The Wisconsin Badgers beat the Rutgers Scarlet Knights 96-87 on Saturday afternoon, improving to 13-5 as they won their fourth-straight game. With the win, Wisconsin now stands at 5-2 in Big Ten play.
Wisconsin
3 quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s win over Rutgers: Offense is heating up
It was a dominant start for the Badgers, as their offense exploded early with efficiency both inside and outside the arc. They also had some quality defense early in the game, while the offense maintained the lead as the game went on. Rutgers did provide some resistance as their offense heated up in the second half, but Wisconsin managed to hold on and get the win.
Here are three quick takeaways from Wisconsin’s 96-87 win over Rutgers on Saturday.
The Badgers are a team that has seen their cold spells and heaters this season. On Saturday, there were several of the latter in a 51-point first half.
After Rutgers took an early 7-5 lead, the Badgers went on an 11-0 run, as John Blackwell hit a pair of threes to give Wisconsin a 16-7 lead. Midway through the first half, Wisconsin found itself leading 27-20 and proceeded to really separate itself with an 8-0 run as Nick Boyd scored five straight, and Jack Janicki hit a three-pointer.
Then, the Badgers ended the half on a 16-6 run, taking a 51-29 lead into halftime. Wisconsin did a great job turning defense into offense, forcing some tough looks and turnovers, and running in transition, with Nick Boyd leading the way at 15 points.
We’ve said it before, but the potential of this team is shown during these runs, where the Badgers look tough on defense and hot on offense. On Saturday, they sustained that throughout the first half.
In the second half, there weren’t many runs to start the period as Rutgers’s offense really started to click, but Wisconsin was right there as well, continuing where they left off. That kept the game out of arm’s reach, leading the Badgers to a comfortable victory.
However, the Scarlet Knights just wouldn’t go away, as they continued to chip at the lead. They went on an 8-0 run to cut a 19-point lead to 78-67 with seven minutes remaining in the game, as Harun Zrno and Darren Buchanan Jr. both hit threes. Shortly after, they chipped the lead to single digits.
From there, Wisconsin was able to hang on, controlling the pace of the game to lead to a victory. But there were a few big swings in this one.
The Badgers came into the game as 15.5-point favorites. They were expected to win big. But it’s important to see how they come out to play in a game like Saturday’s.
Rather than being sloppy, I thought the ball movement was on point in the win. Wisconsin had assists on 11 of its first 14 shots, but they were just generally creating great looks without turning the ball over (three TOs in first half).
And it wasn’t just one player. After a slow start, going 1-of-6 from the field, Nick Boyd really settled in and had six assists to go with his 15 points in the first half alone. Andrew Rohde and John Blackwell both orchestrated the offense well with three assists apiece in the opening period.
I thought the Badgers were hitting from three, but also attacking well and getting the ball inside the paint before kicking out for better looks. Their offense can be really, really efficient when moving the ball like they did (1.46 points per possession in 1st half).
In the second half, the offense picked up where it left off, scoring 20 points over the first eight minutes of the period, as they shot 53.8 percent from the field and 50 percent from deep. Once again, the ball movement played a big factor there, as Wisconsin had six assists on seven field goals, while continuing to create open shots, both inside the arc and on the perimeter.
But, as Rutgers cut the lead, Wisconsin went on a four-minute stretch without a field goal, as its offense finally stalled. I thought the Badgers weren’t moving the ball enough here. They settled too often for threes (4/14 on threes through first 15 minutes of second half, 67 percent of field goal attempts were threes). That cost them a bit offensively, making the game closer than it should’ve been.
The Badgers were able to hold on, living at the free-throw line late as they conjured enough on both ends for the win. But there was a scare there for a few minutes.
Wisconsin’s defense has been up-and-down this year, but I think we’re slowly starting to see some better performances. I thought Saturday’s first half was one of the best of the year for Wisconsin.
I thought Wisconsin was very active defensively, forcing Rutgers into tough two-point shots and not giving them much in the paint or behind the arc. The Scarlet Knights made some tough shots, but they averaged less than one point per possession in the first half (0.967).
Having the size advantage, Wisconsin also didn’t allow many second-chance opportunities and forced turnovers from a team that likes to play at a slower pace. It was a good performance in the first half, especially in the paint.
The second half? Not so much. Wisconsin really struggled to open the half, allowing Rutgers to score 25 points in the first eight and a half minutes. The Scarlet Knights were 11/15 from the field in that stretch, while averaging an insane 1.92 points per possession.
Now, it ultimately didn’t matter because Wisconsin’s offense was humming at such a high rate, but that’s the consistency we’re talking about. The Badgers need to find a way to play together for 40 minutes. In that eight-minute stretch, Wisconsin allowed way too many dribble drives in the paint, as Rutgers was getting deeper in the paint as compared to the tough midrange jumpers they shot in the first half.
A few minutes later, after some back-and-forth on both sides, Rutgers really started to heat up, going on an 8-0 run with a pair of threes to cut the lead to 11. Once again, there were a few too many good looks given up, which the Scarlet Knights capitalized on. Through the first 11 and a half minutes, Rutgers had 36 points in the second half, shooting 68.2 percent from the field, and still averaging 1.9 points per possession.
The Scarlet Knights were even able to cut what was a 26-point lead at one point to single digits. But, the Badgers mitigated the damage from there, getting a few stops and not allowing Rutgers to get 10 points over the final four minutes of the game, securing the win.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for June 1, 2026
Manuel Franco claims his $768 million Powerball jackpot
Manuel Franco, 24, of West Allis was revealed Tuesday as the winner of the $768.4 million Powerball jackpot.
Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at June 1, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from June 1 drawing
02-42-47-57-58, Powerball: 14, Power Play: 3
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 1 drawing
Midday: 3-8-8
Evening: 0-9-5
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 1 drawing
Midday: 6-2-9-1
Evening: 3-2-0-6
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning All or Nothing numbers from June 1 drawing
Midday: 01-02-03-04-06-09-10-14-19-21-22
Evening: 03-05-08-10-12-13-14-15-17-18-22
Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Badger 5 numbers from June 1 drawing
02-18-23-24-26
Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning SuperCash numbers from June 1 drawing
07-08-11-15-17-33, Doubler: N
Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
- Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
- Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
- Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.
Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?
No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.
When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
- Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **
WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Wisconsin
Is Wisconsin violating the rights of disabled voters? Court hears arguments
A Dane County judge heard arguments Monday in a lawsuit that seeks to make electronic absentee ballots available to Wisconsinites with disabilities.
Disability Rights Wisconsin joined the League of Women Voters in suing the Wisconsin Elections Commission two years ago. Those groups argued that voters with disabilities should be allowed to receive, fill out and return an absentee ballot electronically.
Currently, some disabled Wisconsinites have to rely on help from someone else when filling out a paper absentee ballot. People with print disabilities have difficulty reading print because of issues including visual, cognitive or developmental disabilities.
Understanding Wisconsin, Together.
WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.
That violates the right to a secret ballot as guaranteed by the Wisconsin Constitution, attorney Jared Grubow argued on behalf of the plaintiffs.
“The print disabled voters of Wisconsin cannot vote on the same terms as all other Wisconsinites,” Grubow said during a hearing Monday before Judge Everett Mitchell. “That is discrimination.”
In June 2024, Mitchell issued a temporary order in the case, which would have required Wisconsin to send ballots over email to voters with print disabilities ahead of the November 2024 election. That ruling would not have allowed voters to return completed ballots electronically. Instead, they would need to be turned in via mail or at a clerk’s office.
Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled Legislature appealed the lower court order, however, an appeals court halted Mitchell’s earlier ruling.
Attorneys for the people suing pointed to the Americans with Disabilities Act and argued that Wisconsin is required to provide electronic absentee voting options as a “reasonable accommodation,” for people who rely on screen readers and other devices.
But Assistant Wisconsin Attorney General Karla Keckhaver argued that voters with print disabilities already have sufficient options, because they can either vote in person using electronic machines or they can fill out a ballot at home with the help of a caregiver or assistant.
“The ADA says nothing about privacy and independence in voting, and it doesn’t give voters with disabilities the right to vote without an assistant,” she said.
She also argued that electronic ballots would pose cyber-security issues and put “undue financial and administrative burdens” on Wisconsin’s elections officials.
“Wisconsin’s absentee voting program is a paper-based system, and that’s not an empty procedural requirement — it’s fundamental to the security of the program,” she said. “Internet voting is not an existing service that Wisconsin already provides to others.”
There are roughly 110,000 eligible Wisconsin voters with print disabilities, who may be affected by a ruling in the case, Grubow said.
One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Donald Natzke, is blind, and unable to read or mark a paper absentee ballot on his own. He can’t rely on his wife for help because she is blind as well.
That problem would be solved if Natzke had access to an electronic absentee ballot, since he would be able to use a speech synthesizer and other accessibility devices to read that ballot and fill it out in the privacy of his own home, the lawsuit argues.
In theory, Natzke could go to a polling place or early in-person voting location to fill out a ballot using an electronic voting machine. But Grubow said that option is “extremely difficult” in practice.
“Any amount of poor weather, be it wind, rain, ice or snow, makes getting to the polling place very dangerous for Mr. Natzke,” Grubow said Monday.
Currently, Wisconsinites may return absentee ballots via mail or by dropping them off at their local clerk’s office. In some communities, ballot drop boxes are also available for returning those ballots. Additionally, Wisconsinites can fill out out absentee ballots in-person at early voting locations.
But, based on a declaration filed by Wisconsin’s elections administrator, Wisconsin clerks are “encouraged” but not “required” to make sure that accessible voting equipment is available at early voting locations, Grubow said.
“(If) there is no accessible voting machine, they’re going to face the same issues,” Grubow said. “Which is why often a lot of these voters are deterred from doing that and prefer to vote absentee at home.”
During Monday’s hearing, attorneys for both sides said they believed the matter can be resolved without a trial. Earlier this year, lawyers representing the state of Wisconsin filed a motion asking for summary judgement.
Wisconsin Public Radio, © Copyright 2026, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.
Wisconsin
Ready for a hike? Try reaching the top of Wisconsin’s highest point
Japanese hiker takes on Ice Age Trail, welcomed by Wisconsinites
Masafumi Saito, a Japanese outdoor writer, is hiking the Ice Age Trail.
If a trek up a faraway mountain won’t fit on your summer to-do list, maybe you can still find time to hike to Wisconsin’s highest point.
That journey would take you up Timm’s Hill in Price County, which stands at nearly 1,952 feet above sea level, according to the State Cartographer’s Office.
Timm’s Hill is nestled in woodlands of north central Wisconsin, just off County Road RR in Ogema. At the summit, hikers can climb an observation tower that offers 30-mile views of the surrounding area, according to Travel Wisconsin.
Highpoint Guide, a website with information on peaks across the country, says Timm’s Hill was named after Timothy Gahan, a late-1800s logger. Gahan often set up camp near the woods surrounding the hill, which now make up Timm’s Hill County Park.
What to know if you’re visiting Timm’s Hill
Timm’s Hill County Park is open year-round. The park gate is open 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. approximately May through October, and winter parking is available at the intersection of Ring School Road and County Road RR, the Price County website says.
The park has a boat landing and fishing pier, along with picnic shelters and hiking trails. The 10-mile Timm’s Hill National Ice Ace Trail is accessible for hiking, biking and horseback riding and intersects with the statewide Ice Age Trail, which spans over 1,000 miles.
How does Wisconsin’s highest point compare to other states
Timm’s Hill, at 1,952 feet, ranks as the 39th-highest high point among the 50 states, according to Highpoint Guide.
Minnesota and Michigan both rank just above Wisconsin, though Illinois, Indiana, Iowa and Ohio all have high points below 1,700 feet. The highest point anywhere in the United States is Alaska’s Mount McKinley, formerly known as Denali, at 20,320 feet.
In Wisconsin, Price County is one of six counties in north central Wisconsin with points above 1,900 feet. Powder Hill and Holy Hill have the highest elevations in the southeastern part of the state at just above 1,300 feet.
The Lake Michigan shoreline boasts the lowest elevation in Wisconsin at just 579 feet above sea level, according to the State Cartographers Office.
-
Business3 minutes agoMonterey Park takes landmark vote on banning data centers
-
Entertainment10 minutes ago6 drama actors on learning to say no, what shooting in L.A. means to them and more
-
Lifestyle13 minutes agoInside the all-masc lesbian and translesbian revue electrifying L.A. nightlife
-
Politics18 minutes agoCommentary: Why a loss for Hilton would be a win for Trump
-
Science25 minutes agoPolitical play or budget fix? Competition for JPL’s management comes at a fraught moment
-
Sports28 minutes agoNBA probe of Steve Ballmer, Kawhi Leonard and Clippers at forefront after Aspiration fraud sentencing
-
World40 minutes agoFrance detains tanker linked to network accused of moving Russian oil
-
News1 hour agoPromoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security