Connect with us

South Dakota

How the state, tribes and federal government are working to curb SD’s syphilis epidemic • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

How the state, tribes and federal government are working to curb SD’s syphilis epidemic • South Dakota Searchlight


Tyler Broghammer leaves his office nearly every day armed with a small blue cooler.

Inside is a weapon against South Dakota’s syphilis epidemic: syringes of penicillin. The sexually transmitted infection case manager at Oyate Health Center in Rapid City also carries rapid STI tests and condoms on his near daily drive around town, meeting with people he’s learned may have the disease.

Broghammer is one of two STI case managers at Oyate Health finding and treating people who have syphilis. The organization is one of several working to address the epidemic in South Dakota through collaborative partnerships.

COVID-19 ‘completely overwhelmed’ screening

Syphilis is a bacterial infection most often spread through sex that can be cured, but can cause serious health problems without treatment and can be spread from mothers to unborn babies.

Advertisement

South Dakota experienced a 2,493% increase in adult syphilis cases from the five-year median in 2022, according to the state Department of Health, with 1,504 cases reported — the highest rate of syphilis cases in the country at the time. That was a 90% increase from 2021.

The number of syphilis cases in the state dropped in 2023 to 1,374 cases, according to the state’s infectious disease dashboard.

Syphilis cases are down by 335 cases in the first quarter of this year compared to 2023, according to a state Department of Health spokesperson.

The state had the second highest rate of congenital syphilis in the country in 2022 with 40 cases, which is 351.8 cases per 100,000 births, and was a 150% year-over-year increase. The state saw a 1,233% increase in congenital syphilis among infants from the five-year median in 2022.

Advertisement

The state reported 54 congenital syphilis cases in 2023 and 18 through April of that year. So far this year, there have been nine reported cases.

A cooler is filled with doses of penicillin on April 24, 2024, at the Oyate Health Center in Rapid City. (Seth Tupper/South Dakota Searchlight)

Syphilis was close to being eradicated in the United States in the 1990s, but cases in South Dakota were increasing in the years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Syphilis infections nationwide have climbed rapidly in recent years, reaching a 70-year high in 2022, according to the most recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That rise comes amid a shortage of penicillin, the most effective treatment, due to the nationwide increase in syphilis cases. The shortage is predicted to last until the end of this year.

Hospitals were overwhelmed with treating the coronavirus in 2020 and 2021 and patients were hesitant to get screened or treated for STIs, said Meghan Curry O’Connell, a member of the Cherokee Nation and chief public health officer at the Great Plains Tribal Leaders’ Health Board in Rapid City.

“The whole system we have to make sure people are screened and treated for STIs was completely overwhelmed by COVID, like everything else,” said Curry O’Connell, who is a family physician by training. “Particularly in South Dakota, added challenges included difficulty in accessing care in very rural areas, which compounded the impacts of the pandemic.”

Native American communities hit hardest

Native American communities have been hit the hardest by the epidemic in South Dakota and nationally. About 90% of congenital syphilis cases in South Dakota are among Indigenous babies, according to the state Health Department.

Advertisement

Syphilis causes a range of symptoms, including rashes, sores and hair loss. But if the disease isn’t treated, symptoms may go away even though the infection remains, making it a prolific spreader unless sexually active people are educated on the disease, practice safe sex and are regularly tested, Curry O’Connell said. 

The disease can potentially persist for decades if untreated, which can lead to death. If pregnant people are infected, it poses a dangerous risk to their baby; congenital syphilis can cause bone deformities, severe anemia, jaundice, meningitis and even death. In 2022, the CDC recorded 231 stillbirths and 51 infant deaths caused by syphilis nationally, out of 3,761 congenital syphilis cases reported that year.

The Great Plains Tribal Leaders’ Health Board and tribal leaders from North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa have asked the federal Department of Health and Human Services to declare a public health emergency in their states. A declaration would expand staffing, funding, and access to contact tracing data across their region.

“It’s important to get treated, because we want to prevent any of those outcomes, and it’s just so easy for people to do,” Curry O’Connell said. “Most people just need one shot of penicillin if newly infected.”

Advertisement

The rate of congenital syphilis infections among Native Americans (644.7 cases per 100,000 people in 2022) is comparable to what the rate for the entire U.S. population was in 1941 (651.1) before doctors began using penicillin to cure syphilis, according to KFF Health News.

The risk is especially high for people with limited access to health care.

“If you’re putting off care or don’t have a regular relationship with a doctor, those people are more likely to go untreated,” Curry O’Connell said. “For whatever reason or barrier — if a person can’t get time off of work, they have a distance to travel, they don’t have immediate transportation or anything — it could end up that the symptom goes away.”

How SD entities are addressing the epidemic

Broghammer’s position is funded by a grant from the Indian Health Service. His “boots on the ground” method is the most effective way to treat patients, though it’s also a “grind,” Broghammer said.

Whether due to homelessness, financial or privacy concerns, many patients struggle to find their way to Oyate Health on the west side of Rapid City, Broghammer said. He’ll meet patients anywhere: their home, hotels or even in parking lots.

Advertisement

“Some days I’ll get five to six phone calls reaching out to us, which is great. Other days we’re picking up the phone and trying to locate people but might not find anybody,” Broghammer said. “It’s not just as simple as a phone call and meeting with them. We have a decent sized population of houseless relatives where it’s difficult to find them — no phone or address. Sometimes we literally have nothing to go off of.”

Some other health care systems will test for syphilis but won’t go to the patient’s location. 

“Underlying all of this is it’s very resource intensive, especially in rural areas,” Curry O’Connell said. “However, there’s not anything we know of yet that can replace it. Boots on the ground, going out to talk to people, giving testing and doing what needs to be done is just basic public health work, and there’s nothing else that really works better.”

Some tribes and Indian Health Service locations are also sending nurses across South Dakota reservations to find and treat people. The state Department of Health plans to launch its Wellness on Wheels program in May, with five vans traveling across the state to provide basic health care to rural communities — including STI testing, treatment, education, counseling and referrals to community resources.

The vans will also provide pregnancy care services, safe sleep guidance and developmental screening for children, WIC services, maternal depression screening, immunizations and oral health.

Advertisement

“We hope to use these vans several times a week to reach clients who might not have access to one of our physical locations,” said Tia Kafke, media spokesperson for the department, in an emailed statement. “The vans will operate in the winter as much as possible, weather permitting.”

The state, tribes and tribal health board have monthly meetings about syphilis, Curry O’Connell said. IHS recommends every patient age 16 and older be screened for syphilis at least once a year. Pregnant patients should be screened three times during their pregnancy.

Broghammer often receives calls from the state Department of Health with leads on people who tested positive for syphilis.

“They save me time and energy, so I know they’re working their tails off,” Broghammer said.

Advertisement

The state department started piloting a rapid testing partnership with a health care provider in Mission, on the Rosebud Reservation, in December. Fifty patients were tested in the first three months with eight testing positive and being treated for the disease.

The move to rapid testing is an important development, professionals agree, because patients are able to be treated immediately rather than days or weeks later when results come in from laboratories. The department has seven normal testing centers across the state.

The number of syphilis cases in South Dakota has decreased since it peaked in 2022, though it’s still at epidemic levels. Congenital syphilis is only prevented by treating pregnant females. The number of congenital syphilis cases in South Dakota increased from 2022 to 2023.

Prenatal care, intervention key to addressing congenital syphilis

Though Broghammer sees the collaborations’ effect, he said there could be more entities working together in the state to put more boots on the ground.

Curry O’Connell said more effort is needed to test pregnant patients who aren’t receiving prenatal care. Nearly one-third of congenital syphilis cases in the first half of 2023 did not receive prenatal care, according to the state.

Advertisement

Most women still will interact with the health care system at some point during their pregnancy, even if they don’t receive prenatal care. They should be screened with a rapid test at that point, Curry O’Connell said.

“If someone goes into urgent care or goes in for something that’s not even pregnancy related, that would be a place to start, because a lot of women will receive some sort of care during pregnancy,” Curry O’Connell said. “It’s trying to maximize the screening potential of those visits that’s important.”

Education, Broghammer said, is an important tool.

“I think the biggest thing is to just get checked,” Broghammer said. “If you’re sexually active, be safe: get screened and get checked. Be mindful of your partners and safe sex practices.”

 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota vs. North Dakota State channel, time, schedule, live stream to watch Saturday college football game | Sporting News

Published

on

South Dakota vs. North Dakota State channel, time, schedule, live stream to watch Saturday college football game | Sporting News


North Dakota State is almost at the finish line, looking to complete the season with just one blemish on its record.

The Bison lost the season-opener against Colorado but have since been perfect and are 10-1 heading into the final regular-season game. A Missouri Valley Football Conference title is in their sights.

South Dakota is also one of the top teams in the MVFC, posting an 8-2 record but just one conference loss. The Coyotes are looking to knock off the Bison and force a tie for first place in the conference.

South Dakota has the luxury of playing at home in the most important game of the regular season.

Advertisement

The Sporting News has all the details on how to watch South Dakota vs. North Dakota State.

What channel is South Dakota vs. North Dakota State on today?

  • TV channel: N/A
  • Live stream: ESPN+

South Dakota vs. North Dakota State won’t be broadcast on TV. Instead, it will be exclusively streamed. ESPN+ has fans covered with the live stream.

For a limited time get 12 months of ESPN+ for the price of 9 with the purchase of an annual plan. Stream your favorite teams live and enjoy more sports anywhere with an ESPN+ subscription.

South Dakota vs. North Dakota State start time

  • Date: Saturday, Nov. 23
  • Time: 2 p.m. ET

South Dakota vs. North Dakota State kicks off on Saturday, Nov. 23 at 2 p.m. ET in South Dakota.

South Dakota schedule

Date Game Time (ET)
Nov. 23 vs. North Dakota State 2 p.m.

North Dakota State schedule

Date Game Time (ET)
Nov. 23 at South Dakota 2 p.m.

Related Links

If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation. Learn more >

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

UMC Women’s Basketball uses big second quarter to beat South Dakota School of Mines | KROX

Published

on

UMC Women’s Basketball uses big second quarter to beat South Dakota School of Mines | KROX


The University of Minnesota Crookston Golden Eagle Women’s basketball team is taking on the South Dakota School of Mines in Rapid City, South Dakota this evening.

FIRST QUARTER –
UMC jumped out to a 4-0 lead with baskets from Willow Thiel (Fresh. Perham) and Nicole Hernandez (Sr. Oak Creek, WI). After a Mines basket, UMC responded with five more points with an Emma Miller (Jr. Albertville), another Thiel basket, and two free throws from Riley Jenkins (Soph. Galesburg, IL) for a 9-2 lead to start the game. Mines made another basket before Miller made a basket, and Thiel added two free throws for a 13-4 lead with 5:38 left in the opening quarter. Mines made a three-pointer before Thiel connected on a pair of free throws, and Miller made a layup for a 17-7 lead. Mines finally got the offense going and went on a 7-2 run to get within a 19-14 deficit with one minute remaining. UMC’s Miller made a basket before Mines finished the quarter with a three-pointer, and the Golden Eagles took a 21-17 lead into the second quarter. 

SECOND QUARTER –
UMC dominated the second quarter as Hope Dudycha (Soph. Austin) got things going with a three-pointer, and Jenkins added a free throw. After a Mines basket, it turned into the Jenkins and Thiel show as the two went on an 11-0 run on their own for a 36-19 lead with 18 seconds left in the half.  That is right. UMC held Mines to only two points over nine-plus minutes of the quarter. Mines made a three-pointer with four seconds left in the half, and UMC took a 36-22 lead into halftime. Mines only made two of 15 shots from the field in the second quarter and were 9 of 33 in the first half.

THIRD QUARTER –
Mines started the second half on a 7-2 run before Dudycha and Miller made baskets for a 42-39 lead. After Mines got within a 12-point deficit, UMC’s Jenkins made a three-pointer, and Dudycha scored six points for a 51-32 lead with less than four minutes left in the quarter. Mines chipped away at the deficit and got within a 54-41 score before UMC’s Miller ended the quarter with a three-pointer for a 57-41 lead going into the final quarter.

Advertisement

FOURTH QUARTER –
UMC led 60-45 when Dudycha made a basket, and Jenkins converted a three-point play for a 65-45 lead with 6:27 left in the game. Mines made a basket before Hernandez and Thiel scored two points apiece for a 69-47 lead. The teams played even the rest of the way and the Golden Eagles won 74-55.

UMC improves to 2-4 on the year and will travel to Minot State on Tuesday to start Northern Sun Conference play. Mines drops to 0-5 on the year.

  1st  2nd 3rd  4th Final
UM-Crookston 21 15 21 17 74
South Dakota Mines 17 5 19 14 55
For UMC Points Rebounds Assists/Steals
Emma Miller 19 10 3 assists/1 steal
Riley Jenkins 16 7 4 assists/1 block
Hope Dudycha 16 3 2 steals/1 assist
Willow Thiel 16 9 1 assist
Nicole Hernandez 5 8 1 block/1 assist
Emme Munch 2

Tags: Brynlea Mahlen, Emma Miller, Hope Dudycha, Kloe Wadd, Natalie Mikrot, Nicole Hernandez, Rayna Klejeski, Riley Jenkins, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Hardrockers, sports, Taryn Frazier, University of Minnesota Crookston Golden Eagles Women’s Basketball, Willow Thiel



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Iowa Supreme Court upholds land survey abilities of pipeline companies in Summit case • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Iowa Supreme Court upholds land survey abilities of pipeline companies in Summit case • South Dakota Searchlight


The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s decision that Summit Carbon Solutions is allowed temporary access to properties for surveying, because it is a pipeline company that would be transporting a hazardous liquid.

The case involved Kent Kasischke, a Hardin County landowner who refused to let Summit surveyors on his land to survey for their proposed pipeline that would transport carbon dioxide, primarily sequestered from ethanol plants, to underground storage in North Dakota. The pipeline route includes South Dakota.

The Iowa Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case in early October.

Kasischke argued Iowa Code section 479B.15, which allows a pipeline company to enter private land to survey, was unconstitutional because the invasion of property required compensation.

Advertisement

Justice Thomas Waterman, who issued the court’s decision, said Kasischke’s argument “fails.”

“He has no right to exclude the surveyor because section 479B.15 is a lawful pre-existing limitation on his title to the land,” the decision said.

Carbon pipeline company reapplies for South Dakota permit

According to the decision, this is consistent with rulings in “at least four” district courts, including the Iowa District Court for Hardin County that originally ruled in the case, and with Supreme Court decisions in North Dakota and South Dakota.

The decision in South Dakota, while it upheld the constitutionality of a similar statute in the state, was touted as win by those opposed to the pipeline because it said the company must prove it is a common carrier and said surveying was only constitutional if they were “minimally invasive superficial inspections that, at most, cause minor soil disturbances.”

Advertisement

A press release from the Iowa Easement Team and Bold Alliance, groups opposed to the pipeline that supported Kasischke, and his attorney, Brian Jorde, said the Friday Iowa Supreme Court’s decision “sidesteps” questions around surveying.

“Right now Iowa has no guardrails as to the level of invasive activity a pipeline company can do to private property as they can claim anything they want to do falls under ‘survey’ or ‘examination,’” the press release said.

Jorde, who has represented numerous landowners in cases against Summit, said “we will have to go back to the Court” to address the limitations, with a hope that Iowans will be granted the “same protections” as South Dakotans.

As part of its ruling, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s decision that Summit Carbon Solutions is a pipeline company and fits the definition under Iowa Code by transporting a hazardous liquid.

Kasischke argued the supercritical carbon dioxide that would be transported in the pipeline was not a liquid.

Advertisement

Waterman’s written decision said the court relied on testimony from the district court trial for its decision, though he noted that since the district court trial, the Iowa Utilities Commission (then the Iowa Utilities Board) “determined that supercritical carbon dioxide is a liquefied carbon dioxide.”

The CEO of Summit Carbon Solutions, Lee Blank, said in a statement Friday the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision was a “win for infrastructure projects across the state and the nation.”

“It underscores the importance of balancing landowner rights with the need to advance critical infrastructure that benefits communities, agriculture, and the broader economy,” Blank said.

The press release said the ruling “confirms” the company has met “all statutory requirements” and it supports infrastructure “vital to enhancing economic competitiveness and ensuring energy and agricultural sustainability.”

Opponents of the pipeline project said in their press release, the ruling “did not conclude” the proposed 2,500 mile pipeline is a public use, nor that the company is a common carrier.

Advertisement

However, Summit was granted use of eminent domain in August when the Iowa Utilities Commission approved its permit.

A final element of the case was whether or not Kasischke had a tenant on the property who would have impacted Summits’ efforts to provide adequate notice of their plans to survey his property.

Waterman wrote the court agreed with the district court’s credibility analysis calling Kasischke’s testimony on the issue “evasive and not credible.”

Jorde and the Iowa Easement Team called this “puzzling and disappointing, but a minor issue to the appeal.”

The Iowa justices affirmed that Summit complied with notice requirements and the district court’s ruling and injunction.

Advertisement
Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: [email protected]. Follow Iowa Capital Dispatch on Facebook and X.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending