Connect with us

News

PwC to reverse controversial US tax split

Published

on

PwC to reverse controversial US tax split

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

PwC plans to reverse a controversial restructuring of its tax practice in the US after just three years, in a strategy U-turn under its incoming senior partner Paul Griggs.

The Big Four firm will reunify its tax division when Griggs takes over in July, dismantling the business model brought in by the firm’s current boss Tim Ryan, according to a note to partners seen by the Financial Times,

PwC departed from the industry’s historic model of having tax as a standalone business unit in 2021, when Ryan split the almost 1,000 US tax partners between the firm’s accounting and consulting arms.

Advertisement

“Tax is a tremendous brand and I’m a big believer that you never dilute a brand that has meaningful value,” Griggs told the FT.

The move by Griggs marks a reversal of his predecessor’s marquee strategy, which had prompted widespread debate about the Big Four business model when it was implemented.

Ryan described the reorganisation as a “once-in-a-generation change” that grouped PwC’s US audit business together with tax reporting and compliance under the umbrella of “trust solutions”.

Tax consulting activities, which include advising on the structure of merger and acquisition deals or where to locate business operations, were moved into PwC’s advisory arm, which was renamed “consulting solutions”.

However, discontent among tax partners was widespread enough that all the main candidates in this year’s leadership election supported the business being put back together, according to people familiar with the matter.

Advertisement

Griggs will also scrap the “trust solutions” and “consulting solutions” brands in favour of “assurance” and “advisory”. Tax accounted for 26 per cent of the US firm’s revenue before the split.

Griggs said that having tax under one umbrella reflected how clients bought services from PwC. It was also important for the “identity” of partners and staff in the business, and for ensuring investment was directed appropriately, he said.

“Having the tax business connected to assurance and advisory is critical, but structurally I don’t need those businesses to be smashed together for that to happen.”

Outside the firm, Ryan’s reorganisation was seen as a potential precursor to splitting PwC in two via the spin off or sale of its advisory arm — something he and other PwC leaders said was never on the cards.

EY, which pursued its own plan to spin off its consulting arm, feared ceding a first-mover advantage to PwC. EY’s plan ultimately fell apart last year because of disagreements over how to divide tax partners between the two halves of the business.

Advertisement

Deloitte said last month that it had considered and rejected splitting its tax business, deciding that an integrated model was a “significant source of strength and differentiation”.

Ryan’s reorganisation was not adopted by other countries in the PwC network, whose member firms have typically kept tax as a standalone business line.

Ryan had been expected to become global chair of PwC but encountered opposition to his management style. Opponents cited his willingness to take unilateral action in the US business that might be more typically co-ordinated at a global level, where consensus is prized.

Ryan withdrew from the global leadership race in October and will retire from the firm.

Griggs, an auditor, was elected US senior partner in February in a ballot of PwC’s 4,000 US and Mexico partners, beating Kathryn Kaminsky, co-head of trust solutions, and Jenny Koehler, chief investment officer. Another frontrunner, former consulting co-chair Neil Dhar, was excluded from the ballot after allegations he breached election rules.

Advertisement

Griggs announced key members of his leadership team on Thursday, including appointing Krishnan Chandrasekhar, who is at present banking and capital markets tax services leader, as head of the reunified tax business.

The assurance business will be run by Deanna Byrne, head of PwC’s Philadelphia office, and advisory will be led by Tyson Cornell, leader of its cloud and digital practice.

Koehler has been named chief operating officer of advisory and Kaminsky will become chief commercial officer.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Live news: Sell-off in cruise operators creates choppy conditions ahead of Viking IPO

Published

on

Live news: Sell-off in cruise operators creates choppy conditions ahead of Viking IPO

Fed decision: The US Federal Reserve is expected to keep the federal funds rate on hold at the conclusion of its two-day meeting. After a series of hotter than expected employment and inflation figures, investors will be listening for clues on when the central bank expects to cut interest rates.

US employment: US government data is expected to show that job openings in March edged down to 8.69mn from 8.75mn in February. Separately, ADP will release its US employment report for April, which will give some insight into the labour market before the official government figures on Friday. Private payrolls are expected to have added 175,000 jobs in April, compared with the 184,000 jobs added in March.

Pfizer: The pharmaceutical company is expected to report that quarterly revenue declined 23.4 per cent from the same period last year to $14bn, according to LSEG, as the company faces weak demand for its Covid-19 vaccine and antiviral medicine.

Other companies: CVS Health, KKR, Marriott International, Estée Lauder, Kraft Heinz, Yum Brands, and Norwegian Cruise Line will report earnings before the bell. DoorDash, eBay and Etsy will report after the markets close.

Manufacturing: Activity in the US manufacturing sector is expected to have remained in expansion territory, but April’s reading is forecast to have ticked down 0.3 percentage points to a reading of 50.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Some Republicans expected to join Arizona Democrats to pass repeal of 1864 abortion ban

Published

on

Some Republicans expected to join Arizona Democrats to pass repeal of 1864 abortion ban

Two Republican state senators are expected to join Democrats in Arizona on Wednesday to pass a bill to repeal the state’s Civil War-era near-total abortion ban — three weeks after the state Supreme Court ruled the law was enforceable and one week after the House passed its own legislation to roll back the restrictions that have stirred widespread controversy.

GOP state Sens. T.J. Shope and Shawnna Bolick have both indicated they will support the Democratic-led repeal effort, giving Democrats the necessary votes in the chamber.

Notably, Bolick is married to one of the state Supreme Court justices who voted to reinstate the 1864 law, which supersedes a 15-week abortion ban that was enacted in 2022 and which blocks all abortions except to save the life of the pregnant woman.

While Republicans in the state Senate could delay the repeal vote with procedural hurdles, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, has expressed confidence the repeal bill will pass Wednesday.

Hobbs has also expressed frustration that the Legislature didn’t take action sooner, noting that unless the courts impose a pause on the 1864 abortion ban, there could be a monthslong gap between when it goes into effect and then its repeal kicks in.

Advertisement

As of Tuesday morning, the office of Attorney General Kris Mayes said the effective date for the ban has been pushed from June 8 to June 27, after the state Supreme Court rejected a motion to reconsider. If the ban is repealed by the Legislature, that move wouldn’t take effect until 90 days after the legislative session ends, which must be by June 30, meaning the repeal of the 1864 law may not take effect until around Oct. 1.

Some Democrats have acknowledged “uncertainty” that at least two GOP senators will vote for repeal on Wednesday “because the Republican Party has moved to the extremes since Trump first got elected,” Sen. Priya Sundareshan, a Democrat, said on a call with reporters on Tuesday.

People protest after Arizona’s Supreme Court revived a law dating to 1864 that bans abortion in virtually all instances, in Peoria, AZ, April 14, 2024.

Caitlin O’Hara/Reuters

Conservatives in the state House initially resisted efforts to fast-track legislation to undo the ban.

Advertisement

“Legislatures are not built for knee-jerk reactions,” state House Speaker Ben Toma said during one floor session.

He has also said that “abortion is a complicated topic — it is ethically, morally complex. I understand that we have deeply held beliefs, and I would ask everyone in this chamber to respect the fact that some of us who believe that abortion is in fact the murder of children.”

Anti-abortion groups have also rallied around the state Capitol seeking to urge lawmakers to stick by the ban. Arizona voter Desiree Mayes, a Republican, told ABC News last mont that “if you really if you really believe that babies in the womb are precious and valuable, they deserve equal protection,” she said, explaining she doesn’t support exceptions for rape or incest.

But Democrats, locally and across the country have called out the ban — as have some Republicans who otherwise say they oppose abortion, like Donald Trump. Three Republicans in the state House ultimately joined the Democratic minority to repeal the law.

“This is a stain on history that this ban even exists — from a time when the age of consent was 10, from a time when women didn’t have the right to vote,” Arizona state Sen. Eva Burch, a Democrat, previously told ABC News’ Elizabeth Schulze.

Advertisement

Anti-abortion groups are encouraging supporters of the near-total ban to again gather on the Capitol grounds on Wednesday to pressure Republicans to stick together and not join Democrats. Meanwhile, Arizona for Abortion Access organizers continue to gather signatures for a potential ballot initiative that would go before voters in November and would protect abortion up to the point of fetal viability, around 24 weeks into pregnancy.

House Republicans are considering proposing their own ballot measures for November to counter the pro-abortion access initiative.

“We don’t deserve to win the legislature if we cannot get it right on the basic tenets of our Republican platform, which is life,” said state GOP Sen. Anthony Kern.

If the repeal bill does not pass the state Senate, Democratic Sen. Sundareshan said her party would “keep fighting” by reintroducing bills or motions.

“We’ll do whatever is available to us to continue to fight to repeal this ban,” she told reporters on Tuesday. “And we will continue fighting to repeal all of the bans that remain on the books.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

Published

on

Video: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

new video loaded: Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

transcript

transcript

Police Arrest Columbia Protesters Occupying Hamilton Hall

Officers entered the building through a second-floor window using a bridge on top of an emergency service vehicle.

“The people united will never be defeated.” “So, we have hundreds of police officers, they’re surrounding the perimeter of the encampment. Most of them, well, actually, not all of them — some of them have their body camera lights flashing. They have club sticks, riot gear, handcuffs.” “There’s a student knocked unconscious. “We are all Palestinian.”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in New York

Continue Reading

Trending