South Dakota
South Dakota Coyote MBB Finalizes 2022-23 Schedule
Regardless of it being halfway via the faculty soccer season, basketball followers are already clamoring for schedules and previews of the upcoming season as nicely.
On Friday, the College of South Dakota Males’s Basketball program introduced that their 2022-23 schedule has been finalized.
It is an thrilling step to a a lot anticipated upcoming season for the Yotes, as they give the impression of being to rebound from final 12 months’s 19-12 season in what would be the first 12 months beneath new Head Coach Eric Peterson.
Per GoYotes.com, Sunday, October thirtieth would be the first motion of the season, when the Coyote males play host to Simpson Faculty (Iowa) in Vermillion for an exhibition. It is a 1:00 tip time on Halloween eve.
The season opener ought to present the Coyotes and Coach Peterson with a problem, because the crew travels to Madison, Wisconsin to tackle the Wisconsin Badgers on Monday, November seventh, tip off set for 7:30pm.
The true-blue dwelling opener is about for simply two nights later, as USD will host Lipscomb in Vermillion on November ninth, a 7:00 begin time. The Yotes can even have a tricky matchup at Mississippi State on Thursday, November seventeenth.
As for Summit League play:
The Summit League opener is Dec. 19 at Kansas Metropolis. South Dakota’s first dwelling video games in Summit play are over the vacations in opposition to St. Thomas (Dec. 29) and Western Illinois (Dec. 31). South Dakota hosts rival-South Dakota State Jan. 14 and returns to Brookings Feb. 11. The Summit League Match is March 3-7 in Sioux Falls.
Here’s a hyperlink to the whole schedule.
It is the primary 12 months for Head Coach Eric Peterson, who served as an assistant in Vermillion from 2014-2018. Peterson replaces Todd Lee, who was fired after 4 seasons as Head Coach final March.
Source: GoYotes.com
Do You Bear in mind These 10 Loopy Snowstorms In South Dakota?
Do you bear in mind any main snowstorms that hit South Dakota?
South Dakota
SD resource for deaf and hard of hearing community
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — For people who are deaf or hard of hearing, it may be difficult to know where to find resources that can help.
Bir Gurung was just 14 years old when he came to America.
“I didn’t know American Sign Language when I moved here, and I didn’t know how my language in Nepali sign language would translate as well as English,” Deaf, Bir Gurung said.
It wasn’t until he found SD DROP that his life changed, and he was able to learn American Sign Language, also known as ASL.
“I thought it was crucial to do that if you’re going to be in America. I didn’t want this communication breakdown that I’ve experienced for so long. And so I wanted to make sure that I knew what was going on. And now that I know the language, that’s crucial and I got that through them,” Gurung said.
South Dakota Deaf Resources and Outreach Programs, also known as SD DROP, used to be known as Communication Service for the Deaf.
“We serve deaf and hard of hearing individuals from birth, wherever. It’s primarily like social work, independent living, peer support. We work in groups or one on one. We work under the state’s Department of Human Services. We’re funded through them. And then we run the programs for them, primarily the communication assistance,” co-director of SD DROP, Lance Sigdestad said.
“We have deaf mentoring where we’ll bring in a mentor to help teach a family sign language. They have a new baby who has been diagnosed as deaf. And so we can come in and start teaching that family right away so that they can start reading stories to their baby in sign. So it’s all through the life span,” co-director of SD DROP, Katie Peterson said.
SD DROP helps people like Gurung in a variety of different ways.
“Our communication assistance program provides anything from maybe a deaf person will come in with a letter they don’t quite understand all the jargon of, and so we can just sort of explain that or advocacy we call in and help them get an interpreter for an appointment. It can really be so many different things,” Peterson said.
The nonprofit’s work reaches beyond just the deaf community.
“We also do work with individuals who have really any communication barrier and the good example, people with Down’s syndrome or speech delays, it’s just a way for them to learn, sign and open up more opportunities for communication,” Sigdestad said.
“We work with people who are hard of hearing and just have maybe don’t hear as well as they’d like to on the telephone. So we may not be talking about sign language for them, but giving them tools like the idea that you can pull out your phone and open an app and it will caption everything that somebody’s saying or over the phone,” Peterson said.
Helping people in the deaf community have access to resources that weren’t always there.
“I have the knowledge to share with them and be ready to empower that next generation. So that’s because I had that experience of not having it. I want to make sure that the next generation has that. So that’s what drives me to do what I do,” Sigdestad said.
“It’s a necessity to help me learn and now they’ve helped me find a job. They’ve helped me be able to go and get a car and learn how to drive and become a citizen, which that is something that’s very important to me,” Gurung said.
Click here to learn more about SD DROP’s resources and how they can help you.
South Dakota
Top SD environmental regulator says Biden-era law created ‘water renaissance’ in state • South Dakota Searchlight
Though he didn’t credit the Biden administration by name, South Dakota’s top environmental official recently praised one of the administration’s laws for spurring a “water renaissance that was overdue” in the state.
Hunter Roberts leads South Dakota’s Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Its responsibilities include the regulation of drinking water and wastewater systems.
The office awarded $689 million to 200 water-related projects across the state during the last several years, Roberts told a legislative committee last week at the Capitol in Pierre. The money came from the American Rescue Plan Act, known by the acronym “ARPA.”
“It created an opportunity to make that investment and, I think, move our state forward long-term when we look at water-wastewater infrastructure, which is critical,” Roberts said. “If we don’t have safe, clean drinking water, what else do we have?”
Congress passed the ARPA legislation in 2021. Then-President Joe Biden signed it into law that March. It included a total of $1.9 trillion in funding to stimulate the national economy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
If we don’t have safe, clean drinking water, what else do we have?
– Hunter Roberts, secretary of the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources
South Dakota’s share was about $1 billion. Besides water and wastewater infrastructure, the money funded broadband internet expansion, infrastructure for housing, telemedicine initiatives, the construction of a new state public health lab, and more.
Roberts’ department used the water and wastewater money to make grants for local projects. The grants helped to pay for infrastructure such as storage reservoirs, tanks, water pipes, treatment plants, wells, pump stations, filtration systems and sewer lines.
Some local water systems had been diligent about upgrading and modernizing before the ARPA funds became available, Roberts said, but for the others, “those additional funds kind of spurred our utilities to get off their keister and make those investments that they maybe hadn’t made in 20 to 30 years.”
At another point in his presentation to the legislative committee — which included a broad overview of departmental activities — Roberts said he was excited about the end of the Biden administration. Roberts was appointed to his job in 2019 by then-Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican who’s since become President Donald Trump’s secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
Roberts said the Biden administration enacted “overly broad, overreaching, unfounded” laws and regulations.
“It seemed like there was a lot of regulatory overreach coming from Washington, D.C., pushed down to the regions and the states that we didn’t like,” Roberts said.
He also acknowledged that Trump’s zeal for imposing tariffs could negatively impact international trade and industries that depend on it, including agriculture.
“That remains to be seen how that all works through the system, but it’s certainly something we’re watching closely,” Roberts said.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
South Dakota
SD Legislature won't quit trying to make it harder to change the constitution • South Dakota Searchlight
South Dakota voters aren’t particularly fond of ballot measures that seek to change the state constitution. They’re even less enamored of attempts to mess with the way that their constitution can be changed. That history of failure doesn’t keep legislators from trying.
The latest attempt is House Joint Resolution 5003 sponsored by Rep. John Hughes, a Sioux Falls Republican. Currently, constitutional amendments placed on the general election ballot are passed with 50% of the vote plus one. Hughes seeks to raise that benchmark to 60% of the vote.
The resolution has passed its first two hurdles, getting approval from the House State Affairs Committee on an 11-2 vote and passing the full House on a vote of 61-5.
According to Hughes, because South Dakota has a 50% plus one threshold, “We are a target for being used as a laboratory for the emergence of new values and new ideas that many, many, many South Dakotans do not share.”
Lawmakers consider higher bar for constitutional amendments and a trigger to end Medicaid expansion
Often during the testimony about HJR 5003, there were complaints about the millions of dollars dumped into South Dakota elections by out-of-state interests. It sounds naive to think that big-money interests would stay away from South Dakota elections if the threshold for passing a constitutional amendment were raised to 60% of the vote.
Many of South Dakota’s current crop of legislators weren’t around in 2017 when their brethren in the Legislature made quick work of dismantling Initiated Measure 22, an anti-corruption bill endorsed with 51% of the vote. IM 22 may have been as unworkable as it was unconstitutional, but instead of letting the courts decide on its demise, lawmakers acted fast to do the job themselves.
Their eagerness to enact some parts of the initiated measure and ignore other parts led some people — particularly those people who are interested in getting their ideas on the ballot — to believe that the Legislature was circumventing the will of the people. The Legislature’s fast action on an initiated measure made constitutional amendments, which can’t be messed with by lawmakers once the voters approve, all the more compelling for people who want to raise issues that the Legislature won’t tackle.
Resolutions like the one Hughes is backing don’t have a good track record with voters. In 2018, the mysteriously named Amendment X sought to raise the approval threshold on constitutional amendments to 55%. It garnered only 46% of the vote. In 2022, Amendment C sought to raise the requirement to three-fifths of the vote if the amendment in question required an increase in taxes or fees or the appropriation of $10 million over five fiscal years. Voters didn’t like that one either, with 67% of them voting against it.
Often during the discussion about HJR 5003, Hughes and the committee members asserted that voters are suffering from “ballot fatigue.” Their suffering will only get worse in 2026 when, besides ballot issues, voters will be faced with choices for governor, U.S. representative, state constitutional offices and the Legislature. The “ballot fatigue” argument leads to the realization that lawmakers are irony-impaired.
Prior to voting to put HJR 5003 on the ballot, members of the committee approved HJR 5001, a constitutional amendment that would ease South Dakota’s escape from paying for expanded Medicaid. There’s also a joint resolution in the Senate seeking to put yet another constitutional amendment of the ballot. If lawmakers themselves weren’t so eager to change the constitution, South Dakota’s ballots would be shorter.
In 2024, two of the constitutional amendments originated with lawmakers — a work requirement for Medicaid and a neutering of the language used in the constitution to get ride of male pronouns. The language amendment failed. Voters approved of the Medicaid work requirement, but if Hughes’ effort was in effect, it would have failed since it got only 56% of the vote.
South Dakota finds itself at a veritable Bermuda Triangle of election factors that attract out-of-state influence. It’s a state where it’s relatively easy to get on the ballot, media costs are cheap by national standards and campaign finance laws are hard to enact ever since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that political spending is a form of free speech.
In the end, there’s not much that the Legislature can do to keep away out-of-state interests and their fat wallets. But lawmakers can help out voters by curbing their baser instinct to continually use their power to put even more constitutional amendments on the ballot.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
-
News1 week ago
Hamas releases four female Israeli soldiers as 200 Palestinians set free
-
Politics1 week ago
Oklahoma Sen Mullin confident Hegseth will be confirmed, predicts who Democrats will try to sink next
-
Nebraska1 week ago
3 years of the Nebraska Examiner: Looking back for inspiration and ahead to growth, with your help • Nebraska Examiner
-
Culture6 days ago
How Unrivaled became the WNBA free agency hub of all chatter, gossip and deal-making
-
World1 week ago
Israel Frees 200 Palestinian Prisoners in Second Cease-Fire Exchange
-
Technology4 days ago
Mark Zuckerberg says Meta isn’t worried about DeepSeek
-
Business4 days ago
Tulsi Gabbard Defended Russia and Syria. Now She Must Defend Those Views.
-
News2 days ago
Hamas frees more Israeli hostages in Gaza as fragile ceasefire holds