Connect with us

News

Russia intensifies Ukraine attacks on New Year’s Eve

Published

on

Russia intensifies Ukraine attacks on New Year’s Eve

Ukraine on Monday said Russia had launched a “record” number of 90 drones in attacks on New Year’s Eve that killed several people and left dozens injured.

Most of the drones involved were downed by its air defences, Ukraine said on New Year’s Day, days after Moscow’s deadliest strikes on Ukrainian cities in nearly two years of war.

The mounting attacks and casualties came as both sides settle in for a protracted war after Russia’s full-scale invasion launched in February 2022 failed to achieve its aims but claimed hundreds of thousands of casualties on both sides.

Ukraine’s air force said on Sunday that “the whole of Ukraine is on missile strike alert” after Russian MiG-31 jets had taken off, with “significant activity” recorded in the east and south of the country.

Ukrainian officials reported Russian artillery and air strikes in regions across the country, including the southern city of Kherson liberated in autumn 2022, where a 14-year old boy was killed and another child and two women were seriously injured.

Advertisement

In other regions, despite Russian claims of targeting military infrastructure, Ukrainian officials reported strikes on power lines, grain storage facilities, pharmacies and office buildings.

In Kharkiv region, police said Russian artillery strikes had killed a woman and two men in the village of Borova on Saturday night. The region’s governor Oleg Synegubov said at least six missiles had hit Kharkiv city, with 28 civilians injured in strikes that also hit healthcare buildings and the prominent Kharkiv Palace hotel which is frequented by media.

Ihor Klymenko, Ukraine’s minister for internal affairs, said a journalist from the UK was among those injured in the attack. A German team from public broadcaster ZDF was also in the hotel at the time of the attack and their translator suffered spinal injuries, the TV network said.

The Kharkiv Palace hotel was hit by a Russian missile strike © Vital Hnidyi/Reuters

“On the eve of the New Year, the Russians want to intimidate our city, but we are not scared,” Ihor Terekhov, Kharkiv’s mayor, said in a statement on social media. His posts included photos and videos of rescue workers putting out fires and searching through rubble for survivors at bombed-out residential buildings, a café and a bank.

Moscow on Sunday described the Kharkiv attack as retaliation for Ukraine’s alleged attack a day earlier which it said had killed more than 20 people in Russia’s city of Belgorod, just a few kilometres north of the Ukrainian border.

Advertisement

The Kharkiv and Belgorod attacks came after record Russian missile and drone strikes hitting targets across Ukraine on Friday claimed nearly 50 lives, including 23 in Kyiv.

“In retaliation to this terrorist attack, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation struck the decision-making centres and military targets in the city of Kharkiv,” Russia’s defence ministry said Sunday.

The ministry claimed that troops from Ukraine’s army and GRU military intelligence unit “directly involved in planning and executing the terrorist attack in Belgorod . . . were neutralised by a precision-guided missile strike at the former Kharkiv Palace hotel complex”.

“Up to 200 foreign mercenaries who were . . . involved in terrorist raids on the territory of the Russian Federation bordering on Ukraine were also there,” the ministry said, pointing to units of Russian citizens fighting on Ukraine’s side which have routinely conducted raids cross-border attacks in the region.

Ukraine’s GRU military intelligence service denied these claims.

Advertisement

Ukrainian media, citing domestic intelligence sources, reported that the explosions in Belgorod were caused by debris from projectiles falling upon the city after being “unprofessionally” intercepted by Russian air defences.

In a Saturday address to the nation, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the Russian attack had affected “more than 120 of our cities and villages” and pledged retaliation.

“For every ‘Shahed’ drone, for every Russian missile, there will be a fair responsibility of the terrorist state. Both political and very practical,” he said.

Without directly referring to delayed decisions by the US and EU to approve financial and military assistance for 2024, Zelenskyy said he had discussed with his military chiefs what still needed to be done next year.

“Despite everything that will happen in other countries, despite any political changes and moods, we need sufficient potential to do our own thing,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Ukraine was preparing for increased weapons production in 2024.

Advertisement

In a separate year-end address, Zelenskyy mentioned his forces’ stepped-up long-range strikes on Crimea, the Ukrainian peninsula occupied by Russia since 2014, which forced the Russian navy to withdraw to eastern parts of the Black Sea. This, in turn, allowed Kyiv to break Moscow’s blockade of its ports by unilaterally restarting maritime exports of grain, metals and other commodities.

A long-anticipated counteroffensive this year failed to make significant territorial gains, despite modern weaponry supplied by Kyiv’s western allies. Russia has also failed to win any major land offensive this year, though it continues to occupy about 18 per cent of Ukrainian territory.

Zelenskyy highlighted the positives: “This year, Ukraine did not retreat in any direction on earth, regained the sea and made the sky safer.”

News

Trump Backs Cuomo, Threatens NYC Funds If Mamdani Wins – The Source with Kaitlan Collins – Podcast on CNN Podcasts

Published

on

Trump Backs Cuomo, Threatens NYC Funds If Mamdani Wins – The Source with Kaitlan Collins – Podcast on CNN Podcasts



Trump Backs Cuomo, Threatens NYC Funds If Mamdani Wins – The Source with Kaitlan Collins – Podcast on CNN Podcasts


SNAP Half Covered, Alleged Terror Plot Charges, Trump’s Pardon Comments and more

Advertisement

5 Things

Listen to
CNN 5 Things

Mon, Nov 3


On your computer
On your mobile device
Smart speakers

US
World
Politics
Business

showcast

Advertisement

Kaitlan Collins goes straight to the source and chases the facts so you can get the very latest on The Source with Kaitlan Collins.

Trump Backs Cuomo, Threatens NYC Funds If Mamdani Wins

The Source with Kaitlan Collins

Nov 4, 2025

Advertisement

On the eve of the mayor’s race in New York City, President Trump just endorsed a longtime rival and a Democrat. 

CNN Sans ™ & © 2016 Cable News Network.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

Video: The Nationwide Battle Over Electoral Maps

Published

on

Video: The Nationwide Battle Over Electoral Maps

new video loaded: The Nationwide Battle Over Electoral Maps

What began with Texas drawing what could be five new Republican districts in the House of Representatives at President Trump’s behest has spiraled into a nationwide redistricting race. Nick Corasaniti, a New York Times reporter covering national politics, gives an overview.

By Nick Corasaniti, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Claire Hogan, June Kim, Christina Thornell and Ashley Wu

November 3, 2025

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s National Guard deployments aren’t random. They were planned years ago

Published

on

Trump’s National Guard deployments aren’t random. They were planned years ago

Members of the National Guard patrol near the U.S. Capitol on Oct. 1 in Washington, D.C.

Al Drago/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Al Drago/Getty Images

President Trump’s deployments of National Guard troops to U.S. cities have outraged his political rivals, tested legal precedents and led to nationwide protests.

The courts are weighing in on their legality. But — if successful — they could also fulfill a long-running administration goal of employing America’s military to aid in the mass deportation of immigrants without legal status, according to an NPR review of past comments from Trump and his allies. It’s a move that would stray significantly from past federal use of the Guard, challenging laws that dictate how the U.S. military can be used domestically. And with the 2026 midterms looming, some experts worry Guard troops could even be used as a tool of systemic voter suppression and intimidation.

Trump has sent troops into four Democratic-led cities and threatened to send them to several more, claiming they are needed to crack down on crime and protect federal immigration facilities and officers. Those deployments, and the White House’s rhetoric around them, have regularly conflated violent crime and illegal immigration into a single crisis, blurring the lines around the role of the Guard and federal agents.

Advertisement

Taken one at a time, the deployments can seem random or fickle — Trump will often muse about sending troops into a city, only to back track his comments and focus on a different city days later.

But the president and several others in his inner circle — most notably Stephen Miller, a senior aide to Trump in his first term, and now Trump’s right hand man on immigration — have long talked about using the National Guard to help with mass deportations and immigration raids, despite U.S. laws broadly preventing the military from being used for domestic policing. To get around those laws, both Trump and Miller have talked about invoking the Insurrection Act, which allows the president to deploy the military within the U.S. in certain situations.

Legal experts, activists and watchdog groups worry the Trump administration could fundamentally change the way the military is used on U.S. soil, specifically raising concerns about the upcoming 2026 midterm elections and what armed troops on the streets could mean as voters cast ballots.

Laying the groundwork 

Much of Trump’s campaign ahead of the 2024 election was focused on drumming up anti-immigrant sentiment and pushing his plan for mass deportations. He vowed several times on the campaign trail that he would launch the largest deportation operation in American history.

In his first term, Trump and his administration had similar ambitions, but struggled to scale up infrastructure and manpower needed to carry out the goal.

Advertisement

In a TIME Magazine interview in April of 2024, then-candidate Trump was asked specifically if his plan included the use of the U.S. military.

“I can see myself using the National Guard and, if necessary, I’d have to go a step further. We have to do whatever we have to do to stop the problem we have,” Trump responded.

Using the National Guard for immigration enforcement is an idea that Miller had talked about publicly in the years before.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for policy and U.S. Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller speaks after President Trump signed an order sending National Guard to Memphis, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on September 15, 2025.

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for policy and U.S. Homeland Security Adviser Stephen Miller speaks after President Trump signed an order sending National Guard to Memphis, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on September 15, 2025.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

In 2023, Miller appeared on the late right-wing activist Charlie Kirk’s podcast to talk about how mass deportations under Trump’s hopeful second term could work.

Advertisement

“In terms of personnel, you go to the red state governors, and you say, give us your National Guard. We will deputize them as immigration enforcement officers,” Miller explained. “The Alabama National Guard is going to arrest illegal aliens in Alabama, and the Virginia National Guard in Virginia.”

Miller doesn’t specify how that would be legal — under U.S. law, the military can’t be used for domestic policing unless authorized by the Constitution or Congress. For Democratic-run states that don’t comply, Miller said, the federal government would simply send the National Guard from a nearby Republican-run state.

The deployments 

In recent months, the Trump administration has deployed Guard troops to states against the wishes of their Democratic governors — including sending troops from Texas into Illinois. The administration said their purpose was to protect federal immigration facilities and officers. Those deployments are tied up in court challenges.

Members of the Texas National Guard stand guard at an army reserve training facility on October 07, 2025 in Elwood, Illinois.

Members of the Texas National Guard stand guard at an army reserve training facility on October 07, 2025 in Elwood, Illinois.

Scott Olson/Getty Images North America


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Scott Olson/Getty Images North America

Miles Taylor, former chief of staff in the Department of Homeland Security during Trump’s first term, worked closely with Miller. He’s since become a vocal critic of the president and his policies.

Advertisement

Taylor says he’s not surprised to see Miller’s plan coming to fruition.

“Trump was deeply deferential to Stephen and I think you’ve seen that with a vastly more empowered Stephen Miller in a second term,” says Taylor, an author and commentator.

Taylor says that during Trump’s first term, the president wasn’t talking publicly about using the U.S. military for immigration enforcement, but it was something that was discussed behind closed doors.

Miles Taylor, former chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during President Donald Trump's first term, holds up his phone outside of the Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse ahead of the arraignment hearing for former FBI director James Comey in Alexandria, Virginia on October 8, 2025.

Miles Taylor, former chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security during President Trump’s first term, holds up his phone outside of the U.S. courthouse in Alexandria, Va., ahead of the arraignment hearing for former FBI director James Comey on Oct. 8

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

“I can remember in meetings with him in the Oval Office, or on Air Force One, or at the border, him starting to bring up this idea of using the United States military to solve the problem,” he says.

Advertisement

It wasn’t something that Trump just talked about. In 2017, The Associated Press reported on a memo it obtained from DHS, outlining a draft proposal to use the National Guard to round up unauthorized immigrants throughout the U.S. At the time, the White House denied it, saying there was no such plan.

Taylor says there very much was — but it was also more than that.

“It was the invocation of the Insurrection Act to deputize the military to enforce domestic law to basically become a domestic police force,” he says, noting that this particular idea was something that troubled him and several other staffers.

“It rocked us to our core,” he says.

Trump invoking the Insurrection Act would legally allow for the military to act as police on U.S. soil — to carry out immigration enforcement, but possibly other enforcement too, according to legal experts.

Advertisement

NPR asked the White House about potential plans to deputize the Guard for law enforcement and to use the Insurrection Act, but it did not directly respond to those questions, instead criticizing Taylor and NPR. Spokeswoman Abigail Jackson also referenced Trump’s “highly successful operations to drive down violent crime in American cities.”

Project 2025

The broader themes of these National Guard deployments are also embedded in Project 2025, a conservative action plan written by the Heritage Foundation after Trump’s first term that’s more than 900 pages long.

Trump has incorporated many of its policies, and authors into his second administration. So much so that the report’s architect, Russell Vought, is the head of the White House’s Office of Management and Budget.

Russ Vought, Director of the US Office of Management and Budget (OMB), speaks at the National Conservative Convention in Washington D.C., Sept. 3, 2025. (Photo by Dominic Gwinn / Middle East Images via AFP) (Photo by DOMINIC GWINN/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)

Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, in September.

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Dominic Gwinn/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty

Matt Dallek, a professor at The George Washington University who studies the American conservative movement, says that Project 2025 essentially opens the door for Trump’s National Guard deployments — particularly to Democratic-led cities — without explicitly calling for them.

Advertisement

“The subtext of Project 2025 is to take any and all steps at the executive level to go into cities and states to enact the priority — which is to root out illegal immigration,” Dallek says.

The idea of bullying states and cities into following orders from the president is a key part of the text, says David Graham, a journalist for The Atlantic who also wrote a book on the project. So is the use of the military.

“There is this idea in Project 2025, and among the authors, that the military is just an underused resource for policing immigration,” Graham says, noting that often illegal immigration is presented as a national security problem. He says the report’s authors believe that the U.S. has “this huge, huge resource of armed people, and we’re not doing anything with it, and we need to use it to secure the border.”

Beyond mass deportation 

In recent weeks, Trump has talked about invoking the Insurrection Act often, especially in regard to deploying the National Guard. Earlier this month, he said that he was “allowed” to invoke it if the courts deny his deployments in places like Portland, Ore., or Chicago, where prosecutors and federal judges have questioned the need for troops on the ground.

Trump invoking the Insurrection Act to allow troops to help with immigration enforcement is also something that Stephen Miller has talked about.

Advertisement

He told the New York Times back in 2023: “President Trump will do whatever it takes.”

That possibility has both legal experts and immigration advocates worried, especially about the implications it could have for Americans at large.

Kica Matos, president of the National Immigration Law Center, an immigration rights advocacy group, says it has her worried about the upcoming 2026 midterm elections and what the presence of troops might mean for voters as they cast ballots.

“What I have said repeatedly is that the path to authoritarianism in this country is being built on the backs of immigrants. They will begin with immigrants. They will not end with immigrants,” she says.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending