Connect with us

News

Tracking Attacks in the First Harris-Trump Debate

Published

on

Tracking Attacks in the First Harris-Trump Debate

The New York Times will be tracking speaking time during the only scheduled debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald J. Trump. We will break it down by topic and measure how much time the candidates spend attacking each other. The debate will begin at 9 p.m. Eastern time.

Minutes of speaking time and length of attacks

The debate is scheduled to last 90 minutes.

This is the first head-to-head confrontation between Ms. Harris and Mr. Trump. It is also the first debate since President Biden exited the race after his disastrous showing with Mr. Trump in June.

Total speaking and attack time from the June presidential debate

Trump

Advertisement

Time attacking opponent

Total time

18:04

41:02

With only 56 days remaining until Election Day, the debate stage provides Ms. Harris with an important opportunity for voters to get to know her. In the latest New York Times/Siena College national poll, 28 percent of likely voters said they needed to learn more about Ms. Harris; only 9 percent said the same about Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

What are the top issues?

A measurement of how much time the candidates speak on key issues and how much time they spend attacking their rival on that topic.

How will Harris’s performance differ from Biden’s?

Percentage of time Ms. Harris spent on key issues, compared with Mr. Biden from the presidential debate in June.

How tonight’s attacks compare with previous debates

Percentage of time the candidates spend attacking each other’s policies and character.

Advertisement

News

Video: Jack Smith Defends His Trump Indictments During House Hearing

Published

on

Video: Jack Smith Defends His Trump Indictments During House Hearing

“Do you swear or affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the testimony you’re about to give is true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information and belief, so help you God?” “I do. No one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. So that is what I did. To have done otherwise on the facts of these cases would have been to shirk my duties as a prosecutor.” “You, like the President’s Men for Richard Nixon, went after your political enemies. Maybe they’re not your political enemies, but they sure as hell were Joe Biden’s political enemies, weren’t they? They were Harris’s political enemies. They were the enemies of the president, and you were their arm, weren’t you?” “No.” “So, Mr. Smith, what evidence did you develop to suggest Trump knew he had lost the 2020 election?” “We had evidence from a variety of sources, evidence from people who were close to Donald Trump and who he relied on, people who wanted him to win the election. Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump is the person who caused Jan. 6, that it was foreseeable to him and that he sought to exploit the violence.” “Under your theory, people besides the president were involved in the unprecedented assault on American democracy, but you didn’t find it necessary to charge them criminally.” “I had not yet charged anyone besides the president.” “You didn’t — you decided not to charge anybody but Donald Trump in that indictment.” “I made the decision to make the charges in this case.” “And, Mr. Smith, do you believe that President Trump’s Department of Justice will find some way to indict you?” “I believe that they will do everything in their power to do that because they’ve been ordered to by the president.”

Continue Reading

News

Do we know what’s happening with Greenland? : Sources & Methods

Published

on

Do we know what’s happening with Greenland? : Sources & Methods
For weeks, President Trump has made plain he wants the United States to own the Arctic island. Then on Wednesday, he appeared to back down, and announced a “framework” of a deal. Host Mary Louise Kelly speaks with reporter Willem Marx in Davos and NPR Pentagon Correspondent Tom Bowman about the deal and how this could signal a new world order.Email the show at sourcesandmethods@npr.orgNPR+ supporters hear every episode without sponsor messages and unlock access to our complete archive. Sign up at plus.npr.org.
Continue Reading

News

Magistrate judge rejects charges against Don Lemon over anti-ICE protest in Minnesota church

Published

on

Magistrate judge rejects charges against Don Lemon over anti-ICE protest in Minnesota church

A Minnesota federal magistrate judge refused to sign a complaint charging independent journalist Don Lemon in connection with a protest inside a church in St. Paul on Sunday, multiple sources familiar with the proceedings told CBS News.

“The attorney general is enraged at the magistrate’s decision,” said a source familiar with the matter. Attorney General Pam Bondi has been in Minnesota for two days, as the Justice Department has sought to surge prosecutorial and law enforcement resources there.

A different source stressed that the process is not over, and the Justice Department could find other avenues to charge Lemon.

On Thursday morning, Bondi announced two arrests connected to the church protest — Chauntyll Louisa Allen, who serves on the St. Paul School Board, and Nekima Levy Armstrong. Bondi alleged that Armstrong was involved in organizing the protest. 

A source familiar with the matter confirmed that a magistrate judge approved charges against Allen and Armstrong. 

Advertisement

Kristi Noem, the Department of Homeland Security secretary, said Armstrong is being charged with a federal crime under 18 USC 241, a civil rights law that prohibits two or more people from conspiring to interfere with constitutionally protected rights, like the free practice of religion. 

Protesters said they entered St. Paul’s Cities Church on Sunday, after discovering that an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official appeared to be one of the pastors at the church. 

Protests and clashes between some residents and federal immigration officers in the Twin Cities have been occurring daily since the Trump administration deployed thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents to the area. Among other demands, protesters have called for accountability in the death of Renee Good, a U.S. citizen and Minneapolis resident who was fatally shot by an ICE officer on Jan. 7.

Lemon, a former CNN anchor, attended the protest, which interrupted the Sunday service, prompting congregants and their families to leave.

In an interview with the pastor, Lemon said, “There’s a Constitution and a First Amendment, and freedom of speech and freedom to assemble and protest.” 

Advertisement

Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, has publicly hinted that Lemon could potentially face charges for his role in disrupting the service.

Being a journalist “is not a badge or a shield that protects you from criminal consequences,” she said during an appearance on the “Benny Show,” hosted by far-right podcaster Benny Johnson.

Dhillon declined to comment when reached by CBS News.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., faced similar hurdles last year, after President  Trump flooded the streets with federal agents as part of an initiative to crack down on violent crime.

Prosecutors in U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office were ordered to pursue every case as a federal offense when possible – a plan that backfired as the Justice Department began to see grand juries reject charges and magistrate judges push back on cases they viewed as flimsy or that contained constitutional defects.

Advertisement

In an Oct. 8, 2025, opinion, Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia revealed that over the course of eight weeks since the crime surge began in August, the government moved to dismiss 21% of all cases that were charged by criminal complaint.

That statistic is “shocking,” he wrote, compared with the 0.5% of cases charged by criminal complaint that the government dismissed in the district over the past decade.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending