Connect with us

News

Trump’s attack on the enemy within will delight America’s real foes

Published

on

Trump’s attack on the enemy within will delight America’s real foes

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

We all know the slogan. But Donald Trump will not make America great again by waging war on his domestic enemies. Instead Trump’s vengeance campaign threatens the real foundations of American greatness.

The American military, the country’s leading universities, the Federal Reserve, the justice system, the free press, the scientific establishment, even the health of American citizens are all at risk. The president-elect has nominated vengeful crackpots to key positions and promised to let people like Robert F Kennedy Jr “go wild”.

The damage that Trump’s policies could inflict on America will delight the country’s real enemies in Moscow and Beijing. They know from their own histories that when a nation turns on itself, its international power can collapse.

Advertisement

Trump’s Maga shock troops believe that they can only make their country great again by first destroying their internal enemies. Trump has said the “enemy from within” is “more dangerous” than Russia and China. His appointees are willing to turn America’s institutions upside down in the pursuit of vengeance.

Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee as defence secretary, has written that “sometimes the fight must begin with a struggle against domestic enemies”. In a podcast, he demanded: “Any general, any admiral . . . that was involved in diversity, equity and inclusion programmes or woke shit has got to go.”

Reports are already circulating that Trump plans to establish a “warrior board” empowered to force out senior military officers, replacing them with loyalists. His team are also reportedly considering court-martialling some military leaders for their roles in the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In his first term, Trump was enraged when “his” generals insisted that their loyalty was to the constitution, not to him personally. Senior officers resisted Trump’s demands for the deployment of troops on American streets in the Black Lives Matter protests.

This time Trump will want absolute obedience from his newly promoted corporals and colonels, particularly if he intends to deploy the military to carry out the mass deportation of illegal immigrants. But purging your most senior generals can leave a country vulnerable and its military confused.

Advertisement

America’s intelligence services are also at risk. Trump’s nominee for the job of director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is noted for her sympathy for Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Vladimir Putin in Russia. She has consistently echoed Russian propaganda, suggesting that Nato expansion was responsible for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and that the US was running secret bio-labs inside Ukraine. Her appointment will cause consternation among American allies, Britain foremost among them, which routinely share intelligence with the US.

American science and medicine lead the world. But Trump proposes to put a conspiracy theorist in charge of the health and human services department. Even the Trump-supporting New York Post concluded, after meeting Robert F Kennedy Jr, that he was “nuts on a lot of fronts”. If RFK imposes his vaccine hostility on the US as a whole, he will sow the seeds of future epidemics.

Seven of the world’s top 10 universities are in the US. But America’s institutes of learning are also on Trump’s enemies list. His allies claim that the universities are bastions of “wokeness” and antisemitism. Bill Ackman, a Trump-supporting financier, recently opined that Yale was “no different than Hamas”. The attack on wokeness can be used as a battering ram to try to cow the universities into submission on a wider range of issues. Over time, America could see a threat to the intellectual liberty on which great universities depend.

Press freedom, something that truly distinguishes America from its autocratic rivals, is also menaced. Trump has filed a series of lawsuits against media outlets that have displeased him — a favourite tactic of authoritarian regimes.

Trump regards independent institutions of any sort as a threat. There is widespread speculation that his administration will attempt to sack Jay Powell, head of the Federal Reserve. Powell has reminded journalists that Trump is “not permitted under law” to force him out.

Advertisement

But Trump has his own ideas about the rule of law. Matt Gaetz, his nominee for attorney-general, was under investigation by his Republican colleagues for alleged ethics violations that include having sex with a minor. Gaetz, who has denied the allegations, claims to believe that he, like Trump is the victim of a politicised justice system. Other close confidants of Trump, like Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, have recently emerged from prison.

These are angry men, who may be intent on revenge. They could use the justice system to go after their enemies. That will be bad news not just for the individuals who get caught up in the witch hunt, but for the whole country.

American greatness is founded on the rule of law. That is a fundamental reason why foreigners trust American assets and the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. If Trump uses the justice system to go after his enemies — and to reward his billionaire cronies — then investors could rightly take fright.

Rather than making America great again, Trump’s assault on US institutions will make America more like Russia and China. Putin and Xi Jinping will benefit. Americans and America’s allies will suffer the consequences.

gideon.rachman@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending