Connect with us

News

Opinion: Why I’m ditching my comfy Canadian lifestyle for Ukraine

Published

on

Opinion: Why I’m ditching my comfy Canadian lifestyle for Ukraine

The image of a quaint village was based mostly on Bohdan Bociurkiw’s reminiscences of dwelling in western Ukraine as a scholar and scholar, shortly after he left a refugee camp in Europe and migrated to Canada in 1947.

Bucolic, peaceable and rustic, the scene all the time had satisfaction of place on the partitions of our numerous properties in Canada and world wide. For a few years, it was how us youngsters fantasized in regards to the land of our ancestors.

Now many years later I’ve returned to my dad and mom’ homeland to report on the battle for world media — and discover the sleepy village scene of reminiscence reworked right into a nightmare.

I’ve witnessed firsthand the destruction by Russian forces of enormous elements of Ukraine —together with villages not dissimilar to that sketched by my father — and am struck by a deep feeling of loss.

With the land of my ancestors going by means of this bloody, existential struggle for survival, the pull to stay is as highly effective as ever.

Advertisement

To be nearer to the battle — and a probably historic redrawing of Europe’s safety structure — is a significant cause why I’ve determined to surrender my enviable way of life on the Pacific Northwest.

I will likely be getting into the other way of many others in Ukraine, packing up my waterfront rental on Vancouver Island to be nearer to the entrance line to articulate why this complicated battle issues.

I’ve no illusions in regards to the potential hazard of basing myself in Lviv, a Ukrainian metropolis on NATO’s doorstep and close to key weapons provide routes for the navy.
In lots of elements of Ukraine, after greater than 100 days of battle, it is as unhealthy because it will get. The Russian navy has dedicated unspeakable potential battle crimes harking back to the horrors seen in Chechnya — together with studies of mass rape (together with of younger kids and aged grandmothers), taking pictures of civilians, cleaning of dissidents, abstract executions, filtration camps and the forcible deportation of a whole lot of 1000’s of Ukrainians to Russia.
A lot of my family members have been forcibly deported to the Soviet gulag, by no means to return. Who may have imagined that many years later Ukrainians are as soon as once more going through mass deportations in 2022.

As quickly as we had thought we had witnessed the final word of inhumanity, the Russian battle machine manages to show itself able to going even additional.

I believe that my late father would have reacted to the Russian invasion of Ukraine with little astonishment.

Having been the sufferer of Russian aggression and several other makes an attempt to silence his personal voice of dissent, what’s taking part in out now throughout the nation feels very very like historical past repeating itself — from the liquidation of Ukrainian tradition to the burning of church buildings (Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says Russian forces have “destroyed” 113 church buildings because the begin of the battle) and the stealing of grain from Ukrainian ports, to the mass pressured deportations to Russia.
My father, a Sovietologist with a give attention to church-state politics, was so despised by the Kremlin that he was prevented from returning to the then-Soviet Union to attend his personal mom’s funeral simply outdoors of Lviv. Up till Ukraine’s independence in 1991, he was refused entry to KGB archives for his ebook on the persecution of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.

Over the previous weeks, as I’ve walked the cobblestone streets of this metropolis discovered within the late Center Ages, I usually surprise if I could be retracing the footsteps of my father and different ancestors.

When the urge hits to complain of my spartan lodging, the nighttime air raid sirens or the stench in our bomb shelter, I believe again to the close to dying encounters my father had by the hands of the German Gestapo and Soviet authorities. He stored himself alive by creating works such because the homeland portray, which is why it holds particular which means to me.

Advertisement
On my many journeys to Ukraine I’ve all the time felt the religious pull in the direction of Lviv and now it has taken on higher significance as a humanitarian help hub and a brief secure haven for nearly 1 / 4 of 1,000,000 displaced individuals.
Properly earlier than the battle, Lviv was referred to as the birthplace of most of the patriotic heroes, artists and political leaders; the Ukrainian language is broadly spoken and its historic and cultural websites have earned it satisfaction of place as a UNESCO heritage web site.
That’s the reason I’ve lengthy feared {that a} twisted thoughts comparable to Putin’s would regard it as a tempting goal. Thus far the historic Lviv metropolis heart has been spared however long-range Russian missiles have struck close by on a number of events, together with as not too long ago as June 1. To see so lots of its prized cultural artifacts and church home windows shrouded or boarded up pains the guts.
Writer Michael Bociurkiw and his father Bohdan "many years ago as he bid me farewell on another travel adventure."

Whereas the main focus of the brutality has been within the east — a whole lot of kilometers away in locations comparable to Mariupol and Donetsk and Luhansk — cities comparable to Lviv have additionally despatched their little kids into battle in massive numbers.

Prior to now weeks in central Lviv, it is change into inconceivable to disregard the each day funerals for Ukrainian servicemen who’ve come house from the entrance line. On some days three at a time are despatched to relaxation. The historic Lychakiv cemetery the place they’re taken is now overflowing to the purpose the place recent graves needed to be dug outdoors its hallowed partitions.

Regardless of the losses on the Ukrainian aspect, help for the battle stays excessive. We have seen it on a regular basis in patriotic slogans comparable to ‘Slava Ukraini’ (glory to Ukraine) which have change into on a regular basis greetings.

Watching the tearful goodbyes on the navy funerals or in my go to to Lychakiv, I get the sensation that family members nonetheless really feel a way of satisfaction for his or her sons paying the final word worth to defend their homeland. At a double funeral final week, the priest instructed the households of the departed: “Your sons are nonetheless working arduous from the heavens to guard you; they have not actually left us.”

A Ukrainian pal, Ania, not too long ago requested me what number of occasions I’ve cried because the battle began. I replied twice — and virtually one other time dwell on CNN.

Earlier, when the threats to Lviv, my base for many of this battle have been way more acute, easy acts like having a shower or having fun with a meal out appeared treasured given it may very well be the final for some time if we have been pressured to evacuate. Hugs with family members change into tighter. Desires begin to embody photographs of battle. It takes lots much less to set off tears.

Not too long ago I left Ukraine for a break and to begin, at the very least for me, what will likely be a major relocation. Battle brings a readability of thoughts. You shortly notice how little you should dwell on and that life is fleeting. I’ve found I’m in the correct place, on the proper time, doing precisely the factor for which I’m finest suited.

Advertisement

Life is unusual however stunning. Only a few days in the past, as I packed up my waterfront rental, a beautiful native couple dropped by to gather furnishings for incoming Ukrainian refugees. I’m nonetheless making an attempt to course of the circle of historical past that introduced itself right here. Belongings that have been handed all the way down to me from dad and mom who needed to flee Ukraine many years in the past are going to individuals fleeing violence in the identical nation.

Tato can be proud.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending