Connect with us

News

Georgia’s opposition calls for protests after pro-Russian party declared winner

Published

on

Georgia’s opposition calls for protests after pro-Russian party declared winner

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Georgia’s opposition has called for protests after rejecting preliminary results showing victory for the ruling party in a pivotal election widely seen as a choice between a future in Europe or alignment with Russia.

With votes from 99 per cent of precincts counted, the ruling Georgian Dream (GD) party controlled by pro-Russian oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili had secured 54.2 per cent of the vote, according to Central Election Commission results early on Sunday.

The main opposition parties — the four-party Coalition for Change and the United National Movement (UNM) founded by jailed former president Mikheil Saakashvili — received 10.8 per cent and 10.1 per cent of the vote, respectively. They have called for protests on Sunday.

Advertisement

If Ivanishvili’s party’s majority in the 150-seat parliament is confirmed, analysts say it could end Georgia’s hopes of securing EU membership and deliver a severe blow to the opposition and civil society. It has been in power for 12 years. “The elections were stolen, this is a coup and the GD is responsible for it and they will be held accountable,” Nika Gvaramia, one of the leaders of the oppositional coalition said late on Saturday. 

Tina Bokuchava, the chair of the UNM, also rejected the results: “We will not give up our European future and we will not accept the stolen election results announced by the Central Election Commission,” she said. 

Before the polls had even closed on Sunday, GD Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze declared the results a “landslide victory” for the ruling party.

“It’s a rare occasion worldwide for the same party to continue succeeding under such difficult circumstances,” Ivanishvili said from a stage in front of GD’s headquarters. 

Observers reported widespread irregularities during the vote, including the distribution of pre-marked ballots, the forced expulsion of observers from polling stations and violations of voting secrecy.

Advertisement

“My Vote,” a domestic electoral observation mission, described the irregularities as part of a “larger scheme” designed to undermine the outcome. The ruling party also pressured state workers to secure their votes, observers said. “They often don’t even need to make explicit threats. Hints like ‘you need to do the right thing’ are enough,” said Natia, an election observer.

Unidentified men dressed in dark jeans and black coats — widely believed to belong to special services — attacked opposition party headquarters and a crew from an opposition TV station. The Financial Times saw these groups outside several polling stations in Tbilisi on Sunday. 

In the capital GD polled 38-40 per cent of the vote, while in smaller towns such as Bolnisi and Marneuli it secured 80 per cent, preliminary results on the election commission’s website showed. 

The first exit polls had revealed starkly conflicting results. Two polls, conducted by Edison and HarrisX for opposition-leaning TV stations, showed GD receiving between 40.9 and 42 per cent of the vote, while a pro-government station reported 56 per cent.

The elections are seen by many as a watershed moment for Georgia’s future. About 80 per cent of the population support accession to the EU, a prospect made more tangible after Georgia received EU candidate status in December 2023.

Advertisement

While GD formally remains committed to Georgia’s integration with Europe its anti-EU rhetoric stepped up after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Tbilisi refused to impose sanctions on Moscow and barred several Russian opposition politicians from entering the country.

The GD framed the elections as a choice between war and peace, positioning itself as able to maintain equilibrium between the west and the Kremlin. The situation in Georgia closely mirrored the situation of Moldova, where voters last week opted for EU accession with a razor-thin majority.

To promote the war and peace message, GD had launched an aggressive campaign, covering cities with posters that juxtaposed scenes of destruction in Ukraine — burnt buses and ruined buildings — with pristine images of Georgia.

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending