Connect with us

News

A bloody nose, a last hurrah for friends, and more prom memories you shared with us

Published

on

A bloody nose, a last hurrah for friends, and more prom memories you shared with us

Eddie Almance, left, and his sister Leila, pose for portraits taken by their cousin Ailem Villarreal on the rooftop of the Marriott Hotel in downtown Odessa, Texas

Danielle Villasana/Danielle Villasana


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Danielle Villasana/Danielle Villasana


Eddie Almance, left, and his sister Leila, pose for portraits taken by their cousin Ailem Villarreal on the rooftop of the Marriott Hotel in downtown Odessa, Texas

Danielle Villasana/Danielle Villasana

It’s prom season, and we asked you to share stories from that special night, whether you went last year or decades ago.

We received many heartwarming stories about going to prom with friends, future spouses and high school sweethearts.

Advertisement

Some people told us they didn’t go to prom at all — or didn’t go with a date. Some people learned big lessons at their prom, while others had unforgettable mishaps.

Here are some of the memories you shared with us. And remember that you can participate in future callouts by signing up for NPR’s Up First newsletter.

Day-of mishaps didn’t stop the celebrations

Marshall Metcalf from Taylorville, Ill. recalls how, after walking into his prom, his “nose exploded in a spontaneous fountain of blood.”

It was “Kind of like Footloose, without the fighting or dancing. Just an enormous nosebleed, all down the white rented shirt,” Metcalf wrote. “I dove into the bathroom to clean up, terribly embarrassed. But to my great surprise no one commented on it the rest of the night. Guess my classmates weren’t that bad after all.”

Anthony Rodas from Wisconsin almost crashed his car when his date mentioned she was dating someone else. “On the way there, she nonchalantly mentions, ‘Oh, by the way, that guy is my boyfriend.’ I drove through a stop sign — which has flashing red lights below the sign as well as little LEDs around the signs themselves, the least excusable stop sign to run — as I am processing what had just happened,” Rodas wrote. His date was a little startled and concerned, but no one was hurt and they made it safely to prom. “It was rather awkward, and we spent a good portion of the prom doing our own things, but we did dance to a few songs and still ended up having a good time,” Rodas wrote.

Advertisement

Jessica Reitano also ended up marrying her prom date. In 1990, her and her now husband crashed a prom when she came back home from college.

Jessica Reitano


hide caption

toggle caption

Jessica Reitano

Advertisement


Jessica Reitano also ended up marrying her prom date. In 1990, her and her now husband crashed a prom when she came back home from college.

Jessica Reitano

Josh Waters in Georgia wrote that his “prom date was so mad at me because I refused to wait in line for pictures right when we got there.”

After three hours of dancing to Boyz II Men, the pair looked “a sweaty mess. However, it must not have made her that mad,” Waters wrote. “We just celebrated 16 years of marriage.”

Prom night was clouded by difficult times, personal and political, for some

Robin Dias of Scottsdale, Ariz. went to prom in Darien, Conn. in 1968, as unrest around the Vietnam War reached its peak. The spring was fraught with protests, political unrest and the assassinations of two of America’s most high profile leaders, Martin Luther King and Robert F Kennedy. Dias wrote that “It almost seemed wrong to want to dress like a princess at a ball when there was so much turmoil,” Dias wrote.

Advertisement

She recalled her mother standing in her bedroom, ironing while the TV blared with the news of the MLK funeral march. Dias’ mother sighed, and said aloud, “It’s all so terrible. But I really hope the school won’t cancel the proms this spring. You kids still deserve to have your Prom Night.”

Casey Promise Thompson was one of the only openly gay students at her prom night in her small town in Tennessee.

“I walked in, nervous of people’s reactions to me wearing a tux. I had lived a life of being severely bullied and not being the best at making friends. But I had evolved over time and tried to learn to connect to others through art,” Thompson wrote to us.

She would give away her doodles and sketches all the time. She estimates she probably gave away hundreds of drawings. So, it came as no surprise that by senior year, she was voted “Most Talented” by her classmates.

Of course, this would mean that she would have to get on stage at prom and accept her award with all the other superlatives. “I was immediately nervous and sick to my stomach,” she wrote. “Instead of the expected cold shoulder and fear of being laughed at, they all smiled and welcomed me.”

Advertisement

Thompson learned an important lesson that day: “It suddenly dawned on me that my art had made an impact. Everyone did know who I was. I had actually been a popular kid my Senior year and I didn’t even know it. My brain had built up this idea that no one liked me all of these years, and right before I graduated high school…I finally learned that people actually did respect and appreciate me. My art has made me into someone.”

Romantic dates weren’t always the focus of prom

In 2010, Karley Ford went to her senior prom with her best friends instead of a date.

Karley Ford


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Karley Ford


In 2010, Karley Ford went to her senior prom with her best friends instead of a date.

Karley Ford

Karley Ford in Colorado told us that she “had the worst luck with getting dates to… literally any dance. I was just perpetually single. Prom was no exception. Junior prom, my date got swine flu. Senior prom, my date decided to go with someone else– one week – before prom. I had already gotten his boutonniere in 2010.

At senior prom, Ford said she expected to be depressed because she was going alone. One of her good friends asked Ford to join her as her “date” a couple days before.

Advertisement

“The best thing, though, was this picture. We had been friends since grade school, and it was one of the last hurrahs together before going off to college or wherever the wind took us,” Ford wrote. “Despite me not having a date, my childhood friends all rallied together, made sure that I had reasons to smile and reminded me that I am never alone (and I didn’t need a stinkin’ date).”

Going with a friend also made things 10 times more fun for Laura Popielski in Washington D.C. “My best friend and I decided to go to prom months before the date. He was gay and I was a bit of a wallflower when it came to dating/boys so it made good sense to go together,” Popielski wrote. “Nine years later, he passed away and now it’s been ten years since that… and I still remember how fun it was to collaborate with him, how we were the perfect pair.”

Some who didn’t attend prom are stamping their own traditions on the day

Ananya Paul grew up in India and never went to prom. Now in California, she “will be making memories when my rising Junior wears a saree to her prom. Our children take pride in celebrating and showcasing their culture.” Paul wrote that it is “heartening” to see more students wear traditional attire like sarees or lehengas to prom in recent years.

“What’s also intriguing is how my daughter has chosen to go to prom with her girlfriends rather than a date. It speaks volumes about the evolving dynamics of friendship and independence among today’s youth,” Paul wrote. “It’s these unique cultural shifts and personal choices that make each prom season special and memorable in its own way.”

Chad Campbell contributed production to the audio version of this story and Ally Schweitzer edited. The digital version was edited by Obed Manuel.

Advertisement

News

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Published

on

Trump claims US stockpiles mean wars can be fought ‘forever’; Kristi Noem testifies before Congress – US politics live

Trump says US stockpiles mean “wars can be fought ‘forever’”

In a late night post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said that the US munitions stockpiles “at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better”.

He added that the US has a “virtually unlimited supply of these weapons”, meaning that “wars can be fought ‘forever’”.

This comes after Trump said that the US-Israel war on Iran could go beyond the four-five weeks that the administration initially predicted. The president also did not rule out the possibility of US boots on the ground in Iran during an interview with the New York Post on Monday.

Advertisement

“I rebuilt the military in my first term, and continue to do so. The United States is stocked, and ready to WIN, BIG!!!,” he wrote.

Share

Key events

During his opening remarks, Senate judicicary committee chairman, Chuck Grassley, blamed Democrats for the ongoing shutdown Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but highlighted four agencies: the Secret Service, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the Coast Guard.

Democrats are demanding tighter guardrails for federal immigration enforcement, but a sweeping tax bill signed into law last year conferred $75bn for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which means the agency is still functional amid the wider department shuttering.

Share
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending