Connect with us

News

Santander delays full UK results as it weighs impact of car finance ruling

Published

on

Santander delays full UK results as it weighs impact of car finance ruling

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Santander has delayed the release of its full UK results because of a court ruling on car loans while revealing a large drop in the division’s profits, as one of the Spanish bank’s most important markets emerges as a trouble spot.

The company said on Tuesday its UK profit in the three months to the end of September had dropped 18.5 per cent from a year earlier to €346mn, in a highly competitive lending market. That followed a 23 per cent fall in the previous quarter.

The lender is already streamlining its UK operation and said it had cut its headcount by 468 to 21,812 this year via a combination of redundancies and not replacing staff who had quit or retired.

Advertisement

The night before publishing its global results, Santander said it would not publish a detailed set of numbers for the UK because it was seeking to quantify the possible cost of a British court decision that some commissions that banks paid to car dealerships had been unlawful.

The ruling, which comes as UK financial regulators investigate potential mis-selling in car finance, has increased the likelihood that the Financial Conduct Authority will implement a costly redress scheme for lenders, mirroring remediation imposed over the payment protection insurance scandal.

The regulator is investigating the historic use by brokers and lenders of so-called discretionary commission agreements on car loans, a practice that was banned in 2021. Lenders including Santander are braced for the possibility of being ordered to make large compensation payments to consumers, with analysts saying the sector could be hit with as much as £16bn in redress costs.

Santander said it did “not expect any material impact” for the group as a whole but it had to delay its UK results because the consequences could be material at the national level.

Benjamin Toms, an analyst at Royal Bank of Canada, estimates that Santander could be hit with a €1bn charge. Lloyds Banking Group, which owns the largest car finance provider, already took a £450mn provision to prepare for potential compensation costs.

Advertisement

Marta Sanchez Romero, analyst at Citibank, said that despite the decline in UK profit the British business had done better than the market expected. But she said “the UK’s beat could be overshadowed” by the car loan risk and delayed results.

The regulatory threat comes amid fierce competition in the UK lending market, most notably for mortgage customers. Santander’s fall in UK profit came as national revenue fell almost 10 per cent as it resisted pressure to lower interest rates by as much as some competitors.

UK house prices and mortgage activity have been rising as falling interest rates have buoyed buyers’ confidence. However, lenders including Santander have in recent weeks pulled back some of their cheapest mortgage deals as stronger economic data for the UK and concerns about the government’s borrowing plans ahead of this week’s Budget have put upward pressure on swap rates, which are key to the pricing of mortgages.

The bank said the drop in profit partly reflected the fact it had received a one-off windfall of £46mn in the same quarter of 2023 from the sale of a stake in Euroclear. But net interest income and net fee income also declined from the same period last year.

Mexico was the only other big market where Santander’s profit fell, sliding 2 per cent to €394mn. Profit grew modestly in the US and Brazil, while the best performance came in its home market of Spain, where profit jumped 50 per cent.

Advertisement

Overall the bank reported a quarterly profit of €3.25bn, up 12 per cent from a year ago.

Ana Botín, Santander’s executive chair, said: “We are growing both net interest income and net fee income, credit quality is robust and our transformation continues to generate positive operational leverage.”

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending