushed to reassure US staff that they would still have jobs and continue to be paid even if the app was shut down, according to three people with knowledge of the situation. 

Meanwhile, marketers have already begun to divert advertising spending away from the platform. One media buyer said that they had paused all their spending on the platform in the US. However, TikTok was still encouraging them to spend their budget on the platform in other markets, the person said.

Advertisement

“It’s very messy and while people are not surprised, it was really impossible to plan for,” said the head of another big advertising agency. 

Additional reporting by Zijing Wu in Hong Kong

Continue Reading

News

Trump's border czar says immigration raids will begin next week, including in Chicago

Published

on

Trump's border czar says immigration raids will begin next week, including in Chicago

Incoming White House “border czar” Tom Homan speaks during Turning Point’s annual AmericaFest 2024 in Phoenix on Dec. 22.

Jos Edelson/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jos Edelson/AFP via Getty Images

Incoming “border czar” Tom Homan said large-scale raids as part of President-elect Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration are set to begin as soon as Tuesday.

In an interview with Fox News on Friday night, Homan did not offer further details, but he did confirm that Chicago will be one of the cities targeted.

“On Tuesday, ICE is finally going to go out and do their job. We’re going to take the handcuffs off ICE,” he said, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Advertisement

Homan, a former acting head of ICE, added that immigration agents will focus on the “worst first, public safety threats first, but no one is off the table. If they’re in the country illegally, they got a problem.”

The anticipated raids in Chicago were first reported by The Wall Street Journal. It comes after Homan visited the city in December and threatened to prosecute the city’s mayor if he refused to cooperate.

On Saturday, Homan told The Washington Post that the incoming administration was reconsidering launching raids in Chicago because details had leaked in the media, but had yet to make a final decision.

Chicago is one of the hundreds of sanctuary cities and counties in the U.S., which typically prohibit local resources from supporting federal immigration enforcement.

The prospect of raids in Chicago echoes Homan’s past remarks that he will not allow sanctuary jurisdictions to hinder the incoming administration’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

Advertisement

On Saturday, Beatriz Ponce de León, Chicago’s deputy mayor for immigrant, migrant and refugee rights, said the news that immigration raids could start in Chicago on Tuesday “wasn’t a surprise,” but that “hearing confirmation made it more real, more concrete.”

She said the city is prepared. In addition to community agencies holding “know your rights” events all over, she said Chicago leaders have met with city departments and sister agencies, such as the police and public school district, to detail existing city policies.

An estimated 11 million immigrants live in the U.S. without legal status.

Both Homan and Trump have vowed to carry out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history. But the plan is expected to face legal and logistical hurdles, including where to house millions of people once they are detained.

In Chicago, community organizers and elected officials scramble to encourage residents to not panic

On the city’s Southwest Side, Any Huamani, a community organizer with the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council, was fielding requests for Know Your Rights Trainings and leading a rapid response team via private group chat. Team members are ready to be dispatched in case ICE agents arrive in her community.

Advertisement

“Obviously each scenario is different,” Huamani said. “If they’re there to detain someone, rapid response teams respond in a different way. We have to yell out ‘These are your rights. You know, who can we call? Give us a phone number.’ And we’re also trying to record … ICE agents, if there’s an ICE truck or if it’s an unrecognizable truck.”

Meanwhile, 20 requests for trainings had come in.

The biggest fear among immigrants who don’t have a legal status in the U.S., Huamani said, is leaving their children behind.

During Trump’s first administration, his “zero tolerance” policy separated more than 5,000 children from parents who crossed the border, without systems to track and reunite families. Some also fear being detained or held in cities or states unfamiliar to them. Huamani has been advising people at risk of being detained by ICE to memorize at least three phone numbers so that they can be located if taken into ICE custody.

Organizers are worried that ICE agents could target the city’s Southwest Side and execute workplace raids in nearby suburbs, where there are also large concentrations of immigrants without legal status.

Advertisement

Garien Gatewood, Chicago’s deputy mayor of community safety, said the police department has been working under a welcoming city ordinance for 40 years, which stipulates that immigration enforcement is up to the federal government.

Chicago’s police department does not document immigration status, nor share information with federal immigration authorities, said spokesman Don Terry in a statement. But he added that police “will not intervene or interfere with any other government agencies performing their duties.”

“From the top down, everybody at CPD understands the roles that they play,” he said. “This is not the first time that they’ve had interactions with federal agents acting about immigration status.”

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s office did not provide a response to news that immigration raids were going to start in Chicago next week. The office provided a transcript of the governor’s statement at a Dec. 11 press conference where he said he “believes it is his obligation to protect” immigrants without legal status who have not committed violent crimes.

WBEZ has more on how Chicago is preparing for the incoming Trump administration.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Thousands Protest Trump’s Return to White House Days Before His Inauguration

Published

on

Thousands Protest Trump’s Return to White House Days Before His Inauguration

Some climbed into buses in the wee hours of the morning. Others boarded planes from across the country or drove bleary-eyed through the night. No matter how they got to Washington on Saturday, they shared a common goal: to protest against President-elect Donald J. Trump.

Just two days before Mr. Trump’s inauguration, thousands of people attended the People’s March across Washington. Despite the damp and chilly weather on Saturday, demonstrators came out to rally against Mr. Trump’s hard-right plans for the country and show support for causes like civil rights, racial justice, immigration and gun violence prevention.

“I am angry and frustrated,” said Jillian Wheat, who came to the march from Columbus, Ohio, with her 14-year-old daughter, Emma. “I’m worried that he is going to dismantle our democracy.”

It was a sequel of sort to the Women’s March in 2017, right after Mr. Trump was sworn in for his first term, a protest that focused on women’s reproductive rights. But the march was rebranded and expanded to include more people and a wider range of issues. Various sponsors, including the Sierra Club and Time to Act, a group against authoritarianism, backed the event on Saturday.

With signs that called Mr. Trump a felon, an oligarch and a danger to democracy — one read, “such a disaster that even grandmoms have to take to the streets to resist” — protesters yelled chants such as, “Stand up! Fight back!” and “No justice, no peace, no Trump,” at times injecting an expletive into the chant.

Advertisement

Many, if not most, attendees said they were nervous that Mr. Trump would try to roll back more rights they valued than he did in his first administration, during which he nominated Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. They were hoping that he would not strip away climate change protections and L.G.B.T.Q. rights, and that he would not follow through with his threat to carry out mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Debbie Pierce, a gerontologist from Tampa, Fla., wiped tears from her eyes as she held up a photo of a young relative who recently told her that she might be a lesbian.

“I’m here for her,” said Ms. Pierce, referring to her relative. “With this new administration, I don’t know if she will be safe.”

Alana Eichner, co-director of the local chapter of the National Domestic Workers Alliance, came to the march with more than a dozen women who work as caregivers for children and the elderly. She said she hopes that Mr. Trump realizes that domestic workers — including many who are undocumented — are essential to the American economy and help the country function.

“We’re here to make sure these workers are protected and valued,” she said, as the women she came with nodded in agreement.

Advertisement

On the dawn of a second Trump presidency, marches also were held in other cities, including New York, Nashville and Portland, Ore. All were different — and felt different — than the ones held to protest his first term.

The Women’s March eight years ago was much bigger than the People’s Marches on Saturday. More than 470,000 people had packed into the nation’s capital in 2017, ready and energized to fight after his surprise defeat of Hillary Clinton. The protest turned into a sea of pink as many attendees wore pink knitted hats.

This time, the crowd in Washington was smaller and the pink hats were sparse. Mary Griffin, who flew to Washington from Seattle for both Saturday’s march and the one in 2017, said she was troubled by the lower turnout, adding that people were squished together shoulder-to-shoulder at the 2017 march. She said she suspects that voters for Vice President Kamala Harris are still in shock and “in the doldrums,” frozen about how to show their resistance to the new administration.

“We need to get our energy back,” said Ms. Griffin, a 63-year-old lawyer. “I think once Trump starts moving in the direction I think he’s going in, the pendulum will swing back and people will be energized again.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending