Connect with us

Wisconsin

What channel is Wisconsin vs Montana basketball on today in the NCAA tournament? Time, TV, schedule, streaming, odds

Published

on

What channel is Wisconsin vs Montana basketball on today in the NCAA tournament? Time, TV, schedule, streaming, odds


play

At the first glance of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament pairings Sunday night, it appeared the selection committee decided to build the bracket before Wisconsin played a game in the Big Ten tournament.

Perhaps it’s fair that Wisconsin isn’t playing in Milwaukee this weekend. It was 2-6 against the other top seven teams in the league before last weekend’s victories in Indianapolis.

Advertisement

But why would a team that avenged two of those losses on a neutral court and played the last conference tournament game Sunday be assigned to tip off at 11:30 a.m. Mountain time Thursday?

Watch Wisconsin vs Montana on TNT

That’s madness in March for sure, but not of the buzzer-beating variety.

The Badgers will face No. 14 Montana in Denver. If they win Thursday, their reward is possibly No. 6 BYU, which features one of the top perimeter offenses in the country. The Cougars have a shorter trip to Denver. So much for the protected No. 3 seed.

But the Badgers are 2-0 in first-round games as a third-seeded team and are making a 24th NCAA tournament appearance in the last 26 years. Only four other teams have accomplished that — Gonzaga, Michigan State, Duke and Kansas.

Advertisement

Wisconsin lost its first-round game last season to 12th-seeded James Madison. Badgers fans are looking forward to a much more watchable game Thursday.

Here’s how to view and listen to it:

What channel is Wisconsin vs Montana on today?

  • TV: TNT
  • Stream: You can stream the game on the March Madness app and Sling TV has a special offer
  • Announcers: Brad Nessler (play-by-play), Brendan Haywood (analysis) and Dana Jacobson (reporter) will call the game.

Wisconsin vs Montana time today

  • Date: Thursday, March 20
  • Time: 12:30 p.m. CT

The first-round NCAA tournament game between Wisconsin vs. Montana game starts at 12:30 p.m. Thursday at Ball Arena in Denver.

Is Wisconsin vs Montana on the radio?

  • FM-97.3 in Milwaukee and AM-1310 and FM-101.5 in Madison and on the Varsity Network app.
  • Matt Lepay (play-by-play) and Brian Butch (analyst) will call the game.

Is Wisconsin vs Montana on SiriusXM Radio?

Yes, the broadcast is on Channel 203.

Wisconsin vs Montana odds

Odds courtesy of BetMGM as of Wednesday

Advertisement
  • ODDS: Wisconsin by 17.5
  • MONEY LINE: Wisconsin -2500, Montana +1050
  • O/U: 151.5

Wisconsin Badgers basketball schedule 2024-25

All times Central

  • Nov. 4: Wisconsin 85, Holy Cross 61 | Box score | 1-0
  • Nov. 7: Wisconsin 79, Montana State 67 | Box score | 2-0
  • Nov. 10: Wisconsin 87, Appalachian State 56 | Box score | 3-0
  • Nov. 15: Wisconsin 103, Arizona 88 | Box score | 4-0
  • Nov. 18: Wisconsin 87, UT-Rio Grande Valley 84 | Box score | 5-0
  • Nov. 22 Wisconsin 86, UCF 70 | Box score | 6-0
  • Nov. 24: Wisconsin 81, Pittsburgh 75 | Box score | 7-0
  • Nov. 30: Wisconsin 74, Chicago State 53 | Box score | 8-0
  • Dec. 3: Michigan 67, Wisconsin 64 | Box score | 8-1, 0-1 Big Ten
  • Dec. 7: Marquette 88, Wisconsin 74 | Box score | 8-2
  • Dec. 10: Illinois 86, Wisconsin 80 | Box score | 8-3, 0-2
  • Dec. 14: Wisconsin 83, Butler 74 | Box score | 9-3
  • Dec. 22: Wisconsin 76, Detroit Mercy 53 | Box score | 10-3
  • Jan. 3: Wisconsin 116, Iowa 85 | Box score | 11-3, 1-2
  • Jan. 6: Wisconsin 75, Rutgers 63 | Box score | 12-3, 2-2
  • Jan. 10: Wisconsin 80, Minnesota 59 | Box score | 13-3, 3-2
  • Jan. 14: Wisconsin 70, Ohio State 68 | Box score | 14-3, 4-2
  • Jan. 18: Wisconsin 84, USC 69 | Box score | 15-3, 5-2
  • Jan. 21: UCLA 85, Wisconsin 83 | Box score | 15-4, 5-3
  • Jan. 26: Wisconsin 83, Nebraska 55 | Box score | 16-4, 6-3
  • Jan. 29: Maryland 76, Wisconsin 68 | Box score | 16-5, 6-4
  • Feb. 1: Wisconsin 75, Northwestern 69 | Box score | 17-5, 7-4
  • Feb. 4: Wisconsin 76, Indiana 64 | Box score | 18-5, 8-4
  • Feb. 8: Wisconsin 74, Iowa 63 | Box score | 19-5, 9-4
  • Feb. 15: Wisconsin 94, Purdue 84 | Box score | 20-5, 10-4
  • Feb. 18: Wisconsin 95, Illinois 74 | Box score | 21-5, 11-4
  • Feb. 22: Oregon 77, Wisconsin 73 (OT) | Box score | 21-6, 11-5
  • Feb. 25: Wisconsin 88, Washington 62 | Box score | 22-6, 12-5
  • March 2: Michigan State 71, Wisconsin 62 | Box score | 22-7, 12-6
  • March 5: Wisconsin 74, Minnesota 67 | Box score | 23-7, 13-6
  • March 8: Penn State 86, Wisconsin 75 | Box score | 23-8, 13-7
  • March 13: Wisconsin 70, Northwestern 63 | Box score | 24-8
  • March 14: Wisconsin 86, UCLA 70 l Box score | 25-8
  • March 15: Wisconsin 77, Michigan State 74 | Box score | 26-8
  • March 16: Michigan 59, Wisconsin 53 | Box score | 26-9
  • Record: 26-9

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association, wildlife advocates react to delisting of the gray wolf

Published

on

Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association, wildlife advocates react to delisting of the gray wolf


GREEN BAY, Wis. (WBAY) – The Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association is speaking out about the U.S. House passing the “Pet and Livestock Protection Act”.

“I’ll be honest, our cattlemen are pretty fed up. I mean, they have been dealing with this issue for a long time, so. I mean just really felt like we are finally making progress here. And that’s really exciting that we can help our producers deal with this issue,” says Brady Zuck, a cow-calf producer and the past president of the Wisconsin Cattlemen’s Association.

Brady Zuck, one of many livestock producers in Wisconsin, is responding to the U.S. House passing a bill to delist the gray wolf from the “Endangered Species Act”.

The population of gray wolves is increasing, and according to the Wisconsin DNR, from April 2024 to April 2025, there were 70 verified wolf conflicts with livestock.

Advertisement

“That’s what’s been the most frustrating, is that we have producers locally here in northwest Wisconsin or your area by Green Bay that are dealing with this issue, and it’s all controlled in Washington, and we have people in our state that could make those management decisions, but their hands are tied,” says Zuck.

Supporters of the bill say non-lethal methods used to keep gray wolves away, such as strobe lights and music, are only short-term solutions.

“We’re asking, saying hey, if we’re having problems with wolves on farms, we need ways to effectively deal with that, that work,” says Zuck.

The Great Lakes Wildlife Alliance shared a statement from Thursday about the delisting, saying: “We are disgusted by this reckless abandonment of science-based wildlife management. However, our advocates showed up in extraordinary numbers against overwhelming odds, and their voices were heard. This organization and our supporters are not defeated.”

“As cattlemen, we never said we want to eliminate all wolves, we don’t want any wolves, we never said that. But we just need to make sure we have the tools in place that we can, you know, if we have wolves killing calves, we need a way to deal with it, right?” Zuck says.

Advertisement

The bill still has to pass the Senate and reach the president’s desk before changes are made.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Watch Live: Demolition of bridge between Iowa, Wisconsin

Published

on

Watch Live: Demolition of bridge between Iowa, Wisconsin


LANSING, Iowa (KCRG) – The Black Hawk Bridge, connecting Iowa and Wisconsin over the Mississippi River will come down Friday morning.

The Iowa DOT and Wisconsin DOT are partnering on the demolition, which is set for 9:30 am on Friday. You can watch the demolition live in this article when it happens.

The bridge has been closed since October with plans to construct a new bridge, planned to open in 2027.

Advertisement

The Iowa DOT laid out safety plans for the demolition:

  • A zone around the bridge will be blocked off to protect people from debris.
  • The Lansing Ferry service will not run from 6:00 p.m. on December 18 to the morning of December 22.
  • Highway 26 will be closed from around 8:45 a.m. on December 19 and reopen around 30 minutes after the implosion. Detour signs will be posted.
  • The demolition zone will be closed to recreational boat traffic on December 18 and expected to reopen during the night of December 19.
  • No trains will run through Lansing for four hours on the morning of December 19.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics

Published

on

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics




AP
 — 

A jury found a Wisconsin judge – accused of helping an undocumented immigrant dodge federal authorities – guilty of obstruction Thursday, marking a victory for President Donald Trump as he continues his sweeping immigration crackdown across the country.

Federal prosecutors charged Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan with obstruction, a felony, and concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, in April. The jury acquitted her on the concealment count, but she still faces up to five years in prison on the obstruction count.

The jury returned the verdicts after deliberating for six hours. Dugan faces up to five years in prison when she’s sentenced, but no date had been set as of late Thursday evening.

Advertisement

Dugan and her attorneys left the courtroom Thursday, ducked into a side conference room and closed the door without speaking to reporters. Steve Biskupic, her lead attorney, later told reporters that he was disappointed with the ruling and didn’t understand how the jury could have reached a split verdict since the elements of both charges were virtually the same.

US Attorney Brad Schimel denied the case was political and urged people to accept the verdict peacefully. He said courthouse arrests are safer because people are screened for weapons and it isn’t unfair for law enforcement to arrest wanted people in courthouses.

“Some have sought to make this about a larger political battle,” Schimel said. “While this case is serious for all involved, it is ultimately about a single day, a single bad day, in a public courthouse. The defendant is certainly not evil. Nor is she a martyr for some greater cause.”

According to court filings that include an FBI affidavit and a federal grand jury indictment, immigration authorities traveled to the Milwaukee County courthouse on April 18 after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Dugan learned that agents were in the corridor outside her courtroom waiting for Flores-Ruiz. She left the courtroom to confront them, falsely telling that their administrative warrant for Flores-Ruiz wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest him and directing them to go to the chief judge’s office.

Advertisement

While the agents were gone, she addressed Flores-Ruiz’s case off the record, told his attorney that he could attend his next hearing via Zoom and led Flores-Ruiz and the attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. The US Department of Homeland Security announced in November he had been deported.

The case inflamed tensions over Trump’s immigration crackdown, with his administration branding Dugan an activist judge and Democrats countering that the administration was trying to make an example of Dugan to blunt judicial opposition to the operation.

Prosecutors worked during Dugan’s trial to show that she directed agents to the chief judge’s office to create an opening for Flores-Ruiz to escape.

Prosecutors also played audio recordings from her courtroom in which she can be heard telling her court reporter that she’d take “the heat” for leading Flores-Ruiz out the back.

Her attorneys countered that she was trying to follow courthouse protocols that called for court employees to report any immigration agents to their supervisors and she didn’t intentionally try to obstruct the arrest team.

Advertisement

This story has been updated with additional details.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending