Connect with us

News

Hungary loses EU funds as economic slump deepens

Published

on

Hungary loses EU funds as economic slump deepens

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Hungary is set to permanently lose access to just over €1bn in EU funds on January 1, as disputes between Budapest and Brussels hamper the country’s capacity to drag itself out of recession — and undermine Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s bid for re-election in 2026.

The freeze on EU funds has hit Hungary at a time when its government has little room for manoeuvre. Its budget deficit this year stands at more than 4.5 per cent of GDP, increasing political tensions.

Hungary’s economy shrank by 0.7 per cent in the third quarter — the second contraction in a row — plunging the economy into a technical recession amid weak demand in the automotive, electronics and pharmaceutical sectors that dominate its manufacturing base.

Advertisement

Of the €6.3bn in funds frozen by Brussels over concerns about the rule of law, Budapest will permanently lose €1.04bn because this amount must be allocated by the end of 2024 or it expires. Hungary is also missing out on €1mn per day in funding from the EU over its illegal treatment of asylum seekers; its total losses over the treatment of asylum seekers will amount to €200mn by the year’s end.

Both come on top of a one-off €200mn fine imposed by the European Court of Justice in June over breaching asylum rules and ignoring an earlier judgment.

In total, €19bn in post-pandemic recovery funds and other EU resources remain blocked.

János Bóka, EU affairs minister for Hungary, said in mid-December that it was “very difficult” not to interpret the withdrawal of funds as “political pressuring”, adding that Budapest would take action to “remedy this discriminatory situation”.

The government is also seeking compensation for the ECJ’s June ruling that led to the multimillion-euro fines, in another sign that relations between Brussels and Budapest have reached a new low.

Advertisement

The Hungarian opposition has seized the opportunity to blame Orbán’s government for the economic malaise.

Péter Magyar, an Orbán ally turned foe whose party caught up with Orbán’s Fidesz in EU elections in June and has since come to lead opinion polls, said: “You have had 14 years with unlimited power and billions in EU funds . . . This ship has sailed. Hungarians won’t wait. Enough is enough!”

EU money is likely to remain blocked all the way until the elections, with neither side willing to let up on what each considers to be fundamental issues, including anti-corruption measures, judicial independence, and Hungary’s treatment of minorities and asylum seekers.

Brussels has also questioned Budapest’s belief that it can raise spending over the course of the next four years, based on Hungary’s expectations of stellar growth.

The two sides have until mid-January to agree on a compromise fiscal plan between 2025 and 2028, with the EU set to give the country bad marks unless the government lowers spending.

Advertisement

“There will be a lot of tug of war,” said Péter Virovácz, ING’s senior economist for Hungary.

For the 2025 budget, billions of euros worth of mostly EU-funded investments and social spending have been cancelled, prompting Magyar to tour the country, calling attention to crumbling hospitals, inadequate childcare facilities and railway stations that have been left to the elements for decades.

Economy minister Márton Nagy has acknowledged that the government cannot entirely plug the gap left by EU funding.

“You can’t just say you want a shiny new hospital, you need money. For that you need growth,” Nagy told the Financial Times. “The economy needs to be fixed first . . . for years we have stumbled from crisis to crisis, Covid, energy crisis, war, now the weakness of the German economy . . . We all know tax revenues are missing so we need to recreate those.”

Nagy has insisted the government will not overspend, saying he will limit the use of funds to boost growth to 0.5 per cent of GDP.

Advertisement

Instead of using government funds for stimulus, the economy minister has proposed enabling people to use about €5bn worth of private pension fund savings for real estate purchases or renovations tax-free, in a move aimed at boosting weak demand.

Orbán, meanwhile, is betting that investors from Asia might fill the gap — a policy that he dubbed “economic neutrality”.

Chinese investment in Hungary has surged in recent years, but few think it can entirely compensate for a lack of funds from Brussels.

Before the spats between Brussels and Budapest intensified in 2022, the EU was ready to fund several big infrastructure projects in Hungary.

Those included a railway link from the centre of Budapest to the capital’s airport.

Advertisement

“We could have had a golden age, with more than €10bn spent on the sector in this decade alone,” said Dávid Vitézy, who led the Budapest transport authority at that time, and later briefly served as Orbán’s state secretary for transport. “We have lost nearly all of that.” 

“EU funding is an important part of a public investment in Hungary,” EU economy commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis told the FT in an interview in December, adding that “it’s important that obviously Hungary does what is necessary to ensure the availability of the funding”.

News

Video: How Trump’s Tariffs Affected the Economy After One Year

Published

on

Video: How Trump’s Tariffs Affected the Economy After One Year

new video loaded: How Trump’s Tariffs Affected the Economy After One Year

One of Donald Trump’s central campaign promises was to raise tariffs on imports from multiple countries. Ana Swanson, a New York Times reporter, analyzes data from the past year to examine how those tariffs have affected the economy.

By Ana Swanson, Leila Medina and June Kim

February 2, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Kennedy Center will close for 2 years for renovations in July, Trump says, after performers backlash

Published

on

Kennedy Center will close for 2 years for renovations in July, Trump says, after performers backlash

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he will move to close Washington’s Kennedy Center performing arts venue for two years starting in July for construction.

Trump’s announcement on social media Sunday night follows a wave of cancellations since Trump ousted the previous leadership and added his name to the building.

Trump announced his plan days after the premiere of “Melania” a documentary of the first lady was shown at the storied venue. The proposal, he said, is subject to approval by the board of the Kennedy Center, which has been stocked with his hand-picked allies. Trump himself chairs the center’s board of trustees.

“This important decision, based on input from many Highly Respected Experts, will take a tired, broken, and dilapidated Center, one that has been in bad condition, both financially and structurally for many years, and turn it into a World Class Bastion of Arts, Music, and Entertainment,” Trump wrote in his post.

Leading performing arts groups have pulled out of appearances, most recently, composer Philip Glass, who announced his decision to withdraw his Symphony No. 15 “Lincoln” because he said the values of the center today are in “direct conflict” with the message of the piece.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the Washington National Opera announced that it will move performances away from the Kennedy Center in another high-profile departure following Trump’s takeover of the U.S. capital’s leading performing arts venue.

Continue Reading

News

Minnesota citizens detained by ICE are left rattled, even weeks later

Published

on

Minnesota citizens detained by ICE are left rattled, even weeks later

Aliya Rahman is detained by federal agents near the scene where Renee Macklin Good was fatally shot by an ICE officer on Jan. 13 in Minneapolis.

Adam Gray/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Adam Gray/AP

It’s a video many saw on social media soon after it happened: Officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, dragging a woman out of her car and forcing her to the ground.

The woman in the video is Aliya Rahman, a Bangladeshi-American and a U.S. citizen. The day she was arrested, Rahman was on her way to the doctor, when she came across an ICE operation and a group of people protesting. She said the ICE officers told her to move her car, but the scene was chaotic and she received multiple instructions at once.

The Department of Homeland Security said in an earlier statement they arrested Rahman because she “ignored multiple commands.” But Rahman, who is autistic and also recovering from a traumatic brain injury, says it sometimes takes her a moment to understand auditory commands. Before she knew it, the officers were carrying her away by her limbs.

Advertisement

“I thought I might well die,” Rahman said. She was placed in an SUV with three ICE officers.

“I heard the laughing driver radio in, ‘we’re bringing in a body,’” she recalled. It took her a second to realize they meant her.

In recent days, federal officials have signaled a willingness to reduce the large number of immigration agents in Minnesota, though they say any decrease will depend on state and local cooperation. Even if a draw-down occurs, they’ll leave behind a changed community, including many citizens questioned and detained by immigration officers in recent weeks.

Rahman was taken to the Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis, where immigration agents have brought detainees before releasing them or sending them out of state. While at Whipple, Rahman experienced a severe headache, and asked for medical care for more than an hour. Eventually, she passed out. She says she woke up in a downtown hospital, where doctors told her she had suffered a concussion.

Her arrest was more than two weeks ago, but she can’t shake the fear.

Advertisement

“I do not feel safe being in my own home, driving these streets,” she said. “And even then, I am in a significantly better place than a lot of the other folks who have been detained.”

Rahman is far from the only U.S. citizen in Minnesota with such a story.

ChongLy Scott Thao, a Hmong man and U.S. citizen, was pulled from his home wearing only sandals, underwear and a blanket around his shoulders. Thao said the immigration agents drove him “to the middle of nowhere” and photographed him. He told reporters he feared they would beat him. They later brought him back to his house.

Mubashir Khalif Hussen, a Somali-American and U.S. citizen, also was detained by ICE.

“I wasn’t even outside for mere seconds before I seen a masked person running at me full speed,” Hussen said at a news conference last month. “He tackled me. I told him, ‘I’m a U.S. citizen.’ He didn’t seem to care. He dragged me outside to the snow while I was handcuffed, restrained, helpless and he pushed me to the ground.”

Advertisement

Hussen is now suing the Trump administration as part of a class action lawsuit, accusing it of racial profiling. According to the lawsuit, ICE eventually released Hussen outside the Whipple building, telling him to walk the seven miles back to where they detained him.

In a statement to NPR, the Department of Homeland Security said “allegations that ICE engages in ‘racial profiling’ are disgusting, reckless and categorically FALSE.”

But Walter Olson, a senior fellow with the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, says many legal experts are coming to a different conclusion.

“This is no longer just a series of accidents that could have been due to someone being badly trained or being a bad apple. This is a systematic assault on constitutional rights,” he said.

The Fourth Amendment protects people from being stopped without reasonable suspicion and arresting without probable cause, a higher standard. Courts in the U.S. have decided skin color alone does not meet either bar.

Advertisement

Last fall, however, the Supreme court ruled that “apparent ethnicity” could be used to determine reasonable suspicion, as long as there were other factors too. Legal experts say the decision may give ICE more discretion.

Olson says even if the Minnesota immigration crackdown eases, these same concerns could arise elsewhere. He noted that judges ruled against the federal government during its crackdowns in Los Angeles, Chicago and Portland.

“And they were not led to call off or rethink the campaign. They just regrouped and came back to another state,” Olson said.

Even citizens who were not arrested but still questioned are rattled after run-ins with immigration officers. Luis Escoto, the owner of El Taquito Taco Shop in West St. Paul, said immigration agents surrounded his wife Irma’s car in their restaurant’s alley when she went out to get more lettuce before the dinner hour. Escoto ran outside.

Luis Escato poses for a portrait inside of his restaurant, El Taquito in West St. Paul, Minnesota.

Luis Escoto poses for a portrait inside of his restaurant, El Taquito in West St. Paul, Minnesota.

Jaida Grey Eagle for NPR

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Jaida Grey Eagle for NPR

Advertisement

“I said, ‘Hey, hold on. That’s just my wife,’” Escoto said. “They said, ‘We need proof of U.S. citizenship,’ and I said, ‘She’s a U.S. citizen.’”

Luis and Irma Escoto are both citizens. Escoto showed one of the officers their passport cards, which he still had in his wallet after a recent trip to Mexico.

“He said, ‘Well, next time she should carry that all the time, because if she doesn’t have proof of citizenship we’re going to arrest her,’” Escoto recalled.

The immigration agents left. But weeks later, Escoto is still shaken and angry. Some of his customers are now escorting him and his wife home each night when the restaurant closes.

When he became a citizen 35 years ago, Escoto said he was nervous because the government took away his green card. He asked the judge about it.

Advertisement
Irma Escoto poses for a portrait inside of her restaurant, El Taquito in West St. Paul, Minnesota.

Irma Escoto poses for a portrait inside of her restaurant, El Taquito in West St. Paul, Minnesota.

Jaida Grey Eagle for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Jaida Grey Eagle for NPR

Advertisement

“I said, ‘Sir, what happens if the immigration officers stop me?’ And he said ‘Well, today you’re proud to be a United States citizen,’” Escoto said.

The judge told him you don’t need documentation when you’re a citizen. But now, Escoto said, that doesn’t seem so true anymore.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending