The Wisconsin Badgers beat the Rutgers Scarlet Knights 96-87 on Saturday afternoon, improving to 13-5 as they won their fourth-straight game. With the win, Wisconsin now stands at 5-2 in Big Ten play.
Wisconsin
3 quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s win over Rutgers: Offense is heating up
It was a dominant start for the Badgers, as their offense exploded early with efficiency both inside and outside the arc. They also had some quality defense early in the game, while the offense maintained the lead as the game went on. Rutgers did provide some resistance as their offense heated up in the second half, but Wisconsin managed to hold on and get the win.
Here are three quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s 96-87 win over Rutgers on Saturday.
The Badgers are a team that has seen their cold spells and heaters this season. On Saturday, there were several of the latter in a 51-point first half.
After Rutgers took an early 7-5 lead, the Badgers went on an 11-0 run, as John Blackwell hit a pair of threes to give Wisconsin a 16-7 lead. Midway through the first half, Wisconsin found itself leading 27-20 and proceeded to really separate itself with an 8-0 run as Nick Boyd scored five straight, and Jack Janicki hit a three-pointer.
Then, the Badgers ended the half on a 16-6 run, taking a 51-29 lead into halftime. Wisconsin did a great job turning defense into offense, forcing some tough looks and turnovers, and running in transition, with Nick Boyd leading the way at 15 points.
We’ve said it before, but the potential of this team is shown during these runs, where the Badgers look tough on defense and hot on offense. On Saturday, they sustained that throughout the first half.
In the second half, there weren’t many runs to start the period as Rutgers’s offense really started to click, but Wisconsin was right there as well, continuing where they left off. That kept the game out of arm’s reach, leading the Badgers to a comfortable victory.
However, the Scarlet Knights just wouldn’t go away, as they continued to chip at the lead. They went on an 8-0 run to cut a 19-point lead to 78-67 with seven minutes remaining in the game, as Harun Zrno and Darren Buchanan Jr. both hit threes. Shortly after, they chipped the lead to single digits.
From there, Wisconsin was able to hang on, controlling the pace of the game to lead to a victory. But there were a few big swings in this one.
The Badgers came into the game as 15.5-point favorites. They were expected to win big. But it’s important to see how they come out to play in a game like Saturday’s.
Rather than being sloppy, I thought the ball movement was on point in the win. Wisconsin had assists on 11 of its first 14 shots, but they were just generally creating great looks without turning the ball over (three TOs in first half).
And it wasn’t just one player. After a slow start, going 1-of-6 from the field, Nick Boyd really settled in and had six assists to go with his 15 points in the first half alone. Andrew Rohde and John Blackwell both orchestrated the offense well with three assists apiece in the opening period.
I thought the Badgers were hitting from three, but also attacking well and getting the ball inside the paint before kicking out for better looks. Their offense can be really, really efficient when moving the ball like they did (1.46 points per possession in 1st half).
In the second half, the offense picked up where it left off, scoring 20 points over the first eight minutes of the period, as they shot 53.8 percent from the field and 50 percent from deep. Once again, the ball movement played a big factor there, as Wisconsin had six assists on seven field goals, while continuing to create open shots, both inside the arc and on the perimeter.
But, as Rutgers cut the lead, Wisconsin went on a four-minute stretch without a field goal, as its offense finally stalled. I thought the Badgers weren’t moving the ball enough here. They settled too often for threes (4/14 on threes through first 15 minutes of second half, 67 percent of field goal attempts were threes). That cost them a bit offensively, making the game closer than it should’ve been.
The Badgers were able to hold on, living at the free-throw line late as they conjured enough on both ends for the win. But there was a scare there for a few minutes.
Wisconsin’s defense has been up-and-down this year, but I think we’re slowly starting to see some better performances. I thought Saturday’s first half was one of the best of the year for Wisconsin.
I thought Wisconsin was very active defensively, forcing Rutgers into tough two-point shots and not giving them much in the paint or behind the arc. The Scarlet Knights made some tough shots, but they averaged less than one point per possession in the first half (0.967).
Having the size advantage, Wisconsin also didn’t allow many second-chance opportunities and forced turnovers from a team that likes to play at a slower pace. It was a good performance in the first half, especially in the paint.
The second half? Not so much. Wisconsin really struggled to open the half, allowing Rutgers to score 25 points in the first eight and a half minutes. The Scarlet Knights were 11/15 from the field in that stretch, while averaging an insane 1.92 points per possession.
Now, it ultimately didn’t matter because Wisconsin’s offense was humming at such a high rate, but that’s the consistency we’re talking about. The Badgers need to find a way to play together for 40 minutes. In that eight-minute stretch, Wisconsin allowed way too many dribble drives in the paint, as Rutgers was getting deeper in the paint as compared to the tough midrange jumpers they shot in the first half.
A few minutes later, after some back-and-forth on both sides, Rutgers really started to heat up, going on an 8-0 run with a pair of threes to cut the lead to 11. Once again, there were a few too many good looks given up, which the Scarlet Knights capitalized on. Through the first 11 and a half minutes, Rutgers had 36 points in the second half, shooting 68.2 percent from the field, and still averaging 1.9 points per possession.
The Scarlet Knights were even able to cut what was a 26-point lead at one point to single digits. But, the Badgers mitigated the damage from there, getting a few stops and not allowing Rutgers to get 10 points over the final four minutes of the game, securing the win.
Wisconsin
Suspected human bones found in northern Wisconsin
(WFRV) – Authorities in northern Wisconsin are investigating after suspected human bones may have been found by a forester.
According to a release from the Rusk County Sheriff’s Office, a forester marking trees on Friday, May 8, notified officials that he may have found human bones.
Rusk County deputies, DNR officials, and officials with the Wisconsin Department of Justice – Division of Criminal Investigations responded to the scene and were led through the woods and recovered the suspected human bones.
Authorities say they are working with the Rusk County Medical Examiner’s office and a forensic anthropologist to confirm the identity.
Positive identification has not yet been made, but officials say a positive identification is expected to be made based off of medical records.
No other information is available at this time.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for May 10, 2026
Manuel Franco claims his $768 million Powerball jackpot
Manuel Franco, 24, of West Allis was revealed Tuesday as the winner of the $768.4 million Powerball jackpot.
Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 10 drawing
Midday: 4-5-6
Evening: 6-9-4
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 10 drawing
Midday: 3-8-0-8
Evening: 5-0-5-0
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning All or Nothing numbers from May 10 drawing
Midday: 07-08-09-11-12-15-16-17-20-21-22
Evening: 02-05-06-07-11-13-17-18-19-20-22
Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Badger 5 numbers from May 10 drawing
17-19-23-28-29
Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning SuperCash numbers from May 10 drawing
05-09-10-14-33-39, Doubler: N
Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
- Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
- Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
- Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.
Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?
No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.
When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
- Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **
WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Wisconsin
How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?
(Stacker) – Homebuilding plays a critical role in maintaining a steady housing supply and keeping prices at sustainable levels. As the U.S. population grows, more housing is needed to meet demand. Since the Great Recession, construction has lagged well behind what is needed, which is one of the main reasons home prices are so high today.
Supply has slowly increased over the past few years but is still below what is needed for the market to balance out. Until that gap closes, prices are likely to remain elevated, and many buyers will likely struggle to afford a home.
So, how many homes are getting built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026? Is construction increasing or decreasing?
Redfin Real Estate analyzed the rate of housing permits issued in the cities of Appleton, Fond du Lac, Green Bay, Oshkosh and Sheboygan over the past 13 months to find out.
Appleton
2026
- January – Building permits: 29 (1.2 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 57 (2.3 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 52 (2.1 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 46 (1.9 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 60 (2.5 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 183 (7.5 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 53 (2.2 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 128 (5.3 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 139 (5.7 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 86 (3.5 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 246 (10.1 per 10k)
Fond du Lac

2026
- January – Building permits: 10 (1.0 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 15 (1.4 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 17 (1.6 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 16 (1.5 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 19 (1.8 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)
Green Bay

2026
- January – Building permits: 304 (9.3 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 84 (2.6 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 67 (2.0 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 97 (3.0 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 166 (5.1 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 141 (4.3 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 93 (2.8 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 185 (5.6 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 120 (3.7 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 88 (2.7 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 155 (4.7 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 156 (4.8 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 62 (1.9 per 10k)
Oshkosh

2026
- January – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 15 (0.9 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 23 (1.3 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 22 (1.3 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 46 (2.7 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 61 (3.6 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 54 (3.1 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 77 (4.5 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 26 (1.5 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 87 (5.1 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 125 (7.3 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 79 (4.6 per 10k)
Sheboygan

2026
- January – Building permits: 3 (0.3 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 31 (2.6 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 27 (2.3 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 9 (0.8 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 19 (1.6 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 22 (1.9 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 15 (1.3 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 174 (14.7 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 38 (3.2 per 10k)
Nationally

2026
- January – Building permits: 1,386,000 (44.2 per 10,000 population)
2025
- January – Building permits: 1,460,000 (46.6 per 10,000 population)
- February – Building permits: 1,454,000 (44.2 per 10k)
- March – Building permits: 1,481,000 (47.2 per 10k)
- April – Building permits: 1,422,000 (45.4 per 10k)
- May – Building permits: 1,394,000 (44.5 per 10k)
- June – Building permits: 1,393,000 (44.4 per 10k)
- July – Building permits: 1,362,000 (43.5 per 10k)
- August – Building permits: 1,330,000 (42.4 per 10k)
- September – Building permits: 1,425,000 (45.1 per 10k)
- October – Building permits: 1,411,000 (45.0 per 10k)
- November – Building permits: 1,388,000 (44.3 per 10k)
- December – Building permits: 1,455,000 (46.4 per 10k)
National permit data is a seasonally adjusted annual rate; metro-level permit data is the non-seasonally adjusted total number of permits issued per month.
Copyright 2026 Stacker via Gray Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
-
Pennsylvania3 minutes agoHersheypark in Pennsylvania could be forced to close this summer
-
Rhode Island9 minutes agoLieutenant governor candidate wants the office to be RI’s inspector general
-
South-Carolina15 minutes ago
Alan Wilson says affordability a top issue for SC voters this year
-
South Dakota21 minutes agoBlack Hills Bottlenecks: Road work update for the week of May 11
-
Tennessee27 minutes agoNew Tennessee law allows K9 officers to be transported by helicopter, ambulance to vet
-
Texas33 minutes agoTexas sues Netflix, alleges platform spied on kids and collected data
-
Utah39 minutes agoTeens airlifted to Utah County hospitals after rollover of at least 50 yards | Gephardt Daily
-
Vermont45 minutes agoCommentary | Afonso-Rojas: Who pays when businesses ignore risks?