Connect with us

South Dakota

State officials peppered with questions on price tag for new men’s prison • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

State officials peppered with questions on price tag for new men’s prison • South Dakota Searchlight


Lawmakers expressed frustration Tuesday in Pierre over the uncertain price tag for construction and operations of a proposed men’s prison in Lincoln County.

Members of the Legislature’s Appropriations Committee also had pointed questions for Department of Corrections officials on alternative sites for the project, which has sparked a lawsuit from nearby neighbors and represents the most expensive taxpayer-funded capital project in state history.

“I’m just flabbergasted that we’ve not yet wrapped our arms around this as a total package,” said Rep. John Mills, R-Brookings.

Wealth of controversies, outbreaks of violence spark questions on prison oversight

Advertisement

Lawmakers have already dedicated more than $569 million to the project across the past two legislative sessions, including $62 million in preparatory spending. The rest sits in an incarceration construction fund.

The guaranteed maximum price for construction is expected in early November, DOC Secretary Kellie Wasko and Finance Director Brittni Skipper testified on Tuesday. That fixed price wouldn’t change, Skipper said, even if inflation or other construction costs increase.

Some lawmakers, including Sen. Jim Bolin, R-Canton, struggled to understand how a company could make such a promise. 

“If you’re talking about an $800 million project, maybe more, if you make a mistake on that, you can bankrupt your whole company,” Bolin said.

Skipper told Bolin the DOC has a construction manager at-risk, JE Dunn and Henry Carlson Construction, who will build three years of projected inflation into the promised price.

Advertisement

“It’s in their contract to provide to us a guaranteed maximum price,” Skipper said, noting that the DOC has a similar arrangement for a new women’s prison under construction in Rapid City.

Rep. Chris Karr, R-Sioux Falls, was one of several lawmakers to push Wasko and Skipper about the potential ongoing costs associated with the prison once it’s complete. Karr and other committee members asked about prison population growth and staffing projections.

“If we’re going to make this huge investment, are we going to be able to house everybody?” Karr said.

Wasko said she doesn’t trust inmate population projections any further than five years out. 

She said too many things can change, including when lawmakers create new felony crimes or toughen penalties. They did that with 2023’s “truth in sentencing” bill, which now forces those convicted for violent offenses to serve most or all of their prison terms.

Advertisement

“Our rate of incarceration is not slowing down. It’s actually speeding up,” Wasko said. 

South Dakota Department of Corrections Finance Officer Brittni Skipper, left, and Corrections Secretary Kellie Wasko testify before the Legislature’s Appropriations Committee on July 30, 2024. (Courtesy SD.net)

Even so, she said, the 1,500-bed proposal would offer the agency breathing room, as it’s designed to be a maximum-security facility capable of managing overflow from other areas of the system. The prison would take on most of the inmates now housed at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Rep. Tony Venhuizen, R-Sioux Falls, said he understands that projections can change, but also said it’s important for appropriators to have a better sense of what they’re committing to.

“This could be a pretty considerable ongoing cost, and I do think at some point during the next session, we’re going to need a ballpark of what that might be,” Venhuizen said. 

Advertisement

Skipper said the previous ballpark estimates anticipated 130 more employees and approximately $15 million in ongoing funding.

Sen. Red Dawn Foster, D-Pine Ridge, wanted to know if the DOC had consulted with the state’s Supreme Court, Unified Judicial System or Attorney General’s Office to drill down on what to expect in terms of offender population growth. 

Wasko said the DOC hadn’t reached out to those agencies to talk about projections.

Opposition won’t cause state to change prison location, official says

Steve Haugaard, a Republican former lawmaker and one-time primary candidate for governor, seized upon that point during his testimony, which he offered via video feed later in the afternoon.

Advertisement

Haugaard argued that lawmakers were spending too much money on prisons without clear goals for managing corrections and criminal justice as a whole. Haugaard argued that “the building is going to control the overall policy,” and said policy guidance ought to come first.

Upon hearing that the DOC hadn’t consulted with the courts or attorney general, he said, “I just wonder what are we doing?” Haugaard said.

“We don’t have a corrections policy that’s firmly in place,” Haugaard said. “And from what I can see from those stats from the past 40-plus years, we didn’t respond to the ever-increasing spike in incarceration rates.”

Wasko said, as she has in the past, that South Dakota stands out from many other states for harsh penalties. But she also said that as a member of the executive branch, her responsibility is to manage an offender population, not to influence its size.

“There’s a judicial branch, the legislative branch, and I’m the executive branch, and there’s reasons for that,” Wasko said. “I would not be responsible for anything on the front end of incarceration.”

Advertisement

Wasko got backing on that point from Rep. Rep. Linda Duba, D-Sioux Falls, said the courts, prosecutors and lawmakers need to be proactive in criminal justice policy. She said the new facility is needed to make space for treatment and rehabilitation programs.

During another line of questioning, Karr asked about recent heavy rains and the possibility of flooding. He wanted to know if the proposed prison site is in a flood plain. 

Haugaard also keyed in on flooding potential, as did Kyah Broders, one of the Lincoln County residents suing the DOC over its site selection process.

The area did see several road closures during the heavy rains, she said Tuesday. 

“Adding sewage ponds and tons of concrete will only compound this issue in the future,” she said.

Advertisement

Skipper said the site is not in a flood plain. She showed the committee a photo of the land shortly after the historic June rainfall that wreaked havoc on communities in southeast South Dakota.

“You can see from those photos that there was minimal water damage to the site, without any soil being moved or anything being done,” Skipper said. 

The site of a proposed new men's prison in Lincoln County, showing water after a major flood. (Courtesy South Dakota Department of Corrections)
The site of a proposed new men’s prison in Lincoln County, showing water after a major flood. (Courtesy South Dakota Department of Corrections)

In response to an email about the rainfall, DOC spokesman Michael Winder sent the photos shown to the lawmakers and wrote that the project’s civil engineer “will prepare the design for watershed from the property that would include any stormwater runoff.”

Bolin asked what might happen if Broders and her fellow prison site opponents succeed in forcing the state to apply for a county zoning permit and the county refuses to grant one.

“We do not have a valid or developed plan B if that ruling does not come through for us,” Wasko said.

Advertisement

Bolin, who is not returning to Pierre for the next legislative session, closed out the prison site update portion of Tuesday’s meeting by returning to the influence harsh penalties have on prison populations.

Bills meant to get tough on crime and “lock them up and throw away the key” have appeared in nearly all of his 16 years in Pierre, Bolin said.

For future lawmakers, he said, “If you really believe that, you’ve also got to be prepared to pay the bill.”

 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

In rare bipartisan vote, U.S. Senate passes package aimed at protecting kids online • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

In rare bipartisan vote, U.S. Senate passes package aimed at protecting kids online • South Dakota Searchlight


This story mentions suicide. If you or a loved one are experiencing a mental health crisis or thoughts of suicide, please dial 988 or chat with a live counselor at 988lifeline.org.

WASHINGTON — Legislation aimed at protecting children online sailed through the U.S. Senate Tuesday, marking what could be the first update since the late 1990s for companies who interact with minors on the internet.

Senators approved the package of two bills in a 91-3 vote (including yes votes from South Dakota Republicans John Thune and Mike Rounds). It was a rare bipartisan landslide in the tightly divided body, despite loud and fervent opposition from civil liberties and LGBTQ organizations that say the measures would hand the government power to subjectively censor content.

The three no votes were cast by Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Wyden of Oregon.

Advertisement

If passed by the House, the legislative package would require producers of platforms popular among children and teens to follow new rules governing advertising, algorithms and collection of personal data.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has expressed interest in “working to find consensus in the House.”

President Joe Biden released a statement Tuesday calling the Senate vote a “crucial bipartisan step forward” and said the bill dovetails with measures he advocated for in his first State of the Union Address.

“There is undeniable evidence that social media and other online platforms contribute to our youth mental health crisis. Today our children are subjected to a wild west online and our current laws and regulations are insufficient to prevent this. It is past time to act,” Biden said, adding that tech companies need to be “accountable for the national experiment they are running on our children for profit.”

Families asked for federal help

The package contains two bills moving together: the Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act, which is mainly targeted at regulating the collection of personal data, and the Kids Online Safety Act, a bill that has been a lightning rod of criticism from outside groups.

Advertisement

A bipartisan group of senators points to years of hearings and meetings with tragedy-struck families — including those whose children struggled with eating disorders and died by suicide — as the motivation behind the proposals.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, of Tennessee, one of the Kids Online Safety Act’s original sponsors, said the legislation is a “safety by design bill, a duty of care bill that gives kids and parents a toolbox so that they can protect themselves.”

“A message that we’re sending to big tech: kids are not your product, kids are not your profit source, and we are going to protect them in the virtual space,” Blackburn, a Republican, said at a press conference following the vote.

‘Firehose’ of information confronts legislators studying internet use by children and AI

Blackburn co-led the bill dubbed the Kids Online Safety Act with Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut.

Advertisement

Sen. Ed Markey, who championed the last protections passed by Congress in late 1990s, said “back in 1998 only birds tweeted, a gram was a measurement of weight, and so we need to update the law.”

The Massachusetts Democrat joined Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana in co-sponsoring the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act.

Markey likened addictive social media products to those of the tobacco industry in previous decades, and cited public health warnings attributing increasing childhood mental health issues to the platforms.

“So we have to give the tools to parents and to teenagers and children to be able to protect themselves, and that would be my message to my colleagues in the House. We cannot avoid this historic moment,” Markey said at the press conference.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer praised the legislation’s passage in the Senate and said the parents of affected teens are “the reason we succeeded today.”

Advertisement

“I’ve heard the terrible stories: children, teenagers, perfectly normal, then some algorithm captures them online by accident, and they end up committing suicide shortly thereafter,” the New York Democrat said in a statement. “You imagine being a parent and living with that.”

New rules for platforms

The original two bills, rolled into one legislative vehicle, respectively outline “duty of care” rules requiring platform creators to consider broad mental health categories when designing and operating their products as well as a prohibition of the use of personal data for targeted marketing.

The legislation would also mandate that platforms create an “easy-to-understand privacy dashboard” detailing how a minor’s personal information is collected, used and protected.

Other measures would include a prohibition on hidden algorithms, mechanisms for minors or parents to remove data, parental controls to restrict financial transactions and annual public reports from the platforms on “reasonably foreseeable” harms to children and teens and efforts underway to prevent them.

Enforcement

The new policies, if enacted, would be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission and any civil actions would be prosecuted by states in U.S. district court with advance notice to the FTC.

Advertisement

The legislation defines the online platforms as public-facing websites, social media applications, video games, messaging applications or video streaming services that are “used, or reasonably likely to be used, by a minor.”

Snap, the company behind the popular platform Snapchat, issued a statement specifically praising the Senate’s passage of the Kids Online Safety Act.

“The safety and well-being of young people on Snapchat is a top priority,” a Snap spokesperson said in a statement provided to States Newsroom. “That’s why Snap has been a long-time supporter of the Kids Online Safety Act. We applaud Senators Blackburn, Blumenthal and the roughly 70 other co-sponsors of this critical legislation for their leadership and commitment to the privacy and safety of young people.”

Opponents see ‘dangerous’ measure

A coalition of organizations advocating for First Amendment rights, privacy and the interests of LGBTQ minors urged the House to vote no on the legislation, criticizing it as “blatantly unconstitutional.”

Evan Greer, director of the tech policy group Fight For the Future, also lambasted the bill as “dangerous and misguided” and “wildly broad.”

Advertisement

The coalition largely takes issue with the Kids Online Safety Act’s “duty of care” provision that requires companies to “prevent and mitigate” harms associated with anxiety, depression, eating disorders, substance use disorders and suicidal behaviors.

During a joint virtual press conference hosted by the groups during the Senate vote, Greer described the provision as “a blank check for censorship of any piece of content that an administration could claim is harmful to kids.”

“What that means in practice, is that for example, a Trump administration FTC would get to dictate what types of content platforms can recommend or even show to younger users,” Greer said, referring to Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump.

Jenna Leventoff, senior policy counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, said the Kids Online Safety Act is “nothing more than a thinly veiled effort to censor information that some consider objectionable”

“If enacted, KOSA could lead to information about health care, gender, identity, politics and more being removed from social media. And kids note that censorship will make them less and not more safe,” Leventoff said. “As one student recently told me, they don’t get sex education in school, and if information about sex is removed from the internet because platforms fear liability for hosting it, how else can they learn about sex?”

Advertisement

Teens in opposition

The ACLU brought roughly 300 teens to Capitol Hill Thursday to lobby against the legislation.

Dara Adkinson, of the organization TransOhio, said the legislation is “truly terrifying.”

Adkinson questioned whether state and federal authorities could argue that content about climate change or the nation’s history of slavery causes anxiety and should therefore be regulated.

Regarding content about transgender youth, Adkinson said: “We know there (are) people out there that would like us to not exist and having the lack of visibility of the kinds of resources found on the internet is the first step for many of these folks.”

Greer said the coalition is concerned about the role of “big tech” in society. Advocates would support a “heavily modified” version of the Kids Online Safety Act that focuses on regulating business practices, including targeted advertising or videos that automatically play and encourage continuous, addictive scrolling habits.

Advertisement

Greer said their organization is neutral on the legislation targeted at protecting children’s privacy, but that they would like to see comprehensive legislation that protects minors and adults alike.

“Censorship and privacy do not go together, and these should not be moving together,” Greer said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota Supreme Court reverses lower court bail bond decision

Published

on

South Dakota Supreme Court reverses lower court bail bond decision


The South Dakota Supreme Court has reverse a lower court decision and ordered a jail bond be set aside.

Dakota Bail Bonds posted jail bonds for two defendants under one condition: they both appear in court.

The defendants made their court date, but violated other conditions of their release, so the state ordered forfeiture of the bonds. That means the bond money must be given to the court.

Dakota Bail Bonds claimed the defendants appeared in court, therefore their bonds should not be forfeited.

Advertisement

A lower court sided with the state saying the language of the bond didn’t apply to only court appearances.

The state Supreme Court reversed that decision, saying a bail bond is “widely understood only to ensure appearances.” The court also said that Dakota Bail Bonds’ agreement with the state solely ensured defendants would appear in court. Because the defendants did, the forfeiture should have been set aside.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

How a small South Dakota college became a national cyber powerhouse

Published

on

How a small South Dakota college became a national cyber powerhouse


MADISON, S.D. (AP) — A seed planted by South Dakota legislative and higher education leaders four decades ago has blossomed into one of the nation’s top high-tech universities located in a small city in the rural midsection of the state.

The story of how Dakota State University rose to become a powerhouse in cyber technology academics, job creation and research is one of ingenuity, strong leadership and a bit of fortuitous timing.

Those factors have combined to build DSU into a university that has received well over $140 million in public and private donations over the past decade. The university has developed numerous working partnerships with government and private industry, and it’s expanding its campus with a massive research and development facility in Sioux Falls. Soon, DSU could become a leader in research into the world’s next major technology breakthrough in quantum computers.

And it all began at a time when the future of the entire university itself was in question.

Advertisement

In 1984, the South Dakota Board of Regents, under pressure to cut its budget, closed its Springfield campus and the state turned it into a women’s prison. The late Gov. Bill Janklow that spring also signed a law that changed DSU’s mission to focus on technology in all academic programs, a hopeful effort called, “A Brand New Day.”

The decision to reinvent a teacher’s college founded in 1881 into a technology-focused university in a somewhat isolated rural city of 6,000 people may, in retrospect, seem like a risky move.

But as told by current DSU President José-Marie Griffiths, the new focus on tech dovetailed with the decision by financial giant Citibank to move its credit card operation to Sioux Falls, an hour’s drive from Madison.

“Citibank was in need of mainframe programmers. And as a result of that, somebody came up with the idea that, well, we could turn this college that’s fumbling a little bit into a computer school with software development and engineering,” Griffiths told News Watch. “That way, we could supply the needed programmers to the Sioux Falls workforce for Citibank and ultimately for others, and I guess the advantage of proximity was in favor of Madison.”

Initially, mission shift not universally supported

DSU business and information systems professor Lynette Molstad Gorder was teaching at the university 40 years ago when the shift to a high-tech campus began. In a video recorded by DSU, Molstad Border recalled that there was initial hesitancy on campus about the mission change.

Advertisement

“The first thing that goes through your mind is apprehension,” she said. “How it’s going to affect you personally and how it’s going to affect faculty and the curriculum we had set up.”

Molstad Gorder, who was teaching typing and office and records management at the time, said acceptance of the shift to technology slowly washed over the DSU campus.

“Later on we looked upon it as a welcome opportunity,” she said. “It was kind of hazy (at first) and then all of a sudden, it just clicked.”

Suddenly, computers replaced pens, pencils and typewriters in classrooms. And later, the need to delve more deeply into computer science, and eventually cyber security, became a greater focus at DSU, she said.

“Somehow we had to protect this whole digital infrastructure,” she said. “With our faculty and staff we were able to move into the whole cyber security realm of problems and issues and teach our students. And we’ve had great success.”

Advertisement

Molstad Gorder said she sees a continued bright future for DSU.

“When you look at 40 years ago in 1984 what we were using to accomplish the tasks and what we have today, it’s absolutely amazing,” she said. “Everything seems to be going faster and faster (and) it takes a lot of power and leadership to keep abreast of all the changes that are happening.”

DSU’s venture started with computer science

In 1984, while still known as Dakota State College, a name used until 1989, the initial jump into technology came with creation of a bachelor’s degree in computer science using a curriculum from IBM. That foundation in teaching computer science and software development – and in forming an industry partnership – laid the groundwork for what was to come, Griffiths said.

With a mix of private and public funding, the university was able to slowly but consistently expand its facilities and academic offerings, she said.

In the early 2000s, a further step forward came when DSU began to focus on cyber security.

Advertisement

“We were actually quite late in the game to get into cyber security,” Griffiths said. “But DSU decided to get into that game and did so with a vengeance.”

A milestone achievement, and a significant source of mission confirmation, came 20 years later, in 2004, when the National Security Agency named DSU a Center of Academic Excellence in computer security, one of the first. It is now one of just 10 in the nation to hold three center of excellence designations from NSA.

Now, another 20 years later, that gradual growth has exploded into almost constant expansion of academic offerings, research opportunities, industry and government partnerships and construction of new facilities to accommodate it all.

Enrollment has risen steadily, from 867 in 1985 to 1,801 in 2000 and to 3,509 in 2023. The number of female students enrolled in technology programs has jumped about 300% in recent years, according to DSU data.

Dakota State University now offers 44 degrees, including seven master’s degrees and four doctoral programs. Upon graduation, 99.7% of students in 2022 got jobs or went further in their educational journey, the university said.

Advertisement

Shift toward research

When Griffiths arrived on campus, DSU had a strong academic reputation but was not known for its research. In her time at the helm, she has pushed to obtain funding and the infrastructure necessary to conduct research and develop doctoral programs to involve students and faculty in the work.

In 2017, the research and development efforts took a major step forward with the launch of the Madison Cyber Labs, or MadLabs, facility on campus. A sparkling, glass-encased $18 million research building is at the heart of what overall was a $40 million program to expand research into groundbreaking fields of cyber security, digital forensics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, among others.

The state pitched in $10 million in Future Fund money to add to a $30 million donation from Premier Bankcard CEO Miles Beacom and wife Lisa, along with Denny Sanford, owner of the Sioux Falls-based First Premier Bank and Premier Bankcard.

Up next for DSU is an expansion into Sioux Falls, where thanks to roughly $100 million in combined public and private funds, DSU will build an off-campus Applied Research Lab on the city’s northwest side.

That funding package included another $60 million donation from Sanford and $30 million in state funding to build the research facility and to launch the Governors Cyber Academy on the DSU campus. The academy will include a dual credit program for high school students in South Dakota. The city of Sioux Falls is contributing $10 million to get the applied lab up and running.

Advertisement

As reported earlier by News Watch, DSU’s next big venture will be to lead a multi-campus effort to expand research in South Dakota into quantum computers, which are far faster and more capable than any of the largest, most complex supercomputers already in use.

The 2024 state Legislature approved $3 million in spending to pay for faculty and other resources to help DSU and other colleges take a leading role in understanding quantum computers and developing a path forward for their use.

“Obviously, there’s a sense of excitement around innovation because it doesn’t just happen everywhere,” said Griffiths, 72, who told News Watch her job as DSU president will be her last before retirement. “There’s a shared vision around the culture of innovation here, and we’re all excited about that. It means you create an environment where people can try things out, and if they fail, it’s not the end of the world.”

Opportunities for DSU graduates abound

People within and outside the university said DSU has a strong reputation in the high-tech industry as a pipeline for employers seeking well-prepared students.

Alexis Kulm of Sioux Falls said she had several employment options upon graduation from DSU in December 2022 with a degree in cyber operations, which she describes as “kind of cool, right?”

Advertisement

Kulm, 23, had a flair for math and science while at Washington High School in Sioux Falls and attended a pair of technology summer camps at DSU prior to graduation. She liked the small-town feel, the professors and administrators she met and saw great opportunity in the university’s growing range of cyber education options.

“That’s one thing I really liked, that it doesn’t limit your opportunities,” she said. “You get a strong real-world education in your classes.”

Kulm took classes in web and network design, computer programming and malware analysis, which she said all helped prepare her for the cyber workplace. As a native of South Dakota, and with close family ties, Kulm took a job at Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, where she joked she received a “not bad” employment and benefit package that allows her to live comfortably.

Sanford Health and DSU announced a partnership in November 2020 to create a CyberHealth innovation hub that will increase employment opportunities for DSU graduates while expanding the health care provider’s ability to innovate and create economic development across its footprint.

In her work on the Sanford Health cybersecurity team, Kulm works at the secure operations center, helping keep computer systems and information safe from errors or outside cyber attacks.

Advertisement

Kulm said her fellow DSU graduates took cyber positions in Hawaii and Washington, D.C., and she feels well positioned for her own professional future.

“What I heard a lot during the interview process was, ‘Oh, you’re from DSU, I know about them,’” she said. “It’s a small school, but it’s very well known.”

Dakota State University’s rising national reputation

The growing influence of DSU in the cyber security realm was highlighted when the university attracted Jen Easterly, director of the federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, as the keynote speaker at its DakotaCon event in March.

Easterly said the agency’s mission is “to lead the national effort to understand and manage and reduce the risk to the cyber and physical infrastructure that Americans rely on every hour of every day, for water, for power, for finance, for transportation, for communication, for health care and the networks and data that power our daily lives.”

She said that prior to her visit to Madison, she had been hearing increasing discussion on the national level about the growth and innovation taking place at DSU.

Advertisement

“The ideas generated at forums like this are just further proof that it doesn’t matter the size of the university. It’s really about the power of innovation and the focus on collaboration and the cutting edge of emerging technology that really makes this place something truly miraculous,” Easterly said.

She specifically praised the ability of Griffiths to establish meaningful partnerships across the cyber world and urged future graduates to consider working in cyber security in either the private or public sectors.

“I look at this (DSU) community as really being at the forefront of being able to keep our nation safe against very real cyber threats,” Easterly said. “I’ve been excited to make this trip for a while because I’ve been impressed by DSU’s efforts to actively inspire the next generation of cyber leaders to join alongside public servants and the private sector that are looking to keep our country safe and secure.”

Job creation in Madison and beyond

The cutting-edge academic programs at DSU have created a pipeline of new, well-trained employees for a wide range of companies across the country, including in its home city of Madison.

After graduating from DSU with a master’s degree in 2006, Jon Waldman and fellow graduate Chad Knutson started an information security company that got in on the ground floor of what has become a massive industry in the U.S. and across the world.

Advertisement

“We started as a handful of college kids with a garage-band mentality,” Waldman, a self-described “technology nerd,” told News Watch in an interview during DakotaCon at DSU in March.

The fledgling information security business began as Secure Banking Solutions, helping banks keep critical information safe and preventing internal systems from being hacked.

Over the past 20 years, the firm – now named SBS CyberSecurity and headquartered in Madison – has grown to include 90 employees with clients in 49 states that include the nation’s largest turkey farm and the Graceland Mansion tourist attraction.

Waldman, 43, said he saw great value as a student in the small class sizes and close faculty relationships he developed at DSU, which continue at the university today. He also credits DSU with providing students with educational and job opportunities they might not get at a university that lacks the industry and government partnerships DSU has secured.

“DSU might be smaller in size, but what they do for their students is so powerful, both in terms of the training and the relationships that are built here, among the students, among faculty and among industry partners,” Waldman said. “They’ve been on the forefront of what the cyber industry really needs for the last 25 years or more.”

Advertisement

Waldman retains close ties with DSU, serving on a cybersecurity industry advisory board at the university and by continuing to hire DSU graduates, of whom there are now 25 working at SBS. His company in June donated $300,000 to DSU to offer scholarships and to support the growing CybHER program that seeks to boost female participation in the cyber industry.

“We’re very proud to have big DSU connections and be part of that pipeline,” he said.

Waldman said DSU has “a commitment to innovation” that allows for a nimble approach to creation of academic tracks and degrees that allow DSU graduates to remain at the forefront of the constantly and rapidly evolving cyber technology and security industry.

A new degree focused on artificial intelligence and its applications is a good example of how DSU reacts quickly to changes in the industry and in society as a whole, he said.

“DSU is building new programs that apply to the kids of yesterday, today and tomorrow,” Waldman said. “So that’s part of what makes DSU really special.”

Advertisement

___

This story was originally published by South Dakota News Watch and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending