Connect with us

News

Opinion: Garbage, blasted glass, and the women cleaning up political filth in Lebanon

Published

on

Opinion: Garbage, blasted glass, and the women cleaning up political filth in Lebanon
We’re obsessive about cleansing our houses in Lebanon. I feel it’s inter-generational, inherited from a long time of struggle and battle, and exacerbated by the truth that our nation is so soiled. We dwell in one of the vital polluted locations within the area, with nearly zero public providers.
Not that our protests in opposition to the federal government’s failure to successfully present rubbish assortment modified a lot — trash has been piling up ever since. Simply this week the United Nations Particular Rapporteur on excessive poverty and human rights revealed a report primarily stating that Lebanon’s present distress was avoidable.
Lebanon is within the grip of one of many worst financial collapses of the century and remains to be reeling from the 2020 Beirut explosion, the world’s largest non-nuclear blast. And this man-made catastrophe we discover ourselves in, stated the UN report, has “deep roots in a venal political system plagued with conflicts of curiosity.”

Now, simply hours forward of Lebanon’s parliamentary election on Sunday, voters are anticipated to solid a poll amidst distress, threats and corruption. It is the primary vote because the monetary implosion and civil protests of 2019, and Beirut blast a 12 months later, with newcomers hoping to interrupt the lengthy stranglehold of ruling sectarian politicians.

On the eve of those elections, there are extra ladies operating than ever earlier than — a 37% improve in candidates from 2018. The final time Lebanon went to the polls, ladies’s parliamentary illustration additionally elevated — from 3% to five%.

However although the numbers look like headed in the correct path, they do not actually inform the complete story.

Sure, a report variety of ladies are operating — however the proportion to males is dismal. Extra ladies are assured sufficient to run for parliament. However elsewhere, extra ladies are additionally migrating. Extra ladies are unemployed. With Covid-19, home violence elevated and ladies suffered, particularly migrant home employees who really feel underneath captivity protected by the kafala system.
As ladies, we undergo essentially the most from a century-old patriarchal system. We’re segregated from one another as a result of sectarian politics implies that 15 completely different spiritual courts get to rule over our our bodies and lives. Even earlier than the economic system crashed, ladies have been a mere 23% of the labor drive.

The protests got here because the nation stood at a political crossroads. Demonstrators railed in opposition to corruption and demanded accountability from politicians who had disadvantaged us of fundamental providers for 3 a long time. We referred to as for the correct to be acknowledged as residents — not topics to warlords who stored us captive as ladies underneath spiritual legal guidelines.

The protests have been additionally intersectional, displaying solidarity with underprivileged ladies, and in doing so demanded the implementation of Lebanon’s structure that had been trampled on by the warlords.

Certainly, Lebanese ladies have been on the forefront of each try to overhaul the insurance policies and practices that discriminate in opposition to us.

Advertisement

We shut down the college and joined our college students — the streets grew to become the classroom for weeks and months. Loyalists and thugs of political events beat us up and referred to as us traitors, police forces shot bullets and detained many people.

However the protests created and revived hope. We held palms from north to south in a human chain, we cleaned the streets, we resisted oppression and we chanted for unity.
Within the final election in 2018, one girl who ran as an impartial received a seat in parliament. In her quick tenure of two years, earlier than she resigned in protest in opposition to the Beirut explosion, Paula Yacoubian labored on extra draft legal guidelines than most males ever did in a long time of sitting in parliament.

After the 2022 elections, we’ll see new ladies enter parliament they usually, too, will probably be pioneers and leaders in laws. However numbers could be deceptive. Wanting solely on the numbers of ladies renders us as tokens to be celebrated. The state too has its ladies and they’re as sectarian and patriarchal as the boys.

I do know this as a result of I served on the Nationwide Fee for Lebanese Ladies for a 12 months earlier than I resigned. The Fee had no curiosity or capability to advocate for reforms to enhance ladies’s lives past tokenism, and the members have been completely bored with addressing the rights of non-nationals. (Lebanon just isn’t a signatory to the 1951 Geneva Conference but has the best variety of refugees per capita worldwide).

Ladies have been carrying the burden for too lengthy and in solidarity with ladies from different elements of the Arab area. We’re exhausted and issues in lots of areas have gotten worse since we began. We will not count on Lebanese ladies to interrupt the cycles of corruption and patriarchy on their very own.

The ladies who lead civil society associations, political change, protests, and campaigns for accountability should be heard.

Take, for instance, distinguished human rights activist Wadad Halawani, who has campaigned for nearly 4 a long time to search out out what occurred to her husband after he disappeared throughout Lebanon’s civil struggle struggle (1975 to 1990) — one among an estimated 17,000.

The successive governments after the struggle promised her a fact-finding mission that’s but to see the sunshine of day. Lebanon didn’t endure a reality and reconciliation course of after the struggle.

Advertisement

The warlords granted themselves amnesty and proceeded to control via impunity. This can be a system constructed on exclusionary grounds: non-nationals haven’t any rights, LGBTQ individuals are criminalized, ladies are sub-level residents and civil marriage just isn’t allowed.

Now because the nation goes to the poll field, the dialog on ladies’s rights ought to by no means be about numbers. Numbers present us the few who succeeded and miss the bulk who’re suffocating.

You will need to have extra ladies formally represented. However with out an inclusive and honest political system, the potential impression stops at that: the variety of ladies who made it, the celebrity pioneers who’re resilient within the face of adversity, the fortunate ones, the educated and socially privileged, and those who hand over a lot of themselves to steer a life devoted to altering inconceivable constructions.

We should not rejoice those who made it to the highest with out fixing the way in which up and making the system open to all ladies. Our method ought to be to look after those who could not make it, the ladies who died, the ladies who misplaced the roof over their heads, the non-gender conforming, the poor, the marginalized, and the ladies who have been forcefully displaced.

These ladies have been and can stay the crushing majority in Lebanon, earlier than and after this election. To them we should dedicate our consideration and concentrate on bringing accountability to the boys, the warlords, who destroyed their lives.

Advertisement

Lebanon’s issues are extreme however not distinctive. Womens’ inclusion in public life and dignified work are each conditions of freedom and wellbeing in all places.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending