Connect with us

News

‘I thought I would die on that boat’: Mother recalls the horror of month at sea | CNN

Published

on

‘I thought I would die on that boat’: Mother recalls the horror of month at sea | CNN


Aceh, Indonesia
CNN
 — 

Hatemon Nesa weeps as she clings to her 5-year-old daughter, Umme Salima, at a rescue shelter in Indonesia’s Aceh province. Their faces seem gaunt, their eyes sullen, after drifting for weeks at sea on a ship with little meals or water.

“My pores and skin was rotting off and my bones have been seen,” Nesa mentioned. “I assumed I’d die on that boat.”

Nesa additionally cries for her 7-year-old daughter, Umme Habiba, who she says she was compelled to depart behind in Bangladesh – she couldn’t afford any greater than the $1,000 the traffickers demanded to move her and her youngest youngster to Malaysia. “My coronary heart is burning for my daughter,” she mentioned.

Nesa and Umme Salima have been amongst round 200 Rohingya, members of a persecuted Muslim minority, who launched into the damaging voyage in late November from Cox’s Bazar, a sprawling refugee camp in Bangladesh crowded with round 1,000,000 individuals who fled alleged genocide by the Myanmar navy.

Advertisement

However quickly after they left, the engine minimize out, turning what was imagined to be a 7-day journey right into a month-long ordeal at sea, uncovered to the weather within the open-topped picket boat, surviving solely on rainwater and simply three days’ value of meals.

Nesa mentioned she noticed ravenous males soar overboard in a determined seek for meals, however they by no means returned. And she witnessed a child die after being fed salt water from the ocean.

Because the weeks wore on, the passengers’ households and support businesses pleaded with governments in a number of international locations to assist them – however their cries have been ignored.

Then on December 26, the boat was rescued by Indonesian fishermen and native authorities in Aceh, based on the United Nations refugee company (UNHCR). Of the 200 or so individuals who boarded the boat, solely 174 survived – round 26 died on the boat, or are lacking at sea, presumed lifeless.

Babar Baloch, an Asia spokesperson for the company, mentioned after a lull throughout Covid, the numbers of individuals fleeing are again to pre-Covid ranges. Some 2,500 boarded unseaworthy boats final 12 months for the journey, and as many as 400 of them died, making 2022 one of many deadliest years in a decade for Rohingya escaping Cox’s Bazar.

Advertisement

“These are actually demise traps that after you get in … you find yourself shedding your life,” he mentioned.

Nesa and Salima’s journey started on November 25 from the overcrowded refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, the place she mentioned her youngsters couldn’t go to highschool, leaving her with little hope for his or her future.

Nesa mentioned she had carried round two kilograms of rice for the journey, however shortly after the boat left the port, its engine died they usually began drifting.

“Ravenous with no meals, we noticed a fishing boat close by and tried to go shut,” she mentioned, crying as she recalled the horror. “We jumped within the water to swim near that boat however in the long run, we couldn’t.”

Advertisement
The rickety wooden boat that carried Hatemon Nesa and her daughter, Umme Salima pictured in  Aceh province, Indonesia.

Throughout December, because the boat bobbed aimlessly within the Bay of Bengal, the UNHCR mentioned it was noticed close to India and Sri Lanka. However the company mentioned these international locations “constantly ignored” its pleas for intervention.

CNN has contacted the Indian and Sri Lankan Navies for remark however has not obtained a response. Final month, the Sri Lankan Navy mentioned in a press release that its crews had made a “strenuous effort” to rescue one other boat carrying 104 Rohingya, together with many ladies and youngsters, who had fled Bangladesh.

On December 18, Nesa’s brother, Mohammed Rezuwan Khan, who’s in Cox’s Bazar, shared with CNN an audio clip of a harrowing cellphone name he obtained from one of many refugees aboard Nesa’s boat.

“We’re dying right here,” the person mentioned through satellite tv for pc cellphone, based on the recording. “We haven’t eaten something for eight to 10 days. We’re ravenous.”

Hatemon Nesa and her 5-year-old daughter Umme Salima at a shelter in Aceh province in Indonesia.

Nesa mentioned the boat’s driver and one other crew member jumped into the ocean to search out meals, however they by no means returned. “I feel they received eaten by fish within the sea,” she mentioned.

Advertisement

Twelve different males entered the water, whereas holding onto an extended rope connected to the boat to attempt to catch one thing to eat, however as others on the boat tried to drag them again in, the rope snapped, Nesa mentioned. “They may not return to the boat.”

Whereas all international locations are sure by worldwide regulation to rescue individuals in misery at sea, swift motion just isn’t at all times forthcoming – notably the place Rohingya refugees are involved, based on Baloch, from the UNHCR.

“I feel everybody will agree as human beings that we have now the duty you wish to save one life in misery, not to mention tons of of individuals dying,” Baloch mentioned. “(Close by states) must act to save lots of these determined individuals. It must be an motion which is in coordination completed collectively by all of the states within the area.”

Nesa and Umme Salima have been among the many 174 emaciated survivors proven on video setting foot on land for the primary time in weeks in late December, some instantly collapsing onto the sand of an Aceh seashore, too weak to face.

They’re among the many extra lucky ones – the UNHCR believes one other 180 are presumed lifeless, misplaced at sea on one other boat since early December, when the occupants stopped speaking with their households.

Advertisement

The survivors from Nesa’s boat are actually receiving medical care in Aceh, nevertheless it stays unclear what may occur to them within the coming weeks and months.

Rohingya refugees rest after being transferred to a temporary shelter following their arrival by a boat in Laweung, Aceh province on December 27, 2022.

Indonesia just isn’t social gathering to the UN Refugee Conference and lacks a nationwide refugee safety construction, based on the UNHCR.

For these discovered to be refugees, UNHCR will start to search for considered one of a spread of what options, together with resettlement to a 3rd nation or voluntary repatriation, if an individual is ready to “return in security and dignity.”

This marks the beginning of a brand new chapter for the group of passengers, who’ve lived for years in overcrowded, unhygienic and unsafe refugee camps in Bangladesh, after fleeing many years of systematic discrimination, widespread brutality and sexual violence of their dwelling nation of Myanmar.

“Stateless, persecuted, these Rohingya refugees have identified little peace,” mentioned UNHCR’s Baloch.

Advertisement

Rather more must be completed by the worldwide group for the persecuted group, that suffer on a scale most can not think about, he added.

For Nesa, the hope stays that she may be reunited together with her different daughter some day.

“I used to be about to die (in Bangladesh),” she mentioned. “Allah gave me a brand new life … My youngsters ought to get a correct schooling. That’s all that I needed.”

Advertisement

News

Firing of National Security Agency Chief Rattles Lawmakers

Published

on

Firing of National Security Agency Chief Rattles Lawmakers

As soon as word spread that President Trump had fired Gen. Timothy D. Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command, current and former administration officials began floating theories about why he had been let go.

Had General Haugh opposed one of Mr. Trump’s initiatives, perhaps moved too slowly on purging officers who had worked on diversity issues? Or was he a casualty of the administration’s shifting priorities to counter narcotics?

Whether any of that was true, it had little, if anything, to do with why he was fired.

General Haugh was ousted because Laura Loomer, a far-right wing conspiracy theorist and Trump adviser, had accused him and his deputy of disloyalty, according to U.S. officials and Ms. Loomer’s social media post early Friday. He was one of several national security officials fired this past week on her advice.

“I predict you are going to see some nonsense statement about some policy difference or something General Haugh wasn’t doing, but we all know what happened,” said Senator Angus King, a Maine independent who is on the intelligence and armed services committees. “Laura Loomer said it. She is the one who told Trump to fire him.”

Advertisement

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican and former majority leader, lamented that the Trump White House had ousted General Haugh and was appointing people to Pentagon posts who were skeptical of America’s engagement with allies and the world.

“If decades of experience in uniform isn’t enough to lead the N.S.A. but amateur isolationists can hold senior policy jobs at the Pentagon, then what exactly are the criteria for working on this administration’s national security staff?” Mr. McConnell said. “I can’t figure it out.”

The criteria Ms. Loomer appears to be using as she looks to oust people she sees as disloyal is their connections to critics of the Trump administration.

In her social media post, Ms. Loomer said General Haugh had been chosen by Gen. Mark Milley, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, whom she called a traitor.

Ms. Loomer said General Haugh’s deputy at the National Security Agency, Wendy Noble, was close to James Clapper, a former director of national intelligence and fierce critic of Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

As chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Milley reviewed the appointments of hundreds of officers to key positions. Mr. Clapper, the longest-serving director of national intelligence in the Obama administration and a senior defense intelligence official under George W. Bush, has ties to officials throughout the spy agencies.

Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, said he had worked closely with General Haugh and never saw anything to suggest disloyalty or a lack of competence.

“I fear this is just the hourly installment in the Laura Loomer clown car aspect of this administration,” Mr. Himes said.

He said that it was important to have a detail-oriented leader at the top of the N.S.A., and that he was concerned General Haugh’s ouster could lead to policy changes.

Mr. Himes also said he was concerned that the Trump administration could try to split the jobs of N.S.A. director and head of Cyber Command.

Advertisement

Since U.S. Cyber Command was created, the director of the National Security Agency has led that organization. Some within the Trump administration, and veterans of his first term, want the two jobs separated. That would allow a military officer to lead Cyber Command but give the president or the defense secretary the license to name a civilian to lead the agency.

The two agencies work closely together, but have different roles. The National Security Agency penetrates telecom and computer networks overseas, collecting communications intercepts. Cyber Command conducts offensive and defensive operations on computer networks overseas. The command helps allied countries defend their networks and hunts for malware and breaches by Russia and other adversaries.

It also conducts offensive operations against the networks of adversaries to disrupt their ability to attack the United States.

A succession of N.S.A. directors have argued that one military officer should lead both agencies to improve coordination. But some Trump administration officials believe that it is important to have a civilian in charge one of the most important spy agencies.

Some Trump administration officials have been critical of the N.S.A.’s broad power to intercept phone calls overseas, because some Americans have been caught up in those efforts.

Advertisement

Mr. Himes said he opposed splitting the jobs. While there is an argument for separating them if done carefully, Mr. Himes said he doubted the Trump administration would proceed in such a manner. The administration was already imposing irrational cuts on the N.S.A. that were costing the agency skilled people, he said.

“Given this administration’s break-it-first-then-fix-it style of operating, I am concerned,” Mr. Himes said. “It is not the low performers or obsolete skill sets that are being fired. In many cases it is some of our most valuable people. And this very directly makes us less safe.”

Beyond the structure of the commands, some Trump administration officials want the N.S.A. to move faster on White House initiatives.

But Mr. Himes said there was no evidence the N.S.A. was slow rolling administration priorities, and he added that General Haugh was working to step up collection on drug cartels.

“I can say with certainty that the N.S.A. was reorienting its priorities,” Mr. Himes said. “In fact in some ways they were shifting in ways that made me a little concerned that the pivot to Asia and counterterrorism collection would get short-shrifted.”

Advertisement

Mr. King said it was deeply dangerous to remove General Haugh at a time when Chinese intelligence agencies were penetrating telecom networks and ransomware attacks backed by Russia on hospitals were continuing.

“Our country is under attack right now in cyberspace, and the president has just removed our top general from the field for no reason at the recommendation of someone who knows nothing about national security or even the job this general does,” Mr. King said.

Continue Reading

News

Corporate America fears wrath of Trump as it mulls tariffs response

Published

on

Corporate America fears wrath of Trump as it mulls tariffs response

US companies are struggling to figure out how to respond to Donald Trump’s trade war, concerned about the impact of the president’s tariffs on the economy but wary of speaking out for fear of retaliation by the White House, according to executives and board members.

Corporate leaders are unsure of how far to go in re-engineering their businesses in response to Wednesday’s tariffs, amid doubts over how long Trump will stick to his current course and hope that they can lobby him to ease some of the policies.

Complicating matters is a climate of fear created by the White House’s recent targeting of law firms including Paul Weiss. 

“You don’t want to be the barking dog for everyone else because you’re going to be the one who will get shot,” said one person who leads the board of a US company.

Another executive on a corporate board said the best approach was to make the case to Trump and his team privately that these policies could hurt his core constituents through higher prices and job losses.

Advertisement

“It is going to be velvet glove lobbying at his more thoughtful policy advisers and that clearly includes Scott,” said another executive on a US board, referring to US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent.

Disney chief executive Bob Iger voiced concern on Thursday at an internal editorial meeting at ABC News, according to people who heard the remarks.

He said that it would not be easy for US companies to shift their production to the country because of specialised workforces and differing skillsets across borders. Iger cited the example of Apple’s Foxconn facilities in China, where the tech giant makes the vast majority of its devices. 

Iger also cautioned that Disney itself would be affected. With steel prices likely to rise, the company’s costs of building cruise ships would go up, he said.

Trump’s tariff blitz and China’s retaliation roiled commodity markets, causing crude prices to settle at three-year lows of $65.58 on Friday, with oil traders betting the US administration has no immediate plan to reverse punitive trade measures.

Advertisement

On Friday shale magnate Harold Hamm, executive chair of Continental Resources, told the Financial Times he remained supportive of Trump and his efforts to make fundamental reforms and rebuild US manufacturing by tackling unfair trade practices overseas.

“But it is also true that you cannot drill, baby, drill if you are producing oil and gas below the cost of supply. Shale producers hope the current market turbulence is a temporary situation so they can deliver on the president’s agenda to unleash American energy dominance,” said Hamm, who is also executive chair of industry group Domestic Energy Producers Alliance. 

A private equity executive at one of the industry’s largest firms said many companies had analysed and gamed out tariffs to see their impact on their bottom lines and drawn up solutions to be prepared for “liberation day”, when the tariffs were announced.

But that preliminary work was thrown out because the formula the White House used to calculate the tariffs came nowhere near people’s expectations.

Scores of investment firms have or are planning to outline their views on tariffs to clients, many of whom are overseas investors who were shocked by the scope and direction of the levies.

Advertisement

Carlyle Group on Monday will host a “special global investment environment update” call with top investors, in which co-founder David Rubenstein and two other executives are expected to outline a playbook to deal with the tariffs.

Some corporate leaders appealed for calm and did not discount the possibility that the market overreacted. 

“While it has been pretty harsh and drastic, we all know stocks have a tendency to overreact and underreact,” said Herman Bulls, vice-chair at commercial real estate group JLL and a board director at USAA, Host Hotels, Fluence Energy and Comfort Systems. 

“This is not a surprise in terms of the direction,” Bulls said. “This was talked about during the campaign and when he won.”

The tariffs announcement came midway through the “retail round-up” conference hosted in New York by JPMorgan Chase for executives, investors and analysts in the retail sector.

Advertisement

Home Depot chief financial officer Richard McPhail was among executives who indicated there would now be potentially tense negotiations about shifting the burden of tariffs on to suppliers rather than US consumers.  

“In normal course, we are having always-on conversations about cost with our vendors,” he said. “When it comes to tariffs, that’s just another cost in the equation that we have to understand mutually.”

Another retailer, Guess, this week suggested that it could switch away from suppliers in Asia to Latin America, where the tariffs announced tend to be more moderate. 

But corporate advisers said there remained too many questions over US policy for companies to be able to commit to large-scale adjustments. 

“I think they will stop short of making major supply chain moves because this is not even the beginning of the end,” said Kristin Bohl, a customs specialist at PwC US.

Advertisement

“It’s not even the end of the beginning. There’s far too much uncertainty for a CEO to decide that he or she is going to pick up operations out of country A and move them to country B.”

Reporting by Joshua Franklin, Stephen Foley, Anna Nicolaou, Antoine Gara, Jamie Smyth, Patrick Temple-West and Claire Bushey

Continue Reading

News

Trump goes all in with bet that the heavy price of tariffs will pay off for Americans

Published

on

Trump goes all in with bet that the heavy price of tariffs will pay off for Americans

WASHINGTON (AP) — Not even 24 hours after his party lost a key Wisconsin race and underperformed in Florida, President Donald Trump followed the playbook that has defined his political career: He doubled down.

Trump’s move on Wednesday to place stiff new tariffs on imports from nearly all U.S. trading partners marks an all-in bet by the Republican that his once-fringe economic vision will pay off for Americans. It was the realization of his four decades of advocacy for a protectionist foreign policy and the belief that free trade was forcing the United States into decline as its economy shifted from manufacturing to services.

The tariff announcement was the latest and perhaps boldest manifestation of Trump’s second-term freedom to lead with his instincts after feeling his first turn in the Oval Office was restrained by aides who did not share his worldview. How it shakes out will be a defining judgment on his presidency.

The early reviews have been worrisome.

Financial markets had their worst week since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, foreign trade partners retaliated and economists warned that the import taxes may boost inflation and potentially send the U.S. into a recession. It’s now Republican lawmakers who are fretting about their party’s future while Democrats feel newly buoyant over what they see as Trump’s overreach.

Advertisement

Democratic activists planned to participate in rallies across the country Saturday in what was shaping up as the largest demonstrations since Trump returned to office in January. “The winds are changing,” said Rahna Epting, who leads MoveOn, one of many organizing groups.

Trump is unbowed.

He has promised that the taxes on imports will bring about a domestic manufacturing renaissance and help fund an extension of his 2017 tax cuts. He insisted on Thursday as the Dow Jones fell by 1,600 points that things were “going very well” and the economy would “boom,” then spent Friday at the golf course as the index plunged 2,200 more points.

In his first term, Trump’s tariff threats brought world leaders to his door to cut deals. This time, his actions so far have led to steep retaliation from China and promises from European allies to push back.

Even some Trump supporters are having their doubts.

Advertisement

Frank Amoroso, a 78-year-old resident of Dewitt, Michigan, said he is concerned about short-term rising interest rates and inflation, although he believes the tariffs will be good for the country in the long run.

Amoroso, a retired automotive engineer who voted for Trump, said he would give the president’s second-term performance a C-plus or B-minus. “I think he’s doing things too fast,” he said. “But hopefully things will get done in a prudent way, and the economy will survive a little downfall.”

Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., in a telephone town hall with constituents on Thursday night, expressed reservations about the broad nature of the tariffs.

Hill, who represents a district that includes Little Rock, said he does not back tariffs on Canada and Mexico. He said the administration should instead focus on renegotiating a U.S. trade agreement with its two neighbors.

“I don’t support across-the-board tariffs as a general matter, and so I don’t support those, and I will be urging changes there because I don’t think they will end up raising a bunch of revenue that’s been asserted,” Hill said. “I wish I thought they did, but personally I don’t think they will. But I do support trade diplomacy.”

Advertisement

Still, much of Trump’s “Make America Great Again” coalition remains publicly supportive.

Doug Deason, a prominent Texas-based Republican donor, said he loves the president’s tariff plan, even if it causes some economic disruption.

“He told us during the election there would be pain for every American to get this ship turned around,” Deason said. “It is hard to watch our portfolios deteriorate so much, but we get it. We hope he holds course.”

As Trump struggles with the economy, Democrats are beginning to emerge from the cloud of doom that has consumed their party ever since their election drubbing in November.

They scored a decisive victory in Wisconsin’s high-profile state Supreme Court election on Tuesday, even after Elon Musk and his affiliated groups poured more than $20 million into the contest. New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker then breathed new life into the Democratic resistance by delivering a record 25-hour-long speech on the Senate floor that centered on a call for his party to find its resolve.

Advertisement

Booker told The Associated Press afterward that a significant political shift has begun even as his party tries to learn from its mistakes in the 2024 presidential election.

“I think you’re seeing a lot more energy, a lot more determination, a lot more feeling like we’ve got to fight,” Booker said. “You can’t sit back any more. You can’t sit on the sidelines. There’s a larger, growing movement.”

Booker, a 2020 presidential candidate, acknowledged he is not ruling out a 2028 run, although he said he is focused on his 2026 Senate reelection for now.

There is broad agreement among Democrats — and even some Republicans, privately at least — that what Trump has unleashed on the global economy could help accelerate the Democratic comeback.

Ezra Levin, co-founder of the progressive resistance group known as Indivisible, has been critical of Democratic officials’ response in recent weeks to Trump’s leadership. But on Friday, he was somewhat giddy about the political consequences for Trump’s GOP after the tariffs announcement.

Advertisement

“Raising prices across the board for your constituents is not popular,” Levin said. “It’s the kind of thing that can lead to a 1932-style total generational wipe out of a party.”

___

Peoples reported from New York. Associated Press writers Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas, and Isabella Volmert in Dewitt, Michigan, contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending