Connect with us

News

‘Shocking’ failures led to shooting of Richneck teacher by 6-year-old

Published

on

‘Shocking’ failures led to shooting of Richneck teacher by 6-year-old

A 6-year-old boy who shot and wounded a teacher in Southeast Virginia last year had previously choked a different teacher and should have been unenrolled from the school, but lapses by administrators allowed him back on campus, according to a special grand jury report released Thursday.

The breakdown was one of a series of glaring discipline issues, security failures and ignored warnings that allowed the boy to sneak a weapon inside Richneck Elementary School in Newport News and open fire on Abigail Zwerner, a first-grade teacher, the special grand jury concluded.

The 11-member panel also suggested a criminal probe of a high-ranking member of the Newport News School District for obstructing the investigation into the high-profile shooting, after key pieces of evidence — the boy’s disciplinary files — went missing.

The special grand jury reserved its harshest judgments for Richneck’s former assistant principal, Ebony Parker, who it found was warned three times on the day of the shooting that the boy had a weapon but failed to do anything.

“Dr. Parker’s lack of response and initiative given the seriousness of the information she had received on Jan. 6, 2023 is shocking,” the panel wrote in its 24-page report.

Advertisement

The special grand jury was empaneled by Newport News Commonwealth’s Attorney Howard E. Gwynn to examine whether any security lapses that contributed to the shooting last year that left Zwerner grievously wounded, captured national attention and led to the ouster of the school superintendent.

The report was made public one day after the special grand jury’s indictment against Parker was unsealed. Parker is facing eight counts of child abuse, possibly the first time an administrator has been charged in the handling of a school shooting, experts said.

Gwynn’s office has declined to comment on what prompted the charges, but a $40 million lawsuit brought by Zwerner claims Parker ignored several warnings by teachers and other staff that the boy had a gun on the day of the shooting.

Parker’s attorney has not responded to requests for comment, but has denied Zwerner’s allegations in a response to her lawsuit filed in court. Parker is scheduled to appear in Newport News Circuit Court on Thursday morning. She resigned from Richneck after the shooting.

The incident began when the 6-year-old took his mother’s gun from her purse on the top of her dresser and brought it to school in his backpack on Jan. 6, 2023.

Advertisement

Zwerner’s lawsuit claims she had warned Parker that day that the boy was in a “violent mood” and threatened to beat up a kindergartner, but that Parker did nothing. Zwerner claims it was one of several moments that Parker might have intervened to prevent the shooting.

Later that day, two students told a reading specialist that the boy had said he had a gun, according to the lawsuit. The reading specialist questioned the boy, but he denied having a gun and wouldn’t let the teacher search his backpack.

During the recess that followed, Zwerner told the reading specialist she thought she saw the boy pull something from his backpack and put it in his pocket, according to the lawsuit. The reading specialist searched the boy’s backpack but did not find the weapon. The reading specialist then told Parker that students had relayed to her that the boy had a gun.

Zwerner’s lawsuit claims a student told another teacher that the boy had shown the classmate a gun on the playground at recess. The teacher also got the information to Parker through an intermediary.

Shortly before the shooting, a guidance counselor asked Parker to search the boy for a gun, but she denied his request, according to Zwerner’s lawsuit. The boy pulled out the gun and fired a single shot at her, striking her hand and chest.

Advertisement

Zwerner was taken to the hospital and a teacher restrained the boy.

Deja Taylor, the boy’s mother, was convicted of firearms violations and child neglect in federal and state courts after the shooting. Taylor admitted to lying about her marijuana use on her background check to purchase the gun and failing to keep the weapon from her son. She is currently serving out prison terms.

Gwynn empaneled the special grand jury in April 2023, asking it to probe “any actions or omissions by current or former employees of the Newport News School System which may have contributed to this shooting.”

The panel began taking testimony in September. It heard from 19 witnesses, amassed hundreds of pages of documents obtained videos to compile its report. Under Virginia law, special grand juries have broad powers to investigate.

Advertisement

News

Amazon accused of listing products from independent shops without permission

Published

on

Amazon accused of listing products from independent shops without permission

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Amazon has been accused of listing products from independent retailers without their consent, even as the ecommerce giant sues start-up Perplexity over its AI software shopping without permission.

The $2.5tn online retailer has listed some independent shops’ full inventory on its platform without seeking permission, four business owners told the Financial Times, enabling customers to shop through Amazon rather than buy directly.

Two independent retailers told the FT that they had also received orders for products that were either out of stock or were mispriced and mislabelled by Amazon leading to customer complaints.

Advertisement

“Nobody opted into this,” said Angie Chua, owner of Bobo Design Studio, a stationery store based in Los Angeles.

Tech companies are experimenting with artificial intelligence “agents” that can perform tasks like shopping autonomously based on user instructions.

Amazon has blocked agents from Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and a host of other AI start-ups from its website.

It filed a lawsuit in November against Perplexity, whose Comet browser was making purchases on Amazon on behalf of users, alleging that the company’s actions risked undermining user privacy and violated its terms of service.

In its complaint, Amazon said Perplexity had taken steps “without prior notice to Amazon and without authorisation” and that it degraded a customer shopping experience it had invested in over several decades.

Advertisement

Perplexity in a statement at the time said that the lawsuit was a “bully tactic” aimed at scaring “disruptive companies like Perplexity” from improving customers’ experience.

The recent complaints against Amazon relate to its “Buy for Me” function, launched last April, which lets some customers purchase items that are not listed with Amazon but on other retailers’ sites.

Retailers said Amazon did not seek their permission before sending them orders that were placed on the ecommerce site. They do not receive the user’s email address or other information that might be helpful for generating future sales, several sellers told the FT.

“We consciously avoid Amazon because our business is rooted in community and building a relationship with customers,” Chua said. “I don’t know who these customers are.”

Several of the independent retailers said Amazon’s move had led to poor experiences for customers, or hurt their business.

Advertisement

Sarah Hitchcock Burzio, the owner of Hitchcock Paper Co. in Virginia, said that Amazon had mislabelled items leading to a surge in orders as customers believed they were receiving more expensive versions of a product at a much lower price.

“There were no guardrails set up so when there were issues there was nobody I could go to,” she said.

Product returns and complaints for the “Buy for Me” function are handled by sellers rather than Amazon, even when errors are produced by the Seattle-based group.

Amazon enables sellers to opt out of the service by contacting the company on a specific email address.

Amazon said: “Shop Direct and Buy for Me are programmes we’re testing that help customers discover brands and products not currently sold in Amazon’s store, while helping businesses reach new customers and drive incremental sales.

Advertisement

“We have received positive feedback on these programmes. Businesses can opt out at any time.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump says Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to US | CNN Business

Published

on

Trump says Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to US | CNN Business

President Donald Trump said Tuesday night that Venezuela will turn over 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil to the United States, to be sold at market value and with the proceeds controlled by the US.

Interim authorities in Venezuela will turn over “sanctioned oil” Trump said on Truth Social.

The US will use the proceeds “to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States!” he wrote.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright has been directed to “execute this plan, immediately,” and the barrels “will be taken by storage ships, and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States.”

CNN has reached out to the White House for more information.

Advertisement

A senior administration official, speaking under condition of anonymity, told CNN that the oil has already been produced and put in barrels. The majority of it is currently on boats and will now go to US facilities in the Gulf to be refined.

Although 30 to 50 million barrels of oil sounds like a lot, the United States consumed just over 20 million barrels of oil per day over the past month.

That amount may lower oil prices a bit, but it probably won’t lower Americans’ gas prices that much: Former President Joe Biden released about four to six times as much — 180 million barrels of oil — from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve in 2022, which lowered gas prices by only between 13 cents and 31 cents a gallon over the course of four months, according to a Treasury Department analysis.

US oil fell about $1 a barrel, or just under 2%, to $56, immediately after Trump made his announcement on Truth Social.

Selling up to 50 million barrels could raise quite a bit of revenue: Venezuelan oil is currently trading at $55 per barrel, so if the United States can find buyers willing to pay market price, it could raise between $1.65 billion and $2.75 billion from the sale.

Advertisement

Venezuela has built up significant stockpiles of crude over since the United States began its oil embargo late last year. But handing over that much oil to the United States may deplete Venezuela’s own oil reserves.

The oil is almost certainly coming from both its onshore storage and some of the seized tankers that were transporting oil: The country has about 48 million barrels of storage capacity and was nearly full, according to Phil Flynn, senior market analyst at the Price Futures Group. The tankers were transporting about 15 million to 22 million barrels of oil, according to industry estimates.

It’s unclear over what time period Venezuela will hand over the oil to the United States.

The senior administration official said the transfer would happen quickly because Venezuela’s crude is very heavy, which means it can’t be stored for long.

But crude does not go bad if it is not refined in a certain amount of time, said Andrew Lipow, the president of Lipow Oil Associates, in a note. “It has sat underground for hundreds of millions of years. In fact, much of the oil in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has been around for decades,” he wrote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

Published

on

Video: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

new video loaded: Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

transcript

transcript

Nvidia Shows Off New A.I. Chip at CES

At the annual tech conference, CES, Nvidia showed off a new A.I. chip, known as Vera Rubin, which is more efficient and powerful than previous generations of chips.

This is the Vera CPU. This is one CPU. This is groundbreaking work. I would not be surprised if the industry would like us to make this format and this structure an industry standard in the future. Today, we’re announcing Alpamayo, the world’s first thinking, reasoning autonomous vehicle A.I.

Advertisement
At the annual tech conference, CES, Nvidia showed off a new A.I. chip, known as Vera Rubin, which is more efficient and powerful than previous generations of chips.

By Jiawei Wang

January 6, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending