Connect with us

News

House GOP lays groundwork for Mayorkas impeachment as moderates balk | CNN Politics

Published

on

House GOP lays groundwork for Mayorkas impeachment as moderates balk | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

Senior Home Republicans are transferring swiftly to construct a case in opposition to Homeland Safety Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas as they strongly weigh launching uncommon impeachment proceedings in opposition to a Cupboard secretary, a plan that would generate sharp backlash from GOP moderates.

Key committee chairmen are already getting ready to carry hearings on the issues on the southern border, which Republicans say might function a prelude to an impeachment inquiry in opposition to Mayorkas. Three Home committees – Oversight, Homeland Safety and Judiciary – will quickly maintain hearings concerning the inflow of migrants and safety issues on the border.

The Home Judiciary Committee, which might have jurisdiction over an impeachment decision, is ready to maneuver forward with formal proceedings if there seems to be a consensus inside the GOP convention, in keeping with a GOP supply straight aware of the matter. The primary impeachment decision launched by Home Republicans already has picked up help, together with from a member of the GOP management staff.

Advertisement

A GOP supply mentioned the primary Judiciary Committee listening to on the border might come later this month or early February.

One high chairman is already sounding supportive of the transfer, an indication of how the thought of impeaching President Joe Biden’s Cupboard secretary has moved from the fringes to the mainstream of the convention.

“If anyone is a chief candidate for impeachment on this city, it’s Mayorkas,” Rep. James Comer, chairman of the Home Oversight Committee, advised CNN.

It’s exceedingly uncommon for a Cupboard secretary to be impeached, one thing that has solely occurred as soon as in US historical past – when William Belknap, the secretary of warfare, was impeached by the Home earlier than being acquitted by the Senate in 1876. But it’s a really actual risk now after Kevin McCarthy – as he was pushing for the votes to win the speakership – known as on Mayorkas to resign or face potential impeachment proceedings.

With no indicators that Mayorkas is stepping apart, Home Republicans are signaling they’re ready to maneuver forward, whilst a bevy of members are uneasy concerning the strategy.

Advertisement

Certainly, McCarthy has to stability his base’s calls for for aggressive motion with the issues from extra reasonable members – lots of whom maintain seats in swing districts central to his slim majority. And a few in safer seats aren’t but bought on whether or not the GOP ought to pursue that route.

“Clearly, the administration of the Southern border has been incompetent,” Rep. Dusty Johnson, a Republican of South Dakota, advised CNN. “That isn’t the edge within the Structure for impeachment – it’s excessive crimes and misdemeanors. … I’d wish to take into consideration the authorized commonplace the Structure has set out – and whether or not or not that’s been met.”

If he loses greater than 4 GOP votes on an impeachment decision, the trouble would fail within the Home and will mark an enormous embarrassment for the GOP management. Already, he has misplaced one vote – Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas who mentioned he’d oppose the trouble – and a number of other different members are removed from satisfied that charging Mayorkas with committing a excessive crime and misdemeanor is warranted, even when they consider he’s performed a lackluster job in serving to safe the southern border.

“Has he been completely dishonest to individuals? Sure. Has he failed in his job miserably? Sure,” Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, a Florida Republican, mentioned of Mayorkas. “Are these grounds for impeachment? I don’t know.”

Certainly, Republicans from swing districts are urging their colleagues to not rush into impeachment, which might be dead-on-arrival within the Senate and will flip the American individuals off if the get together is perceived as overreaching.

Advertisement

“The border is a catastrophe and a complete failure by the Biden administration. We must always first to attempt to power change by way of our energy of the purse,” Rep. Don Bacon, who represents a Biden-won district in Nebraska, advised CNN. “Possibly after extra oversight we’ll see the place center America is at, however I don’t assume impartial, swing voters are concerned with impeachments.”

Requested Tuesday about his pre-election warning that Mayorkas could possibly be impeached by the Home over the GOP issues concerning the borders, McCarthy railed on the issues on the border.

“Ought to that particular person keep of their job? Nicely, I raised the difficulty they shouldn’t. The factor that we will do is we will examine, after which that investigation might result in an impeachment inquiry,” McCarthy advised CNN, including it might “rise to that event” of an impeachment if Mayorkas is discovered to be “derelict” in his duties.

In the course of the first working week of their new majority, Rep. Pete Fallon, a Texas Republican, launched articles of impeachment for Mayorkas over issues on the southern border, and Rep. Andy Biggs, a hard-right Arizona Republican, vowed to re-introduce an identical decision within the coming weeks, which might function a template for eventual impeachment proceedings.

Fallon’s decision says Mayorkas has “undermined the operational management of our southern border and inspired unlawful immigration,” additionally contending he lied to Congress that the border was safe.

Advertisement

Democrats say Republicans are threatening to question Mayorkas for pure political causes, and say coverage disputes hardly rise to the extent of “excessive crimes and misdemeanors.”

Mayorkas has already testified in entrance of Congress quite a few instances since he assumed his submit, and his company says he’s totally ready to proceed complying with oversight within the GOP-led Home. Thus far, there have been no formal requests for hearings or testimony, with congressional committees nonetheless working to get off the bottom, although Republicans final yr despatched quite a few letters and preservation requests telegraphing their plans for almost all.

In a press release, a spokeswoman for Mayorkas made clear he has no plans to resign and known as on Congress to return collectively to repair the nation’s immigration system.

“Secretary Mayorkas is proud to advance the noble mission of this Division, help its extraordinary workforce, and serve the American individuals. The Division will proceed our work to implement our legal guidelines and safe our border, whereas constructing a secure, orderly, and humane immigration system,” the spokeswoman mentioned in a press release. “Members of Congress can do higher than level the finger at another person; they need to come to the desk and work on options for our damaged system and outdated legal guidelines, which they haven’t up to date in over 40 years.”

But there are indicators that the push is gaining steam within the Home GOP.

Advertisement

Fallon’s decision has attracted the help of a number of Republicans who beforehand held off on calling for impeachment, together with Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Texas Republican and member of the Homeland Safety Committee, and Oklahoma Rep. Stephanie Bice, a brand new member of the GOP management staff – signaling the thought is hardly remoted to the perimeter wing of the get together.

Fallon, too, had not beforehand backed impeaching Mayorkas till this Congress. Fallon mentioned that he launched impeachment articles to assist get “the ball rolling,” however nonetheless believes it’s key to indicate the American public why they consider Mayorkas deserves to be faraway from his submit.

“It will be significant, it’s an emergency, you should break the glass, you actually do have to take it up, after which we’re going to have an extra investigation,” Fallon advised CNN. “Whereas that’s why I filed the articles, you’ll be able to at all times simply sit on them and never do something with them. That begins the ball rolling, we’re going to present Mayorkas the chance to defend himself and his division.”

In the meantime, key committee chairs are vowing to carry hearings on the disaster on the southern border and prepping plans to haul in officers for interviews. GOP Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who leads the highly effective Home Judiciary Committee the place impeachment articles would originate, steered the difficulty can be one of many first hearings when his panel will get up and operating.

GOP leaders are cognizant of the very fact they’ll solely afford to lose 4 Republicans on any given vote, and wish to construct an intensive case for impeachment that may carry your complete get together alongside. However strain is already constructing on McCarthy, who has emboldened members of his proper flank in his bid to assert the speaker’s gavel – and even given them a strong software to name for his ouster if he doesn’t hearken to their calls for.

Advertisement

Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican and one of many key negotiators within the standoff over McCarthy’s speakership and who was the primary to name for Mayorkas’ impeachment, advised CNN: “I’ve been very public about my perception that he has violated his oath, that he has undermined our capacity to defend our nation.”

The first committees that may be concerned in constructing a case in opposition to Mayorkas are each chaired by members of the hardline Home Freedom Caucus: Jordan and Tennessee Rep. Mark Inexperienced, the newly elected chief of the Home Homeland Safety Committee.

A part of Inexperienced’s pitch to turn out to be chairman has centered on how he’ll maintain the Biden administration accountable over the southern border. Inexperienced advised CNN he has a “five-phase plan” to delve into the difficulty.

“And if it seems that (impeachment) is important, we’ll hand that over to Judiciary,” Inexperienced mentioned. “We’ll have a fact-finding function.”

There’s additionally been speak of holding area hearings on the southern border, whereas Republicans plan to maintain making visits there, as they did within the final Congress.

Advertisement

Jordan advised reporters that the border issues will probably be certainly one of his first hearings as chairman of the Judiciary Committee. However a supply near Jordan, who has turn out to be an in depth McCarthy ally, cautioned that they won’t transfer forward with impeachment except the get together is totally on board

And it’s clear that Home Republicans usually are not but in settlement on the difficulty.

Freshman Rep. Mike Lawler, who represents a Biden-won district in New York, advised CNN shortly earlier than being sworn in: “I feel the highest precedence is to cope with inflation and the price of residing. … I don’t wish to see what we noticed throughout the Trump administration, the place Democrats simply went after the President and the administration incessantly.”

However there are some Republicans in Biden districts already lining up behind impeachment articles for Mayorkas, suggesting the politics could possibly be transferring within the GOP’s course.

Freshman Rep. Nick Langworthy, one other New York Republican, is among the many 26 co-sponsors who’ve signed on to Fallon’s impeachment articles up to now.

Advertisement

And one other freshman New York Republican from a swing district, Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, has additionally expressed help for impeaching Mayorkas.

D’Esposito contended that many Customs and Border Safety brokers are bored with the management from the highest.

“They’re those that can let you know flat out that Secretary Mayorkas just isn’t residing (up) to his oath and he’s failing to safe our homeland,” he added.

And South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, additionally a Republican who hails from a swing district, mentioned Mayorkas must go.

“Whenever you increase your hand and take an oath to guard our nation’s border, and also you deliberately and willfully neglect to do this job, it is best to lose it,” mentioned Mace, who pointed to the inflow of medication throughout the southern border. “Both manner, Secretary Mayorkas has to go.”

Advertisement

Home Republicans who’ve lengthy been itching to question Mayorkas have been making an attempt to maintain the strain on their management, holding a information convention final month and urging McCarthy to extra explicitly spell out the place he stands on the difficulty earlier than they voted him speaker.

McCarthy traveled to the southern border shortly after the November election, the place he known as on Mayorkas to resign and threatened him with a possible impeachment inquiry, although he has not explicitly promised he would go that route.

However even when an impeachment decision is authorized within the Home, successful a two-thirds majority within the Senate to convict Mayorkas has just about no probability of succeeding. Some Senate Republicans, corresponding to Senate GOP Whip John Thune of South Dakota, had been noncommittal about backing such a transfer. And Democrats are roundly dismissing the thought.

“A splendidly constructive motion,” Sen. Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, mentioned sarcastically when requested concerning the impeachment speak.

Coons shortly added: “I feel that’d be an unlimited waste of time.”

Advertisement

This story has been up to date with further developments Tuesday.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Published

on

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Your investigation of these allegations is consistent with the IG’s mission to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in federal agencies, and can help determine if politically connected crypto interests are undermining our national security. As Congress considers legislation on the market structure for digital assets, we must ensure that cryptocurrencies like USD1 are not providing the President and senior officials with the ability to line their pockets at the expense of the public interest.

The following facts have been reported in multiple outlets regarding Mr. Witkoff:

• Mr. Witkoff’s son Zach Witkoff is the CEO of World Liberty Financial (WLF), which the President’s family owns a majority stake in.³
• Beginning in January, one of Sheikh Tahnoon’s employees, Fiacc Larkin, joined WLF as the “chief strategic advisor” while continuing to work at G42, an AI investment firm owned by Sheikh Tahnoon that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, works closely with Chinese military companies.4



On May 1, 2025, Zach Witkoff announced that MGX, a state-owned investment firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, had agreed to use a WLF-issued stablecoin, USD1, to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. As a result of this deal, WLF stands to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction fees from MGX, and more from the returns on any investments it makes with the $2 billion deposit.³
As of August, Mr. Witkoff maintained a financial interest in WLF and thus stands to personally benefit from his son’s business dealings with the UAE.6 Nevertheless, he did not recuse himself from deliberations regarding the UAE, which may violate federal ethics law.

The following facts have been reported about Mr. Sacks:







He is a special government employee who continues to serve as a “general partner” at his venture capital fund, Craft Ventures.

8

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, an Emirati sovereign wealth fund controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, was an early investor in Craft Ventures and continues to hold an investment in the fund.
In addition, Craft Ventures is invested in BitGo, which has partnered with WLF to provide the technical infrastructure for USD1. If BitGo’s valuation grows, based on the UAE’s investment into USD1, Mr. Sacks and his firm stand to benefit.

3 Yahoo Finance, “Trump family reportedly has a 60% stake in the World Liberty Financial,” Anand Sinha, March 31, 2025,
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-reportedly-60-stake-172742661.html.
4 New York Times, “Inside U.S. Efforts to Untangle an A.I. Giant’s Ties to China,” Mark Mazzetti and Edward
Wong, Nov. 27, 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/us/politics/ai-us-uae-china-security-g42.html.
5 New York Times, “At a Dubai Conference, Trump’s Conflicts Take Center Stage,” David Yaffe-Bellany, May 1, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/us/politics/trump-cryptocurrency-usd1-dubai-conference-

announcement.html.

6U.S Office of Government Ethics, Form 278e for Steven C. Witkoff, August 13, 2025, p. 23, https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/090d0de07e1d2fdf/bbf02867-full.pdf.

18 U.S.C. § 208.

8 White House, “Limited Waiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) Regarding A.I. Assets,” June 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/David-Sacks.pdf.

2

Continue Reading

News

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Published

on

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Nigel Farage has refused to criticise Donald Trump’s claims that paracetamol, sold in the US as Tylenol, could cause autism, insisting “science is never settled” and he would never “side with” medical experts.

The Reform UK leader said he had “no idea” if the US president was right to tell pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, also known as Tylenol and paracetamol, and suggesting that those who could not “tough it out” should limit their intake.

Scientists and global health agencies including the World Health Organization have strongly dismissed Trump’s false claims, calling them misguided and saying the evidence linking paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism was “inconsistent”.

The UK’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the British public they should not “pay any attention whatsoever to what Donald Trump says about medicine”, adding: “I trust doctors over President Trump frankly, on this.”

But in a wide-ranging interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Farage was asked directly if Trump was right to share those unproven claims. He said: “I have no idea, I’ve no idea. You know we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows Nick, I don’t know.

Advertisement

“He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism. I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I’ve no idea.”

When Farage was asked if he would side with medical experts who say it is dangerous to make the link, he added: “I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody, right? You know? I don’t side with anybody, because science is never settled. We should remember that.”

Yet when challenged over whether it was irresponsible for Trump to make such an unproven claim, Farage said: “That’s an opinion he’s [Trump’s] got. It’s not one that I necessarily share.”

Farage’s refusal to condemn Trump’s claims comes weeks after a controversial doctor, Aseem Malhotra, was given top billing at Reform UK’s party conference and used his main-stage speech to claim the Covid vaccine caused cancer in the royal family. Malhotra is an adviser to Trump’s health secretary, Robert F Kennedy.

In the same interview, Farage said Trump was “right to say” that sharia law “is an issue in London”.

Advertisement

“Never take what he [Trump] says literally, ever on anything. But always take everything he says seriously,” Farage said, adding: Trump “has a point.”

“So is he right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No. Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

Labour MPs have urged Keir Starmer to reprimand Trump’s administration after the US president falsely claimed in a speech to the United Nations: “I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed.

skip past newsletter promotion

“Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.”

Trump has been publicly attacking the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, since 2015 when the Labour politician criticised Trump, the then presidential candidate, for suggesting that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.

A spokesperson for Khan said: “We are not going to dignify his appalling and bigoted comments with a response. London is the greatest city in the world, safer than major US cities and we’re delighted to welcome the record number of US citizens moving here.”

During the LBC phone-in, Farage also said Reform’s plan to ban anyone who was not a UK citizen from claiming benefits would not apply to Ukrainians and Hongkongers.

Advertisement

“No, because they come for different reasons,” Farage said, adding those who had lived in the UK on indefinite leave to remain and had not worked or paid into the system would be told their benefits would be cut.

Continue Reading

News

Alphabet market value exceeds $3tn

Published

on

Alphabet market value exceeds tn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Alphabet’s market capitalisation surged above $3tn for the first time on Monday on the back of a sharp rally for the search giant’s shares over the past few weeks.

Shares in Google’s parent company have climbed more than 30 per cent to a record high of $252 since the group posted double-digit growth in revenue and profit in quarterly results out in late July.

The rally means Alphabet joins Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple as the only US companies valued above $3tn. Chipmaker Nvidia in July became the first company to hit a $4tn market value.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending