Connect with us

News

Opinion: The struggle to hold Putin accountable

Published

on

Opinion: The struggle to hold Putin accountable

So when the horrors of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine play out in full view, when a Kyiv suburb is become a killing area, when a missile strikes a practice terminal filled with folks attempting to flee the battle, there is a highly effective impulse for justice. But, with the West ruling out army motion in assist of Ukraine for concern of sparking a wider battle, there are limits to what sanctions and symbolic steps can obtain.

“With each picture of a murdered civilian mendacity on the sidewalk in a Ukrainian city devastated by occupying Russian forces, with each interview of a tearful lady mourning useless relations by the aspect of a grave, the extent of frustration rises world wide,” wrote Frida Ghitis.

“How can Russian President Vladimir Putin get away with openly assaulting a neighboring nation, concentrating on noncombatants and killing hundreds of harmless folks whereas repeatedly claiming his troops will not be committing atrocities or aiming at civilians? Cannot he be stopped?”

The West’s response to Putin’s invasion has been threefold — delivery arms to Ukraine, slapping sanctions on Russia and supporting symbolic measures like Thursday’s UN Normal Meeting vote to expel Russia from the UN Human Rights Council.

“That the UNGA was in a position to concern a damning indictment by expelling it from the UNHRC reveals that, profoundly flawed as it’s, the UN nonetheless offers a spot for the expression of the world’s outrage,” Ghitis noticed.

Advertisement
“However barring Putin’s Russia from the UNHRC is a purely symbolic act. It is not going to save a single life. Until, that’s, it turns into the primary transfer in an effort to restore the structure of worldwide diplomatic establishments.”

‘Genocide’

After visiting Bucha, the place the our bodies of slain civilians have been discovered mendacity within the streets, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky branded Russia’s actions a “genocide” and referred to as for prosecuting these answerable for the atrocities. The Biden administration responded “cautiously to any references to genocide in Ukraine,” wrote Daniel Rothenberg. “And rightly so; genocide is a fancy authorized idea, which many specialists think about tough to use and extensively misused.” However given the reasoning Putin has introduced for the battle, “together with Russia’s army actions and what UN officers have described as concentrating on of civilians, the time period genocide might nicely apply to what we’re seeing in Ukraine.”

Putin argued earlier than the invasion “that there isn’t a authentic Ukrainian state that represents the Ukrainian folks’s proper to self-determination. In a February 21 speech, Putin defined ‘since time immemorial, the folks residing within the southwest of what has traditionally been Russian land have referred to as themselves Russians and Orthodox Christians.’ He went on to explain fashionable Ukraine as a false development, presenting these supporting Ukrainian sovereignty as terrorists and neo-Nazis,” added Rothenberg, a professor at Arizona State College.

Ruti Teitel, an knowledgeable on worldwide regulation and a professor at New York Legislation Faculty, noticed that “the regulation of battle has lengthy prohibited intentional assaults on civilians, referred to as noncombatants, in addition to assaults that don’t distinguish between civilian and army targets.”

“A report this week by Human Rights Watch, primarily based on interviews with eyewitnesses, victims and native residents of Russia-occupied territories between February 27 and March 14, paperwork many regulation of battle violations. Interviewees described repeated rape and abstract killings, in addition to threats in opposition to civilians.”

“A few of these offenses, particularly these coming to mild in Bucha, might not solely be battle crimes however possess such gravity as to be thought of crimes in opposition to humanity.”

US officers revealed extra sanctions in opposition to Russia final week, concentrating on two grownup daughters of Vladimir Putin, together with relations of different Russian leaders and two huge Russian banks. However to this point, sanctions apparently have not succeeded in deterring the army marketing campaign in opposition to Ukraine.

Advertisement

“The ratcheting-up of sanctions on Russia offers the world the phantasm that actual motion is happening on Ukraine,” wrote Peter Bergen, “however will they’ve any impact on Putin’s decision-making? Historical past means that that is fairly unlikely.”

“Certainly, the entire idea behind sanctions is essentially flawed because it assumes that strongmen like Putin will change their insurance policies if sufficient ache is inflicted on them, their cronies and their populations.”

For extra:

Peter Bergen: What’s behind Russia’s historical past of atrocities
Cristina Florea: Putin is aware of that controlling historical past is the important thing to complete energy

Supreme Court docket’s new justice

With strong assist from Democrats and the votes of three Republicans, the Senate confirmed Ketanji Brown Jackson to the US Supreme Court docket.

Peniel E. Joseph captured the historic significance of the second, alluding to Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famed Riverside Church speech 55 years in the past this week: “King’s work to construct a extra simply, inclusive and equitable society is alive in Jackson. As soon as confirmed, she would be the solely Supreme Court docket justice in American historical past to not solely be a Black lady however to have served as a public defender. Her efforts to carry empathy and compassion to the prison justice system are a mirrored image of King’s dream to construct a beloved neighborhood in America, one whereby establishments acknowledged the humanity of Black folks and underdogs from marginalized communities world wide.”

Tomiko Brown-Nagin, who wrote a biography of Constance Baker Motley, the primary Black lady appointed as a federal decide, famous that “It has taken over 230 years to succeed in this auspicious second. Till 1967, when former President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court docket, presidents solely chosen White males to function justices. And for tons of of years, race and gender not solely outlined the courtroom’s membership, however the courtroom, in its selections, additionally served as an instrument of discrimination in opposition to folks of colour and girls …”

“We should always not solely have fun the achievement of 1 exceptionally completed Black lady. We should additionally work more durable than ever to create a extra equitable society — one which helps the event of excessive achievers from each background and each neighborhood in America.”

The Republican few

Advertisement
Democrats might have confirmed Jackson with solely their celebration’s votes, however some observers praised the Republicans who supported the nomination. Rep. Charlie Dent, a member of the GOP, wrote, “Most senators usually disqualify a Supreme Court docket nominee of the opposing celebration on ideological grounds, whilst they acknowledge the robust {qualifications} and good character of the nominees themselves,” Dent noticed, after Sen. Susan Collins introduced that she would again Jackson. “America wants extra leaders with guts, and we have now one in Sen. Susan Collins. The nation can be nicely served if we had a number of dozen extra like her in workplace.”
In distinction, the Republican chief within the Senate, Mitch McConnell, would not decide to holding a listening to for Biden’s future Supreme Court docket nominees, if the GOP wins management of the Senate within the November midterm election.
An uglier observe was sounded by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who lashed out on the three GOP supporters of Jackson’s nomination on Twitter, Jill Filipovic noticed. “When a sitting US congresswoman offers oxygen to a harmful conspiracy idea by falsely accusing her colleagues of being ‘pro-pedophile,’ the nation has an issue — and her celebration has an pressing obligation to repair it.

“Sadly, the difficulty right here is deeper than one unhinged congresswoman. It is the unhinged, morally bankrupt and chronically dishonest habits of lots of the celebration’s main voices.”

For extra on politics:

SE Cupp: Matt Gaetz’s pathetic stunt falls flat
Dean Obeidallah: Lawmaker falsely claiming Trump caught bin Laden completely sums up in the present day’s GOP

Barack and Joe

Twelve years after the passage of the Reasonably priced Care Act, former President Barack Obama returned to the White Home to mark the event together with his former Veep, President Joe Biden.

Paul Begala, who served within the Clinton White Home, famous a shift in how Biden approached the event. “Quite than simply praising what Democrats completed via the ACA, the President defined how Republicans might undermine these beneficial properties and depart Individuals worse off — a framing his Democratic colleagues can be smart to be aware of.”

“Democrats ought to construct a marketing campaign message across the menace Republicans pose reasonably than search an attaboy from people who find themselves in no temper to thank anybody,” wrote Begala. “I communicate from expertise. Heading into the 1994 midterm elections, my then-boss, former President Invoice Clinton, needed each Democratic member of Congress to hold round playing cards on which we would printed all the nice issues the celebration had delivered to the American folks: the Household and Medical Depart Act, tax cuts for working households, the creation of AmeriCorps, a ban on assault weapons, the Violence In opposition to Ladies Act — and extra. We misplaced 52 Home seats and eight Senate seats.”

At one other occasion, Obama was confronted with questions in regards to the battle in Ukraine and his dealing with of relations with Putin’s Russia. SE Cupp wrote that “Obama was requested point-blank if he needs he’d been stronger on Putin understanding what we do now.”

He replied, “I really do not, as a result of the circumstances have been completely different.’”

Advertisement

In a 2012 debate in opposition to Republican Mitt Romney, Obama faulted his opponent for labeling Russia America’s biggest geopolitical foe. Requested final week about his causes for not arming Ukraine, Obama mentioned: “We have been involved about ensuring that we didn’t give (Russia) an excuse for one more incursion,” and “You had points of coaching.” As Cupp famous, “He stunningly defined how we bought to a spot the place Russia believed it might invade a sovereign nation. He mentioned, Western democracies ‘have gotten complacent.’ Seemingly, the sort of warning Romney was flagging in 2012.”

“It is exhausting to think about an individual being much less self-reflective and extra dug in on an apparent international coverage blunder, and one which you may simply argue helped lay the trail for this present invasion.”

Ivanka and Jared

Two members of former President Donald Trump’s household have spent hours testifying earlier than the Home choose committee investigating the Capitol riot, in distinction to onetime Trump associates like Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, who’ve refused to cooperate.

“It is notable that Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner selected to voluntarily cooperate,” wrote Michael D’Antonio. “This alternative saved them from the prospect of being subpoenaed and compelled to determine whether or not to testify below the specter of being cited for contempt.”

“As somebody who was within the Oval Workplace on January 6,” Ivanka “might have supplied particular reminiscences of occasions. Committee members are notably focused on any discussions about Donald Trump’s 2:28 p.m. tweet chastising Vice President Mike Pence for not supporting the plan to dam certification of Biden’s electoral win. They’re additionally curious in regards to the planning and her father’s frame of mind on that day.”

“It is exhausting to think about that anybody on the earth can higher assess Trump’s frame of mind than his daughter. The Trumps lengthy operated their enterprise as an in depth household unit, which meant she labored with him immediately. She appeared to take pleasure in an uncommon latitude when it got here to establishing an unbiased id.”

Advertisement

Elon Musk’s Twitter shock

“I need to die on Mars,” Elon Musk has famously mentioned. “Simply not on influence.” This week, the outspoken entrepreneur (and world’s richest man) had a unique sort of influence — he introduced that he had taken a 9% stake in Twitter and was appointed to the corporate’s board.

As Julian Zelizer wrote, “Musk, a robust advocate of free speech who has used Twitter to unfold disinformation and mock politicians, has already urged he would work with the corporate to make ‘vital enhancements’ … In the meantime, some conservatives are calling on Musk to permit Trump again on the platform after the previous President was completely suspended two days after the January 6, 2021, assault on the US Capitol ‘because of the danger of additional incitement of violence.’”

“The potential for Trump to regain entry to Twitter might have a major influence on the 2024 Republican primaries, assuming the previous President is planning to run once more. Twitter was integral to Trump’s political success, and if his accounts are restored, he would have immense leverage to safe the Republican presidential nomination and improve his place in a basic election.”

Trump’s Twitter various, “Fact Social, is flailing,” Kara Alaimo wrote. “It was purported to be ‘totally operational’ by the top of final month, in keeping with its father or mother firm’s chief govt, former Rep. Devin Nunes of California. However now, it is affected by a scarcity of content material, technical points and the resignations of high executives.”

It is no shock, Alaimo argued. “To join Fact Social is to lend legitimacy to the previous President and his habits. It is no surprise that a variety of corporations and other people aren’t clamoring to take action: they acknowledge that becoming a member of would trigger self-inflicted reputational harm to themselves by mere affiliation. In consequence, it merely is not doable for this social community to take off on a major scale.”

Conservatives tackle Disney

Conservatives in Florida and different states are passing payments to control what youngsters might be taught in colleges. Alongside these efforts, a rising cohort of publishers is providing content material designed “to seal conservatives’ youngsters off from a broader tradition,” as Nicole Hemmer famous.

“‘Are your youngsters being brainwashed?’”

“That is the query that greets guests to the Tuttle Twins web site, which sells libertarian youngsters’s books. The books, written by Connor Boyack, are supposed to defend youngsters from the ‘socialism and woke-ism’ that the web site says American instructional and cultural establishments are ‘pushing into the minds of our youngsters.’ A cartoon on the location reveals a mom wielding a Tuttle Twins defend whereas defending her frightened youngsters, absorbing the arrows of socialism, Marxism, collectivism, and ‘media lies.’”

Advertisement
“Throw within the Every day Wire’s vow to spend $100 million on conservative youngsters’s packages to oppose Disney in its battle with Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis — and Glenn Beck’s secretive new Florida Challenge, launched to counter Disney’s so-called ‘homosexual agenda’ — and you’ve got the emergence of a full-on right-wing youngsters’s leisure complicated. Its sole mission: to struggle what the proper sees as liberal indoctrination with some indoctrination of its personal.”

Do not miss

Artwork Acevedo: These legal guidelines tie regulation enforcement’s palms behind their backs
Roy Schwartz: The world of ‘Morbius’ was born over 9,000 years in the past
Marta L Tellado: The silent menace in your burger wrapper
David A. Andelman: Putin casts a shadow over Macron’s reelection bid
Yanzhong Huang: Why Xi cannot give up zero-Covid

AND…

Sports activities comebacks

After a lockout-shortened spring coaching, Main League Baseball’s Opening Day lastly arrived. The game “which was as soon as the preferred within the nation, has a bevy of issues which have landed it, at greatest, a distant second place in America’s hearts. That is very true amongst America’s youth,” wrote Harry Enten.

Additionally making an attempt a comeback was golf legend Tiger Woods, who competed within the 86th Masters event this weekend.

“It was simply over a yr in the past when the world was shocked by the information that Woods had been in a horrible automotive accident in Los Angeles,” Roxanne Jones recalled. “Woods’ proper leg almost needed to be amputated however was saved by emergency surgical procedure. Afterward, many questioned whether or not Woods ever stroll once more, not to mention play golf.”

Remarkably, Woods “completed the opening spherical at 71, 1 below par. He was 4 strokes behind the chief, South Korea’s Sungjae Im.” Woods fell additional behind within the third spherical Saturday. “Nonetheless, as we have seen so many occasions,” Jones wrote, “even when Woods is just not profitable, he elevates the sport and every thing round it, as evidenced by the massive crowds and intense media buzz in Augusta, Georgia … They name it the ‘Tiger Impact.’ And it has ceaselessly modified the best way we see the sport of golf.”
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending