South Dakota

Familiarity abounds for Iowa State, South Dakota State basketball, who will meet in NCAA Tournament

Published

2 months ago

March 17, 2024

Press Room

Familiarity abounds for Iowa State, South Dakota State basketball, who will meet in NCAA Tournament

AMES – Selection Sunday usually sends coaches scrambling.

There’s a mad dash to collect as much information as possible to face an unfamiliar team on short notice in the NCAA Tournament.

That’s not really the case for Iowa State and South Dakota State this season.

The East Region’s second-seeded Cyclones and the No. 15 Jackrabbits are well acquainted. They meet at 6:35 p.m. CT Thursday in Omaha (TruTV).

More: Iowa State’s March Madness bracket opponent is South Dakota St. to open 2024 NCAA Tournament

Iowa State coach T.J. Otzelberger was South Dakota State’s head coach from 2016-19. Eric Henderson, then an Otzelberger assistant, took over as the Jackrabbits’ coach following Otzelberger’s departure.

That’s just the start, though.

Henderson is a former Cyclone staffer under Greg McDermott while Jackrabbit assistant Bryan Peterson is a former Cyclone who played for McDermott. Current Jackrabbit staffers Tyler Glidden (a former Iowa State manager and graduate assistant) and Rob Klinkefus both worked for Otzelberger.

“Across the board, from the trainer to the strength coach,” Otzelberger said, “I know all those guys and worked with them.

“They’re friends and we’ll continue to be friends, and on Thursday I’m sure we’ll both aim to do the best we can to come out with a win.”

More: How a small detail makes a big impression for Iowa State basketball

Otzelberger went 70-33 while going to two NCAA Tournaments in his three seasons in Brookings. Henderson has gone 109-47 over five seasons with now two NCAA Tournaments on his resume.

“Coach Henderson does a great job,” Otzelberger said. “They won the league outright, won the tournament. To do that you’ve got have a really good group. I’ve watched them a fair amount through the season because of my relationship with coach Henderson and their coaching staff from my time there.

“Really good team.”

Travis Hines covers Iowa State University sports for the Des Moines Register and Ames Tribune. Contact him at thines@amestrib.com or (515) 284-8000. Follow him at @TravisHines21.

Source link

Click to comment

South Dakota

Why Charlie Adelson Was Transferred to South Dakota: Insiders Tell All

Published

28 mins ago

May 24, 2024

Press Room

Why Charlie Adelson Was Transferred to South Dakota: Insiders Tell All

Joel Waldman and Karm Waldman, podcast hosts and authors of the book “Surviving the Survivor,” say Charlie left FL because the Latin Kings put a hit on him. They say Wendi Adelson is bound for Austin, possibly preparing to slip into Mexico. (5/24/24) MORE

Latest Videos

Do
you want to continue watching?

Source link

South Dakota

Petition returns Roe v. Wade to South Dakota ballot

Published

7 hours ago

May 24, 2024

Press Room

Petition returns Roe v. Wade to South Dakota ballot

RAPID CITY, S.D. (KEVN) – With Roe v Wade being overturned at the federal level in 2022, the pro-choice community has been working to bring back those rights. At South Dakota’s state level, Dakotans For Health put together a petition with more than 55,000 signatures to put the measure on the ballot.

Rick Weiland, Co-Founder of Dakotans for Health, believes these rights are important to protect women, living in a State that prides itself on freedom.

“We’ve spent millions of South Dakota tax dollars advertising what a free state we are. ‘come here and work in South Dakota, enjoy the freedom living in our state’, and then I look at the hypocrisy, and I think if you’re a woman and you’re raped and you’re pregnant, do you have freedom to make a choice of what to do? No, you’ve lost that,” Weiland said.

Travis Lasseter, executive Director of Black Hills Pregnancy Center, says no matter what happens with this initiative, their center will continue to answer all of their patient’s questions with medical facts, allowing women to make an informed decision.

Weiland says his group has faced backlash over potential late-term abortions. He went on to say the initiative is simply restoring women’s rights.

“I think this freedom amendment is so important to just restore the rights Women had for 50 years, we’re getting criticized for being too radical, that this goes way beyond Roe, which is just a bold-faced lie,” Weiland said.

Weiland says he is optimistic voters from both sides will bring women’s rights back to the most restrictive reproductive rights state of South Dakota.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Source link

South Dakota

U.S. House panel debates nutrition benefit changes in GOP farm bill proposal • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

14 hours ago

May 23, 2024

Press Room

U.S. House panel debates nutrition benefit changes in GOP farm bill proposal • South Dakota Searchlight

WASHINGTON — Democrats and Republicans on the U.S. House Agriculture Committee clashed late into the evening Thursday over funding for food and nutrition programs as part of Republicans’ sweeping proposal for the new five-year farm bill.

The committee’s $1.5 trillion omnibus farm bill would set policy and funding levels for agriculture and conservation programs for the next five years, as well as for food and nutrition programs for families in need.

House Agriculture Chair Glenn “GT” Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican, introduced the long-awaited bill last week and his panel undertook a marathon markup Thursday. The committee is expected to vote on a series of amendments and the bill around midnight Eastern.

SD’s Rep. Johnson defends criticized provisions in farm bill draft

The bill is tied up over disagreements between Democrats and Republicans on a funding calculation that would place limits on the formula that calculates benefits for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, SNAP, the food aid program formerly referred to as food stamps.

Democrats said Thursday it would lead to cuts in SNAP and kill any future of bipartisan support for the farm bill, which it would need to pass the Senate.

“There is absolutely no way you are going to get a farm bill unless we take care of this business, which is the heart of the matter,” Rep. David Scott of Georgia, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said of the SNAP funding mechanism.

As the House committee debated the bill, Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow, the chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said in an interview Thursday that the legislation has no chance in the Senate.

“It tears up the farm and food coalition and does not have the votes to pass on the House floor. And certainly not in the Senate,” Stabenow told States Newsroom.

Nutrition programs account for the majority of farm bill spending. There are more than 41 million people who use SNAP benefits, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Dems pan changes to SNAP funding

Thompson’s bill would limit future updates to the Thrifty Food Plan, the formula that calculates benefits for SNAP. This would result in a nearly $30 billion reduction in spending over ten years, based on the estimates from the Congressional Budget Office, lawmakers say.

Democrats say that would significantly reduce food purchasing power for needy Americans.

“Any effort that takes the food off the table for hard-working families takes my vote off the table,” said Rep. Gabe Vasquez, a Democrat from New Mexico.

“If we want a farm bill that is able to pass into law with the bipartisan levels that it requires to pass beyond this committee, it is necessary that we go back to the negotiating table and remove this provision,” said Colorado Democrat Yadira Caraveo.

Connecticut Democrat Jahana Hayes offered an amendment that would have struck the changes to the program. But after more than two hours of impassioned debate on the issue Thursday night, the amendment failed on a party-line vote, 25-29.

“It is unfathomable that we are once again attacking the most vulnerable in this country, the hungry,” Hayes told the committee. “There are components of the bill that are promising, but that should not come at the expense of the most vulnerable.”

Republicans defend new formula

The underlying issue is cost projections for the farm bill over the next 10 years. The farm bill has to remain budget neutral, so lawmakers must fit their proposals into a baseline of how much the government would spend if the current farm bill was extended.

Republicans insist the SNAP changes are a cost calculation that would not actually reduce food support for needy families. The change would not kick in until 2027 and would not directly reduce current SNAP levels. Rather, it would freeze the list of products that families can buy with their benefits and the values allowed to purchase them, except for increases from inflation.

As such, the limits would make it more difficult for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to add new items to SNAP or offer more support for certain categories, like the Biden administration did in 2021 when it increased the benefit for fruits and vegetables.

New York Republican Mark Molinaro said it is “dishonest” to describe the changes as a cut to SNAP benefits and South Dakota Republican Dusty Johnson said the benefits on the electronic benefit cards for SNAP would not go down.

U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-South Dakota, speaks to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on June 14, 2023, in Washington, D.C. (Courtesy of Rep. Johnson’s Office)

But Democrats pointed to the CBO cost estimates that project a reduction in federal spending for SNAP if the bill became law.

“Let’s not try to make believe that this is no big deal, it is a huge deal… we need to do better,” said Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Jim McGovern.

California Democrat Salud Carbajal said Republicans were trying to “have it both ways.”

“If the committee’s considering it a paid-for then that is funding you are taking away from hungry families,” said Carbaja.

The farm bill funds programs across 12 titles for five years. The massive bill stitches together support for agriculture producers, energy and conservation programs on farmland and food and nutrition programs for families in need.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack raised concerns this week that the Republican proposal’s adjustment to SNAP benefits threatened that coalition.

The Republican bill would increase farm “safety net” payments for some commodity crops, expand eligibility for disaster assistance and increase funding for speciality crops, organic farmers and dairy farmers.

It is expected to cost $1.5 trillion over 10 years. A title-by-title summary of the 942-page bill can be is available online.

Jennifer Shutt contributed to this report.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Source link