Connect with us

Wisconsin

Juneau County Republicans falsely claim ‘planes full’ of refugees arriving in Wisconsin

Published

on

Juneau County Republicans falsely claim ‘planes full’ of refugees arriving in Wisconsin


Immigration at the southern border is one of voters’ top concerns in the upcoming election.

And Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s large-scale operation to bus thousands of migrants and asylum seekers to other U.S. cities has drawn both scrutiny and praise.

But Wisconsin cities have not been locations where migrants, asylum seekers or other kinds of immigrants have been transported en masse.

Despite that fact, the Republican Party of Juneau County posted on Facebook: “Ask Governor Evers why planes full of unvetted ‘refugees’ are being accepted at the Milw. & Madison airports!”

Advertisement

The post, from June 25, 2024, has 31 shares as of July 2. Among those who shared the post were the Republican Party of Green and Lincoln counties.

We found the claim is incorrect on multiple counts. 

More: What’s going on at the US-Mexico border, and what are asylum and parole? Here are answers to key questions

Planes full of migrants are not arriving in Wisconsin, officials say

First, officials for both Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport and Dane County Regional Airport said planes full of refugees have not been arriving.

Advertisement

“The source provides no proof, and we have no proof either. The information posted is not factual,” Harold Mester, director of public affairs and marketing for the Milwaukee airport, said in an email.

Kimberly Jones, director of the Dane County airport, agreed.

“We certainly have not had ‘planes full’ of refugees coming in to our Airport. To my knowledge there is no accuracy to the statement,” Jones said in an email.

And Gina Paige, the spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Department of Children and Families, which houses the state Bureau of Refugee Programs, said the department “has not been made aware of any migrant arrivals to Wisconsin airports.”

Advertisement

Jim Mackman, director of philanthropy for Jewish Social Services of Madison, one of Wisconsin’s resettlement agencies, said the same:

“I am not aware of a current surge of other types of migrants coming to Wisconsin.” 

More: In Whitewater, an influx of immigrants has leaders determined to welcome newcomers, solve problems

Refugees are not the same as those who cross the border without documents

Second, the use of the word refugees in the claim is off the mark.

The federal government defines refugees narrowly. They are not the same as migrants or asylum seekers, or others who cross the border without proper documentation.

Advertisement

The State Department says a refugee is “an individual who is outside their country of nationality, or if no nationality, their last habitual residence, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unwilling or unable to avail themselves of the protection of, that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”

In short, refugees are people who were forced to flee their home countries because of threats or persecution against their identity, and they are staying in a second country — often in a refugee camp — where they register with the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. 

After a screening process, the UNHCR then recommends refugees to be resettled in a third country. The U.S. set a ceiling of admitting 125,000 refugees in the 2024 fiscal year.

“Refugee resettlement to the U.S. is traditionally offered to the most vulnerable refugee cases including women and children at risk, women heads of households, the elderly, survivors of violence and torture and those with acute medical needs,” the UNHCR said. 

More: Afghan refugee women learn to drive in Milwaukee so they can support their families

Advertisement

‘Unvetted refugee’ is an oxymoron

Further, the claim misunderstands how refugees are resettled in the U.S. 

Once refugees are selected to be resettled, one of nine national refugee resettlement agencies takes their case and determines which of their local affiliates should handle the case.

Local resettlement agencies and their volunteers set up refugees in homes, help them find jobs, take them to doctor’s appointments and English classes and more.

Refugees do not cross the southern border to arrive, and they are not undocumented. When refugees are brought to the U.S., they receive permanent legal residency, also known as a green card.

And while refugees do arrive in the U.S. on airplanes, they do not arrive on “planes full” of other refugees. Paige said refugees take flights as individuals, or as families, on commercial airlines.

Advertisement

Finally, refugee resettlement leaders also note that an “unvetted refugee” is an oxymoron. 

“Refugees are among the most vetted immigrants to the United States,” Mackman said.

Paige echoed that comment.

“Refugees go through a rigorous vetting process which usually takes 12-24 months,” she said.

According to the UNHCR, the vetting process includes:

Advertisement
  • Screening by eight federal agencies including the State Department, Department of Homeland Security and the FBI
  • Six security database checks and biometric security checks screened against U.S. federal databases
  • Medical screening
  • Three in-person interviews with Department of Homeland Security officers

It’s unclear whether the person who created the Facebook post was referring to refugees or migrants who cross the U.S.-Mexico border. People associated with the Republican Party of Juneau County, as well as the parties of Green and Lincoln counties, did not respond to emails, calls and text messages from PolitiFact Wisconsin.

But the poster commented on their own post alluding to border crossers:

“Where I work, I know 2 people who immigrated legally, one from Canada, one from Jamaica. Both said the process was vigorous and took weeks, and required a physical examination. Contrast that to what is going on at our borders,” the person wrote.

Our ruling

The Republican Party of Juneau County claimed on Facebook that planes full of unvetted refugees were being accepted to the Milwaukee and Madison airports.

But officials from both airports, the state refugee bureau and a local resettlement agency said there was no evidence that planes full of unvetted individuals were arriving in Wisconsin. The party provides zero evidence of this, nor could we find any on our own.

Advertisement

What’s more, the Facebook post misunderstands the meaning of the word refugee and the process by which refugees are allowed to enter the United States. In short, there is basically nothing right about the claim, and everything wrong about it.

We rate the claim Pants on Fire.

Sources

Republican Party of Juneau County, Facebook, June 25, 2024

U.S. Department of State, U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, June 28, 2024

U.N. High Commissioner on Refugees, Refugees in America, July 1, 2023

Advertisement

Email with Harold Mester, spokesman, Milwaukee Mitchell Airport, June 26, 2024

Email with Gina Paige, spokeswoman, Wisconsin Department of Children and families, June 26, 2024

Email with Jim Mackman, director of philanthropy, Jewish Social Services of Madison, June 28, 2024

Email with Kimberly Jones, director, Dane County Regional Airport, June 28, 2024



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics

Published

on

Wisconsin judge found guilty of obstruction for helping an immigrant evade federal agents | CNN Politics




AP
 — 

A jury found a Wisconsin judge – accused of helping an undocumented immigrant dodge federal authorities – guilty of obstruction Thursday, marking a victory for President Donald Trump as he continues his sweeping immigration crackdown across the country.

Federal prosecutors charged Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan with obstruction, a felony, and concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, in April. The jury acquitted her on the concealment count, but she still faces up to five years in prison on the obstruction count.

The jury returned the verdicts after deliberating for six hours. Dugan faces up to five years in prison when she’s sentenced, but no date had been set as of late Thursday evening.

Advertisement

Dugan and her attorneys left the courtroom Thursday, ducked into a side conference room and closed the door without speaking to reporters. Steve Biskupic, her lead attorney, later told reporters that he was disappointed with the ruling and didn’t understand how the jury could have reached a split verdict since the elements of both charges were virtually the same.

US Attorney Brad Schimel denied the case was political and urged people to accept the verdict peacefully. He said courthouse arrests are safer because people are screened for weapons and it isn’t unfair for law enforcement to arrest wanted people in courthouses.

“Some have sought to make this about a larger political battle,” Schimel said. “While this case is serious for all involved, it is ultimately about a single day, a single bad day, in a public courthouse. The defendant is certainly not evil. Nor is she a martyr for some greater cause.”

According to court filings that include an FBI affidavit and a federal grand jury indictment, immigration authorities traveled to the Milwaukee County courthouse on April 18 after learning 31-year-old Eduardo Flores-Ruiz had reentered the country illegally and was scheduled to appear before Dugan for a hearing in a state battery case.

Dugan learned that agents were in the corridor outside her courtroom waiting for Flores-Ruiz. She left the courtroom to confront them, falsely telling that their administrative warrant for Flores-Ruiz wasn’t sufficient grounds to arrest him and directing them to go to the chief judge’s office.

Advertisement

While the agents were gone, she addressed Flores-Ruiz’s case off the record, told his attorney that he could attend his next hearing via Zoom and led Flores-Ruiz and the attorney out a private jury door. Agents spotted Flores-Ruiz in the corridor, followed him outside and arrested him after a foot chase. The US Department of Homeland Security announced in November he had been deported.

The case inflamed tensions over Trump’s immigration crackdown, with his administration branding Dugan an activist judge and Democrats countering that the administration was trying to make an example of Dugan to blunt judicial opposition to the operation.

Prosecutors worked during Dugan’s trial to show that she directed agents to the chief judge’s office to create an opening for Flores-Ruiz to escape.

Prosecutors also played audio recordings from her courtroom in which she can be heard telling her court reporter that she’d take “the heat” for leading Flores-Ruiz out the back.

Her attorneys countered that she was trying to follow courthouse protocols that called for court employees to report any immigration agents to their supervisors and she didn’t intentionally try to obstruct the arrest team.

Advertisement

This story has been updated with additional details.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin students can soon use Pell Grants to enroll in short-term programs

Published

on

Wisconsin students can soon use Pell Grants to enroll in short-term programs


Wisconsin students enrolled in short-term, workforce training programs will soon be able to use federal grants to pay their tuition.

Millions of low-income students rely on Pell Grants to pay for college, including more than 70,000 in Wisconsin. The awards have long been limited to courses that span a minimum of 15 weeks or 600 “clock hours.”

The Trump administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” signed into law this summer will extend Pell Grant eligiblity to include short-term nondegree programs as short as eight weeks beginning July 1, 2026. The expansion is the largest in decades, making programs previously paid out of pocket – from truck drivers to machinists to nursing assistants – more affordable to students.

These types of programs are mostly offered by community and technical colleges, which have long lobbied for the change. They are studying their programs and deciding which need adjustments ahead of the eligibility expansion.

Advertisement

“Opening up financial aid and making financial aid policy more flexible and relevant to how folks are accessing workplace today, I think it has the potential to be really exciting,” said Wisconsin Technical College System President Layla Merrifield. “How do we bundle these skills? How do we construct these programs and get students a credential that’s very relevant to their field that could potentially provide a great on-ramp to a further credential later on?”

Some education policy experts have reservations about the financial aid expansion and whether it will deliver for students. There’s concern about online training programs and for-profit institutions, some of which have a pattern of predatory practices and poor graduation outcomes. Research also shows short-term programs lead to less upward mobility and lower long-term earnings for students than associate or bachelor’s degrees.

“There is a big risk here,” said Wesley Whistle, the higher education project director at New America, a left-leaning think tank. “An eight-week program is really easy to crank out lots of people. You could have a lot of low-quality programs that don’t lead to much. Students could waste their time, exhaust their Pell eligibility and be left without the right skills to succeed in the workforce. That’s my worry.”

Short implementation timeline, outcome requirements among Workforce Pell challenges

Advocates say the proposed regulations approved Dec. 12 by the federal education department include accountability measures to prevent programs from taking advantage of students and wasting taxpayer money.

Advertisement

The programs must be run by an accredited institution of higher education, and be offered for more than one year before being approved. States must track outcomes, requiring programs meet a 70% completion and job-placement rate, and demonstrate they lead to in-demand, high-wage jobs.

The law includes no additional funding for states to take on the new role of approving individual programs, a worry of Whistle’s.

The tight timeline is also a concern to him. States could quickly throw together an approval process and never again look at it. Whistle advocated for states to start with a pilot approach and reassess in the coming years. He also suggested they creatively leverage state funding to target specific programs that serve high workforce needs.

“This could actually be a moment where we have laboratories for democracy,” Whistle said. “To see what works and what doesn’t.” 

Merrifield said technical colleges are working closely with the state Department of Workforce Development on program approvals. She said she’d love to see the expansion in place for fall 2026 but it may realistically take a little longer than that.

Advertisement

Wisconsin technical colleges take stock of programs

State technical colleges already have some programs that will qualify for the expanded financial aid. But they are considering which ones to revamp.

Take the certified nursing assistant program, Merrifield offered as an example. Students pursuing their registered nursing degree earn their CNA as part of the program. But some students aren’t in the RN program and are seeking only their CNA.The program is 75 hours, which is not enough to meet the new financial aid criteria.

Do technical colleges keep the program short, meaning students continue paying out of pocket? Or do they overhaul it, add skills that hospitals and medical facilities may be looking for and allow students to qualify for Pell Grants?

“There’s potential to re-examine why is it that we package skills the way that we do,”Merrifield said. “What is it that employers are really loooking for in the marketplace?”

Merrifield said manufacturing and agriculture programs may also be ripe for revamp.

Advertisement

Milwaukee Area Technical College has identified eight technical diploma programs that will qualify for a Pell Grant under the expansion, said Barbara Cannell, the executive dean of academic systems and integrity. The programs include nail technician, office technology assistant, real estate broker associate, truck driver training, IT user support technician and food service assistant.

MATC has a number of other programs, mostly certificates, that are too short to qualify for the expansion, she said. College officials are deciding whether to keep the programs as-is or tweak them to allow students to qualify for Pell Grants.

Both Cannell and Merrifield see the Pell Grant expansion as a way to make work-force training more accessible to nontraditional students.

“This opens the door to populations of students who just never saw themselves in that way before,” Merrifield said.

Kelly Meyerhofer has covered higher education in Wisconsin since 2018. Contact her at kmeyerhofer@gannett.com or 414-223-5168. Follow her on X (Twitter) at @KellyMeyerhofer. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin to receive $750k in multistate Menards settlement

Published

on

Wisconsin to receive 0k in multistate Menards settlement


MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) – A more than $4 million multistate settlement was reached with Menards Wednesday over deceptive rebate advertising and price gouging, Wisconsin officials announced Wednesday.

Attorney General Josh Kaul and the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection said the settlement resolves claims that Menards falsely marketed its merchandise credit check program, also known as the Menards’ 11% Rebate Program, and allowed price gouging during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Wisconsin will receive $750,000 in the settlement, according to DATCP.

“Figuring out how much you’ll have to pay to buy something should be straightforward,” Kaul said. “It shouldn’t be an adventure.”

Advertisement

Investigators involved in the multi-state lawsuit, which included Illinois and Minnesota, reviewed several aspects of Menards’ sales practices.

Wisconsin officials said investigators reviewed allegations that Menards’ use of the 11% off rebate program falsely claimed a point-of purchase discount, when the home improvement chain only offered in-store merchandise credit for future use, among other advertising claims.

Officials also investigated price gouging on four-gallon bottles of purified water at two locations in Wisconsin, including in Johnson Creek.

As part of the settlement, Menards will need to follow several advertising and sales practices. The terms, noted by DATCP, are as follows (wording theirs):

  • Not advertising or representing that any program that offers store credit for making purchases at Menards provides consumers with a point-of-purchase discount;
  • Clearly and conspicuously disclosing material limitations of the rebate program and disclosing all applicable terms and conditions of the rebate program in a readily available manner;
  • Investigating whether and to what extent it can offer a process by which consumers can safely and securely submit rebate application forms and receipts online;
  • Investigating whether and to what extent it can offer a process by which consumers can safely and securely redeem their rebate for online purchases;
  • Clearly and conspicuously disclosing that Menards is doing business as Rebates International;
  • Allowing consumers at least one year from the date of purchase to submit a rebate claim;
  • Updating their online rebate tracker with information about the rebate claim within 48 hours of the application being input into Menards’ system;
  • Updating their online rebate tracker with additional information about the rebate, including updates about returns affecting the rebate; and
  • Not engaging in price gouging during a period of abnormal economic disruption.

Click here to download the WMTV15 News app or our WMTV15 First Alert weather app.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending