Connect with us

News

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky to meet as tensions rise

Published

on

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky to meet as tensions rise

Former President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, as tensions rise between the two men over how the future defense of Ukraine against Russian invasion will be conducted if Trump wins the U.S. election.

Trump has long argued that Vladimir Putin would not have dared invade Ukraine if he had been president at the time of the invasion in February 2022. He referred to Zelensky as a “salesman” for securing U.S. financial and military assistance for Ukraine, worth over $175 billion according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

In addition, Trump praised Russia’s historic military victories this week and called for the U.S. “to get out” and end its involvement with Ukraine-Russia conflict. Speaking Wednesday in North Carolina, Trump referred to Ukraine as “demolished” and its people as “dead.”

Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks at Trump Tower in New York, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2024. According to Trump, it was Zelensky’s office who approached him for the visit which is set for…


Seth Wenig/AP

“Any deal—the worst deal—would’ve been better than what we have now,” Trump said. “If they made a bad deal it would’ve been much better. They would’ve given up a little bit and everybody would be living and every building would be built and every tower would be aging for another 2,000 years.”

According to Trump, it was Zelensky’s office who approached him for the visit which is set for 9.45 a.m. Eastern Time on Friday at Trump Tower in New York. Trump said in a news conference Thursday “I look forward to seeing him tomorrow. I believe I will be able to make a deal between President Putin and President Zelensky, quite quickly.”

Advertisement

The timing is significant for the U.S. election.

Clear political battle lines have already been drawn between Democrat rival Harris and Republican Trump over the future of U.S. support for Ukraine and the nation’s role as the main contributor to NATO. The U.S. is due to contribute up to $755 billion in 2024 according to the international defense pact’s own estimates.

Trump meets Zelensky
Vice President Kamala Harris meets with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2024, in the vice president’s ceremonial office inside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington. In keeping…


Jacquelyn Martin/AP

In keeping with President Biden’s stated foreign policy goals, Harris reinforced her continued support for NATO and Ukraine when she accepted her nomination for candidacy in August. Trump, however has remained highly critical, even threatening to withdraw intelligence cooperation and military assistance to NATO members who in his view don’t pay their fair share.

Friday’s meeting almost wasn’t scheduled to go ahead despite Zelensky’s office stating it had been planned during the Ukrainian leader’s visit to the U.N. General Assembly, during which he is making an endgame pitch to his international allies.

In an interview with The New Yorker, Zelensky suggested Trump oversimplifies the conflict and does not understand Ukraine. The Ukrainian leader further explained his position that Trump’s running mate JD Vance was “too radical” by advocating for Ukraine to “make a sacrifice” by “giving up its territories.”

Harris on Thursday stood alongside Zelensky and said Trump’s push for Ukraine to quickly cut a deal to end the war were “not proposals for peace,” but “proposals for surrender.” Trump on Thursday said he was not advocating for a surrender.

Advertisement

While Trump and Vance have long been skeptics of U.S. backing for Ukraine, other Republican allies of the former president have backed Kyiv’s defense against Moscow’s invasion and argue supporting Ukraine is still in America’s interest.

This article includes reporting from The Associated Press

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Goldman Sachs’ chief warns global investors are staying on the ‘sidelines’ in China

Published

on

Goldman Sachs’ chief warns global investors are staying on the ‘sidelines’ in China

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Goldman Sachs’ chief executive has warned that global investors are still “predominantly on the sidelines” over deploying capital in China because of weak consumer confidence and difficulties getting money out of the country.

David Solomon said investors “continue to be concerned” about cashing out of investments in the world’s second-largest economy.

“It’s been very difficult over the course of the last five years to get capital out,” he told an event on Tuesday organised by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the territory’s de facto central bank.

Advertisement

“I think you’ve got a combination of issues that have global investors predominantly on the sidelines with respect to capital deployment,” Solomon said.

He added that investors would like to see “an improvement in consumption” in China and “continued progress in the opening up of the capital markets”. 

Speaking on the same panel, Morgan Stanley chief executive Ted Pick said he agreed with Solomon. “Transparency is important and battling deflation takes time,” he said.

Deflationary pressures have increased in China, where the country’s leadership is trying to stabilise a property sector crisis and boost domestic consumption in order to meet its economic growth target of 5 per cent for the year.

Chinese stocks rallied in September after Beijing launched a stimulus package, including measures to boost the stock market. But the rally has cooled as authorities held off from making significant new fiscal spending announcements.

Advertisement

The CSI 300, China’s blue-chip index, on Tuesday closed down 11 per cent from a post-stimulus peak on October 8.

“The fiscal piece will take time, the real estate dynamic is going to take a number of quarters,” said Pick. “Clearly the name of the game here is to reignite consumer confidence and that’s something that takes a while to take hold, but we’re seeing some green shoots.”

The conference is a sign of HKMA’s sway over global financial institutions even as US-China relations fray. The annual event is attended by the biggest names on Wall Street, in part because the HKMA oversees hundreds of billions of dollars and is a valuable client and limited partner of many of the institutions.

Attendees included Apollo Global Management’s chief executive Marc Rowan, Blackstone president Jon Gray, and leading figures from buyout groups KKR, TPG, CVC and Carlyle.

Solomon and Pick were responding to a question from deputy HKMA chief Howard Lee about whether China’s stimulus package and “positive remarks” from Beijing officials, who stressed the importance of China opening up to the world, would make investors “feel more assured” about the country.

Advertisement

Earlier in the morning, China’s vice-premier He Lifeng delivered a speech in which he said mainland officials wanted to preserve Hong Kong’s status as an international financial centre while encouraging greater mutual market access between the city and the rest of mainland China.

The bank bosses spoke briefly about Donald Trump’s US election victory. Citi chief executive Jane Fraser said it had prompted a “big unlock” in demand for initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions that had been “very gummed up” in recent years.

The prospect of reduced regulation “puts many CEOs in a good mood”, she said.

Continue Reading

News

California governor delays clemency decision for Menendez brothers pending new DA review | CNN

Published

on

California governor delays clemency decision for Menendez brothers pending new DA review | CNN



CNN
 — 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom will delay his decision on clemency for Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, until the newly elected Los Angeles County district attorney completes his review of the case, Newsom’s office said Monday.

“The governor respects the role of the district attorney in ensuring justice is served and recognizes that voters have entrusted District Attorney-elect (Nathan) Hochman to carry out this responsibility,” Newsom’s office stated. “The governor will defer to the DA-elect’s review and analysis of the Menendez case prior to making any clemency decisions.”

Current District Attorney George Gascón, who has voiced strong support for the Menendez brothers’ clemency petition and submitted letters to the governor advocating for them, requested a judge in October to resentence the siblings, who are serving life without parole.

Gascón was recently defeated in his reelection bid by Hochman, a former federal prosecutor who campaigned on a tougher stance against crime. With Hochman set to take office in December, questions have arisen about the future of the resentencing effort and the clemency process.

Advertisement

Hochman stated that he is committed to thoroughly reviewing the Menendez case, including the confidential prison files, trial transcripts and extensive exhibits, as well as consulting with prosecutors, defense attorneys and family members of the victims.

“This is the same type of rigorous analysis I have done throughout my 34-year career in criminal justice as a prosecutor and defense counsel, and the same type of thorough review that I will give to all cases regardless of media attention,” he told CNN.

The brothers, family members and the public deserve a thorough review, Hochman said.

The renewed examination of the Menendez case comes more than 35 years after Jose and Kitty Menendez were shot dead in their Beverly Hills home. Their sons, then 21 and 18, were arrested less than a year later in 1990 and found guilty of first-degree murder in 1996.

During their two highly publicized trials, the brothers did not dispute the act of killing their parents but claimed self-defense, citing a lifetime of physical and sexual abuse by their father. The first trial, notable for being one of the earliest televised cases, ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury. In the subsequent trial, much of the evidence regarding the alleged abuse was deemed inadmissible, resulting in the brothers’ conviction and life sentences.

Advertisement

Attention to the case has surged following the September release of the Netflix series “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story.” Netflix recently launched a documentary on the case, featuring the brothers discussing the events that led to the tragic killings.

Continue Reading

News

Hong Kong sentences 45 democracy activists to up to 10 years in prison

Published

on

Hong Kong sentences 45 democracy activists to up to 10 years in prison

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A Hong Kong court has sentenced 45 leading pro-democracy activists to up to 10 years in prison in a landmark security case as authorities stamp out dissent in the Chinese territory.

Legal scholar Benny Tai received 10 years in prison, the heaviest sentence. The court, in its ruling on Tuesday, said that Tai was a “principal offender” in organising an unofficial primary election in 2020.

The other defendants received sentences of between four and eight years. Joshua Wong, a former leading student protest organiser, was sentenced to more than four years in prison, while Gordon Ng, an Australian national, received more than seven years.

Advertisement

“One day in prison is too many,” said Chan Po-ying, wife of former lawmaker Leung Kwok-hung, 68, who was sentenced to 81 months.

The trial of the Hong Kong 47, as the case was known, was the largest national security trial in Hong Kong, which has been struggling to restore its reputation as an international financial centre in the wake of Beijing’s political crackdown and coronavirus pandemic restrictions.

“This case is unprecedented in Hong Kong’s history of democratic movement,” said Eric Lai, a research fellow at Georgetown University’s Center for Asian Law. “Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement will suffer for many years due to the vacuum of leaders and outstanding activists.”

The defendants — who were arrested in sweeping dawn raids in January 2021 — represented some of the city’s most prominent pro-democracy politicians, activists, union officials, journalists, academics and student leaders.

Thirty-one, including Tai and Wong, had pleaded guilty in hopes of receiving reduced sentences, while 14 were convicted in May. Two were previously acquitted, though prosecutors have filed an appeal against one of the acquittals.

Advertisement

Most of the defendants have been in detention for more than three years after being denied bail. The charges carried a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

This is a developing story

Continue Reading

Trending