Connect with us

News

Donald Trump trial opens with allegations he tried to ‘corrupt’ 2016 US election

Published

on

Donald Trump trial opens with allegations he tried to ‘corrupt’ 2016 US election

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Donald Trump attempted to “corrupt” the 2016 election when he directed his team to buy the silence of a porn actor who threatened to go public with claims of an extramarital affair, Manhattan prosecutors said during opening arguments in the first criminal trial against a former US president.

A lawyer for Trump, Todd Blanche, countered that his client was “cloaked in innocence” and had merely been trying to “protect his family, his reputation and his brand”. The 77-year-old former president was “not on the hook” for the way the payments were organised or recorded by his employees, with which he “had nothing to do”, Blanche added.

The competing narratives of the events that form the core of the “hush money” case against Trump came during the opening salvos of the first — and possibly only — criminal trial to proceed against the Republican nominee for president before November’s vote.

Advertisement

As Trump sat feet away at the defence table in a cold Manhattan courtroom on Monday morning, silently glowering, the seven men and five women on the jury heard assistant district attorney Matthew Colangelo outline a “catch and kill” scheme allegedly orchestrated by the former president and his inner circle to buy the silence of porn actor Stormy Daniels.

Daniels had threatened to go to the press with her story of how she had a tryst with the then-reality television star in 2006, Colangelo said, a revelation that would have been all the more damaging to Trump’s campaign following the furore over the publication of an Access Hollywood tape, in which he was heard to be bragging about grabbing women’s genitals.

Trump went on to disguise the transactions behind the $130,000 payment, Colangelo added, because he “wanted to conceal his and others’ criminal conduct”. 

“This was a planned, co-ordinated, long-running conspiracy . . . to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures,” he said. “It was election fraud, pure and simple.”

Blanche said Trump was tackling a “sinister” attempt to embarrass him with false allegations, and had acted entirely lawfully in trying to suppress the story. “You will learn that companies do that all the time,” he told jurors, adding: “There is nothing wrong with trying to influence an election — it is called democracy.”

Advertisement

The start of the six-week trial comes just over a year after Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg brought the first criminal charges against a former US president, indicting Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Like any criminal defendant, Trump must be in attendance every day, a requirement that he has complained will limit his campaigning ahead of November’s election. The court will break on Wednesdays if the case is proceeding on schedule, Judge Juan Merchan said last week.

Trump railed against the court and prosecutors on social media and once again denounced the case as a witch hunt on his way into the courtroom on Monday morning. “This is done as election interference, everybody knows it,” the presumptive 2024 Republican nominee for the White House told reporters. 

After opening arguments concluded, the court briefly heard from the prosecution’s first witness, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, who was allegedly involved in the “catch and kill” scheme by purchasing exclusive rights to anti-Trump stories — and then preventing them from being published.

Merchan adjourned early for the day due to the Passover Jewish holiday and to allow a juror to attend an emergency dental appointment.

Advertisement

Last week, 12 jurors and six alternates were chosen from a pool of almost 200 New Yorkers from the borough of Manhattan, who were carefully vetted to ensure they did not harbour insurmountable bias towards Trump. All said they could be impartial in deciding the facts of the case, although some expressed distaste for his policies and persona.

The former president still faces criminal charges in three different courts over his alleged attempts to thwart the peaceful transition of power after the 2020 election, and over his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago mansion in Florida. It is unclear when the other criminal cases will go to trial.

Trump also faces a number of civil proceedings, and is appealing against a nearly half-billion dollar civil fraud judgment awarded to the New York attorney-general earlier this year. A judge on Monday declined to heed a request by the attorney-general to invalidate the $175mn bond Trump had posted in that case, in a reprieve for the former president.

Another milestone in Trump’s legal travails will be reached later this week, when the US Supreme Court will hear arguments over whether he can claim presidential immunity for acts that he has been charged with that took place while he was in office. The outcome of that challenge has no bearing over the New York case, which has been brought under state rather than federal law.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: University of Chicago President Says Pro-Palestinian Encampment ‘Cannot Continue’

Published

on

Video: University of Chicago President Says Pro-Palestinian Encampment ‘Cannot Continue’

new video loaded: University of Chicago President Says Pro-Palestinian Encampment ‘Cannot Continue’

Recent episodes in Latest Video

Whether it’s reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, Times Video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world.

Whether it’s reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, Times Video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world.

Continue Reading

News

Conservatives battered in local elections as losses mount

Published

on

Conservatives battered in local elections as losses mount

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives have suffered heavy defeats in elections across England and Wales, leaving the prime minister struggling to avert a general election rout but safe in office for now.

The results confirmed Tory MPs’ fears and the UK prime minister described the loss of Conservative councillors as “disappointing”, with Labour gaining seats in electoral battlegrounds across the country.

In the last big test of public opinion ahead of the general election expected this year, and with most of the council results declared, the Tories had lost almost half of the seats they were defending.

Advertisement

They were also trounced in the Blackpool South parliamentary by-election, with a 26 per cent swing from Conservatives to Labour — the third-biggest since the second world war.

By Friday night the Tories had suffered a net loss of 371 council seats while retaining 468, according to PA data. Labour had made 204 gains, securing 1026 seats overall.

Sir Keir Starmer, Labour leader, said it had been “a very good day” for his party, as he paid a celebratory visit to Rishi Sunak’s Richmond constituency, part of the new York and North Yorkshire mayoralty won by Labour.

The results suggested that Starmer was on course for a general election victory, but not a landslide. “This is clearly a bad result for the Conservatives,” said James Johnson, pollster and co-founder of JL Partners. But he added that Labour would have to do better at the general election to achieve a sizeable majority.

The BBC’s projection of an equivalent national vote share put Labour on 34 per cent, Conservatives on 25, Liberal Democrats on 17 and Others on 24, but pollsters note that people often vote differently in general elections. Most national polls give Labour a 20-point lead.

Advertisement

Johnson said the BBC projection mirrored the nine-point lead Labour enjoyed in last year’s local elections, which was widely seen as enough for a bare majority, and well below the 17-point projected national vote lead enjoyed by Tony Blair in 1996, ahead of Labour’s landslide in 1997.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Sunak appeared to gain some breathing space after the threat of a Conservative mutiny against his leadership receded. A victory by Lord Ben Houchen, the high-profile Tory mayor of Tees Valley, calmed nerves among Conservative MPs.

Houchen, a popular local figure who had distanced himself from Sunak and the Conservatives in the campaign, obtained a reduced majority of 18,789. He did not wear a blue rosette at his count.

The Conservatives also hope that Andy Street, the West Midlands mayor, who preferred an endorsement from former prime minister Boris Johnson to one from Sunak, will win a third term when votes are counted on Saturday. Labour insiders said Starmer’s position on the Gaza war may have cost the party Muslim votes in the region.

Advertisement

On Saturday focus will be intense on the London mayoral contest, with rumours swirling that Tory candidate Susan Hall may have defied opinion polls and run Labour incumbent Sadiq Khan close.

Rightwing Conservative critics of Sunak on Friday pulled back from trying to topple him but urged him to tack to the right. One rebel source said that some Tory MPs were looking for an “off ramp” and that the Tees Valley result provided them with an excuse not to challenge the prime minister.

Dame Andrea Jenkyns, a Johnson supporter who submitted a no-confidence letter in Sunak last November, told the BBC: “It’s looking unlikely that the MPs are going to put the letters in. So we’ve got to pull together.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Projections that the Conservatives could lose half the council seats they held were based on results in 71 of the 107 councils being contested. Some voters in England and Wales were also electing mayors as well as police and crime commissioners.

Sir John Curtice, the veteran elections expert, said the results were “not far short” of catastrophic for the Conservatives and “one of the worst, if not the worst” result for the party in local elections for 40 years.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Starmer’s focus on Friday was on Labour’s Blackpool South by-election victory, where the new MP Chris Webb beat the Conservatives’ David Jones with a 26 per cent swing. Reform UK came a narrow third, just 117 votes behind the Conservatives.

Labour overturned a Tory majority of 3,690 votes to take the parliamentary seat with a 7,607 majority. The seat was formerly held by Scott Benton, who was forced to quit in a lobbying scandal.

Reform UK, formerly the Brexit party and founded by Nigel Farage, secured 17 per cent of the vote in Blackpool South, one of the races it focused on, after standing candidates for only 12 per cent of contested council seats.

Reform UK is splitting the vote on the right, a threat that could intensify at the general election when it will field candidates across the country.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

It was not all good news for Labour. The party lost control of Oldham council in Greater Manchester, after ceding several seats to independents who stood on a pro-Palestine platform. It also lost seats in Newcastle.

Pat McFadden, Labour’s elections co-ordinator, admitted that the Gaza war was costing the party votes. “There’s no denying this is a factor in some parts of the country,” he said.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Put your questions to George Parker and colleagues at a webinar for FT subscribers on Wednesday 8 May 1300-1400 UK (GMT+1). Register at ft.com/ukwebinar

Video: Sketchy Politics: can anything save Sunak?
Continue Reading

News

Columbia is rethinking its commencement ceremony in the wake of campus protests

Published

on

Columbia is rethinking its commencement ceremony in the wake of campus protests

Columbia University is rethinking its commencement plans after weeks of pro-Palestinian protests ended with authorities forcing their way into a barricaded school building and arresting dozens of people, according to a source at the university and two members of student government.

The source at the university said the main commencement ceremony was slated to be canceled, but smaller events were still being planned.

After a meeting with top university leaders Friday, two members of student government said administrators indicated they are not sure they can hold a commencement ceremony on the main Morningside Heights campus in Manhattan because of security concerns. 

It is unclear if final decisions have been made.

“We know that our students and their loved ones are wondering about plans for University Commencement and school Class Days. Offices across Columbia are committed to ensuring that all ceremonies run smoothly and that all our students and their families and friends get the celebration they deserve,” a spokesperson for Columbia said in a statement when asked for comment about commencement plans. “We will share more information about preparations that are underway soon.”

Advertisement

One of the student government representatives who was in the meeting said Columbia’s administration is primarily concerned about outside protesters and is struggling to find an alternative venue.

The students told the university leaders that many in the student body are concerned about President Minouche Shafik speaking at the ceremony. “Her presence would be the cause of a lot of upset,” one of the student leaders told NBC News.

Student demonstrators occupy the “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” at Columbia University on Monday.MIchael Nigro / Sipa USA via AP

Other students are worried about the expense of staying on campus until May 15, when commencement is scheduled to happen, only to find out that it has been canceled.

An estimated 15,000 students are planning to graduate in separate outdoor ceremonies May 15. Commencement at the Ivy League school is a venerable tradition dating to 1758, when the school was known as King’s College. Each school within Columbia has also typically held its own individual graduation ceremonies.

One member of the faculty said some faculty and staff at Columbia and Barnard are planning to attend an alternative graduation ceremony on May 16. Another member involved in planning said the counter-graduation will be inspired by the counter-commencement held in 1968.

Advertisement

Protests at Columbia’s upper Manhattan campus erupted April 17 when students pitched about 50 tents while demanding a cease-fire in Gaza and insisting the university divest from companies that they say could be profiting from the war.

NYPD officers in riot gear break into a building at Columbia University.
NYPD officers in riot gear break into a building occupied by protesters Tuesday night at Columbia University.Kena Betancur / AFP – Getty Images

Authorities cleared out the protesters, but they returned — and encampments quickly appeared at college campuses across the country.

At Columbia, school administrators asked New York City police officers for help after protesters — including people identified by city officials as “professional outside agitators” — occupied an on-campus building early Tuesday and barricaded themselves inside.

On Tuesday night, police in riot gear descended on the school around 9 p.m. and entered the occupied Hamilton Hall through a second-floor window. Nearly 100 people were arrested, authorities said, including 40 who were on the barricaded building’s first floor.

The arrests have shaken confidence in Shafik among some students and faculty at Columbia. In a letter to the New York Police Department asking for its assistance to clear Hamilton Hall, the university president said the occupation there “left us no choice.”

In its request for police assistance, Columbia asked the NYPD to stay on campus until at least May 17, two days after commencement.

Advertisement
Members of the NYPD detain protesters from the pro-Palestinian protest encampment.
Police detain pro-Palestinian protesters Tuesday at Columbia University.Stephanie Keith / Getty Images

A Columbia spokesman had warned students that they faced suspension if they did not dissolve an encampment that had grown on the campus’ West Lawn ahead of the end of the academic year, and that if they were seniors they would be ineligible to graduate.

“Disruptions on campus have created a threatening environment for many,” spokesman Ben Chang had said, adding that the steps the school was taking were “about responding to the actions of the protesters, not their cause.”

As campus unrest roils other schools, including with police intervention and arrests, Columbia’s dilemma — whether to hold a commencement ceremony but with major safety concerns or cancel it altogether — is one other colleges have faced.

Last month, the University of Southern California in Los Angeles said it was canceling its main commencement ceremony, scheduled for May 10, that was set to include a keynote address from alumnus Jon M. Chu, the director of “Crazy Rich Asians,” and a presentation of honorary degrees to tennis star Billie Jean King and others.

The school had already canceled a commencement speech by a Muslim valedictorian following controversy over her social media posts about Israel’s war in Gaza. But USC said it would still host individual school commencement ceremonies and other related events.

Continue Reading

Trending