Connect with us

News

Coal miners are getting new protections from silica dust linked to black lung disease

Published

on

Coal miners are getting new protections from silica dust linked to black lung disease

WASHINGTON — Coal miners will be better protected from poisonous silica dust that has contributed to the premature deaths of thousands of mine workers from a respiratory ailment commonly known as black lung disease, the Labor Department said Tuesday as it issued a new federal rule on miners’ safety.

The final rule, announced by Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su, cuts by half the permissible exposure limit for crystalline silica for an eight-hour shift.

Mine workers, community advocates and elected officials from Appalachian states have pushed for the stricter rule, noting that health problems have grown in recent years as miners dig through more layers of rock to gain access to coal seams when deposits closer to the surface have long been tapped. The increased drilling generates deadly silica dust and has caused severe forms of pneumoconiosis, better known as black lung disease, even among younger miners, some in their 30s and 40s.

“It is unconscionable that our nation’s miners have worked without adequate protection from silica dust despite it being a known health hazard for decades,” Su said Tuesday. “Today, we’re making it clear that no job should be a death sentence, and every worker has the right to come home healthy and safe at the end of the day.”

In Central Appalachia, an estimated one in five tenured coal miners has black lung disease. The condition reduces life expectancy by an average of 12 years and makes it a “struggle to get through a phone call or play with their grandkids without losing their breath,” Su said in a speech in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, where she appeared with Cecil Roberts, president of the United Mine Workers of America, and other union leaders.

Advertisement

“For too long, we accepted this as just the way things are for people who work in mines,” Su said. “They’ve had to work without the same protections from silica dust that people in other industries have, even though we’ve known about the harms of silica dust since Frances Perkins,” who was labor secretary in the 1930s and 1940s.

The election-year rule shows “what it looks like to have the most pro-worker, pro-union president in history,” Su said, a political comment referring to Democratic President Joe Biden.

Rebecca Shelton, director of policy at the Appalachian Citizens Law Center, which pressed for stricter rules to protect miners, said the group was reviewing the rule to ensure regulators from the Mine Safety and Health Administration accounted for comments by health professionals, attorneys and miners who have worked on the rule for years.

“There are too many lives at stake to get this wrong, and we’ll do whatever we can to ensure that this rule provides the protection that miners deserve,” Shelton said.

Democratic senators from Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Virginia hailed the new rule, saying it will be essential in safeguarding miners.

Advertisement

A spokesman for the National Mining Association said the group was reviewing the rule but supports the lower limits. The mining lobby has pushed to allow use of administrative controls and personal protective equipment to meet safety standards. “Unfortunately, those recommendations were not included in the final rule,″ said spokesman Conor Bernstein.

Vonda Robinson, whose husband, John, was diagnosed with black lung a decade ago at age 47, said she’s felt hopeful as officials considered the rule changes. But she was skeptical how the rule will be enforced.

Robinson, who lives in rural Nickelsville, Virginia, near the Tennessee line, said the mine safety office does not have enough staff or resources to adequately protect workers and their families.

“You can have rules, but until you back it up with enforcement, it’s not going to mean anything,” she said in an interview. “If they’re going to put out these rulings, you need to hire more people.”

The White House requested a $50 million increase to the mine safety office’s budget for the current year, most of which would have been for more inspectors and enforcement. Congress rejected it, keeping the budget at the 2023 level of $388 million.

Advertisement

Vonda Robinson said her husband struggles every day. John Robinson worked in the mines for almost three decades. Two years ago, the couple met with a physician about a lung transplant.

“Until you see it and live with it, you don’t understand,” Vonda Robinson said. “And knowing what we’re looking at now — miners being diagnosed at 32 – they’ll probably never see their children graduate or have grandchildren.”

The Labor Department rule lowers the permissible exposure limit of respirable crystalline silica to 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air for a full-shift exposure, calculated as an 8-hour average. If a miner’s exposure exceeds the limit, mine operators must take immediate corrective actions.

The rule is in line with exposure levels imposed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration on construction and other non-mining industries. And it’s the standard the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was recommending as far back as 1974.

The Labor Department began studying silica and its impact on workers’ health nearly a century ago, but the focus on stopping exposure in the workplace largely bypassed coal miners. Instead, regulations centered on coal dust, a separate hazard created by crushing or pulverizing coal rock that also contributes to black lung.

Advertisement

In the decades since, silica dust has become a major problem as Appalachian miners cut through layers of sandstone to reach less accessible coal seams in mountaintop mines where coal closer to the surface has long been tapped. Silica dust is 20 times more toxic than coal dust and causes severe forms of black lung disease after even a few years of exposure.

___

Willingham reported from Charleston, West Virginia.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Sweden criticises China for refusing full access to vessel suspected of Baltic Sea cable sabotage

Published

on

Sweden criticises China for refusing full access to vessel suspected of Baltic Sea cable sabotage

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Sweden has sharply criticised China for refusing to allow the Nordic country’s main investigator on board a Chinese vessel suspected of severing two cables in the Baltic Sea.

The Yi Peng 3 sailed away from its mooring in international waters between Denmark and Sweden on Saturday, and appears to be heading for Egypt after Chinese investigators boarded the ship on Thursday.

The Chinese team had allowed representatives from Sweden, Germany, Finland and Denmark on board as observers, but did not permit access for Henrik Söderman, the Swedish public prosecutor, according to authorities in Stockholm.

Advertisement

“It is something the government inherently takes seriously. It is remarkable that the ship leaves without the prosecutor being given the opportunity to inspect the vessel and question the crew within the framework of a Swedish criminal investigation,” foreign minister Maria Malmer Stenergard said in comments provided to the Financial Times.

The Swedish government had put pressure on Chinese authorities for the bulk carrier to move from international waters into Swedish territory to allow a full investigation over the severing of Swedish-Lithuanian and Finnish-German data cables last month.

People close to the probe said the boarding of the vessel on Thursday had shown there was little doubt it was involved in the incident.

Yi Peng 3 belongs to Ningbo Yipeng Shipping, a company that owns only one other vessel and is based near the eastern Chinese port city of Ningbo. A representative of Ningbo Yipeng told the FT in November that “the government has asked the company to co-operate with the investigation”, but did not answer further questions.

There is a split among countries over the motivation behind the cutting of the cables. Some people close to the investigation said they believed it was bad seamanship that may have led to the Yi Peng 3’s anchor dragging along the seabed in the Baltic Sea.

Advertisement

However, other governments have said privately that they suspect Russia was behind the damage and may have paid money to the ship’s crew.

The severing of the two cables was the second time in 13 months that a Chinese ship has damaged infrastructure in the Baltic Sea.

The Newnew Polar Bear, a Chinese container ship, damaged a gas pipeline in October 2023 by dragging its anchor along the bottom of the Baltic Sea for a considerable distance during a storm. Officials reacted slowly to that incident, allowing the vessel to leave the region without stopping, something that they were keen to prevent in the case of the Yi Peng 3.

Nordic and Baltic officials are sceptical about the possibility of the same thing occurring twice in quick succession. “The Chinese must be truly dreadful captains if this keeps on happening innocently,” said one Baltic minister.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

College students get emotional about climate change. Some are finding help in class

Published

on

College students get emotional about climate change. Some are finding help in class

At Cornell University, one professor is helping students navigate their emotions about climate change by learning about food.

Rebecca Redelmeier/WSKG


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Rebecca Redelmeier/WSKG

More than 50% of youth in the United States are very or extremely worried about climate change, according to a recent survey in the scientific journal The Lancet.

The researchers, who surveyed over 15,000 people aged 16–25, also found that more than one in three young people said their feelings about climate change negatively affect their daily lives.

The study adds to a growing area of research that finds that climate change, which is brought on primarily by the burning of fossil fuels, is making young people distressed. Yet experts say there are proven ways to help young people cope with those feelings — and college classrooms could play a key role.

Advertisement

“When any of us talk about climate with students, we can’t just talk about what’s happening in the atmosphere and oceans,” says Jennifer Atkinson, a professor at the University of Washington. “We have to acknowledge and make space for them to talk openly about what’s happening in their own lives and be sensitive and compassionate about that.”

Atkinson studies the emotional and psychological toll of climate change. She also teaches a class on climate grief and eco-anxiety, during which students examine the feelings they have around climate change with their peers. The first time the class was offered in 2017, registration filled overnight, Atkinson says.

While teaching, Atkinson says she keeps in mind that many of her students have lived through floods or escaped wildfires — disasters that have increased in intensity as the world warms — before they even start college, yet often have had few places to find support. In the classroom, students come together, frequently finding solace and understanding in one another, she says.

“Students repeatedly say that the most helpful aspect isn’t anything they hear me say,” says Atkinson. “But rather the experience of being in the room with other people who are experiencing similar feelings and realizing that their emotions are normal and really widespread.”

Students at Cornell University discuss how climate change threatens some of the foods they eat. They also learn what they can do about it during a class on climate change and food.

Students at Cornell University discuss how climate change threatens some of the foods they eat. They also learn what they can do about it during a class on climate change and food.

Rebecca Redelmeier/WSKG

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Rebecca Redelmeier/WSKG

Advertisement

Making climate change personal in class

Atkinson is one of several professors around the country who has opted to put emotions and solutions at the center of her climate teaching to help students learn how to address their worries about human-driven climate change.

At Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, Michael Hoffmann, who directed the Cornell Institute for Climate Change Solutions and held other university leadership positions before becoming a professor emeritus, introduced a class on food and climate change last year. The point of focusing on food, Hoffmann says, is to teach students how to connect with climate change through their personal experiences.

“When you tell the climate change story, it has to be relevant to people,” says Hoffmann. “I’d argue there isn’t much more anything more relevant than food.”

In 2021, Hoffman co-wrote a book on how climate change could impact beloved foods like coffee, chocolate, and olive oil. He started the class in 2023 after students told him they were feeling dread about what climate change could mean for their futures.

Part of the goal, Hoffmann says, is to provide students with clear steps they can take to address climate change. Evidence suggests that approach could counteract students’ anxieties.

Advertisement

Since 2022, researchers at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication have published a biannual report on climate change’s influence on the American mind. In the most recent report, released in July, they found most people are able to cope with the stress of climate change. However, about one in 10 say they feel anxious or on edge about global warming several days per week.

Bringing students together to connect about climate change and learn about solutions could help curb that toll, according to lead researcher and program director Anthony Leiserowitz.

“The best antidote to anxiety is action,” says Leiserowitz. “Especially, I would make a plug for action with other people.”

Facing the problem

Students, too, welcome more creative and emotionally-minded climate classes. Three-quarters of those who responded to the recent Lancet survey endorsed climate education and opportunities for discussion and support in academic settings.

At Cornell University, dozens of students have taken Hoffmann’s class. They learn about the global risks to food brought on by warming temperatures and how personal food decisions can play a role in contributing to planet-warming pollution.

Advertisement

Freshman Andrea Kim, who enrolled in the class this semester, welcomes those lessons. For a recent class, students met in a campus dining hall to make their dinner selections. Then they headed to the seminar room next door, where they partnered up to tell each other how the foods on their plate would be impacted by climate change.

After inspecting a classmate’s dinner, Kim explained that the rice, fish, and salad the student had chosen would all be threatened as global temperatures rose. It’s the kind of assignment, she says, that has helped her better understand the dangers of climate change and steps she can take.

“I think it’s good that we’re not just, like, pushing away the problem,” says Kim. “Because it’s still going to be there, whether or not we address it.”

Kim says she sometimes feels stressed about climate change, especially while scrolling through the news on her phone. But she and several other students say the class has helped them navigate those feelings.

Jada Ebron, a senior at Cornell, says she began the class feeling like there wasn’t much she could do about climate change. She says she was frustrated that large companies and governments continue to pollute and that people who are low-income and non-white suffer more as a result.

Advertisement

The class doesn’t shy away from those truths, says Hoffmann. But it aims to show students that their actions aren’t futile either.

To Ebron, that framing resonates.

“It forces you to challenge your beliefs and your ideas about climate change,” says Ebron, who spent part of the summer before her senior year researching how climate change impacts communities of color. “There is something that you can do about it, whether it’s as small as educating yourself or as big as participating in social justice movements.”

Continue Reading

News

Read Blake Lively’s Complaint Against Wayfarer Studios

Published

on

Read Blake Lively’s Complaint Against Wayfarer Studios

187. The significant spike in the volume of negative sentiments toward Ms. Lively,
included notable spikes on approximately August 8 and 14, 2024, and continued to trend mostly negative
Net Volume of Positive and Negative Mentions of Blake Lively
June 14, 2024 – December 19, 2024
2
3
for the remainder of 2024:
4
5
4,000
2,000
6
0
7
-2,000
-4,000
8
-6,000
-8,000
10,000
10
12,000
11
12
5/Jul/24
14/Jun/24
21/Jun/24
28/Jun/24
12/Jul/24
188.
13
14
August 10, 2024.
189.
15
19/Jul/24
26/Jul/24
2/Aug/24
T
9/Aug/24
16/Aug/24
23/Aug/24
6/Sep/24
30/Aug/24
13/Sep/24
20/Sep/24
27/Sep/24
4/Oct/24
11/Oct/24
18/Oct/24
25/Oct/24
1/Nov/24
8/Nov/24
15/Nov/24
22/Nov/24
29/Nov/24
6/Dec/24
13/Dec/24
Indeed, as noted above, TAG itself noted a shift due to their efforts as early as
16
As of that date, the sentiment towards Ms. Lively turned toxic, with a sudden
increase in negative comments including hypersexual content and calls for Ms. Lively to “go fuck”
17 herself.55
18
19
20
20
190. Nearly decade-old interviews of Ms. Lively were surfaced, commenting on her
tone, her posture, her diction, her language. 5
56
21
22
23
24
24
25
26
27
28
55 @pocketsara, X post, https://x.com/pocketsara/status/1824146308707291152, (Aug. 15, 2024) (“Blake Lively is a cunt”)
@imtotallynotmol, X, Aug. 15, 2024 (“You’re a piece of shit, genuinely go fuck yourself”); FluffyPinkUnicorn VII, Reddit
post, https://www.reddit.com/r/DListedCommunity/comments/1escnuy/blake_lively_getting_criticized_over_press_tour/,
(Aug. 14, 2024) (“Bottled blonde + long legs + fake tits – (brains, judgement, & humility) = Blake Lively”); KettlebellFetish
Reddit
post,
(Aug.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DListed Community/comments/1escnuy/blake_lively_getting_criticized_over_press_tour/,
14, 2024) (“Even with the nose job, she’s such a butterface, great body, hair, but odd face and that body would be so easy to
dress, just a dream body, and nothing fits right, odd clashing colors, just tacky.”); Creative_Ad9660, Reddit_post,
https://www.reddit.com/r/DListed Community/comments/1escnuy/blake_lively_getting_criticized_over_press_tour/, (Aug.
15, 2024) (“Boobs Legsly”); @chick36351, X post, (Aug. 16, 2024) (“Well Blake I a bitch.. She always has been, nice to see
people realize it now… Also WAY too much plastic surgery..”); @Martin275227838, X post,
https://x.com/LizCrokin/status/1824618500431724917, (Aug. 17, 2024) (“@blakelively is a pedophile supporting bully . . .”);
@ZuperGoose, X post, (Aug. 17, 2024) (“Liz tag the bitch @blakelively Blake = pedo”); @myopinionmyfact, X post, (Aug.
22, 2024) (“…@blakelively YOU ARE SUCH A BITCH! What a horrible rude bitch you are. I cannot believe somebody
fucked u, made a kid with u, married u and now has to be stuck with your bitch ass. OMG LMAO I would run!”).
56 Beth Shilliday, Blake Lively Taking a Social Media Break After Being Labeled a ‘Mean Girl’ Amid ‘It Ends With Us’
Backlash, Yahoo Entertainment (Sept. 5, 2024, 8:04) https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/blake-lively-taking-social-media-
57

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending