Connect with us

News

‘Should I Fire Him?’ Inside Trump’s Deliberations Over the Fate of Michael Waltz

Published

on

‘Should I Fire Him?’ Inside Trump’s Deliberations Over the Fate of Michael Waltz

For much of this week, President Trump was consumed by a single question. What should he do about his national security adviser, Michael Waltz?

“Should I fire him?” he asked aides and allies as the fallout continued over the stunning leak of a Signal group chat set up by Mr. Waltz, who had inadvertently added a journalist to the thread about an upcoming military strike in Yemen.

In public, Mr. Trump’s default position has been to defend Mr. Waltz and attack the media. On Tuesday, the day after Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic broke the story about being included in the chat, the president said Mr. Waltz was a “good man” who had nothing to apologize for.

But behind the scenes, Mr. Trump has been asking people inside and outside the administration what they thought he should do.

He told allies that he was unhappy with the press coverage but that he did not want to be seen as caving to a media swarm, according to several people briefed on his comments. And he said he was reluctant to fire people in the senior ranks so early in his second term.

Advertisement

But for Mr. Trump, the real problem did not appear to be his national security adviser’s carelessness about discussing military plans on a commercial app, the people said. It was that Mr. Waltz may have had some kind of connection to Mr. Goldberg, a Washington journalist whom Mr. Trump loathes. The president expressed displeasure about how Mr. Waltz had Mr. Goldberg’s number in his phone.

On Wednesday evening, Mr. Trump met with Vice President JD Vance; the White House chief of staff, Susie Wiles; the White House personnel chief, Sergio Gor; his Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff, and others about whether to stick with Mr. Waltz.

Late Thursday, as the controversy swirled, Mr. Trump summoned Mr. Waltz to the Oval Office. By the next morning, the president signaled to people around him that he was willing to stick with Mr. Waltz, three people with knowledge of the president’s thinking said.

People close to Mr. Trump say Mr. Waltz has been able to hang on in part because some in the administration still support him, and because Mr. Trump has wanted to avoid comparisons to the chaotic staffing of his first term, which had the highest turnover of top aides of any presidential administration in modern history.

And while Mr. Trump can always change his mind, the episode shows Mr. Trump’s willingness to disregard external pressures in his second term, while also grappling with the limits of the loyalty tests he imposed for staff across the administration.

Advertisement

Even before the Signal leak, Mr. Waltz was on shaky footing, viewed as too hawkish by some of the president’s advisers and too eager to advocate for military action against Iran when the president himself has made clear he prefers to make a deal.

An association with Mr. Goldberg, however hazy, gave Mr. Waltz’s opponents more fuel to feed the skepticism.

Some of Mr. Trump closest allies have questioned whether Mr. Waltz, a former George W. Bush administration official, was compatible with the president’s foreign policy. Mr. Waltz had gotten crosswise with Mr. Vance and Ms. Wiles in policy discussions, particularly regarding Iran, according to several people briefed on the matter.

In a statement, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said Mr. Trump has a team whose members debate each other but know that he is the “ultimate decision maker.” “When he makes a decision, everyone rows in the same direction to execute,” she added.

Weeks ago, a discussion arose among some aides about whether Mr. Waltz was ideologically aligned with the president. Mr. Trump, who has at times been effusive in private about Mr. Waltz, made clear he did not want to start the cycle of dismissals so early in his second administration, according to two people briefed on the conversation. Mr. Trump, who regretted pushing out his first national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn, after less than a month in 2017, believed it would feed a narrative that he engenders chaos.

Advertisement

After the Signal thread leaked, someone shared on X a snippet of a 2016 video of Mr. Waltz, produced by a group primarily funded by the billionaire Koch brothers. Speaking as a military veteran, Mr. Waltz looked directly into the camera as he condemned Mr. Trump as a draft-dodger and said, “Stop Trump now.” That snippet drew attention from Mr. Waltz’s critics.

By contrast, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s job appears to be safe, even though he shared detailed information about strike times for the attack on Houthi militants in Yemen in the Signal thread. MAGA stalwarts like Charlie Kirk have defended him online.

Mr. Hegseth “had nothing to do with this,” the president said on Wednesday.

Mr. Hegseth survived a bruising confirmation process in the Senate after being pushed through with help from Mr. Vance, and he has a solid relationship with Mr. Trump.

While Mr. Waltz may keep his job, the controversy has reminded Mr. Trump’s aides that the president’s strategy of crisis management — doubling down and denying, no matter how problematic the facts are — does not seem to work as well for them as it has over the years for Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

When the Atlantic story broke, Mr. Waltz denied meeting, knowing or communicating with Mr. Goldberg. But that claim was quickly called into question by photos that surfaced from a 2021 event at the French Embassy in Washington, where Mr. Goldberg and Mr. Waltz were pictured standing next to one another. Mr. Waltz’s allies dismissed the idea that the photo suggested the two men knew each other.

But the reality is that while Mr. Trump has demanded loyalty from his staff, some top officials are longtime Washington hands who have relationships, past experiences and contacts with people whom Mr. Trump despises.

“I would say the principle of getting a bunch of yes men and yes women around him is the guiding principle, a foundation of which is not having, or renouncing, any past that may be proof to the contrary,” said John R. Bolton, who worked as Mr. Trump’s third of four national security advisers and then wrote a revealing book about his time in the White House.

“Anybody who’s been around Washington 10 years, 15 years, has all kinds of backgrounds,” Mr. Bolton said.

In Greenland on Friday, Mr. Vance, who was traveling with Mr. Waltz on a visit to try to apply pressure for the United States to take over the territory, made clear that Mr. Waltz was at fault for adding Mr. Goldberg to the Signal thread.

Advertisement

But Mr. Vance, who was also in the group chat and has defended Mr. Waltz internally in the past, made a point of doing so again. It was a sign that Mr. Trump was ready to move on, for now.

“If you think you’re going to force the president of the United States to fire anybody, you’ve got another think coming,” he said. “President Trump has said it on Monday, on Tuesday, on Wednesday, on Thursday, and I’m the vice president saying it here on Friday, we are standing behind our entire national security team.”

News

In defence of the weird and wonderful Wicked ‘womance’

Published

on

In defence of the weird and wonderful Wicked ‘womance’

Stay informed with free updates

The second part of the Wizard of Oz-inspired hit musical Wicked (For Good, this time) hits big screens across the world this weekend and, if the critics are to be believed, it makes for an emotional cinema experience. “Heartbreakingly tender,” says one Deadline critic. “A legitimate tearjerker,” reckons Roger Ebert. “The young women in the row behind me . . . started sniffling and sobbing, their tears then flowing on and off through the entire final act,” per the Hollywood Reporter.

The viewers are not the only ones sniffling. The film’s two leading stars, Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, have become known just as much for their overt displays of emotion and affection towards one another and frequent capitulations into tears as for their performances — they were both nominated for Oscars last time. 

Some people are highly unimpressed. “In a repeat of last year’s memorable antics that saw the inseparable pair repeatedly crying and touching each other . . . the recent press tour for the sequel has been equally ridiculous — with yet more weeping and even one bizarre breakdown over a noisy nearby helicopter,” raged the Daily Mail on Thursday. (A reference to a viral clip in which Grande shouts “Not the time, helicopter!” upwards as she strokes a weeping Erivo beside her.) “The carry-on is too much. Too much,” fumed Sky News Australia’s Rita Panahi during a regular (rather entertaining) segment called “Lefties Losing It”.

Advertisement

The carry-on never seems to ebb, either. Last week, Erivo made headlines for lunging to Grande’s defence during the Singapore premiere of the film, after a fan jumped on to the red carpet. Another video that has gone viral in recent days shows Erivo pulling away Grande’s arm and then kissing it after producer Marc Platt shakes it excitedly during a panel discussion.  

But the clip that eclipses all the others, immortalised by countless memes, is one from last year’s press tour. An interviewer tells Erivo that fans have been “holding space” (?!) for one of her songs, to which the actress responds “that’s really powerful, that’s what I wanted”, looking moved (again). We then see Grande grabbing on to her co-star’s index finger to comfort her, a visual made all the more striking — some might say iconic — by the three-inch-long green nail jutting off the end of Erivo’s pointer.

Is it all a bit intense and unusual for them to be, er, carrying on like this? Yes. Are some of the parodies of them very funny and on the money? Also yes. But have I become obsessed with their weird little platonic — or at the very least semi-platonic — love affair, with the raw emotion they obviously feel in each other’s company and the absolute devotion these pint-sized vocal powerhouses hold for each other? That’s very much another yes.  

That’s right, while I understand why everyone else is so focused on the “bromance” brewing between Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, it’s the relationship between Grande and Erivo — which I would like to call their womance — that really moves me. 

The first thing I like is their normalisation of the display of real, passionate emotion or, to put it another way, of wearing one’s heart on one’s sleeve. In our efficiency-focused, productivity-driven — dare I say male-dominated, or at least masculine-energy-dominated — society, it often feels like emotion is something we are meant to keep private, or certainly out of any professional setting. And while I am not suggesting that we start slopping our sentiments out on to the table the second they arise, I do welcome a world in which we are allowed to show that we are actually feeling things the whole time, and sometimes very deeply. 

Advertisement

The second is just their celebration of the sheer unalloyed joy of close friendship. As CS Lewis writes in his tremendous 1960 book The Four Loves, it is often seen as the least important of the loves (the others he identifies are affection, as exists between parents and children, eros, and charity) but it is in fact far from that. It is precisely because it is not strictly needed that it is so important. “Friendship is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art, like the universe itself,” Lewis writes. “It has no survival value; rather it is one of those things which give value to survival.”

Maybe it is because I feel this so strongly myself that I am so taken by this unusually public friendship. “Just by being around her, I have become more of an ally to myself when I used to do a lot of self-abandoning, and I really do credit that to our friendship,” Grande said in a joint interview last year (before, of course, starting to weep).

Long live the Wicked witches and their weird and wonderful womance. 

jemima.kelly@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hitting the road for Thanksgiving? Here’s the best time to go

Published

on

Hitting the road for Thanksgiving? Here’s the best time to go

Cars congest Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport the day before Thanksgiving Day in 2024, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

Marta Lavandier/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Marta Lavandier/AP

A record number of people are expected to travel within the U.S. for Thanksgiving, be it plane, train or automobile.

Nearly 82 million are projected to travel at least 50 miles from Nov. 25 to Dec. 1, an increase of 1.6 million people compared to last year’s holiday, according to an AAA report released on Monday.

Most of them will be hitting the road in a car, with about 73.2 million people expected to drive, AAA said. That’s 1.8% more car travelers compared to the 2024 holiday period.

Advertisement

AAA projected 6 million people to travel by plane within the country for the holiday, a 2% increase from last year. Due to concerns over recent flight delays and cancellations, however, AAA also said that number could end up dropping slightly if travelers make last-minute arrangements to use other forms of transportation. Staffing shortages during the prolonged government shutdown earlier this month resulted in mass flight disruptions.

The FAA lifted its directive that called for an emergency reduction in flights, allowing airlines to return to operating normally. Aviation experts warned it could take some time before flights return to normal, but industry leaders appeared confident that airline operations would return to normal pre-shutdown levels in time for the Thanksgiving travel frenzy. Weather forecast to bookend the holiday in some parts of the country could cause flight disruptions and delays.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Friday it expected the upcoming holiday rush to be the busiest Thanksgiving travel time for air travel in 15 years, with Tuesday being the busiest flying day.

Travel across other transport modes — bus, train and cruise — was forecast to increase 8.5% this year, with a likely uptick in last-minute bus and train bookings

“People are willing to brave the crowds and make last-minute adjustments to their plans to make lifelong memories, whether it’s visiting extended family or meeting up with friends,” Stacey Barber, vice president of AAA Travel said in a statement on Monday.

Advertisement

Here is what else to know:

Driving in the afternoon? Think again

Tuesday and Wednesday afternoon are expected to be the most congested times for drivers in major metro areas, according to INRIX, a transportation analytics firm.

If driving, the best times to hit the road for the holiday will be before noon on Tuesday and 11 a.m. on Wednesday to avoid backups, according to the firm. Thanksgiving Day will have minimal road traffic impacts.

When returning home after the holiday, travelers are advised to start driving before noon on any day except Monday. The Sunday after Thanksgiving will likely have heavy traffic most of the day and the best time to travel Monday will be after 8:00 p.m., INRIX said.

Weather could be messy, but should clear up for your trip back

During peak travel times, from Monday through Wednesday, rain extending from Southern Texas up to Minnesota will move across the country to the east, according to the National Weather Service (NWS).

Advertisement

“Monday into Tuesday will probably be a little problematic anywhere from Texas, eastern Oklahoma, into Arkansas and northwestern Louisiana,” Bob Oravec, lead forecaster for the NWS, told NPR.

By Thanksgiving Day, things will be a little drier across the U.S. Temperatures will be colder than average for a majority of the country on Thanksgiving morning, with central parts of the U.S. seeing temperatures in the teens. On Black Friday, there will be warmer than average temperatures from the Great Plains to the West Coast, with places like Denver, Colo., seeing temperatures in the mid-50s, Oravec said.

Some of the worst weather will be across much of the central and eastern U.S. where there will be lake-effect snow showers coming off the Great Lakes, Oravec said.

For holiday travelers returning home on Friday and Saturday, the weather should be decent for a large portion of the country, he said. But a storm system is expected to develop over the weekend.

On Saturday and Sunday, the system could bring heavy snow across western Nebraska, South Dakota and North Dakota as well as parts of Minnesota into Wisconsin, according to Oravec. On Sunday, from Texas up into Missouri and Illinois, chances of rain are forecast to increase.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: In Charlotte, Border Patrol Arrests Send Families Into Hiding

Published

on

Video: In Charlotte, Border Patrol Arrests Send Families Into Hiding

new video loaded: In Charlotte, Border Patrol Arrests Send Families Into Hiding

transcript

transcript

In Charlotte, Border Patrol Arrests Send Families Into Hiding

After Border Patrol agents showed up to an afterschool care facility for immigrant children in Charlotte, N.C., staff members mobilized to deliver food and essentials to local families in hiding. The New York Times spoke to one mother with three children who said they have not left their home in several days.

This afterschool program in East Charlotte has been a safe space for immigrant children. But today, there are reports that Customs and Border Patrol agents are approaching. Staff rush to lock down the building. They say this is the second day in a row that immigration enforcement has showed up. We’re walking up right now to a CBP sighting here. In a statement to The Times, the Department of Homeland Security stated it did not target a school or daycare, and denied trying to enter or make any arrests near the building. Across Charlotte, more than 370 people have been arrested so far, sending large parts of the immigrant community here into hiding. A lot of families, even regardless of legal status, they’re afraid and they’re staying home. People aren’t going to work. Businesses are closing, and kids aren’t going to school. According to city officials, about 20 percent of the city’s student population was missing from school on Monday. Maria asked to only be identified by her first name for fear of being arrested. She said she and her husband, who are both undocumented, and their three children have not left home in four days. Ourbridge suspended its afterschool program after Border Patrol showed up on Monday. Its staff is now delivering food and essentials to families like Maria’s, who remain in hiding with their children. These specific families that we’re heading to right now, they contacted our team and they let us know what specifically they needed. So that’s what we’re dropping off. In just two days, their number of requested deliveries jumped from 40 to 267. Maria said she doesn’t know when the immigration operation will end, but she and her husband will stay home until it does.

Advertisement
After Border Patrol agents showed up to an afterschool care facility for immigrant children in Charlotte, N.C., staff members mobilized to deliver food and essentials to local families in hiding. The New York Times spoke to one mother with three children who said they have not left their home in several days.

By Ang Li, Alex Pena and Amy Marino

November 22, 2025

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending