Connect with us

News

Opinion: Trump’s unlikely Manhattan saga faces unprecedented moment | CNN

Published

on

Opinion: Trump’s unlikely Manhattan saga faces unprecedented moment | CNN

Editor’s Notice: Signal as much as get this weekly column as a e-newsletter. We’re wanting again on the strongest, smartest opinion takes of the week from CNN and different retailers.



CNN
 — 

In 1971, an Ivy League graduate in his mid-20s rented a studio condo on Third Avenue and seventy fifth road in New York Metropolis. The window appeared out on an adjoining constructing’s water tank.

“I … tried to divide it up in order that it will appear greater. However it doesn’t matter what I did, it was nonetheless a darkish, dingy little condo. Even so, I liked it,” wrote former President Donald Trump in his 1987 guide, “The Artwork of the Deal,” co-authored with Tony Schwartz. “You must perceive; I used to be a child from Queens who labored in Brooklyn, and all of a sudden I had an condo on the Higher East Aspect. … I turned a metropolis man as an alternative of a child from the boroughs.”

Trump was not the final individual to fall below the spell of Manhattan, with its quick tempo, its hovering towers and its glamorous celebrities. There, he would construct his profession, endure divorces and enterprise bankruptcies, grow to be a legendary determine via his starring position on “The Apprentice” and mount an unlikely marketing campaign for president.

Advertisement

In the end, he’d grow to be the primary New Yorker since Franklin D. Roosevelt to make it to the White Home. However Trump’s Manhattan saga may very well be coming to an in depth on Tuesday only some miles from the place it started, when he’s scheduled to seem in a downtown courtroom to face felony costs.

As with nearly every little thing concerning the former president, there’s no actual precedent for the most recent chapter of his story — and no method to inform the way it will finish.

“It lastly occurred,” wrote authorized analyst Jennifer Rodgers. “After a number of investigations over half a dozen years, former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a grand jury in New York, in accordance with sources acquainted with the matter. Trump fired again, calling the indictment ‘political persecution’ and warned ‘this Witch-Hunt’ will backfire.”

“Although we not but know the small print of the costs, we do know that Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg had been investigating Trump in connection together with his alleged position in a hush cash cover-up scheme involving grownup movie star Stormy Daniels throughout his 2016 presidential marketing campaign…It’s the first time any former president has been criminally charged. As such, we’re getting into uncharted territory.”

“It ought to be evident that nobody is above the regulation, and that Trump ought to be held accountable for his actions in the best way that some other citizen could be. These costs characterize step one towards accountability, however the journey shall be lengthy and winding.”

Advertisement

Trump can proceed working for the Republican nomination for president in 2024 and if he can delay the prosecution and is elected, Rodgers identified, “count on him to argue that the case towards him have to be dismissed as unconstitutional primarily based on the Justice Division’s 2000 steering {that a} president can’t be indicted ‘or tried’ whereas in workplace.”

Elie Honig argued that the primary hurdle for Manhattan District Lawyer Alvin Bragg is to beat any movement by Trump’s lawyer to dismiss the costs. However even when he succeeds there, his prosecutors must persuade 12 jurors to vote unanimously to convict.

“Even when a case was tried in part of the nation the place Trump isn’t highly regarded, statistically you might be very more likely to find yourself with a number of Trump voters on the jury of 12 folks,” mentioned Honig. “A choose would inform jurors to place apart their political opinions and private beliefs — however I do know from my days as a prosecutor that jurors are human beings, not robots — they’re topic to the identical feelings, biases, and incentives as any individual could be. And the authorized bar at trial is much greater than within the grand jury…”

Within the political area, “there’s a distinct chance that Trump not solely survives but in addition thrives,” wrote Julian Zelizer. “Trump has an uncanny intuition for utilizing moments of peril to his benefit and his political profession is constructed on punching again towards the folks and establishments he claims are unfairly attacking him. He has already fallen again on the well-worn technique of presenting himself because the sufferer of a corrupt institution and rallying his supporters behind him.”

Advertisement

“It have to be mentioned that of all of the authorized troubles Trump faces, the indictment in New York seems to pale compared to others, such because the potential racketeering and conspiracy costs Atlanta-area prosecutors are contemplating in connection to the try and overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.”

Within the Washington Publish, Henry Olsen wrote, “Anybody who cares about equity in our felony justice system ought to be queasy that Donald Trump shall be prosecuted in one of many nation’s most liberal jurisdictions. By all accounts, this ought to be a federal case.”

“New York state’s total judicial course of is managed by Democrats who might lose their positions in celebration primaries. Alvin Bragg, the district legal professional overseeing the case, boasted throughout his marketing campaign that he had sued Trump or his administration greater than 100 occasions throughout his tenure within the state legal professional common’s workplace, one thing he in all probability did to curry favor with main voters who detest Trump. Each New York state choose who would both strive the case or hear an attraction is elected on a partisan foundation, too. It could take plenty of braveness for a choose to use the regulation pretty and doubtlessly ignore their voters’ want for vengeance.”

05 opinion column 0401

Sorrow, anger and frustration had been among the many feelings folks felt after yet one more college capturing final week — this time in Nashville, Tennessee, the place three kids and three adults had been killed at The Covenant Faculty on Monday.

Jillian Peterson and James Densley have been learning the life histories of practically 200 mass shooters since 1996. Their findings are instructive — “85% confirmed related warning indicators of a disaster and 92% had been suicidal. Additional, 93% of faculty mass shooters communicated violent intent forward of time and 86% confirmed a excessive diploma of planning earlier than the capturing. Lastly, 73% of all college mass shooters had a historical past of childhood trauma…”

Advertisement

All of this raises the query of the best way to forestall shootings. And so they argued that on this entrance, there’s a optimistic growth — a transfer to carry dad and mom accountable in sure instances:

“The dad and mom of a teen who shot and killed 4 college students at Oxford Excessive Faculty in Michigan in November 2021 are set to face trial for involuntary manslaughter after an appellate court docket final week rejected their rivalry that the costs haven’t any authorized justification,” Peterson and Densely noticed.

“James and Jennifer Crumbley, who’ve pleaded not responsible, allegedly uncared for cries for assist from their son for months and dismissed critical considerations from the college the day earlier than and the morning of the capturing. But at the same time as they apparently ignored warning indicators, the Crumbleys purchased their son a gun and took him to focus on observe. Fifteen on the time of the mass capturing, their son pleaded responsible in October to terrorism and homicide costs.”

06 opinion column 0401

President Joe Biden touted efforts to oppose autocratic governments ultimately week’s White Home democracy summit, co-hosted by Costa Rica, the Netherlands, South Korea and Zambia.

However there was one nation lacking from the gathering — Afghanistan, wrote Peter Bergen.

Advertisement

“This makes the premise of the democracy summit ring considerably hole as a result of whereas the Biden administration does a wonderful job of trumpeting its commitments to democracy and ladies’s rights, solely a yr and a half in the past, it cavalierly deserted 40 million Afghans to the Taliban’s misogynistic theocracy.”

Home Republicans are investigating the tumultuous US withdrawal from Afghanistan and there’s a congressionally mandated bipartisan fee analyzing the complete 20-year conflict in Afghanistan. “After all, any examination of the US report in Afghanistan is one thing of a double-edged sword for Republicans,” Bergen famous, “because it was the Trump administration that signed the settlement with the Taliban in 2020 that set the stage for the entire US withdrawal from Afghanistan.”

The drama taking part in out in Israel this week supplied an indicator of how protest could make a distinction in a democracy. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who’s again in workplace on the power of an excessive right-wing coalition, has been urgent for an overhaul of the nation’s judiciary to put it firmly below the management of the Knesset. “For Netanyahu, the plan was handy,” wrote Frida Ghitis. “It created the opportunity of escaping his personal authorized woes, since one of many controversial payments lately handed would make it harder for a main minister to be declared unfit for workplace…

“It might sound an arcane concern to set off an enormous fashionable rebellion, however Israelis promptly concluded their democracy was at stake, and what adopted was some of the far-reaching, disciplined and decided waves of protests inside a democratic nation in latest reminiscence.”

“On Monday, below practically insufferable stress, Netanyahu agreed to postpone the overhaul -— which was being rammed via the Knesset — till the subsequent legislative time period. The disaster, nonetheless, shouldn’t be over.”

Advertisement

For extra:

Anshel Pfeffer: What on earth was Netanyahu pondering?

“Breakups suck.” So goes the introductory video for a marketing campaign that New Zealand is conducting to assist folks deal with relationships which have ended. “Our conduct doesn’t must” comply with swimsuit, wrote Holly Thomas.

“The nation’s Love Higher marketing campaign … goals to assist younger folks get well from breakups and construct resilience. The marketing campaign features a devoted cellphone, textual content or e-mail helpline run by Youthline, a company devoted to supporting folks ages 12 to 24.”

“It’s a part of a broader technique to assist eradicate household and sexual violence, and it follows a survey of 1,200 16-24-year-olds, 68% of whom reported experiences encompassing self-harm, substance abuse, dangerous sexual behaviors and violence and coercion following rejection. Given the breadth of the potential harm, it’s wild that campaigns like these aren’t ubiquitous in different nations as properly … On the very least, it will enhance our collective psychological well being. At most, it would save lives.”

Advertisement

Is Utah main the best way in fixing what’s mistaken with social media? Kara Alaimo thinks so. Below two new state legal guidelines, “social media corporations must confirm the ages of all customers within the state, and youngsters below age 18 must get permission from their dad and mom to have accounts.”

“Dad and mom may even be capable to entry their children’ accounts, apps received’t be allowed to point out kids adverts, and accounts for youths received’t be capable to be used between 10:30 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. with out parental permission.”

“It’s about time,” wrote Alaimo. “Social networks in america have grow to be doubtlessly extremely harmful for youngsters, and oldsters can now not defend our youngsters with out the instruments and safeguards this regulation supplies. … Congress ought to comply with Utah’s lead and enact an analogous regulation to guard each little one on this nation.”

04 opinion column 0401

For extra:

Mary Ziegler and Naomi Cahn: From Michelangelo’s David to the 2024 presidential race, ‘dad and mom’ rights’ are all over the place

Advertisement

Final weekend, Russian President Vladimir Putin expanded on his plans to station nuclear weapons in Belarus, which borders each Russia and Ukraine. There was little or no new within the announcement, wrote Keir Giles, however it nonetheless set off alarms that the analyst thinks are exaggerated.

“The flurry of alarmist reporting on what this meant highlights a lot of what’s mistaken with Western responses to Russian nuclear intimidation.”

“How Putin’s phrases have been spun within the West could also be a shock to Moscow — however there’s little question it is going to be a extremely gratifying one. As a result of Russia has already ‘used’ nuclear weapons. It’s used them extremely efficiently with out firing them, by buying and selling on empty threats about potential nuclear strikes to very successfully deter the West from absolutely supporting Ukraine towards Russia’s imperialist conflict.”

“By now although, we should always have realized to not confuse what Putin has mentioned with what Russia has performed or is about to do.”

03 opinion column 0401

David Axelrod: The sports activities whiz who may simply save Main League Baseball

Advertisement

Marja Heinonen: Finland’s the happiest nation as soon as once more. Right here’s how we do it

Christina Wyman: How Michelle Obama is deploying her superpower of vulnerability

Sophia Brown: I selected New Faculty as a result of I didn’t have to depart my id on the campus door

02 opinion column 0401

Allison Hope: This Transgender Day of Visibility is extra necessary than ever

Lola Akinmade Åkerström: Why is Sweden afraid of publishing this guide on race?

Advertisement

AND…

01 the real captain american opinion

A yr earlier than the US entered World Struggle II, a gutsy artist and his writing colleague launched a brand new superhero, with the debut cowl of the brand new comedian exhibiting him punching the Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.

Captain America was born, greater than 82 years in the past. In a bit for CNN Opinion, Roy Schwartz explored his again story, and that of the artist, who adopted the identify of Jack Kirby. Each author and artist had been the youngsters of Jewish immigrants.

Schwartz wrote that Kirby’s son mentioned “he was fearful and livid on the rise of Nazism in Europe and the US, particularly after (British prime minister Neville) Chamberlain’s appeasement and Kristallnacht. He and Simon created their hero in direct response, and Kirby plainly said, ‘Captain America was myself.’ When he drew him punching Hitler, it was his ‘personal anger coming to the floor.’”

That was removed from Kirby’s solely contribution to the historical past of comics.

Advertisement

As Schwartz famous, “After the conflict, superheroes fell out of favor and Kirby wrote and drew different genres of comics. When Stan Lee, by then the editor and head author at what would quickly be named Marvel, requested him to strive superheroes once more in 1961, the 2 created collectively the Unbelievable 4, the Hulk, Thor, Ant-Man, Iron Man, the Avengers, the X-Males, Black Panther and numerous others. This, mixed together with his inventive innovation, earned Kirby the moniker ‘King of Comics.’ It additionally made him some of the influential artists of the twentieth century.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Published

on

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Your investigation of these allegations is consistent with the IG’s mission to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in federal agencies, and can help determine if politically connected crypto interests are undermining our national security. As Congress considers legislation on the market structure for digital assets, we must ensure that cryptocurrencies like USD1 are not providing the President and senior officials with the ability to line their pockets at the expense of the public interest.

The following facts have been reported in multiple outlets regarding Mr. Witkoff:

• Mr. Witkoff’s son Zach Witkoff is the CEO of World Liberty Financial (WLF), which the President’s family owns a majority stake in.³
• Beginning in January, one of Sheikh Tahnoon’s employees, Fiacc Larkin, joined WLF as the “chief strategic advisor” while continuing to work at G42, an AI investment firm owned by Sheikh Tahnoon that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, works closely with Chinese military companies.4



On May 1, 2025, Zach Witkoff announced that MGX, a state-owned investment firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, had agreed to use a WLF-issued stablecoin, USD1, to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. As a result of this deal, WLF stands to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction fees from MGX, and more from the returns on any investments it makes with the $2 billion deposit.³
As of August, Mr. Witkoff maintained a financial interest in WLF and thus stands to personally benefit from his son’s business dealings with the UAE.6 Nevertheless, he did not recuse himself from deliberations regarding the UAE, which may violate federal ethics law.

The following facts have been reported about Mr. Sacks:







He is a special government employee who continues to serve as a “general partner” at his venture capital fund, Craft Ventures.

8

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, an Emirati sovereign wealth fund controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, was an early investor in Craft Ventures and continues to hold an investment in the fund.
In addition, Craft Ventures is invested in BitGo, which has partnered with WLF to provide the technical infrastructure for USD1. If BitGo’s valuation grows, based on the UAE’s investment into USD1, Mr. Sacks and his firm stand to benefit.

3 Yahoo Finance, “Trump family reportedly has a 60% stake in the World Liberty Financial,” Anand Sinha, March 31, 2025,
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-reportedly-60-stake-172742661.html.
4 New York Times, “Inside U.S. Efforts to Untangle an A.I. Giant’s Ties to China,” Mark Mazzetti and Edward
Wong, Nov. 27, 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/us/politics/ai-us-uae-china-security-g42.html.
5 New York Times, “At a Dubai Conference, Trump’s Conflicts Take Center Stage,” David Yaffe-Bellany, May 1, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/us/politics/trump-cryptocurrency-usd1-dubai-conference-

announcement.html.

6U.S Office of Government Ethics, Form 278e for Steven C. Witkoff, August 13, 2025, p. 23, https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/090d0de07e1d2fdf/bbf02867-full.pdf.

18 U.S.C. § 208.

8 White House, “Limited Waiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) Regarding A.I. Assets,” June 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/David-Sacks.pdf.

2

Continue Reading

News

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Published

on

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Nigel Farage has refused to criticise Donald Trump’s claims that paracetamol, sold in the US as Tylenol, could cause autism, insisting “science is never settled” and he would never “side with” medical experts.

The Reform UK leader said he had “no idea” if the US president was right to tell pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, also known as Tylenol and paracetamol, and suggesting that those who could not “tough it out” should limit their intake.

Scientists and global health agencies including the World Health Organization have strongly dismissed Trump’s false claims, calling them misguided and saying the evidence linking paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism was “inconsistent”.

The UK’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the British public they should not “pay any attention whatsoever to what Donald Trump says about medicine”, adding: “I trust doctors over President Trump frankly, on this.”

But in a wide-ranging interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Farage was asked directly if Trump was right to share those unproven claims. He said: “I have no idea, I’ve no idea. You know we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows Nick, I don’t know.

Advertisement

“He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism. I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I’ve no idea.”

When Farage was asked if he would side with medical experts who say it is dangerous to make the link, he added: “I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody, right? You know? I don’t side with anybody, because science is never settled. We should remember that.”

Yet when challenged over whether it was irresponsible for Trump to make such an unproven claim, Farage said: “That’s an opinion he’s [Trump’s] got. It’s not one that I necessarily share.”

Farage’s refusal to condemn Trump’s claims comes weeks after a controversial doctor, Aseem Malhotra, was given top billing at Reform UK’s party conference and used his main-stage speech to claim the Covid vaccine caused cancer in the royal family. Malhotra is an adviser to Trump’s health secretary, Robert F Kennedy.

In the same interview, Farage said Trump was “right to say” that sharia law “is an issue in London”.

Advertisement

“Never take what he [Trump] says literally, ever on anything. But always take everything he says seriously,” Farage said, adding: Trump “has a point.”

“So is he right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No. Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

Labour MPs have urged Keir Starmer to reprimand Trump’s administration after the US president falsely claimed in a speech to the United Nations: “I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed.

skip past newsletter promotion

“Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.”

Trump has been publicly attacking the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, since 2015 when the Labour politician criticised Trump, the then presidential candidate, for suggesting that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.

A spokesperson for Khan said: “We are not going to dignify his appalling and bigoted comments with a response. London is the greatest city in the world, safer than major US cities and we’re delighted to welcome the record number of US citizens moving here.”

During the LBC phone-in, Farage also said Reform’s plan to ban anyone who was not a UK citizen from claiming benefits would not apply to Ukrainians and Hongkongers.

Advertisement

“No, because they come for different reasons,” Farage said, adding those who had lived in the UK on indefinite leave to remain and had not worked or paid into the system would be told their benefits would be cut.

Continue Reading

News

Alphabet market value exceeds $3tn

Published

on

Alphabet market value exceeds tn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Alphabet’s market capitalisation surged above $3tn for the first time on Monday on the back of a sharp rally for the search giant’s shares over the past few weeks.

Shares in Google’s parent company have climbed more than 30 per cent to a record high of $252 since the group posted double-digit growth in revenue and profit in quarterly results out in late July.

The rally means Alphabet joins Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple as the only US companies valued above $3tn. Chipmaker Nvidia in July became the first company to hit a $4tn market value.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending