Connect with us

News

Jan. 6 Panel to Seek Interview With Ginni Thomas

Published

on

WASHINGTON — The Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol is prone to attain out quickly to Virginia Thomas, the spouse of Justice Clarence Thomas, to request that she sit for an interview, based on two individuals aware of the matter.

The choice — which ends intense inner debate concerning the matter — got here after the revelation final week of Ms. Thomas’s textual content messages to Mark Meadows, the previous White Home chief of workers, by which she relentlessly urged him to pursue a plan to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Though the committee has been in possession of Ms. Thomas’s textual content messages for months, not everybody on the panel had seen the paperwork earlier than they have been printed in information reviews. That prompted debate among the many committee’s members, a number of of whom urged the panel to attempt to interview her.

An individual aware of the discussions stated the panel concluded that Ms. Thomas had related data, and that it was essential for investigators to listen to from her. CNN earlier reported the committee’s resolution.

An adviser to Ms. Thomas didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Advertisement

For at the very least a number of weeks, the committee’s senior investigators have mentioned whether or not to name Ms. Thomas, who is called Ginni, to testify. They’ve additionally mentioned whether or not to subject subpoenas for every other communications she might have had with the White Home or the President Donald J. Trump’s authorized workforce concerning the election, together with a message that she instructed Mr. Meadows she had despatched to Jared Kushner, a former adviser to Mr. Trump, based on individuals with information of the investigation.

Some high investigators had initially argued in opposition to sending a subpoena to Ms. Thomas, as a result of they considered her as a minor participant within the makes an attempt to subvert the election. However the disclosure of the textual content messages, first by The Washington Submit and CBS Information, and public stress renewed these discussions.

A New York Occasions Journal investigation final month examined the political and private historical past of Ms. Thomas and her husband. That included her function in efforts to overturn the election from her perch on the nine-member board of C.N.P. Motion, a conservative group that helped advance the “Cease the Steal” motion, and in mediating between feuding factions of organizers “in order that there wouldn’t be any division round Jan. 6,” as one organizer put it.

Ms. Thomas acknowledged that she had attended the rally that preceded the violence in an interview with a conservative information outlet this month, however she has in any other case downplayed her function. Then got here disclosure of the texts to Mr. Meadows.

Within the messages, she referred to as the 2020 election a “heist” and even steered the lawyer who needs to be put in control of that effort.

Advertisement

There are many results in pursue. The committee may recall Dustin Stockton, a rally organizer who instructed The Occasions a few dialog he had with Caroline Wren, a Republican who helped elevate cash for the “March for America” on Jan. 6, by which she described Ms. Thomas’s peacemaking function. They may additionally recall Amy Kremer and Jenny Beth Martin, rally organizers near Ms. Thomas, to ask about her postelection communications with them.

The panel may subpoena data from not solely Ms. Thomas, but additionally C.N.P. Motion, which was deeply concerned within the effort to unfold falsehoods concerning the election. Investigators may ask the identify of the buddy Ms. Thomas was referring to when she wrote again to thank Mr. Meadows, saying: “Wanted that! This plus a dialog with my greatest buddy simply now … I’ll attempt to maintain holding on.” (Ms. Thomas and her husband have publicly referred to one another as their greatest buddies.)

In the end, the committee may ask her whether or not she had mentioned along with her husband Mr. Trump’s battle to overturn the election.

Maggie Haberman contributed reporting.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Published

on

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Four people were killed and nine others were injured after a minivan crashed into a Long Island, New York, nail salon Friday afternoon.

The vehicle slammed into Hawaii Nail & Spa on Grand Boulevard in Deer Park shortly before 5 p.m.

A witness told NBC New York that the van plowed through the front of the business and almost came out through the back of the salon.

All of those killed or injured were inside the salon at the time, according to Lt. Kevin Heissenbuttel. Some people were trapped in the salon and had to be extricated by emergency services, he said.

A witness said the vehicle had been racing through a parking lot across the street before crashing and “seemingly in a rush,” NBC New York reported, adding that others said the van was trying to get around another vehicle when it drove into the building.

Advertisement

The van was seen racing though a parking lot across the street, NBC New York reported. A witness said it was trying to pass another vehicle when it drove into the building, the station reported.

Photos from the scene showed a gaping hole in the storefront.

The Associated Press reported that a witness said he heard a speeding car and then a “shattering” noise.

“It was a sound that I never heard before,” he said.

The vehicle’s driver was among the injured and transported to a hospital.

Advertisement

The Deer Park Fire Department chief said it was not clear what caused the vehicle to crash into the business.

About 150 firefighters and EMS personnel responded to the scene.

Continue Reading

News

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Published

on

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Thursday night’s US presidential debate was watched by 48mn television viewers, a sharp drop from the numbers that tuned in to the clashes between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in the 2020 campaign.

CNN, the Warner Bros Discovery-owned network which hosted the event, said just over 9mn viewers had watched on its own channels, narrowly ahead of Fox News and ABC News, with cable rival MSNBC drawing about 4mn viewers. Another 30mn people tuned in on CNN’s digital channels or YouTube, it added.

The combined television audiences were well below the totals for previous presidential debates, however, extending a pattern of US media outlets reporting less interest in their election coverage this year.

Advertisement

Trump and Biden drew 73mn viewers for their first debate in 2020, while Trump and Hillary Clinton pulled in an audience of 84mn for the opening showdown of their 2016 contest.

With full control over the style, content and format of the debate, CNN inserted rules that are atypical for US political events, such as foregoing a live audience and muting each candidate’s microphones unless it was their turn to speak.

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

The debate was also a stark departure in tone from last year’s CNN town hall event with Trump, when a studio audience filled with the former president’s supporters prompted comparisons with his raucous rallies. CNN’s own media commentator slammed the town hall as a “spectacle of lies”, and Chris Licht resigned as CNN’s chief executive just a few weeks later.

By comparison, Thursday’s night’s debate was restrained. With microphones muted, there were no shouting matches, and with no audience or press in the room, it was quiet. The moderators played a background role, leaving the debate largely a back-and-forth dialogue between Trump and Biden. 

Advertisement

However CNN was criticised for one significant choice: moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash largely avoided fact-checking the candidates in real time. The format seemed to favour Trump, who was allowed to make a series of unsubstantiated claims without being challenged during the 90-minute programme. 

The debate was a big test for CNN — the network that pioneered the dramatic, ultra-competitive cable news format in the US in the 1980s, but whose audiences have dwindled in recent years. It was easily the biggest moment yet for CNN chief executive Sir Mark Thompson, who took over as leader of the channel last year and has been tasked with turning around its business and restoring its brand.

CNN landed the sponsorship of the debate in May, beating out competitors including Fox News. The network seized on the moment, promoting the event heavily and forcing its rivals, who simultaneously broadcast the debate, to display CNN’s logo prominently on their screens.

The event was unique for a number of reasons. It was the first presidential debate in decades that was not organised by an independent commission, after Biden and Trump chose to bypass the tradition. It was also scheduled far earlier than usual in the election cycle. In previous years, the initial match-ups between presidential candidates took place in September or October. 

CNN has a fraught history with Trump, who frequently attacked the channel during his presidency. But on Friday morning, the Trump campaign blasted an email out to his supporters titled: “I love CNN . . . Because they gave me the opportunity to wipe the floor with Joe Biden.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court denies Steve Bannon's plea to stay free while he appeals

Published

on

Supreme Court denies Steve Bannon's plea to stay free while he appeals

Steve Bannon, former adviser to President Donald Trump, and attorney Matthew Evan Corcoran, depart the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on June 6, 2024 in Washington, D.C.

Kent Nishimura/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kent Nishimura/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal by Steve Bannon, the right-wing podcaster and former Trump White House aide, to remain free while his case goes through the appeals process.

“The application for release pending appeal presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is denied,” the court said in a one-sentence order.

Bannon now has a deadline to report to a federal prison in Connecticut July 1. He must serve time after refusing to comply with a congressional investigation into the siege on the U.S. Capitol.

Advertisement

A federal jury in Washington, D.C., convicted Bannon two years ago on two criminal contempt charges, for defying subpoenas for documents and testimony from the House Select Committee investigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021.

Bannon successfully delayed his four-month prison sentence for years, as appeals wound through the courts. But his luck ran out in May, when a federal appeals court unanimously rejected his claims.

Bannon is the second Trump-era official ordered to serve prison time for flouting demands from Congress. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro reported to a prison in Florida in March, after Chief Justice John Roberts refused to intervene in the case.

Both men cast their disputes with Congress as challenges to the Constitution’s separation of powers, but judges found no evidence that Trump had formally asserted executive privilege to block their cooperation with lawmakers.

Bannon had tried to argue at his trial that he had relied on advice from his lawyer, and therefore lacked the intent to “willfully” violate the contempt law. A judge foreclosed that defense based on court precedent, but raised significant questions about it — questions that Bannon cited in a June 21 petition to the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

“Mr. Bannon relied in good faith on his attorney’s advice not to respond to a subpoena issued by a House Select Committee until executive privilege issues were resolved—as they had been on three prior occasions when Mr. Bannon had agreed to testify after President Trump’s counsel had asserted executive privilege,” his lawyers wrote.

Bannon, who has been a vocal supporter of Trump’s bid to regain the White House later this year, may now be incarcerated on those misdemeanor charges through the election in November.

He’s separately fighting fraud, money laundering and conspiracy charges in New York state court over an alleged scheme to defraud donors to a charity that aimed to build a wall along the southern border. That case is scheduled for trial later this year.

Trump granted Bannon a full pardon from federal charges related to We Build the Wall in January 2021, shortly before he left the White House. Presidents lack power to issue pardons for state crimes.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending