Connect with us

News

Elon Musk has taken control of Twitter and fired its top executives | CNN Business

Published

on

Elon Musk has taken control of Twitter and fired its top executives | CNN Business


New York
CNN Enterprise
 — 

Elon Musk has accomplished his $44 billion deal to purchase Twitter, a supply conversant in the deal informed CNN Thursday, placing the world’s richest man accountable for one of many world’s most influential social media platforms.

Musk fired CEO Parag Agrawal and two different executives, in keeping with two individuals conversant in the choice. Twitter declined to remark.

The deal’s closing removes a cloud of uncertainty that has hung over Twitter’s enterprise, workers and shareholders for a lot of the yr. After initially agreeing to purchase the corporate in April, Musk spent months trying to get out of the deal, first citing issues in regards to the variety of bots on the platform and later allegations raised by an organization whistleblower.

By finishing the deal, Musk and Twitter have prevented a trial that was initially set to happen earlier this month. However Musk’s takeover, and the instant firings of a few of its high executives, now raises a number of latest questions for the way forward for the social media platform, and the various corners of society impacted by it. Musk on Thursday additionally fired CFO Ned Segal and coverage head Vijaya Gadde, in keeping with the 2 sources.

Advertisement

Musk has mentioned he plans to rethink Twitter’s content material moderation insurance policies in service of a extra maximalist strategy to “free speech.” The billionaire has additionally mentioned he disagrees with Twitter’s apply of everlasting bans for individuals who repeatedly violate its guidelines, elevating the chance that a lot of beforehand banned, controversial customers may reemerge on the platform.

Maybe most instantly, many can be watching to see how quickly Musk may let former President Donald Trump again on the platform, as he has beforehand mentioned he would do. Relying on the timing, such a transfer may have main implications for the upcoming US midterm elections, in addition to the 2024 Presidential marketing campaign. 

In taking these steps, Musk may singlehandedly upend the media and political ecosystem, reshape public discourse on-line and disrupt the nascent sphere of conservative-leaning social media properties that emerged largely in response to grievances about bans and restrictions on Twitter and different mainstream companies.

Earlier this week, Musk visited Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters to fulfill with workers. He additionally posted an open letter to Twitter advertisers, saying he doesn’t need the platform to grow to be a “free-for-all-hellscape the place something could be mentioned with no penalties.”

Advertisement

The acquisition additionally guarantees to increase Musk’s affect. The billionaire already owns, oversees or has vital stakes in corporations growing automobiles, rockets, robots and satellite tv for pc web, in addition to extra experimental ventures comparable to mind implants. Now he controls a social media platform that shapes how a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of individuals talk and get their information.

Even for Twitter, an organization recognized for a specific amount of chaos over its historical past, the months-long deal course of with Musk was turbulent.

Musk, a distinguished and controversial Twitter person, turned concerned with the corporate earlier this yr when he constructed up a greater than 9% stake in its shares. After saying he had grow to be Twitter’s largest shareholder, Musk accepted after which pulled out of a proposal to sit down on the corporate’s board.

Musk then provided to purchase Twitter outright at a big premium, threatened a hostile takeover and signed a “seller-friendly” deal to purchase the corporate that concerned waiving due diligence.

“This isn’t a approach to earn cash,” Musk mentioned in an on-stage interview shortly after making a proposal to purchase Twitter. “My sturdy intuitive sense is that having a public platform that’s maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extraordinarily necessary to the way forward for civilization.”

Advertisement

Musk additionally pledged to “defeat the spam bots or die making an attempt,” referring to the faux and rip-off accounts which might be usually particularly lively within the replies to his tweets and people of others with massive followings on the platform.

Inside weeks of the acquisition settlement, nonetheless, Musk started elevating issues in regards to the prevalence of those self same faux and spam accounts on Twitter and finally tried to terminate the deal.

Musk visited Twitter's San Francisco headquarters earlier this week before the acquisition closed to meet with employees.

Twitter sued him to observe by with the settlement, alleging that Musk was utilizing the bot argument as a pretense to get out of a deal for which he had developed purchaser’s regret. Within the weeks after the deal was introduced, a lot of the inventory market, together with social media corporations, declined amid issues about rising inflation and a looming recession. The downturn additionally hit Tesla and, in flip, Musk’s private internet price.

Authorized consultants extensively believed that Twitter was on sturdy footing to have the deal enforced in court docket. Two weeks earlier than the contentious authorized battle was set to go to trial, Musk mentioned he would observe by with the deal on its authentic phrases in any case. Because the events negotiated, Musk’s attorneys requested a decide to remain the authorized proceedings, prompting pushback from Twitter, which feared that Musk won’t keep true to his promise to shut the deal.

In a pointy response, Twitter’s attorneys wrote that Musk had been trying to exit the deal and “now, on the eve of trial, Defendants declare they intend to shut in any case. ‘Belief us,’ they are saying, ‘we imply it this time.’”

Advertisement

Delaware Chancery Court docket chancellor Kathaleen St. Decide McCormick gave the events till 5 p.m. on Oct. 28 to shut the deal or face a rescheduled trial.

With the deal drama out of the way in which, consideration now turns to Musk’s plans for Twitter.

Past the elimination of Twitter’s CEO and different executives, Musk’s takeover may additionally usher within the return of some measure of affect over the corporate by founder Jack Dorsey, who stepped down as CEO in November and left its board in Could. Whereas Dorsey has mentioned he won’t formally return to Twitter, he has privately mentioned the takeover with Musk and provided recommendation.

Musk has additionally reportedly informed potential buyers within the deal that he deliberate to do away with almost 75% of the corporate’s workers, in a transfer that would disrupt each side of how Twitter operates. He beforehand mentioned dramatically lowering Twitter’s workforce in private textual content messages with pals in regards to the deal, which have been revealed in court docket filings, and didn’t dismiss the potential for layoffs in a name with Twitter workers in June.

Among the changes Musk could make to Twitter is restoring the account of former President Donald Trump, who was banned from the platform following the January 6 Capitol attack in 2021.

Beneath Musk, Twitter might not have use for a lot of of its present workers. Musk has repeatedly made clear he would overhaul Twitter’s content material moderation insurance policies and bolster what he calls “free speech,” probably undoing years of efforts from the corporate to handle misinformation and harassment and to create “more healthy” conversations on the platform.

Advertisement

Such a transfer may even have ripple results throughout the social media panorama. Twitter, though smaller than lots of its social media rivals, has typically acted as a mannequin for a way the trade handles problematic content material, together with when it was the primary to ban then-President Trump following the January 6 Capitol riot.

And in recent times, a number of various social networks have launched largely concentrating on conservatives who declare extra mainstream companies unduly prohibit their speech. These companies embody Trump’s Reality Social and Parler, which Kanye West just lately mentioned he would purchase. Whereas it’s unclear how far Musk may go in fulfilling his free speech desires, any loosening of present content material moderation insurance policies may successfully make Twitter, which offers a a lot bigger viewers, a extra attractive service for among the customers who’ve fled to these smaller, fringe companies. (Musk, nonetheless, may run into regulatory points, particularly in Europe, relying on how far he takes his efforts to loosen content material restrictions.)

Aside from content material moderation, Musk has additionally tossed out a variety of different attainable adjustments for the platform, from enabling end-to-end encryption for Twitter’s direct messaging characteristic to suggesting just lately that Twitter grow to be a part of an “every thing” app known as X, probably within the model of standard Chinese language app WeChat.

Regardless of his months-long try to get out of shopping for the corporate and his personal current remarks that he’s “clearly overpaying” for it, Musk has tried to sound optimistic about Twitter’s potential.

“The long-term potential for Twitter, in my opinion, is an order of magnitude better than its present worth,” he mentioned on Tesla’s earnings convention name final week.

Advertisement

News

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Published

on

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

India’s former prime minister Manmohan Singh, who liberalised the economy and then led the country through a period of strong economic growth, has died.

Singh, 92, was being treated for age-related medical conditions, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi said, as it announced his death on Thursday.

The Oxford university-educated economist set India on a path to becoming a fast-growing economy as finance minister from 1991 to 1996, when he opened up the country to more foreign trade and private investment.

Advertisement

Considered a political lightweight by some in India at that time, Singh was a surprise choice by the Congress party to be prime minister after it won parliamentary elections in 2004.

Alongside a growth rate of almost 7 per cent, Singh’s decade as premier was marred by allegations of widespread corruption against his party’s leaders, although his personal integrity was rarely questioned.

Singh was accused of inaction and opposition parties claimed he was subservient to Congress’s chief at that time, Sonia Gandhi.

Shortly before Congress lost elections to Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party in 2014, Singh said in a speech to parliament that “history would be kinder to me than the contemporary media, or for that matter opposition parties”.

Prime Minister Modi on Thursday described Singh as one of India’s most distinguished leaders, saying he left a “strong imprint on our economic policy over the years” and had “made extensive efforts to improve people’s lives” as premier.

Advertisement

Rahul Gandhi, a senior member of the Congress party, paid tribute to Singh, saying he had lost a “mentor and guide” whose “humility and deep understanding of economics inspired the nation”.

A member of parliament for more than three decades, Singh retired from active politics earlier this year.

The mild-mannered Singh, who belonged to India’s minority Sikh community, was born to a humble family in 1932 in a village in India’s Punjab prior to the country’s independence, which is now part of Pakistan.

Singh rose to become one of India’s most successful economists, serving the government in various capacities, including as head of the country’s central bank in the 1980s.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Border czar Tom Homan says children of illegal immigrants could be put in halfway homes

Published

on

Border czar Tom Homan says children of illegal immigrants could be put in halfway homes

Tom Homan, President-elect Trump’s “border czar,” floated the idea of putting the children of illegal immigrants in halfway homes as part of the incoming administration’s mass deportation plan. 

“As far as U.S. children — children, that’s going to be a difficult situation, because we’re not going to detain your U.S. citizen children, which means, you know, they’re going to be put in a halfway house,” Homan told NewsNation on Thursday, The Hill reported

.CALIFORNIA GOV. NEWSOM’S TEAM CONSIDERING WAYS TO HELP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AHEAD OF SECOND TRUMP ADMIN: REPORT

Incoming Trump ‘border czar’ Tom Homan speaks with Fox News. (Fox News)

“They can — or they can stay at home and wait for the officers to get the travel arrangements and come back to get the family,” he added.

Advertisement

As part of his plan to address the border crisis, Trump has said he plans to deport large numbers of illegal immigrants.

One of the administration’s priorities will be to find the hundreds of thousands of migrant children unaccounted for in the United States.  

MIGRANT CRIME WAVE DURING BIDEN-HARRIS ADMIN UNDER SCRUTINY AMID SERIES OF ASSAULTS, MURDERS: A TIMELINE

“We’re going to ask the American people to take notice: see something, say something and contact us,” Holman told Kellyanne Conway on “Hannity.” “If one phone call out of a thousand saves a child from sex trafficking or forced labor, then that’s one life saved.”

Homan acknowledged it would be a “daunting task,” but “we’re going to give it everything we’ve got.”

Advertisement

During his interview with NewsNation, Homan said giving birth to children born in the U.S. won’t spare illegal immigrants from being deported. 

“Having a U.S. citizen child does not make you immune to our laws, and that’s not the message we want to send to the whole world, that you can have a child and you’re immune to the laws of this country,” Homan said. 

Migrants line up outside a migrant re-ticketing center

Migrants line up outside a migrant re-ticketing center at St. Brigid School on E. 7th St. Friday, Jan. 5, 2024, in Manhattan, New York City. (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images) (Barry Williams/New York Daily News/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

In addition to mass deportations, Trump has threatened to go after birthright citizenship, which automatically grants American citizenship to those born in the country. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Finland probes Russian shadow fleet oil tanker after cable-cutting incident

Published

on

Finland probes Russian shadow fleet oil tanker after cable-cutting incident

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Finnish authorities are investigating an oil tanker that is part of Russia’s shadow fleet over whether it cut an electricity cable between Finland and Estonia.

The Eagle S was stopped by Finnish authorities after the Estlink 2 subsea electricity cable in the Gulf of Finland was disconnected on Wednesday. The tanker, which is registered in the Cook Islands and is carrying oil from Russia to Egypt according to ship tracking data, was seen passing over the cable at the time of the incident.

The aged tanker is part of Russia’s shadow fleet and is the focus of Finland’s investigation, according to people familiar with the probe. The Eagle S is also under investigation over whether it cut three communications cables in the Gulf of Finland, the people added.

Advertisement

The shadow fleet is a group of old and often poorly maintained ships used by Russia to circumvent international sanctions on its oil exports.

The Christmas Day incident appears to be the latest in a series of pipelines and cables being targeted in the Baltic Sea by foreign vessels, sparking fears of deliberate attacks on critical infrastructure between Nato countries.

“We must be able to prevent the risks posed by ships belonging to the Russian shadow fleet,” said Finland’s President Alexander Stubb in a post on X after a meeting with security chiefs on Thursday.

Last year a Chinese container ship, the Newnew Polar Bear, cut a gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia but was not stopped by authorities as it was in international waters.

A Chinese bulk carrier, the Yi Peng 3, last month passed over two data cables between Finland and Germany and Sweden and Lithuania about the times they were severed. It stopped for a month in international waters between Denmark and Sweden.

Advertisement

Chinese investigators finally boarded the ship last week, with Swedish, Danish, German and Finnish representatives present as observers. But Sweden’s foreign minister criticised Beijing for not allowing the lead Swedish investigator to board or to inspect the vessel, which has now left the region.

The Eagle S case is different as the ship voluntarily stopped inside Finnish waters, according to people familiar with the investigation, leaving no question as to jurisdiction. Ownership of the Eagle S is murky but it appears to be the only vessel owned by a Dubai company. Attempts to reach the owner on Thursday were unsuccessful. 

Authorities have not determined the cause of the disconnection of the Estlink 2 cable. Estonia has also said it will not affect its electricity supply. The cable is used to export electricity from Finland, which recently brought its latest nuclear power plant online, to Estonia.

Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo said the country’s electricity supply would not be affected.

Finnish authorities are keeping an open mind on the latest incident, not least because dozens of poorly maintained vessels in the shadow fleet sail in the Baltic Sea.

Advertisement

Environmental campaigners have issued repeated warnings about the dangers in the region and elsewhere of the dilapidated vessels.

In the Mediterranean, a Russian cargo ship under US sanctions for working with the Russian military sank between Spain and Algeria on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Trending