Connect with us

News

Aware Super and Delancey to invest up to £1bn in London’s office sector

Published

on

Aware Super and Delancey to invest up to £1bn in London’s office sector

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

One of Australia’s largest pension funds is making a major bet on central London offices alongside property group Delancey, marking a vote of confidence in a sector hit by high interest rates and questions over post-pandemic demand.

Aware Super plans to invest up to £1bn in offices across the capital with the real estate group founded by Jamie Ritblat, which this month agreed to buy investment bank Lazard’s new base at 20 Manchester Square, opposite The Wallace Collection museum, for about £120mn.

The partnership comes as investors take diverging views on the office sector, with some seeing depressed valuations as a buying opportunity, and others put off the asset class by the shift to hybrid working.

Advertisement

“We get most excited where there is a real contrarian opportunity,” said Damien Webb, Aware’s head of international and deputy chief investment officer. Webb said the £1bn could be deployed over as little as 12 to 18 months, depending on market conditions. 

Aware opened its first international office in London in November with a pledge to invest £5.25bn across the UK and Europe. This year it took a minority stake in London-headquartered fibre platform euNetworks and Octopus Energy. 

Aware Super has partnered with Delancey, founded by Jamie Ritblat

Those deals came after the fund bought Qatari Diar’s 22 per cent in Get Living last year, a rental landlord launched by Delancey whose properties include the east London Olympic estate.  

Support from Australia’s third-largest pension scheme comes as the government has been courting global investors, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer vowing to “rip up” bureaucracy at a summit earlier this month. 

“We are very pleased with our choice of the UK . . . there’s still lots of opportunity in the UK and we’ve got a lot more to do,” said Webb. 

Advertisement

Aware’s latest move also marks a major vote of confidence in London offices from a large international investor following two years when such buildings proved difficult to sell amid a wider market slump in commercial property.

The downturn was triggered by higher interest rates, which increased financing costs in a sector heavily reliant on debt to fund deals. Added uncertainty over the post-pandemic future of hybrid working has pushed European office values down about 37 per cent on average from their peak in 2022, according to Green Street research.

Aware and Delancey said prices were looking cheap at present, adding that a lack of investment in new developments combined with strong demand for the best buildings — those in central locations with high sustainability ratings — would lead to a supply crunch and rising rents in the years ahead. 

Investors buying into the sector claim that any slowdown in demand is disproportionately hitting the bottom segment of the market, while the best buildings will remain sought after. Land Securities estimates that just 10 per cent of buildings account for 90 per cent of London’s vacancy rate.

But given the lack of big deals, there is still uncertainty around where office prices will settle now that many more companies allow working from home. 

Advertisement

“We think London has repriced well. There haven’t been a lot of transactions to date. As you start to see some traditions and you start to see some pricing, you will gather momentum,” said Webb, adding that there was “not perfect harmony . . . just yet” between buyers and sellers on what prices offices should command. 

Several large buildings in London have come on the market in recent months, including Brookfield’s Citypoint tower and Nuveen’s “Can of Ham” — which will help to establish a baseline for larger sales. 

Stafford Lancaster, Delancey’s chief investment officer, said “the market is quite illiquid at the bigger lot sizes” and that the two investors could differentiate themselves by “being able to write those cheques”. 

The strategy could include investing via joint ventures or preferred equity — and backing schemes to fix up older blocks, or buying good quality assets such as 20 Manchester Square. 

The block, bought from Invesco, was once the headquarters of EMI records and features in the cover photo of The Beatles’ album Please Please Me. Lazard is expected to move in next year.

Advertisement

News

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Published

on

Top Drug Regulator Is Fired From the F.D.A.

Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg, the Food and Drug Administration’s top drug regulator, said she was fired from the agency Friday after she declined to resign.

She said she did not know who had ordered her firing or why, nor whether Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. knew of her fate. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The departure reflected the upheaval at the F.D.A., days after the resignation of Dr. Marty Makary, the agency commissioner. Dr. Makary had become a lightning rod for critics of the agency’s decisions to reject applications for rare disease drugs and to delay a report meant to supply damaging evidence about the abortion drug mifepristone. He also spent months before his departure pushing back on the White House’s requests for him to approve more flavored vapes, the reason he ultimately cited for leaving.

Dr. Hoeg’s hiring had startled public health leaders who were familiar with her track record as a vaccine skeptic, and she played a leading role in some of the agency’s most divisive efforts during her tenure. She worked on a report that purportedly linked the deaths of children and young adults to Covid vaccines, a dossier the agency has not released publicly. She was also the co-author of a document describing Mr. Kennedy’s decision to pare the recommendations for 17 childhood vaccines down to 11.

But in an interview on Friday, Dr. Hoeg said she “stuck with the science.”

Advertisement

“I am incredibly proud of the work we were doing,” Dr. Hoeg said, adding, “I’m glad that we didn’t give in to any pressures to approve drugs when it wasn’t appropriate.”

As the director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, she was a political appointee in a role that had been previously occupied by career officials. An epidemiologist who was trained in the United States and Denmark, she worked on efforts to analyze drug safety and on a panel to discuss the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, during pregnancy. She also worked on efforts to reduce animal testing and was the agency’s liaison to an influential vaccine committee.

She made sure that her teams approved drugs only when the risk-benefit balance was favorable, she said.

The firing worsens the leadership vacuum at the F.D.A. and other agencies, with temporary leaders filling the role of commissioner, food chief and the head of the biologics center, which oversees vaccines and gene therapies. The roles of surgeon general and director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are also unfilled.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending