Connect with us

Wisconsin

Predicting Wisconsin’s chances of retaining its starters

Published

on

Predicting Wisconsin’s chances of retaining its starters


Coming off a uniquely discouraging loss to High Point in the NCAA Tournament’s Round of 64, Greg Gard and the Wisconsin Badgers don’t have time to lick their wounds, as the transfer portal madness will be upon us before you can say “Still No Sweet 16 Since 2017.”

With this in mind, here are my very early best guesses for the chances of the Badgers retaining their guys. Part 2, which will cover rotational players, will drop soon.

Let’s dive right in here with the Badgers’ trickiest retention target. I want to be up front with the fact that I have zero insider information on this, but I’ve talked to enough folks who cover the program to have a distinct vibe that he’s quite possibly gone. Illinois, Michigan, and Michigan State have been the most frequently linked suitors for a player who grew up in Detroit and whose father played for the Illini.

Coming off a season with many highs, but a few obvious regressions, especially on defense—along with admitted “struggles” off the court—it’s natural to wonder if Blackwell might be looking for a fresh start (and bigger paycheck).

Advertisement

The fact that there will be more money on the table elsewhere (I don’t think it will be the NBA) doesn’t help the Badgers’ chances. But my vibe is that Gard, the coach who believed in Blackwell when none from other Big Ten programs did, will give Blackwell a very fair offer with a raise and let the chips fall where they may.

High-scoring wings with middling defense are easier to find in the portal than top-quality point guards or bigs with the diverse skills of the player in my next evaluation. Chances of Retention 50%.

Given his premium skill set and room for growth, there’s a good argument that Winter should be the Badgers No. 1 priority for retention. It’s also a fact that he likely has more to prove before an NBA squad will use a pick on him, although I suspect workouts and testing would only help his cause.

Winter has always struck me as Minnesota Nice and profiles as a quintessential Badger. But I felt similarly about Chucky Hepburn before he surprisingly bolted for Louisville before his senior year, so nothing can be taken for granted.

Winter declining to commit to a fourth season in Madison 20 minutes after losing to High Point has been overblown. He was distraught and coming to grips with a cruel and premature end to what was looking like a special March run.

Advertisement

So, I will cut him some slack here. My vibe is that we’ll see Winter back with the Badgers in ‘26-27. Chances of Retention: 70%.

Rapp’s progression on both offense and defense as the season progressed was incredibly encouraging, and his commitment to another year in Madison immediately after Wisconsin’s loss to High Point was music to fans ears.

For the same reasons why we shouldn’t put too much of our hopes and dreams into what Winter said or didn’t say postgame on Thursday, I’d caution you to take Rapp’s Badgers pledge as written in pencil.

While I think he’ll be back, there will be suitors for Rapp’s skill set, and he will be getting a sizable raise. Gard will need to work a bit to lock him down. Chances of Retention: 80%.

Like Rapp, the sturdy Lithuanian big who appears older than his actual age made impressive strides as the season went along, ending up as a solid 5/5 guy with a few notable high points, including torching an elite Michigan squad from deep on the way to college basketball’s most impressive victory of the season.

Advertisement

But his defense has a lot of room for growth, and his offense can also improve, so my guess is that both aspects of his game will be nurtured in Madison, where he was a valuable starter as a true freshman, a rarity.

While he’ll surely have a market in the portal given his age and inside/outside talents, it won’t be nearly as robust as for other Badgers. Being from Europe makes it a bit murkier, but I feel uniquely confident he’ll be back in Madison. Chances of Retention: 85%.



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for June 1, 2026

Published

on

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for June 1, 2026


play

The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at June 1, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from June 1 drawing

02-42-47-57-58, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 3

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 1 drawing

Midday: 3-8-8

Evening: 0-9-5

Advertisement

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 1 drawing

Midday: 6-2-9-1

Evening: 3-2-0-6

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning All or Nothing numbers from June 1 drawing

Midday: 01-02-03-04-06-09-10-14-19-21-22

Advertisement

Evening: 03-05-08-10-12-13-14-15-17-18-22

Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Badger 5 numbers from June 1 drawing

02-18-23-24-26

Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning SuperCash numbers from June 1 drawing

07-08-11-15-17-33, Doubler: N

Advertisement

Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

  • Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
  • Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.

Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?

No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.

When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
  • Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.

That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **

WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Is Wisconsin violating the rights of disabled voters? Court hears arguments

Published

on

Is Wisconsin violating the rights of disabled voters? Court hears arguments


A Dane County judge heard arguments Monday in a lawsuit that seeks to make electronic absentee ballots available to Wisconsinites with disabilities.

Disability Rights Wisconsin joined the League of Women Voters in suing the Wisconsin Elections Commission two years ago. Those groups argued that voters with disabilities should be allowed to receive, fill out and return an absentee ballot electronically.

Currently, some disabled Wisconsinites have to rely on help from someone else when filling out a paper absentee ballot. People with print disabilities have difficulty reading print because of issues including visual, cognitive or developmental disabilities.

Understanding Wisconsin, Together.

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

That violates the right to a secret ballot as guaranteed by the Wisconsin Constitution, attorney Jared Grubow argued on behalf of the plaintiffs.

“The print disabled voters of Wisconsin cannot vote on the same terms as all other Wisconsinites,” Grubow said during a hearing Monday before Judge Everett Mitchell. “That is discrimination.”

In June 2024, Mitchell issued a temporary order in the case, which would have required Wisconsin to send ballots over email to voters with print disabilities ahead of the November 2024 election. That ruling would not have allowed voters to return completed ballots electronically. Instead, they would need to be turned in via mail or at a clerk’s office.

Advertisement

Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled Legislature appealed the lower court order, however, an appeals court halted Mitchell’s earlier ruling.

Attorneys for the people suing pointed to the Americans with Disabilities Act and argued that Wisconsin is required to provide electronic absentee voting options as a “reasonable accommodation,” for people who rely on screen readers and other devices.

But Assistant Wisconsin Attorney General Karla Keckhaver argued that voters with print disabilities already have sufficient options, because they can either vote in person using electronic machines or they can fill out a ballot at home with the help of a caregiver or assistant.

“The ADA says nothing about privacy and independence in voting, and it doesn’t give voters with disabilities the right to vote without an assistant,” she said.

She also argued that electronic ballots would pose cyber-security issues and put “undue financial and administrative burdens” on Wisconsin’s elections officials.

Advertisement

“Wisconsin’s absentee voting program is a paper-based system, and that’s not an empty procedural requirement — it’s fundamental to the security of the program,” she said. “Internet voting is not an existing service that Wisconsin already provides to others.”

There are roughly 110,000 eligible Wisconsin voters with print disabilities, who may be affected by a ruling in the case, Grubow said.

One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Donald Natzke, is blind, and unable to read or mark a paper absentee ballot on his own. He can’t rely on his wife for help because she is blind as well.

That problem would be solved if Natzke had access to an electronic absentee ballot, since he would be able to use a speech synthesizer and other accessibility devices to read that ballot and fill it out in the privacy of his own home, the lawsuit argues.

In theory, Natzke could go to a polling place or early in-person voting location to fill out a ballot using an electronic voting machine. But Grubow said that option is “extremely difficult” in practice.

Advertisement

“Any amount of poor weather, be it wind, rain, ice or snow, makes getting to the polling place very dangerous for Mr. Natzke,” Grubow said Monday.

Currently, Wisconsinites may return absentee ballots via mail or by dropping them off at their local clerk’s office. In some communities, ballot drop boxes are also available for returning those ballots. Additionally, Wisconsinites can fill out out absentee ballots in-person at early voting locations.

But, based on a declaration filed by Wisconsin’s elections administrator, Wisconsin clerks are “encouraged” but not “required” to make sure that accessible voting equipment is available at early voting locations, Grubow said.

“(If) there is no accessible voting machine, they’re going to face the same issues,” Grubow said. “Which is why often a lot of these voters are deterred from doing that and prefer to vote absentee at home.”

During Monday’s hearing, attorneys for both sides said they believed the matter can be resolved without a trial. Earlier this year, lawyers representing the state of Wisconsin filed a motion asking for summary judgement.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Ready for a hike? Try reaching the top of Wisconsin’s highest point

Published

on

Ready for a hike? Try reaching the top of Wisconsin’s highest point


play

If a trek up a faraway mountain won’t fit on your summer to-do list, maybe you can still find time to hike to Wisconsin’s highest point.

That journey would take you up Timm’s Hill in Price County, which stands at nearly 1,952 feet above sea level, according to the State Cartographer’s Office.

Advertisement

Timm’s Hill is nestled in woodlands of north central Wisconsin, just off County Road RR in Ogema. At the summit, hikers can climb an observation tower that offers 30-mile views of the surrounding area, according to Travel Wisconsin.

Highpoint Guide, a website with information on peaks across the country, says Timm’s Hill was named after Timothy Gahan, a late-1800s logger. Gahan often set up camp near the woods surrounding the hill, which now make up Timm’s Hill County Park.

What to know if you’re visiting Timm’s Hill

Timm’s Hill County Park is open year-round. The park gate is open 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. approximately May through October, and winter parking is available at the intersection of Ring School Road and County Road RR, the Price County website says.

The park has a boat landing and fishing pier, along with picnic shelters and hiking trails. The 10-mile Timm’s Hill National Ice Ace Trail is accessible for hiking, biking and horseback riding and intersects with the statewide Ice Age Trail, which spans over 1,000 miles.

Advertisement

How does Wisconsin’s highest point compare to other states

Timm’s Hill, at 1,952 feet, ranks as the 39th-highest high point among the 50 states, according to Highpoint Guide.

Minnesota and Michigan both rank just above Wisconsin, though Illinois, Indiana, Iowa and Ohio all have high points below 1,700 feet. The highest point anywhere in the United States is Alaska’s Mount McKinley, formerly known as Denali, at 20,320 feet.

In Wisconsin, Price County is one of six counties in north central Wisconsin with points above 1,900 feet. Powder Hill and Holy Hill have the highest elevations in the southeastern part of the state at just above 1,300 feet.

The Lake Michigan shoreline boasts the lowest elevation in Wisconsin at just 579 feet above sea level, according to the State Cartographers Office.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending