Connect with us

News

New evidence suggests Shireen Abu Akleh was killed in targeted attack by Israeli forces

Published

on

New evidence suggests Shireen Abu Akleh was killed in targeted attack by Israeli forces

The cameraman filming the scene scrambles backwards to take cowl behind a low concrete wall. Then a person cries out in Arabic: “Injured! Shireen, Shireen, oh man, Shireen! Ambulance!”

Within the moments that comply with, a person in a white T-shirt makes a number of makes an attempt to maneuver Abu Akleh, however is compelled again repeatedly by gunfire. Lastly, after just a few lengthy minutes, he manages to pull her physique from the road.

The shaky video, filmed by Al Jazeera cameraman Majdi Banura, captures the scene when Abu Akleh, a 51-year-old Palestinian-American was killed by a bullet to the top at round 6:30 a.m. on Might 11. She had been standing with a bunch of journalists close to the doorway of Jenin refugee camp, the place they’d come to cowl an Israeli raid. Whereas the footage doesn’t present Abu Akleh being shot, eyewitnesses instructed CNN that they consider Israeli forces on the identical road fired intentionally on the reporters in a focused assault. All the journalists had been carrying protecting blue vests that recognized them as members of the information media. ​

“We stood in entrance of the Israeli army automobiles for about 5 to 10 minutes earlier than we made strikes to make sure they noticed us. And it is a behavior of ours as journalists, we transfer as a bunch and we stand in entrance of them in order that they know we’re journalists, after which we begin shifting,” Hanaysha instructed CNN, describing their cautious strategy towards the Israeli military convoy, earlier than the gunfire started.

When Abu Akleh was shot, Hanaysha stated she was in shock. She could not perceive what was occurring. After Abu Akleh dropped to the bottom, Hanaysha thought she might need stumbled. However when she appeared down on the reporter she had idolized since childhood, it was clear she wasn’t respiratory. Blood was pooling beneath her head.

Advertisement

“As quickly as she [Shireen] fell, I actually wasn’t comprehending that she [was shot] … I used to be listening to the sound of bullets, however I wasn’t comprehending that they had been coming at us. Actually, the entire time I wasn’t understanding,” she stated.

“I assumed they had been capturing so we stayed again, I did not suppose they had been attempting to kill us.”

On the day of the capturing, Israeli army spokesperson Ran Kochav instructed Military Radio that Abu Akleh had been “filming and dealing for a media outlet amidst armed Palestinians. They’re armed with cameras, in case you’ll allow me to say so,” in line with The Instances of Israel.

The Israeli army says it isn’t clear who fired the deadly shot. In a preliminary inquiry, the military stated there was a chance Abu Akleh was hit both by indiscriminate Palestinian gunfire, or by an Israeli sniper positioned about 200 meters (about 656 ft) away in an change of fireplace with Palestinian gunmen — although neither Israel nor anybody else has supplied proof displaying armed Palestinians inside a transparent line of fireplace from Abu Akleh.

The Israel Protection Forces (IDF) stated on Might 19 that it had not but determined whether or not to pursue a legal investigation into Abu Akleh’s dying. On Monday, the Israeli army’s high lawyer, Main Basic Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi, stated in a speech that beneath the army’s coverage, a legal investigation shouldn’t be mechanically launched if an individual is killed within the “midst of an energetic fight zone,” except there’s credible and instant suspicion of a legal offense. United States lawmakers, the United Nations and ​the worldwide neighborhood ​have all referred to as for an impartial probe.

However an investigation by CNN provides new proof — together with two movies of the scene of the capturing — that there was no energetic fight, nor any Palestinian militants, close to Abu Akleh within the moments main as much as her dying. Movies obtained by CNN, corroborated by testimony from eight eyewitnesses, an audio forensic analyst and an explosive weapons knowledgeable, recommend that Abu Akleh was shot lifeless in a focused assault by Israeli forces.

Advertisement

The footage exhibits a peaceful scene earlier than the reporters got here beneath fireplace within the outskirts of Jenin refugee camp, close to the principle Awdeh roundabout. Hanaysha, 4 different journalists and three native residents stated that it had been a traditional morning in Jenin, residence to about 345,000 folks — 11,400 of whom stay within the camp. Many had been on their method to work or faculty, and the road was comparatively quiet.

There was a frisson of pleasure because the veteran journalist, a family title throughout the Arab world for her protection of Israel and the Palestinian territories, arrived to report on the raid. A couple of dozen or so males, some wearing sweats and flip-flops, had gathered to observe Abu Akleh and her colleagues at work. They had been milling round chatting, some smoking cigarettes, others filming the scene on their telephones.

In a single 16-minute cellphone video shared with CNN, the person filming walks towards the spot the place the journalists had gathered, zooming in on the Israeli armored automobiles parked within the distance, and says: “Take a look at the snipers.” Then, when a young person friends tentatively up the road, he shouts: “Do not child round … you suppose it is a joke? We do not wish to die. We wish to stay.”

Israeli raids on the Jenin refugee camp have grow to be an everyday incidence since early April, within the wake of a number of assaults by Palestinians that left Israelis and foreigners lifeless. A number of the suspected assailants of these assaults had been from Jenin, in line with the Israeli army. Residents say the raids usually result in accidents and deaths. On Saturday, a 17-year-old Palestinian was killed and an 18-year-old was critically injured by Israeli fireplace throughout a raid, the Palestinian Ministry of Well being stated.

Salim Awad, the 27-year-old Jenin camp resident who filmed the 16-minute video, instructed CNN that there have been no armed Palestinians or any clashes within the space, and he hadn’t anticipated there to be gunfire, given the presence of journalists close by.

“There was no battle or confrontations in any respect. We had been about 10 guys, give or take, strolling round, laughing and joking with the journalists,” he stated. “We weren’t afraid of something. We did not count on something would occur, as a result of once we noticed journalists round, we thought it might be a secure space.”

However the state of affairs modified quickly. Awad stated capturing broke out about seven minutes after he arrived on the scene. His video captures the second that photographs had been fired on the 4 journalists — Abu Akleh, Hanaysha, one other Palestinian journalist, Mujahid al-Saadi, and Al Jazeera producer Ali al-Samoudi, who was injured within the gunfire — as they walked towards the Israeli automobiles. Within the footage, Abu Akleh could be seen turning away from the barrage. The footage exhibits a direct line of sight in direction of the Israeli convoy.

Advertisement
Palestinian journalist Shatha Hanaysha pictured in the West Bank city of Ramallah on May 12, a day after she and Abu Akleh came under fire.

“We noticed round 4 or 5 army automobiles on that road with rifles protruding of them and one among them shot Shireen. We had been standing proper there, we noticed it. Once we tried to strategy her, they shot at us. I attempted to cross the road to assist, however I could not,” Awad stated, including that he noticed {that a} bullet struck Abu Akleh within the hole between her helmet and protecting vest, simply by her ear.

A 16-year-old, who was among the many group of males and boys on the road, instructed CNN that there have been “no photographs fired, no stone throwing, nothing,” earlier than Abu Akleh was shot. He stated that the journalists had instructed them to not comply with as they walked towards Israeli forces, so he stayed again. When the gunfire broke out, he stated he ducked behind a automobile on the highway, three meters away, the place he watched the second she was killed. {The teenager} shared a video with CNN, filmed at 6:36 a.m., simply after the journalists left the scene for the hospital, which confirmed the 5 Israeli military automobiles driving slowly previous the spot the place Abu Akleh died. The convoy then turns left earlier than leaving the camp by way of the roundabout.

CNN reviewed a complete of 11 movies displaying the scene and the Israeli army convoy from completely different angles — earlier than, throughout and after Abu Akleh was killed. Eyewitnesses who had been filming when the journalist was shot had been additionally within the line of fireplace and pulled again when the gunfire began, so don’t seize the second she is hit with the bullet. ​

The visible proof reviewed by CNN features a physique digicam video launched by the Israeli army, which captures troopers working by way of a slim alleyway, holding M16 assault rifles, and variants, as they spill out onto the road the place the armored automobiles are parked. An Israeli army supply instructed CNN that each side had been firing M16 and M4 model assault rifles that day.

Within the movies, 5 Israeli automobiles could be seen lined up in a row on the identical highway the place Abu Akleh was killed, to the south. The automobile closest to the journalists, emblazoned with a white primary, and the automobile furthest away, marked with the quantity 5, are each positioned perpendicular throughout the road. Towards the rear of the automobiles, immediately above the numbers, is a slim rectangular opening within the exterior of the automobile.

The Israeli army referenced such a gap in a press release about its preliminary investigation into Abu Akleh’s capturing, saying that the journalist could have been hit by an Israeli soldier capturing from a “designated firing gap in an IDF automobile utilizing a telescopic scope,” throughout an change of fireplace. A number of eyewitnesses instructed CNN that they noticed sniper rifles protruding of the openings earlier than the capturing started, however that it was not preceded by another gunfire.

Advertisement

Jamal Huwail, a professor on the Arab American College in Jenin, who helped drag Abu Akleh’s lifeless physique from the highway, stated he believed the photographs had been coming from one of many Israeli automobiles, which he described as a “new mannequin which had a gap for snipers,” due to the elevation and course of the bullets.

“They had been capturing immediately on the journalists,” Huwail stated.

Huwail, a former parliamentarian and member of the Palestinian Fatah Social gathering in Jenin, first met Abu Akleh twenty years in the past, when Israel launched a serious army operation within the camp, destroying greater than 400 properties and displacing 1 / 4 of its inhabitants. When he spoke with the journalist briefly that morning of Might 11 on the Awdeh roundabout, she had confirmed him a video of one among their early interviews from 2002. The subsequent time he noticed her up shut, she was lifeless.

Shireen Abu Akleh lies face down in the street, after having been shot in the head.

In movies of the daybreak military raid on Jenin camp earlier within the morning, Israeli troopers and Palestinian militants could be seen battling one another with M16 assault rifles and variants, in line with Chris Cobb-Smith, an explosive weapons knowledgeable. Meaning each side would have been capturing 5.56-millimeter bullets. To hint the bullet that killed Abu Akleh to the barrel of a selected gun would seemingly require a joint Israeli-Palestinian probe, for the reason that Palestinians have the bullet that killed Abu Akleh, whereas CNN’s investigation suggests the Israelis have the gun. None is straight away forthcoming. Whereas Israel weighs whether or not to launch a legal investigation, the Palestinian Authority has dominated out collaborating with the Israelis on any investigation.

A senior Israeli safety official flatly denied to CNN on Might 18 that Israeli troops killed Abu Akleh deliberately. The official spoke beneath the situation of anonymity to debate particulars about an investigation that continues to be formally open.

“By no means would the IDF ever goal a civilian, particularly a member of the press,” the official instructed CNN.

Advertisement

“An IDF soldier would by no means fireplace an M16 on automated. They shoot bullet by bullet,” the official stated, in distinction with ​Israel’s assertion that Palestinian militants had been firing “recklessly and indiscriminately” whereas its troopers carried out the raid in Jenin.

In a press release emailed to CNN, the IDF stated it was conducting an investigation into the killing of Abu Akleh. It “calls on the Palestinian Authority to cooperate with a joint forensic examination with American representatives to conclusively decide the supply of the tragic dying.”

And added, “assertions relating to the supply of the fireplace that killed Ms. Abu Akleh have to be fastidiously made and backed by exhausting proof. That is what the IDF is striving to realize.”

Even with out entry to the bullet that hit Abu Akleh, there are methods to find out who killed Abu Akleh by analyzing the kind of gunfire, the sound of the photographs and the marks left by the bullets on the scene.

Cobb-Smith, a safety guide and British military veteran, instructed CNN he believed Abu Akleh was killed in discrete photographs — not a burst of automated gunfire. To succeed in that conclusion, he checked out imagery obtained by CNN, which present markings the bullets left on the tree the place Abu Akleh fell and Hanaysha was taking cowl.

Advertisement

“The variety of strike marks on the tree the place Shireen was standing proves this wasn’t a random shot, she was focused,” Cobb-Smith instructed CNN, including that, in sharp distinction, the vast majority of gunfire from Palestinians captured on digicam that day had been “random sprays.”

Palestinian journalist Mujahid al-Saadi, who was with Abu Akleh when she was killed, points to bullet marks on the tree in Jenin where she died.
As proof, he pointed to 2 videos that showed Palestinian gunmen firing haphazardly down alleyways in several components of Jenin. The movies had been circulated by the workplace of Israeli prime minister, Naftali Bennett, and Israel’s overseas ministry, with a voiceover in Arabic saying: “They’ve hit one — they’ve hit a soldier. He is mendacity on the bottom.”

As a result of no Israeli troopers had been reported killed on Might 11, Bennett’s workplace stated the video instructed that “Palestinian terrorists had been those who shot the journalist.” CNN geolocated the movies shared by Bennett’s workplace to the south of the camp, greater than 300 meters, or 1,000 ft, away from Abu Akleh. The coordinates of the 2 places, which had been verified utilizing Mapillary, a crowdsourced road imagery platform, and photographs of the realm filmed by Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, display that the capturing within the movies could not be the identical volley of gunfire that hit Abu Akleh and her producer, Ali al-Samoudi. CNN was additionally unable to confirm independently when the footage was filmed.

In keeping with the Israeli military’s preliminary inquiry, on the time of Abu Akleh’s dying, an Israeli sniper was 200 meters away from her. CNN requested Robert Maher, professor {of electrical} and pc engineering at Montana State College, who makes a speciality of forensic audio evaluation, to evaluate the footage of Abu Akleh’s capturing and estimate the space between the gunman and the cameraman, bearing in mind the rifle being utilized by the Israeli forces.

The video that Maher analyzed captures two volleys of gunfire; eyewitnesses say Abu Akleh was hit within the second barrage, a collection of seven sharp “cracks.” The primary “crack” sound, the ballistic shockwave of the bullet, is adopted roughly 309 milliseconds later by the comparatively quiet “bang” of the muzzle blast, in line with Maher. “That will correspond to a distance of one thing between 177 and 197 meters,” or 580 and 646 ft, he stated in an electronic mail to CNN, which corresponds nearly precisely with the Israeli sniper’s place.

At 200 meters, Cobb-Smith stated that there was “no likelihood” that random firing would lead to three or 4 photographs hitting in such a decent configuration. “From the strike marks on the tree, it seems that the photographs, one among which hit Shireen, got here from down the road from the course of the IDF troops. The comparatively tight grouping of the rounds point out Shireen was deliberately focused with aimed photographs and never the sufferer of random or stray fireplace,” the firearms knowledgeable instructed CNN.

A Palestinian artist paints a mural in Gaza City honoring Shireen Abu Akleh, and depicting Shatha Hanaysha crouching beside her after she was killed.

The tree is now referred to in Jenin because the “journalist tree” and has grow to be a makeshift shrine to Abu Akleh, with images of the beloved reporter taped to the trunk and Palestinian kaffiyeh scarves draped from its branches.

Awad, one of many Jenin residents who inadvertently captured Abu Akleh’s killing on digicam, stated the primary time he noticed her in individual was in 2002, when she was overlaying the Intifada, or rebellion, in Jenin. “She is in fact cherished by so many, however she has a really particular reminiscence in our camp particularly due to the work she has carried out right here. The folks listed here are very unhappy for her loss,” he stated.

Advertisement

Final month, Abu Akleh celebrated her birthday in Jenin, when she was there to cowl an Israeli miltary raid, her longtime colleague, cameraman Majdi Banura, recalled. Banura and Abu Akleh began at Al Jazeera on the identical day 25 years in the past, and spent a lot of their careers out within the area collectively.

Banura continues to be reeling from having seen Abu Akleh, whom he had filmed numerous occasions earlier than, die in entrance of his personal eyes. However when the gunfire broke out, he knew he needed to proceed rolling, saying that it was essential to have a “steady document” of her killing.

“To be trustworthy, as I used to be filming, I had hoped that she will probably be alive, however I knew seeing her immobile she had been killed,” Banura stated.

“Her image would not go away my life and reminiscence, the whole lot I say or do or contact, I see her.”

CNN’s Eliza Waterproof coat in London wrote and reported. Zeena Saifi reported from Abu Dhabi, Celine Alkhaldi from Amman and Kareem Khadder from Jerusalem. Katie Polglase and Gianluca Mezzofiore reported from London. Richard Allen Greene, Abeer Salman, Hadas Gold and Atika Shubert contributed to this report. Design and visible enhancing by Natalie Croker and Henrik Pettersson

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Published

on

Tech pullback drags Wall Street stocks lower

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

US tech stocks slipped on Friday as investors pivoted away from companies that had led markets higher for much of this year.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s main equity benchmark, fell 1.1 per cent on Friday, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.5 per cent. Elon Musk’s electric-car maker Tesla was among the biggest laggards, falling 5 per cent, while chipmaker Nvidia dropped 2.1 per cent.

“I watch probably 30 different [market indicators] and they’re all down today,” said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital. “This was just widespread selling without much enthusiasm.”

Advertisement

Tech stocks have rallied strongly this year, as investors bet artificial intelligence would drive demand for everything from servers to microchips. The gains accelerated after Donald Trump’s election victory in November on bets that the president-elect would usher in more business-friendly policies when his term begins next month.

However, the sector has been choppier in recent weeks as investors reassess their best-performing holdings at the end of the year. The Federal Reserve also sparked ructions last week when it forecast only two quarter-point rate cuts next year, compared with its September forecast of four, as officials fretted about growing risks that inflation becomes lodged well above the central bank’s 2 per cent target.

The hawkish projections have pushed up US long-term borrowing costs, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.63 per cent on Friday, compared with lows in September of about 3.6 per cent. Higher yields typically tarnish the appeal of holding shares in fast-growing companies.

Citigroup analysts on Friday said that while they still forecast the S&P 500 will rise about 10 per cent from current levels by the end of next year, they expect a “more volatile leg of the bull market ahead”.

The US bank noted this year’s gains in stock prices compared with corporate profits were “setting a high bar for fundamentals in the year ahead, and even the year after”. The S&P 500 trades at about 22.2 times expected earnings over the next year, compared with the average over the past decade of 18.1, according to FactSet data.

Advertisement

Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com, said that, “even with that volatile Friday, the market’s still higher than it was on Monday”.

He said: “Markets don’t go straight up, and a pullback often serves as a foundation for the next market advance.”

The S&P 500 is still up 25 per cent year-to-date even after Friday’s pullback, roughly on a par with the previous year’s gains.

The so-called Magnificent 7 Big Tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia and Tesla — have been responsible for roughly half of the S&P 500’s total returns, including dividends, this year, said Howard Silverblatt at S&P Dow Jones Indices.

All of the Magnificent 7 shares declined modestly on Friday, however.

Advertisement

Trading activity is typically lighter than usual during the holiday period, something that can exacerbate volatility.

Continue Reading

News

Costco egg recall for salmonella receives FDA's most severe designation

Published

on

Costco egg recall for salmonella receives FDA's most severe designation

The FDA says that people who bought 24-count packages of organic pasture-raised eggs with UPC 9661910680 under the Kirkland Signature brand — and also bearing the Julian code 327 and a use-by date of Jan 5, 2025 — should bring the products back to Costco or discard them.

Food and Drug Administration


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Food and Drug Administration

The Food and Drug Administration has classified its recall of eggs sold under Costco’s Kirkland brand as a Class I recall, a designation reserved for instances of the highest potential health risk — including death.

A Class I recall signals that “there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death,” according to the FDA. 

The agency announced the voluntary recall on Nov. 27 and posted news of the Class I designation on Dec. 20; it has not provided updates about whether any possible illnesses or medical cases related to the recall. Neither the agency nor Costco responded to NPR’s messages for comment on Friday.

Advertisement

The eggs were voluntarily recalled by Handsome Brook Farms, which is headquartered in New York. The recall covers 10,800 packages of 24-count eggs, sold under the Kirkland Signature brand name and described as organic and pasture-raised.

The products were sent to 25 Costco stores in five states: Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. The recall applies to products with a UPC code of 9661910680 that also have the Julian code 327 and a use-by date of Jan 5, 2025.

“Eggs from a positive Salmonella environment were shipped into distribution to retail facilities,” according to the FDA. Handsome Brook Farms said the eggs hadn’t been intended for retail sales — but were mistakenly packaged and distributed.

“Additional supply chain controls and retraining are being put in place to prevent recurrence,” the recall notice states.

The FDA also placed the Class I designation on a recall of cucumbers due to possible salmonella contamination that, as with the eggs, was also announced in late November.

Advertisement

It’s not unusual for salmonella to trigger a Class 1 recall: The bacteria is “the biggest cause of hospitalization and death in our food system,” Sarah Sorscher, director of regulatory affairs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told NPR’s 1A program in September.

Every year, salmonella causes “about 1.35 million illnesses, 26,500 hospitalizations, and 420 deaths” in the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates.

Symptoms such as diarrhea, fever and stomach cramps can take time to manifest, appearing days or even weeks after the initial infection. Most people usually feel better after four to seven days, but in rare circumstances, salmonella can reach the bloodstream and affect other parts of the body, the CDC says.

Continue Reading

News

Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan suspend flights to Russia after plane crash

Published

on

Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan suspend flights to Russia after plane crash

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The national airlines of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan have suspended some flights to Russia after evidence suggested an Azerbaijani plane had been downed by Russian air defence systems.

The Kazakh airline, Qazaq Air, said on Friday it suspended its Astana to Ekaterinburg route, according to the Kazinform news agency, while Azerbaijan Airlines suspended flights to seven cities in the south of Russia.

The measures were taken after an Azerbaijan Airlines flight from Baku to Russia’s regional capital, Grozny, was diverted across the Caspian Sea and crash-landed near Aktau in Kazakhstan on Wednesday, killing 38 of the 67 people on board.

Advertisement

Video of the fuselage of the crashed aircraft has shown multiple puncture marks consistent with fire from an anti-aircraft system. There is also evidence that Russia was jamming the GPS navigation system near Grozny at the time, apparently to defend against an attack by Ukrainian drones.

Qazaq Air said it was suspending flights to Ekaterinburg until January 27 pending an “ongoing risk assessment” of flights to Russia. Azerbaijan Airlines said it halted flights to Grozny and other southern Russian cities until completion of an investigation into the crash.

Israel’s flag-carrier, El Al, on Thursday also announced it was suspending flights from Tel Aviv to Moscow pending a safety assessment.

Russia had insisted the aircraft was unable to land in Grozny because of heavy fog and that the aircraft had hit a flock of birds. Local authorities in Russia’s nearby North Ossetia region announced an attack by Ukrainian drones, one of which was shot down, killing a woman on the ground. But the Kommersant newspaper reported there was no “heavy fog” forecast for Grozny at the time.

The head of Russia’s Rosaviatsia aviation agency, Dmitry Yadrov, on Thursday said the conditions around Grozny had been “very difficult” amid attacks from Ukrainian combat drones.

Advertisement
Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, near St Petersburg on Thursday © Gavril Grigorov/SPUTNIK/KREMLIN POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Asked on Friday about reports of a missile strike, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he had nothing to add.

The incident has invoked comparisons with Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 being shot down over Ukraine in 2014. An investigation concluded that crash, which killed all 298 people on board, was the result of the firing of an air defence missile by Russia-controlled fighters in eastern Ukraine.

It is not clear how long Kazakhstan’s investigation into the crash will take, or how free it will be to reach conclusions about the cause. The probe includes investigators from Russia and Azerbaijan, according to Kazakh officials.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said it was too early to comment on what had caused the crash.

The aircraft type involved — an Embraer-190 regional jet — was previously regarded as one of the world’s safest civil aircraft.

Advertisement

A senior US official has said there are early indications a Russian anti-aircraft system might have struck the flight.

Senior Ukrainian officials told the Financial Times they also believed the aircraft was probably hit by an air defence missile. Andriy Kovalenko, a Ukrainian national security and defence council official, posted on Telegram on Thursday that Russia should have closed the airspace over Grozny, given the operations it was undertaking, but did not do so.

“The plane was damaged by the Russians and sent to Kazakhstan, instead of making an emergency landing in Grozny and saving people’s lives,” he wrote.

Rasim Musabekov, a member of Azerbaijan’s parliament, has called for Russia to apologise.

“The plane was shot down in Russian territory, in the skies over Grozny, and this cannot be denied,” Musabekov told the Turan news agency. “This is how civilised relations work. If air defence systems are active, the airport should be closed, and warnings should be issued to prevent flights to the area.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending