Connect with us

Wisconsin

Republican lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling – Wisconsin Examiner

Published

on

Republican lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling – Wisconsin Examiner


Wisconsin Republicans have asked the state Supreme Court to reconsider its decision to overturn the state’s legislative maps, saying lawmakers can’t draw new maps by the Court’s Jan. 12 deadline. 

In a motion filed last week, the attorneys for Senate Republicans argued the lawmakers wouldn’t be able to hit the Jan. 12 deadline to produce new maps that follow the Court’s order that districts be contiguous. 

“And now, announced the Friday before Christmas, the parties have been given 21 days — a third of them falling on weekends and state holidays — to submit proposed remedies, lengthy remedial briefs, and expert reports,” the Republican attorneys state in a filing. “The message is clear: The regular rules apply to Republicans. But here, Democrats get special solicitude.”

The Republicans also argue that the Court didn’t listen to their arguments, pre-decided the case and didn’t give them a chance to respond to the deadline for new maps. 

Advertisement

On Dec. 22, the Court ruled in a 4-3 decision that Wisconsin’s current maps are unconstitutional because they include many districts that aren’t contiguous — a requirement under the state constitution. The Court ordered the Legislature and the other parties involved in the lawsuit to submit new maps by Jan. 12, with supporting arguments due 10 days later. 

In order to be in place in time for the 2024 legislative elections, the maps must be set by mid-March, state election officials have said. 

The maps submitted by the parties will also be assessed by two referees the Court has appointed: University of California, Irvine political science professor Bernard Grofman and Carnegie Mellon University postdoctoral fellow Jonathan Cervas. 

For more than a decade, despite Wisconsin’s near 50-50 political divide, Republicans have enjoyed a disproportionately large majority in both houses of the Legislature because of the severe partisan gerrymander they instituted in 2011. That gerrymander, which experts have often cited as one of the worst in the country, was continued in 2022 when the Supreme Court, then under a conservative majority, imposed maps drawn by the Legislature. 

In addition to their request that the state Supreme Court reconsider its decision, Republicans have also suggested plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

That course of action, however, would require Republicans to find a violation of federal law in a case and decision that are almost entirely focused on issues of state law. 

“We will pursue all federal issues arising out of the redistricting litigation at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said in a statement after the state Court’s decision. 

Before the decision, Republicans suggested that they would challenge Justice Janet Protasiewicz’s participation in the case at the U.S. Supreme Court. 

For months, Republicans alleged Protasiewicz had “pre-judged” the case because of comments about the legislative maps she made on the campaign trail and donations her campaign received from the state Democratic Party. Republicans threatened that if she didn’t recuse from the case, they’d move to impeach her. 

Protasiewicz denied the request for recusal, saying that the Democratic Party wasn’t a litigant in the case so its political donations to her didn’t affect the case and that recusing because of donations from one party would set a difficult precedent for the other members of the Court who have received campaign cash from either of the parties. 

Advertisement

The impeachment threat has subsided, but Republicans could argue in federal court that her participation violated their due process rights. 

Such an argument would be made under a federal precedent set in a 2009 Supreme Court case, Caperton v. Massey. In Caperton, a West Virginia judge had refused to recuse himself from the appeal of a $50 million jury verdict after the CEO of the plaintiff in the case had donated $3 million to the judge’s campaign. 

In addition to the facts in the case being different, the Caperton precedent was set by a liberal majority, so the current conservative leaning U.S. Supreme Court — which has regularly ruled in favor of money in politics — might be hesitant to endorse its argument. 

Other federal claims could be made after the maps are chosen. In the legal battle that led to the imposition of the current maps, the U.S. Supreme Court stepped in to say the Wisconsin Supreme Court couldn’t select legislative maps drawn by Gov. Tony Evers because they violated the Voting Rights Act by attempting to create too many majority-minority districts around Milwaukee. 

Vos said he expects a similar outcome this time. 

Advertisement

“Last time around, the Democrats’ maps racially gerrymandered voters to obtain a political goal,” he said. “I expect they’ll do so again. The Supreme Court wasn’t fooled by the overt racial gerrymandering before, and it’s my hope that the Court will refuse to allow that or any other violation of federal law this time around, too.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?

Published

on

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?


With the action-packed Wisconsin high school boys basketball regular season completed and March Madness beginning, it’s time to take a look at some of the outstanding players and cast your vote for the best.

We began by looking at the most prolific individual scoring threats, talented 3-point shooters,strong rebounders, and top free-throw shooters so now it’s time to take a look at the high-caliber guards from throughout the state.

There are hundreds of high-caliber boys basketball players in Wisconsin, and these lists are not intended to be comprehensive.

Voting remains open until March 9 at 11:59 p.m. PT.

Advertisement

(Players are listed in alphabetical order and all nominees are leaders from the 2025-26 season as compiled by Bound.com, and WIAA; the poll is below the list of athletes)

Castillo is averaging 25.4 points per game with 5.4 rebounds, 2.3 assists, and 1.1 steals for Greendale (18-6 overall record).

Collien is averaging 15 points per game with 4.1 rebounds and 2.0 assists for Oakfield (21-3 overall record).

Edwards is averaging 14.1 points per game with 7.1 rebounds and 6.6 assists for D.C. Everest (21-3 overall record).

Gray Jr. was averaging 24.3 points per game with 6.9 rebounds, 4.0 assists and 2.1 steals prior for West Allis Central (22-2 overall record).

Advertisement

Hereford is averaging 36.4 points per game with 9.0 rebounds, 5.6 assists, and 4.1 steals for Beloit Memorial (22-2 overall record).

Johnson is averaging 27.3 points per game with 8.5 rebounds, 4.6 assists, and 3.6 steals for Milwaukee Juneau (22-1 overall record).

Jones is averaging 23.3 points per game with 5.0 rebounds, 3.3 assists, and 2.6 steals for Germantown (15-9 overall record).

Kern is averaging 16 points per game with 6.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists for New Berlin West (21-3 overall record).

Kilgore is averaging 14.6 points per game with 7.0 rebounds, 3.6 assists, and 3.0 steals for Kewaunee (24-0 overall record).

Advertisement

Kohnen is averaging 16.3 points per game with 3.8 rebounds, 1.8 assists, and 1.3 steals for Slinger (20-4 overall record).

Knueppel is averaging 17.4 points per game with 7.4 rebounds, 3.9 assists, 1.9 blocks, and 1.4 steals for Wisconsin Lutheran (24-0 overall record).

Loose is averaging 18.2 points per game with 5.3 rebounds, 3.0 assists, and 2.3 steals for Port Washington (23-1 overall).

Manchester is averaging 35.8 points per game for Mount Horeb (19-5 overall record).

Platz is averaging 19.5 points per game with 7.2 rebounds and 2.3 assists, and 1.4 steals for Brookfield East (19-5 overall record).

Advertisement

Prochnow is averaging 21.3 points per game with 11.1 assists, 4.8 assists, and 3.2 steals for Reedsville (21-3 overall record).

Resch is averaging 21.3 points per game with 3.3 assists and 2.0 steals for Arrowhead (18-6 overall record).

Schultz is averaging 27.4 points per game with 6.5 rebounds, 3.8 assists, and 2.0 steals for Plymouth (17-7 overall record).

Schwalbach is averaging 15 points per game with 4.7 assists and 3.3 rebounds, and 1.7 steals for Kaukauna (21-3 overall).

Sweeney is averaging 15.5 points per game for Appleton North (20-4 overall record).

Advertisement

Vandenberg is averaging 13 points per game with 2.3 assists and 2.0 rebounds for Freedom (23-1 overall).

About Our Player Poll Voting
High School on SI voting polls are meant to be a fun, lighthearted way for fans to show support for their favorite athletes and teams. Our goal is to celebrate all of the players featured, regardless of the vote totals. Sometimes one athlete will receive a very large number of votes — even thousands — and that’s okay! The polls are open to everyone and are simply a way to build excitement and community around high school sports. Unless we specifically announce otherwise, there are no prizes or official awards for winning. The real purpose is to highlight the great performances of every athlete included in the poll.

— Jeff Hagenau | jeffreyhagenau@gmail.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin

Published

on

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin




Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin – CBS News

Advertisement













Advertisement




























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


CBS News’ Noel Brennan hits a frozen lake in Wisconsin to go ice sailing.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion

Published

on

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion



AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing.

Advertisement
play

  • Wisconsin’s Assembly Bill 1034 aims to modernize state law to reflect new NCAA rules on athlete compensation.
  • The bill would relieve several state universities of $15 million in athletic facility debt to reinvest in athletic programs.
  • Proponents argue the legislation is necessary for Wisconsin universities to compete with peer institutions in other states.
  • Wisconsin athletics reportedly generate over $750 million in statewide economic impact annually.

Let me put my bias, or experience up front. I was a student athlete at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and was fortunate to have one of my sons graduate as a far better student athlete.

I am writing in support of Assembly Bill 1034, which modernizes Wisconsin law to reflect the realities of today’s college athletic landscape, not because of those past “glory days,” but because college athletics has changed more in the past three years than in the previous three decades.  

New national rules now see universities sharing millions of dollars annually with student-athletes through revenue sharing and name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities. Other states have responded quickly, updating their laws to ensure they can compete in this new environment.

Advertisement

Making sure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind

The State Assembly, with overwhelming bipartisan support, passed AB 1034, now it’s up to the Wisconsin State Senate to pass this legislation and send it quickly to Gov. Tony Evers to ensure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind.

AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing with peer institutions across the country. In a measured way, the bill would relieve UW-Madison, UW-Milwaukee, and UW-Green Bay of $15 million of debt related to athletic facilities with the expressed purpose that those dollars would instead be used to invest in athletic programs.

This legislation is critical for two inter-connected reasons, competition and economic impact.

At a recent capitol hearing, UW-Madison Director of Athletics Chris McIntosh explained that 80 percent of the entire athletic department budget is generated by the football program. That revenue underwrites the competitive commitment to the other 11 men’s and 12 women’s varsity teams, supporting some 600 student athletes.

Advertisement

The capacity for this to continue is threatened by $20 million in new annual name and likeness costs that impact all NCAA schools. An expense that will continue to rise.  In addition, peer institutions in the Big Ten and across the country are committing substantial additional resources to these NIL efforts. In short, without this debt support, the university and its athletes will not only lose an even playing field, they may lose the ability to get on the field.  

This threat from the changing nature of NCAA athletics also poses a threat to the economic impact from college athletics. A recent study found that nearly 2 million visitors came to campus events annually, generating more than $750M in statewide economic impact from Wisconsin athletics. Case in point, each home football game produces a $19M economic impact, with 5,600 jobs in the state tied directly or indirectly to the department’s activities.  

This bipartisan legislation is not about propping up a single sport. It’s about protecting broad based opportunities for all our student-athletes, some of whom we just watched win a gold medal for the U.S. women’s’ hockey team.

Advertisement

Athletics are often noted as the front door to the university, but I would broaden that opening to the State of Wisconsin. Our public university system success strengthens enrollment, attracts the talent that drives our prosperity, and serves as a sustaining way forward for our economy.

Bill provides measured and responsible investment

As the former head of one of our state’s largest business groups, I have spent much of my career engaged in economic development. I know what generates “return on investment.” AB 1034 provides a measured and responsible investment that will generate a positive impact for Wisconsin taxpayers, citizens, and employers.

NCAA athletics has changed, and Wisconsin must change with it, or sit on the sidelines. So let’s encourage the Wisconsin State Senate to pass AB 1034 and put Wisconsin in position to compete on the field which provides a win for our student athletes and all of us who benefit from a world class university system.

Tim Sheehy is a UW-Madison graduate and former student athlete. Sheehy served as the president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce for more than 30 years where he oversaw economic development and business attraction for the region.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending