Connect with us

News

Donald Trump Makes Crude Joke About Arnold Palmer At Pennsylvania Rally

Published

on

Donald Trump Makes Crude Joke About Arnold Palmer At Pennsylvania Rally

Topline

Former President Donald Trump opened a rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, on Saturday by talking about late golfer Arnold Palmer—and sharing a story about Palmer’s genitalia—for more than 10 minutes, marking the latest bizarre move at a rally from Trump just weeks from Election Day.

Key Facts

Within the first 12 minutes of his rally in Latrobe—which is Palmer’s hometown—Trump praised Palmer as “all man,” before he took it further, saying: “When he took the showers with other pros, they came out of there. They said, ‘Oh my God. That’s unbelievable … We have women that are highly sophisticated here, but they used to look at Arnold as a man.”

Advertisement

Trump also reminisced about golfing with Palmer and said the rally would be more fun if the golfer (who died in 2016) could join him, taking it further than what politicians typically say about the famous golfer when visiting his hometown, the Associated Press reported.

When Trump did turn to politics at the rally, he called his opponent Vice President Kamala Harris “a s*** vice president” and a “radical left Marxist,” and criticized her suggestion in the 2020 primaries that she would ban hydraulic fracking—though Harris has since said she does not want to ban fracking.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you’ll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

Advertisement

Big Number

16. That’s how many days there are until Election Day, when Trump will face off against Harris in what is expected to be a highly contested race. FiveThirtyEight’s national average showed Harris with a 2-point advantage over Trump as of Sunday morning.

Key Background

Trump has been holding rallies across battleground states in recent weeks as Election Day nears, and he has continued to go off script and sometimes confuse viewers. Last Monday, Trump stopped a town hall-style event while attendees got medical help, and rather than resume it, he had his team play music for nearly a half hour as he danced on the stage. After the rally, Harris shared a clip on social media and said “Hope he’s okay.” Trump has become known for going on rants at his rallies in the past, referring to the fictional character “the late great Hannibal Lecter” when discussing immigration, talking about his indictments and having crowds chant attacks at Harris and Biden. Trump’s team had reportedly said his speech Saturday would be the start of his efforts to make closing arguments against Vice President Kamala Harris, though he mostly stuck to his regular talking points of criticizing the Biden administration’s handling of the border and personal attacks on Harris. Trump’s meandering speaking style has caused some critics to raise questions about the 78-year-old’s mental acuity, which he has typically deflected.

Chief Critic

Peg Palmer, the golfer’s daughter, said in 2018 “he was appalled by Trump’s lack of civility … and what he began to see as Trump’s lack of character,” according to Rolling Stone. “He didn’t like it when other people were nasty and rude.”

Further Reading

AP NewsTrump kicks off a Pennsylvania rally by talking about Arnold Palmer’s genitalia
NytimesAt a Pennsylvania Rally, Trump Descends to New Levels of VulgarityForbes‘Let’s Just Listen To Music’: Trump Turns Town Hall Into Concert, Prompting Mockery From Harris

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

What Threats Does My Vote Really Face?

Published

on

What Threats Does My Vote Really Face?

Poll workers verify your information and accept your ballot.

Fake or illegal votes are rare. Voting machines and staff can make minor errors accepting ballots, but there are checks to catch them. The real threat is the perception that fraud is a widespread problem, officials and experts say, if it keeps voters from turning out or fuels unrest.

Will poll watchers interfere?

Local Election Workers Count Votes

Advertisement

Most use technology to count ballots and keep a paper record to audit them.

Will it be harder to vote by mail?

Most voters will have a seamless experience casting a mail ballot, but more of these ballots could be challenged in 2024. Some states adopted stricter rules after the 2020 surge in mail voting, such as tighter signature or ID requirements and shorter ballot return windows.

What about foreign interference?

U.S. security agencies say that foreign adversaries cannot alter our election results. Instead, they may spread false claims about the results that put election staff and their work at risk.

Advertisement

Are election workers in danger?

Election administrators, who have faced a rise in personal threats since 2020, are preparing for protests, some by hiring security guards and installing panic buttons. Protests could put the timely counting of votes at risk.

After local officials review and certify results, states must finalize them by Dec. 11.

What if results are contested?

Recounts are automatic in some states if the results are close, and candidates and voters can petition or sue for a recount in others. Lawsuits contesting results or alleging fraud could delay the final tally in some places, though courts must move swiftly.

Advertisement

Could officials refuse to certify?

County boards must certify their results once checks are complete. But since 2020, officials in at least 20 counties across eight states have voted to deny or delay certification, with many making false claims of fraud.

States can go to the courts to force boards to certify. It is unlikely, but a lengthy legal battle could prevent a state from certifying its results by the deadline, which could put the counting of its electors at risk.

The Electoral College chooses the president, based on state results. Electors meet on Dec. 17.

What about fake electors?

Advertisement

The Electoral Count Reform Act, passed in 2022, makes clear that the state’s top election official must certify the electors pledged to the candidate who wins the most votes.

Attempts by Trump allies in 2020 to push officials to designate alternate electors in states where he lost would be near impossible under the new law.

Election officials and experts worry that false claims about fraudulent votes and electors could spark protests and put the electors’ ability to vote at risk.

Congress Performs the Final Count

On Jan. 6, a newly elected Congress meets at the Capitol to finalize the electoral votes, overseen by the vice president.

Advertisement

Could they reject results?

It is possible that some members of Congress could object to a state’s certification of electoral votes. They would need support in both the House and Senate to challenge the results, and a majority of both chambers to reject them.

If no candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the House would vote to choose the president.

Members of the public who object to the results could protest — as an angry mob did on Jan. 6, 2021 — to try to stop Congress from counting the electoral votes. The Department of Homeland Security has said it will ramp up security on Jan. 6.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Volkswagen plans to close at least 3 German plants and cut thousands of jobs

Published

on

Volkswagen plans to close at least 3 German plants and cut thousands of jobs

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Volkswagen plans to shut at least three German plants, axe tens of thousands of jobs and slash pay by 10 per cent, the company’s top employee representative said on Monday.

The restructuring would mark the first closure of domestic plants in the company’s 87-year history and set up a battle with powerful unions and politicians in Germany, where VW has 300,000 employees.

VW’s management has warned that radical measures are needed as Europe’s largest carmaker faces intense competition in China, slowing sales across other major markets and the need to navigate the costly transition to electric vehicles. It recently issued its second profit warning in three months.

Advertisement

Daniela Cavallo, the head of VW’s works council, on Monday told staff at the company’s main Wolfsburg plant that executives had two days to reverse its plans, as she hinted at future strikes.

She said chief executive Oliver Blume was “playing with the massive risk that . . . we will break off the talks and do what a workforce has to do when it fears for its existence”.

The works council represents VW employees and holds half the seats on the supervisory board.

The plants to be shut will come from 10 that mainly supply the carmaker’s core brand VW brand, according to a spokesperson for the works council.

VW first signalled in September that it was considering shutting German plants but analysts have remained sceptical given the strong opposition from politicians and the works council.

Advertisement
Volkswagen employees gather outside the company’s Wolfsburg headquarters on Monday for an event held by the works council © Julian Stratenschulte/Getty Images

In a statement on Monday, Thomas Schäfer, the head of the company’s VW brand, said some of its German plants were twice as costly to run than those of rival carmakers.

“We are currently earning too little money from our cars,” he said. “At the same time, our costs for energy, materials and personnel have continued to rise. This calculation cannot work in the long term.”

VW declined to comment on the possible plant closures on Monday, referring to a previous statement that they cannot be ruled out.

Thorsten Gröger, chief negotiator at IG Metall, Europe’s largest union, warned that the cost-cutting would provoke “resistance of a kind it could never imagine”.

Politicians pointed to VW’s management for decisions that had contributed to the company’s current crisis. A spokesperson for the German government said Chancellor Olaf Scholz had been clear that “possible wrong management decisions in the past must not be to the detriment of employees”.

Advertisement

The parliamentary group for Scholz’s Social Democratic party echoed that view, with Verena Hubertz, SPD’s spokesperson on economic policy, saying: “The workers shouldn’t have to take the rap if management makes the wrong decisions.”

She said Scholz would on Tuesday hold “confidential talks with business and the unions” over safeguarding jobs and “ensuring that future investments are made in Germany”.

The German state of Lower Saxony, a significant shareholder with control of 20 per cent of the voting rights, has previously said its priority is maintaining jobs and has often sided with the works council.

Matthias Schmidt, an independent car analyst, predicted that following negotiations with the works council and the unions in coming weeks VW would probably end up closing two plants. “They are using some type of political manoeuvring to get a deal they want,” he added.

Like German rivals Mercedes-Benz and BMW, VW faces falling profits in China as consumers cut spending and local brands such as BYD take market share.

Advertisement

The German group, which reports its quarterly results on Wednesday, now expects an operating profit margin of about 5.6 per cent in 2024, down from its earlier forecast of 6.5 per cent to 7 per cent.

In a sign of the deepening pressures in the Chinese market, Porsche, which is majority owned by VW, on Friday reported a 41 per cent plunge in quarterly profits.

Additional reporting by Guy Chazan and Laura Pitel in Berlin

Continue Reading

News

Minneapolis man accused of shooting neighbor arrested; chief says police ‘failed’ victim

Published

on

Minneapolis man accused of shooting neighbor arrested; chief says police ‘failed’ victim


“We failed this victim,” said Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara Sunday night. “He should not have been shot.”

play

A Minnesota man suspected of shooting his neighbor while he was cutting a tree was arrested and charged early Monday morning. His neighbor reported him to police several times before the shooting, officials say.

Advertisement

The suspect, John Herbert Sawchak, 54, is believed to have shot his neighbor, Davis Moturi, on Oct. 23 from inside his Minneapolis home while the victim was cutting a tree.

The victim reported Sawchak several times before, including after Sawchak is said to have threatened to shoot the victim if he touched the same tree he was cutting when Wednesday’s shooting occurred, according to Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara.

When Moturi’s wife got home, she believed her husband had suffered from a heart attack and Emergency Medical Services transported him to the hospital, O’Hara said during a press briefing Friday.

There, medical personnel discovered he’d been shot.

The victim could not remember what happened before he was found unconscious, including that fact that he was shot, O’Hara said. No witnesses were around at the time of the shooting.

Advertisement

USA TODAY reached out to the Minneapolis Police Department. Sergeant Garrett Parten confirmed the victim’s name and directed USA TODAY to the press briefing on YouTube for the latest information.

Florida murder: Palm Beach County man, 21, faces murder charge in failed drug deal

Suspect arrested days later

Sawchak was arrested peacefully Monday morning after a SWAT operation that lasted several hours.

“Minneapolis Police exhausted all of our efforts to peacefully bring the situation to resolution (prior) to escalating the use of force with a SWAT team and special tactics,” said O’Hara.

Advertisement

Sawchak was charged with the following felonies, according to the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Department:

  • Second-degree attempted murder
  • First-degree assault
  • Stalking
  • Harassment

The suspect is being held on a $1 million bail and is set to a court appearance on Tuesday at 1:30 p.m., according to the department’s arrest records.

Police chief apologizes

The victim had also reported his neighbor several times before the shooting and made several 911 calls regarding Sawchak. He also reported his neighbor before when he threatened to shoot him if he touched a specific tree, according to O’Hara.

“We failed this victim,” O’Hara said Sunday night. “He should not have been shot.”

When police responded to the calls, Sawchak refused to open the door and speak with officers, according to O’Hara.

Advertisement

A lieutenant had gone to the suspect’s house over 20 times. The number does not include the times other officers have been called to the address.

This led to the lieutenant giving his phone number to the victim, said O’Hara. The lieutenant asked the victim to call him when he did see Sawchak leave his home.

High-risk warrant

Before Sunday night, police had concerns over an altercation and wanted to arrest the suspect where he did not have access to his firearms, but O’Hara said the man was a “recluse” and did not leave his house often.

The suspect, who O’Hara said was “mentally ill,” was known to possess firearms, had violent confrontations in the past and refused to cooperate in “the dozens of times that police officers have responded to the residence.”

The execution of the arrest warrant was deemed “high-risk.”

Advertisement

“Based on our assessment, the likelihood of an armed, violent confrontation where we may have to use deadly force with the suspect in this case is high,” said O’Hara during a press briefing on Friday. “Prior to Wednesday, all we had was a threats warrant.”

Continue Reading

Trending