Connect with us

News

Treasury Shifts $377 Million Among States as Pandemic Housing Aid Dries Up

Published

on

Treasury Shifts 7 Million Among States as Pandemic Housing Aid Dries Up

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration has clawed again $377 million in federal emergency housing assist from states and counties, most of them managed by Republicans, and redirected the money to states which were clamoring for extra assist, together with New York, California and New Jersey.

The $46 billion Emergency Rental Help Program, first enacted by Congress in 2020, succeeded in stopping a wave of evictions stemming from the downturn brought on by the pandemic. However Treasury Division officers, more and more involved that evictions may rise after this system winds down, have tried to make sure that not one of the remaining funding goes unspent whereas pushing states to seek out different funding sources to help poor tenants.

In latest months, White Home officers have pressured governors in states with unspent funds to show over the cash to native governments inside their states. Now they’re going one step additional, pulling again money from states with comparatively few tenants — like Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming — or localities that did not effectively distribute the help, together with Alabama, Arkansas and a number of other counties in Texas.

The cash, in flip, is being diverted to 4 states that burned by means of their allotted quantities — with $136 million in extra assist headed to California, $119 million to New York, $47 million to New Jersey and $15 million to Illinois, in line with a spreadsheet offered by a senior administration official.

New York officers had been proud of their windfall however mentioned it fell far in need of the $1.6 billion in extra assist requested by the state.

Advertisement

“That is higher,” mentioned Consultant Ritchie Torres, a Democrat whose district consists of the South Bronx, which has a number of the highest eviction and poverty charges within the nation. “However it’s a pitiful drop within the bucket in comparison with what we’d like.”

The 4 states, house to roughly a 3rd of the nation’s low-income renters, have already spent billions in emergency assist paying again hire for tenants prone to eviction, they usually have requested extra funding, citing reasonably priced housing shortages and rising rents. In January, their governors — Gavin Newsom of California, Kathy Hochul of New York, Philip D. Murphy of New Jersey and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois, all Democrats — referred to as on Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen to shift money from low-spending states into their accounts, saying that tenants had been “dealing with a direct want now.”

Treasury officers responded with the reallocation — however made it clear the nicely was operating dry, and states would quickly should make laborious selections through the use of their very own revenues, or different federal pandemic reduction funding, to bankroll anti-eviction initiatives that may have been buoyed by President Biden’s stalled social spending invoice.

“The emergency rental program has helped maintain tens of millions of households of their houses, lowering the financial prices of the pandemic, and constructed a nationwide system for eviction prevention that didn’t exist earlier than,” the deputy Treasury secretary, Wally Adeyemo, who has overseen the implementation of this system, mentioned in an interview.

“As these funds run out, Treasury is encouraging state and native governments to spend money on long-term methods to stop evictions and construct reasonably priced housing, utilizing different assets,” he added.

Advertisement

This system, initiated below the Trump administration and ramped up by Mr. Biden’s crew, obtained off to a sluggish begin, as state governments struggled to create new techniques to course of purposes, decide eligibility and distribute the money.

However by late 2021, most native techniques had been up and operating, thanks partly to White Home tips enjoyable verification necessities.

The large infusion of money, coupled with federal and native eviction bans, helped forestall or delay about 1.35 million evictions in 2021, in line with an evaluation printed final week by Princeton’s Eviction Lab. Evictions have risen in latest months in some cities however stay under the degrees predicted when the pandemic first struck.

Many of the assist that the Treasury Division is clawing again comes from states within the West, Midwest and New England with comparatively excessive per capita incomes and low percentages of renters per capita. However a part of the cash is being pulled out of a number of the nation’s poorest states, the place native officers had been unable, for numerous political and logistical causes, to disburse the funds.

Alabama, as an example, is dropping $42 million from a complete allocation of about $263 million. A spokesman for the state’s housing company offered a memo from state housing officers claiming that the Treasury Division “didn’t take into account that Alabama has a decrease proportion of renters to householders” in making its assist selections, and that an total lack of want put “downward strain” on purposes.

Advertisement

However candidates and housing teams have complained that the state has made accessing the cash troublesome, and that an organization employed to run this system rejected a big proportion of low-income tenants.

West Virginia, which has been gradual to distribute a spread of federal meals, housing and anti-poverty assist in the course of the pandemic, was compelled to return $39 million regardless of latest efforts by state officers to encourage extra renters to use. And Arkansas, which took months to prepare its effort, is giving again $9 million, in line with the tally offered by the senior administration official.

The Biden administration had hoped to keep away from shifting funding throughout state traces, opting as an alternative to barter with governors to ship unspent assist to counties and cities in their very own states. Late final yr, the White Home satisfied Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Wisconsin and different states to voluntarily shift about $875 million to the cities and counties of their states that wanted the cash most.

But administration officers are much less involved about offending state officers which have misplaced funding than tamping down the expectations of Democratic governors who need them to claw again much more.

“Whereas we needed to work by means of some actual start-up challenges, we’ve succeeded in serving to 5 million weak renters,” mentioned Gene Sperling, who oversees the Biden administration’s pandemic reduction packages. He mentioned the most important criticism now was that “the funds are shifting out so swiftly that there’s little or no left to be reallocated.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Published

on

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

US tech stocks slipped on Friday as investors pivoted away from companies that had led markets higher for much of this year.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s main equity benchmark, fell 1.1 per cent on Friday, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.5 per cent. Elon Musk’s electric-car maker Tesla was among the biggest laggards, falling 5 per cent, while chipmaker Nvidia dropped 2.1 per cent.

“I watch probably 30 different [market indicators] and they’re all down today,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital. “This was just widespread selling without much enthusiasm.”

Advertisement

Tech stocks have rallied strongly this year, as investors bet artificial intelligence would drive demand for everything from servers to microchips. The gains accelerated after Donald Trump’s election victory in November on bets that the president-elect would usher in more business-friendly policies when his term begins next month.

However, the sector has been choppier in recent weeks as investors reassess their best-performing holdings at the end of the year. The Federal Reserve also sparked ructions last week when it forecast only two quarter-point rate cuts next year, compared with its September forecast of four, as officials fretted about growing risks that inflation becomes lodged well above the central bank’s 2 per cent target.

The hawkish projections have pushed up US long-term borrowing costs, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.63 per cent on Friday, compared with lows in September of about 3.6 per cent. Higher yields typically tarnish the appeal of holding shares in fast-growing companies.

Citigroup analysts on Friday said that while they still forecast the S&P 500 will rise about 10 per cent from current levels by the end of next year, they expect a “more volatile leg of the bull market ahead”.

The US bank noted this year’s gains in stock prices compared with corporate profits were “setting a high bar for fundamentals in the year ahead, and even the year after”. The S&P 500 trades at about 22.2 times expected earnings over the next year, compared with the average over the past decade of 18.1, according to FactSet data.

Advertisement

Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com, said that, “even with that volatile Friday, the market’s still higher than it was on Monday”.

He said: “Markets don’t go straight up, and a pullback often serves as a foundation for the next market advance.”

The S&P 500 is still up 25 per cent year-to-date even after Friday’s pullback, roughly on a par with the previous year’s gains.

The so-called Magnificent 7 Big Tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla — have been responsible for roughly half of the S&P 500’s total returns, including dividends, this year, said Howard Silverblatt at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

All of the Magnificent 7 shares declined modestly on Friday, however.

Advertisement

Trading activity is typically lighter than usual during the holiday period, something that can exacerbate volatility.

Continue Reading

News

Costco egg recall for salmonella receives FDA's most severe designation

Published

on

Costco egg recall for salmonella receives FDA's most severe designation

The FDA says that people who bought 24-count packages of organic pasture-raised eggs with UPC 9661910680 under the Kirkland Signature brand — and also bearing the Julian code 327 and a use-by date of Jan 5, 2025 — should bring the products back to Costco or discard them.

Food and Drug Administration


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Food and Drug Administration

The Food and Drug Administration has classified its recall of eggs sold under Costco’s Kirkland brand as a Class I recall, a designation reserved for instances of the highest potential health risk — including death.

A Class I recall signals that “there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death,” according to the FDA. 

The agency announced the voluntary recall on Nov. 27 and posted news of the Class I designation on Dec. 20; it has not provided updates about whether any possible illnesses or medical cases related to the recall. Neither the agency nor Costco responded to NPR’s messages for comment on Friday.

Advertisement

The eggs were voluntarily recalled by Handsome Brook Farms, which is headquartered in New York. The recall covers 10,800 packages of 24-count eggs, sold under the Kirkland Signature brand name and described as organic and pasture-raised.

The products were sent to 25 Costco stores in five states: Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. The recall applies to products with a UPC code of 9661910680 that also have the Julian code 327 and a use-by date of Jan 5, 2025.

“Eggs from a positive Salmonella environment were shipped into distribution to retail facilities,” according to the FDA. Handsome Brook Farms said the eggs hadn’t been intended for retail sales — but were mistakenly packaged and distributed.

“Additional supply chain controls and retraining are being put in place to prevent recurrence,” the recall notice states.

The FDA also placed the Class I designation on a recall of cucumbers due to possible salmonella contamination that, as with the eggs, was also announced in late November.

Advertisement

It’s not unusual for salmonella to trigger a Class 1 recall: The bacteria is “the biggest cause of hospitalization and death in our food system,” Sarah Sorscher, director of regulatory affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told NPR’s 1A program in September.

Every year, salmonella causes “about 1.35 million illnesses, 26,500 hospitalizations, and 420 deaths” in the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates.

Symptoms such as diarrhea, fever and stomach cramps can take time to manifest, appearing days or even weeks after the initial infection. Most people usually feel better after four to seven days, but in rare circumstances, salmonella can reach the bloodstream and affect other parts of the body, the CDC says.

Continue Reading

News

Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan suspend flights to Russia after plane crash

Published

on

Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan suspend flights to Russia after plane crash

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The national airlines of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan have suspended some flights to Russia after evidence suggested an Azerbaijani plane had been downed by Russian air defence systems.

The Kazakh airline, Qazaq Air, said on Friday it suspended its Astana to Ekaterinburg route, according to the Kazinform news agency, while Azerbaijan Airlines suspended flights to seven cities in the south of Russia.

The measures were taken after an Azerbaijan Airlines flight from Baku to Russia’s regional capital, Grozny, was diverted across the Caspian Sea and crash-landed near Aktau in Kazakhstan on Wednesday, killing 38 of the 67 people on board.

Advertisement

Video of the fuselage of the crashed aircraft has shown multiple puncture marks consistent with fire from an anti-aircraft system. There is also evidence that Russia was jamming the GPS navigation system near Grozny at the time, apparently to defend against an attack by Ukrainian drones.

Qazaq Air said it was suspending flights to Ekaterinburg until January 27 pending an “ongoing risk assessment” of flights to Russia. Azerbaijan Airlines said it halted flights to Grozny and other southern Russian cities until completion of an investigation into the crash.

Israel’s flag-carrier, El Al, on Thursday also announced it was suspending flights from Tel Aviv to Moscow pending a safety assessment.

Russia had insisted the aircraft was unable to land in Grozny because of heavy fog and that the aircraft had hit a flock of birds. Local authorities in Russia’s nearby North Ossetia region announced an attack by Ukrainian drones, one of which was shot down, killing a woman on the ground. But the Kommersant newspaper reported there was no “heavy fog” forecast for Grozny at the time.

The head of Russia’s Rosaviatsia aviation agency, Dmitry Yadrov, on Thursday said the conditions around Grozny had been “very difficult” amid attacks from Ukrainian combat drones.

Advertisement
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, near St Petersburg on Thursday © Gavril Grigorov/SPUTNIK/KREMLIN POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Asked on Friday about reports of a missile strike, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he had nothing to add.

The incident has invoked comparisons with Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 being shot down over Ukraine in 2014. An investigation concluded that crash, which killed all 298 people on board, was the result of the firing of an air defence missile by Russia-controlled fighters in eastern Ukraine.

It is not clear how long Kazakhstan’s investigation into the crash will take, or how free it will be to reach conclusions about the cause. The probe includes investigators from Russia and Azerbaijan, according to Kazakh officials.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said it was too early to comment on what had caused the crash.

The aircraft type involved — an Embraer-190 regional jet — was previously regarded as one of the world’s safest civil aircraft.

Advertisement

A senior US official has said there are early indications a Russian anti-aircraft system might have struck the flight.

Senior Ukrainian officials told the Financial Times they also believed the aircraft was probably hit by an air defence missile. Andriy Kovalenko, a Ukrainian national security and defence council official, posted on Telegram on Thursday that Russia should have closed the airspace over Grozny, given the operations it was undertaking, but did not do so.

“The plane was damaged by the Russians and sent to Kazakhstan, instead of making an emergency landing in Grozny and saving people’s lives,” he wrote.

Rasim Musabekov, a member of Azerbaijan’s parliament, has called for Russia to apologise.

“The plane was shot down in Russian territory, in the skies over Grozny, and this cannot be denied,” Musabekov told the Turan news agency. “This is how civilised relations work. If air defence systems are active, the airport should be closed, and warnings should be issued to prevent flights to the area.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending