Connect with us

South Dakota

B-21 Ellsworth expansion getting mixed support in Pierre

Published

on

B-21 Ellsworth expansion getting mixed support in Pierre


BOX ELDER, S.D. – The 2024 South Dakota Legislature considered two spending measures for construction projects aimed at preparing for an influx of military personnel and civilians arriving with the launch of the new B-21 Raider bomber program at Ellsworth Air Force Base.

The state funds were proposed in one bill to help build a new elementary school to accommodate rapid student population growth in Box Elder and through another measure that would include the Rapid City Regional Airport in a funding package to aid expansion of airports across the state.

In this tight budget year, lawmakers rejected the plan to spend up to $15 million to help pay for a new $60 million elementary school in the Douglas School District, which serves many families that live and work in and around the base.

Advertisement

But as the 2024 legislative session winds down, legislators are still considering a proposal to spend up to $90 million in state funds to offset costs of expansion projects at municipal airports across the state. At the Rapid City Regional Airport, some of it could help pay for $220 million in planned improvements and expansions to prepare for expected large increases in passengers and flights due to the launch of the B-21 program at nearby Ellsworth.

Ellsworth was officially chosen in June 2021 as the main base of operations and training location for the Air Force’s new B-21 Raider bomber, a $700 million long-range stealth jet with nuclear capabilities that is intended to replace the B-1B Lancer bomber that has been based at Ellsworth for years.

BRAC memories, worries still fresh

In pitching the spending packages, lawmakers from western South Dakota argued that state financial support is needed for the school and airport projects to accommodate the B-21 program and to ensure the long-range viability of the base that was nearly closed by the federal government during the Base Realignment and Closure process in 2005-2006.

Sen. Helene Duhamel, R-Rapid City, sponsored Senate Bill 204 to help fund the proposed elementary school, starting at a $15 million request and then reducing the ask to $5 million after debate. Duhamel reminded members of the Senate Education Committee of the harrowing process South Dakota leaders went through in trying to keep Ellsworth off the final BRAC list in 2006. Duhamel said the effort required support from the South Dakota congressional delegation, state officials and local leaders to persuade the federal government to keep Ellsworth open.

Advertisement

“This did not happen by accident,” Duhamel testified. “It was hard work, investment with an eye on the future and a willingness to help when needed.”

When the 2005 BRAC process began, Ellsworth was home to about 3,500 active duty personnel, 800 civilian employees and created a $350 million annual impact in South Dakota, Duhamel said. Saving the base protected jobs and revenue across the region, and now helping the local school system and regional airport would show the Air Force that Ellsworth is valued not only within the military but by South Dakota and the local community as well, she said.

“It’s time to help again,” Duhamel said, pointing out that the annual economic impact of the base will rise to $480 million a year once the B-21s arrive. “South Dakota needs to do its part to support the military when the military supports us.”

Military wants to see local investment

Scott Landguth, executive director of the South Dakota Ellsworth Development Authority, told lawmakers that local investments are an important factor for the military when it decides whether to maintain or expand its bases. Air Force officials often ask about local “quality of life” issues, which includes the local school system, he said.

Advertisement

Ellsworth has obtained greater stability by aggressively seeking new and expanded roles within the Air Force, Landguth said. Examples include the addition of the Air Force Financial Services Center at Ellsworth in 2007, adding the command and control mission for the MQ-9 Reaper drone program to the base in 2010 and the 2015 opening of the 35,000-square-mile Powder River Training Complex, a major airspace training expansion northwest of Ellsworth.

“We’ve always been on the offensive so we’re not back to where we were (with BRAC),” Landguth said. “The quality of schools is definitely on the radar of the Air Force because they want their airmen and families to be taken care of. And they want the communities where they are investing to be part of that.”

Ellsworth colonel: Investments help ease stress

Col. Derek Oakley, commander of the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth, said at a recent meeting in Rapid City that the Air Force will embark on nearly three dozen individual construction projects on the base at an estimated cost of at least $1.5 billion.

The B-21 program will add more than 4,000 new military personnel, families and civilian workers to the base over the next 20 years, bringing the total base population to nearly 12,000 people, Oakley said.

The Air Force projected in its B-21 Economic Impact Statement that development of the new bomber program at Ellsworth will create nearly 600 local jobs and almost $24 million in local economic impact. Once the bombers arrive, some state officials estimate the program will create an annual benefit of $480 million to the state.

Advertisement

As on-base preparations take off, signs of growth are visible throughout Box Elder, which for years has had strong population growth but not significant retail or commercial development. New houses and apartments are being rapidly constructed, and the town of 12,000 a few miles east of Rapid City has several new businesses already built or in progress, including a McDonald’s, a Starbucks, a Pizza Hut, new bank branches and at least two major gas station/convenience stores.

During a November luncheon hosted by the Black Hills Forum and Press Club, Oakley spoke of the importance of making sure base personnel are well cared for as they take on extended duties due to the B-21 preparations and eventual arrival.

Oakley stressed the importance of ensuring that existing airmen and airwomen, as well as the new arrivals, are not overworked or face hardships outside their work lives.

“It’s a lot to put on their backs for airmen right now,” Oakley told News Watch in an interview. “Our biggest challenge is keeping them engaged and not overworking them. We talk about mental health and taking care of our airmen on and off the base, making sure they have the right time off and things like that.”

Advertisement

South Dakota officials, lawmakers oppose school money

Many of those new military personnel have young children, and Douglas schools will have an estimated enrollment increase of 1,500 in the next 15 years, said superintendent Kevin Case.

The district has already spent $6.2 million on planning for the new elementary school, he said. The federal government is expected to pay about $40 million of the $60 million total construction cost. The district has a limited tax base upon which to draw, and sought the state money to make the deal complete, Case said.

But Morgan Gruebele, a budget analyst with the state Bureau of Finance and Management, told senators it would be unfair to provide extra state money to Douglas schools when other districts across the state are not receiving it.

She also noted that the district currently carries no debt, has an existing capital fund of $2.4 million, accepted $10 million in COVID-era funding and received $24.8 million in “impact aid” that the federal government provided Douglas in 2023 to cover lost property tax revenues due to the base’s presence in the district.

“Douglas has many funding sources,” Gruebele said in opposing the spending measure. “If the state would decide to fund the Douglas school construction, there would be many other schools wondering why they didn’t receive state support for their projects.”

Advertisement

The Senate Education Committee passed the bill on a 5-2 vote, but the Joint Appropriations Committee rejected it in an 11-7 vote.

FAA funding dip a reason for state aid to airports

As of Feb. 28, the proposal to use state funding to expedite expansion of airports statewide still had life in the Legislature.

The Joint Appropriations Committee passed Senate Bill 144 on a 15-2 vote, but lowered the funding level to $1 prior to passage. Passing the bill with no meaningful funding allows for negotiations to continue by appropriators to find a funding level that will be acceptable to the full Legislature and Gov. Kristi Noem.

Initially, the measure would have provided $90 million over five years for airport projects that the state Aeronautics Commission deemed appropriate. The sponsor submitted an amendment cutting the spending to $30 million, but appropriators so far have not decided on a spending level.

Advertisement

Airport officials told lawmakers the state money is needed because funding from the Federal Aviation Administration has been stagnant and is not sufficient to make expensive improvements needed to accommodate passenger growth, especially in the Sioux Falls and Rapid City markets.

The Sioux Falls Airport Authority in 2022 approved a $170 million, two-phase plan to add eight new gates to the airport as well as other improvements, including a concourse expansion. State money is needed to help pay for those improvements, Sioux Falls Regional Airport executive director Dan Letellier told lawmakers.

$220M plan includes more California flights

The Rapid City Regional Airport in late 2023 embarked on a three-phase expansion effort estimated to cost $220 million over the next few years, according to Megan Johnson, spokeswoman for the airport.

The first phase, now underway, would redo the aging baggage handling and Transportation Security Administration checkpoint areas at a cost of $83 million, Johnson said. Future projects would add five new gates and upgrades to the rental and baggage claim areas, she said.

Johnson told News Watch that the airport expansion is driven by steadily rising passenger counts in recent years but also due to the expectation that departures and arrivals will need to increase to accommodate growth from the B-21 program.

Advertisement

“We certainly expect an influx of travelers, families and support personnel due to the base,” she said. “I would say that the state funding is critical if you want to expand the airports because federal funding doesn’t cover every part of every project.”

Airport officials expect to see increased arrivals, especially from Southern California, where the B-21 planes are built. The airport recently announced the launch of a new Allegiant Airlines direct flight between Rapid City and Los Angeles that will start in June.

“When we speak to airlines, we have to provide a case for service to new cities,” Johnson said. “When we speak with airlines, we tell them, ‘Hey, we have Ellsworth Air Force Base and they’re bringing in these new jets.’”



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

South Dakota’s most romantic restaurants for a memorable date night

Published

on

South Dakota’s most romantic restaurants for a memorable date night



Where to take your Valentine? Here are a few restaurants in South Dakota with ambiance made for first kisses and memorable nights.

It should feel like the entire restaurant was made for two.

Advertisement

Some of the most romantic restaurants in South Dakota have barely lit corners for kisses, velvet couches to snuggle into and a good wine list to make your Valentine swoon.

Here’s a look at some memorable, fairy tale dinners. Note: Don’t look at the prices when you make this reservation; the impassioned ambiance is worth the cost for this one.

Minerva’s Restaurant

Cozy booths, sparkly chandeliers and friendly maître d’s make up this historical corner of downtown Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Minerva’s has been open since 1977, but the establishment has been well-known since 1917, when it was first a confectionery and then a creperie. The nostalgia holds strong with a sprawling salad bar today, Santee bison steaks and a decadent chocolate soufflé for two.

Details: 301 S. Phillips Ave., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-334-0386. Hours are 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Monday through Saturday, 4:30 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 4:30 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit minervas.net.

Advertisement

Parker’s Bistro

Another historic building giving remarkable charm in Sioux Falls, Parker’s Bistro has exposed brick walls like a hug around white linen tabletops, glimmering candles and fresh flowers. (Tip: There’s a flower shop nearby. Stop there first.) It’s very intimate in there, with corner nooks on one side and an upscale bar next door with velvet couches near the windowfront. All of it hints at the first kiss.

Details: 210 S. Main Ave., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-250-1322. Hours are 4:30 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 4:30 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit parkersbistro.net.

R Wine Bar

Italiano is spelled a-m-o-r-e.

Advertisement

Owners Riccardo and Marybeth Tarabelsi brought a romantic nighttime-in-Florence experience to downtown Sioux Falls with four upscale establishments, including R Wine Bar, Maribella Ristorante, Brix Wine Bar and Trio Jazz Club. If you really want to impress your date, squeeze it all into one date night, progressive dinner style.

R Wine Bar was first to open, introducing a large wine menu featuring Penfolds or Caymus from Napa Valley and an Antinori Tignanello Chianti from Classico, Italy. Appetizers include mussels and ceviche; dinner includes pasta al limone, Champagne chicken or Gorgonzola steak and gnocchi.

There’s always jazz music in the corner.

Details: 322 E. Eighth St., Sioux Falls, S.D., 605-271-0814. Hours are 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 3 to 10 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. and 3 to 11 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit RWineBar.com.

Advertisement

Legend’s Steakhouse

A legendary dinner for a legendary date night. The Legends Steakhouse is on the upper floor of the Silverado Franklin Hotel in Deadwood, South Dakota, and is notorious for its guests like presidents Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. Babe Ruth enjoyed the hotel bar, too.

Deadwood has so much kitschy history to love.

At the Silverado, it’s raucous at the casino downstairs, but quiet in the restaurant upstairs with a private dinner vibe, soft music barely there and lobster or steak Oscar for dinner.

Details: 709 Main St., Deadwood, S.D., 605-578-3670. Hours are 7:30 to 11 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 5 to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 to 11 a.m. and 5 to 10 p.m. Friday and Saturday. Visit silveradofranklin.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

House committee squashes half-century tax break for SD data centers

Published

on

House committee squashes half-century tax break for SD data centers


PIERRE — Controversial data centers built in South Dakota won’t get a sales tax break—at least not yet.

The House State Affairs committee met Feb. 4 to weigh House Bill 1005, a bill which would have given owners and operators of qualifying data centers exemptions on the state’s sales and use tax for investments made in computer software and “enterprise information technology equipment”—a wide array of computer hardware, servers, power infrastructure, maintenance and security systems.

The exemption would apply to data centers that are issued a building permit between July 1 and June 30, 2036.

Data centers are physical facilities that house servers and networking equipment, which are typically used to store, manage, process and distribute large amounts of data.

Advertisement

Some of the common types of modern data centers include:

  • AI data centers, which are specifically designed to support artificial intelligence applications;
  • Colocation data centers, where third-parties manage the servers and components;
  • Cloud data centers, where major providers, like AMS, Microsoft and Google, host cloud-based data and applications; and
  • Enterprise data centers, which are often used for private uses by corporations.

Particularly large data centers are sometimes known as “hyperscalers.” These facilities can cost hundreds of millions to billions of dollars and require hundreds of acres of land to build, with construction at-times occurring in multi-year phases.

The legislation would have required businesses to submit documentation to the secretary of the state Department of Revenue, who would determine if the data center’s eligibility for the tax exemption.

A data center would have been able to receive the break if it could prove the facility’s electrical demands were under a written agreement or rate schedule that avoids shifting electrical costs to other consumers; and notice was given to local water providers that the site’s water consumption was “compatible for the location,” per the bill’s language. Data center owners would have also had to file an annual affidavit that discloses whether the business continues to meet the eligibility criteria.

However, those documents would have been considered confidential under the proposed legislation.

Advertisement

The bill was rejected by the committee, with nine members voting for and three against the legislation. Sioux Falls Republican Bethany Soye was excused from the vote.

Supporters of the legislation told committee members the sales tax break was essential to give data center investors and developers enough incentive to build in the Mount Rushmore state.

State Rep. Kent Roe, R-Hayti, who drafted the legislation, urged the committee to green-light the tax break on the premise that the state would reap a bounty of benefits—from “immense” property tax revenue and the creation of new high-quality jobs, to diversifying the state’s economic makeup.

Roe said other states have already legislated or otherwise implemented sales tax exclusions, and South Dakota needs a similar policy to remain competitive.

Advertisement

“We tax this technology higher than most,” Roe said. “That’s the truth. President Trump has stressed America’s need to lead. Our senators and congressmen highlight AI’s role in health care and national security. This is a national concern.”

Data center lobby uses well-worn revenue pitch

Steve DelBianco, president of NetChoice, a D.C. e-commerce trade group, threw out big numbers to buoy the benefits argument. Over the next 10 years, he projected $333 milllion of new property tax revenue to South Dakota from data centers alone.

For Jay Grabow, chair of the Deuel County Commission, the existential crisis his area faces is real. In 1920, per historical U.S. Census publications, Deuel County once called 8,759 people local inhabitants. Fast-forward to 2024, the county’s population has more-than-halved to 4,335, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Some of that Grabow attributes to the farming industry becoming more efficient over time—driving people per acre down—and the loss of at least one 200-employee business.

Advertisement

That means increased taxes over a smaller taxable population, Grabow said. And it also means Dallas-based Applied Digital, which is proposing a 430 megawatt AI data center east of Toronto, South Dakota, is, in the commissioner’s eyes, a means to lowering property taxes.

“We’re merely trying to keep what we had, merely trying to figure out a better way to do property taxes than to burden it on the people,” Grabow said. “If we can spread that across a $400 million billing, we have $1.1 billion of assets today. That’s a nearly-40% increase on our assets that we can spread those taxes across. That’s a 10 to 15% property tax [cut] across the board for those people.”

The economic windfall arguments resembled the debate over carbon pipelines over the last several years, when pipeline companies and some analysts projected an Iowa company’s transmission line could generate billions in the state and lower local taxes, as seen in previous Argus Leader reporting.

DelBianco said businesses and governments have increased their use of the cloud in recent years. The tech industry is tasked with building 50 data centers a year to keep up with U.S. demand, he added.

But the supply can’t be met if South Dakota doesn’t give developers and businesses a big-enough carrot to offset the significant capital investments they would make, DelBianco said.

Advertisement

Nick Phillips, executive vice-president for external affairs of Digital Applied, said South Dakota has been “unintentionally tax[ing] itself out of this market” under the current tax policy.

“The siting decision is binary,” Phillips said. “A project is built here or it is built somewhere else … Other states are capturing the investment, the jobs, and the long-term tax base.”

“The truth is that it’s just fiscally irresponsible to spend a billion dollars on a data center and have the equipment [that] goes in there, be subject to sales tax, when a billion dollar manufacturing, agricultural, another facility doesn’t pay sales tax on its equipment,” DelBianco added . “There are 40 states that exempt the equipment, so we have to pick the states that welcome through that policy.”

Data center opposition says tech threatens South Dakota’s largest industry

But opponents viewed the Big Tech push as an infringement upon South Dakota’s already No. 1 industry: agriculture.

Michelle Oftedahl, a Toronto, South Dakota, farm owner who lives a few miles away from Applied Digital’s proposed data center, spoke to the “unintended consequences” of boosting data centers. Farmland often out-prices what young farmers can afford to break into the ag industry, Oftedahl said, but it’s not too much for corporations with billions of dollars to spare.

Advertisement

Incentivizing data centers, the fifth-generation farmer added, would give rise to companies “buy[ing] land up cheap, knowing that they can cash in on possible future expansion projects, such as power plants, substations, and transmission lines, things that are needed to support the high amount of energy production required.”

“Encouraging large-scale economic development like data centers risks discouraging many young people from choosing agriculture for their future,” Oftedahl said. “This isn’t simply a vote about a sales tax exemption. It’s a statement about our values. Is South Dakota still first and foremost an ag state, or is large industrial economic [sic] now more important?”

Sara Steever, a retired Lennox resident who formerly led Sioux Falls agri-marketing agency Paulsen, questioned whether companies “worth billions and trillions of dollars” needed the tax breaks.

“Turns out that the fact that we can provide access to the megawatts of energy that is needed is tremendously valu[able],” Steever said as a remote testifier. “These companies don’t need tax breaks. They need connectivity, which we already have.”

Dakota Rural Action Lobbyist Melissa McCauley said the bill would lead to a “huge miss on revenue” for the state, given what she perceived as the broad nature of the proposed exemption.

Advertisement

“We are concerned that nearly everything needed to outfit the data center down to its door locks, security cameras, and even the cost of laying the fiber to the center would be exempt,” McCauley said. She asked openly whether a fiscal note should be added to the bill.

Tax break eligibility would not be public record under Roe bill

The stipulation that a data center’s eligibility documents would not be public record rankled opponents—some lawmakers, too.

Austin Adee, a Deuel County resident, said that section of the bill would create an “NDA-shielded secret court.” House Speaker Jon Hansen, who is running for South Dakota governor in 2026, raked the measure over this.

“This particular measure lacks transparency,” said House Speaker Jon Hansen. “The information goes to the secretary of the Department of Revenue, who can unilaterally decide without real qualification whether or not there’s going to be a tax break or not, whether or not rates are going to pass on, whether rate increases are going to pass on to consumers, and the people aren’t entitled to see any of the documentation that supports that decision. I think that’s wrong.”

The bill split the few Democrats on the committee, with Rosebud State Rep. Eric Emery supporting the legislation and House Minority Leader Erin Healy, of Sioux Falls, against it.

Advertisement

Emery asked Roe if the initiative behind the data center push included any guarantees that they would bring the promised jobs and wage-growth, to which Roe responded, “there’s no guarantees.”

Roe expounded upon this later, though, by pointing to the property tax revenue Applied Digital would likely bring to Deuel County—”north of $5 million” per annum, the Hayti lawmaker said, which is close to half of the county’s total budget.

At one point, Emery made a motion to send HB 1005 to the floor without a recommendation from the committee. Assistant Majority Leader of the House Marty Overweg spurned the idea, calling it “bad committee policy.” The motion died on a 5–7 vote.

Healy noted the day’s hearing lacked testimony from Sioux Falls stakeholders, despite a surge of public input in the city.

“I do believe that there is potential economic impact for data centers, but I also believe that economic development should never move faster than public input and transparency and also accountability,” Healy said.

Advertisement

House members will likely have to take up the debate once more during the 101st Legislative Session, as State Sen. Casey Crabtree, a Madison Republican who works for an area energy provider, filed a similar bill in the hours after the committee’s Feb. 4 decision.

The new legislation, a self-titled “Data Center Bill of Rights for Citizens”—akin to Crabtree’s 2024 “Landowner Bill of Rights,” which offered concessions to carbon pipeline opponents in order to ease pipeline development in South Dakota—also intends to exempt data centers from paying a sales and use tax for purchases made in developing a site, while also clarifying regulatory authority and preventing electric rate shifts onto consumers.

Crabtree’s bill does not provide an end-date on the sales and use tax exemption.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Sophomores lead Tea Area boys basketball to gritty win over O’Gorman

Published

on

Sophomores lead Tea Area boys basketball to gritty win over O’Gorman


play

Things didn’t look great coming out of halftime for the Tea Area boys basketball team, and O’Gorman made a point to shut off the Titans’ star juniors, Gavin Shawd and Grifin Wiebenga.

Sophomores Mitch Grant and Blake Lundin stepped up to the plate, helping author a 15-8 third that put Tea Area in front for good in a 65-61 win over O’Gorman on the Knights’ home floor.

Advertisement

“At the defensive end, we really just locked in and collapsed the paint and they didn’t really know what to do,” Lundin said.

Not only did the defense shut down the Knights, but Grant scored eight big points with a pair of threes and Lundin had a bucket and commanded lots of attention in the paint.

“I just think we started working as a team really well,” Grant said. “Griff and Gavin started to get in rhythm. I hit a couple big shots. We just play so well together when we get in stride, and when we get in stride it’s hard to stop.”

Tea Area closed out the game without forfeiting the lead, building it to as big as 52-41 early in the fourth. The Titans then had to grind their way to the finish, just like they did the entire first half.

Advertisement

“We talk a lot about taking punches,” Tea Area head coach Drew Weber said. “We don’t play very deep. When you play five or six guys most of the game, it’s hard to play good basketball for 32 minutes. We knew that O’Gorman can play really well and they did in that first quarter. We couldn’t guard worth a hoot in the first quarter, and we took a punch there.”

This young Titans team has learned how to take a punch, though, and dished one back when things mattered most on their 14-0 run between the end of the third and beginning of the fourth.

“That’s kind of been our MO in a lot of these games,” Weber said. “You take some punches here and there, then you throw one back with a 10-0 run, a 12-2 run, something like that.”

Tea Area is now 10-3 and in the midst of its best start since opening 12-3 in the 2022-23 season. It’s been led by two juniors — Shawd and Wiebenga — and the two sophomores, and those guys have used defeat as fuel for improvement.

The last two losses were an 82-55 defeat to Sioux Falls Roosevelt on Jan. 16, and a 62-60 loss to unbeaten Sioux Falls Lincoln on Jan. 31.

Advertisement

“The Roosevelt game hurt, and I feel like the score doesn’t do it justice,” Grant said. “That put a big dagger in us. That Lincoln game, it just hurt us more which helped us this game with energy and stuff.”

“That Lincoln game, that hurt,” Lundin said. “We probably played the best we’ve ever played and coming into this game, I think we knew they’re a top, competitive team. I think we all played together.”

Those losses have helped the Titans up their focus in practice, and the results of that focus have shown in their road win over Mitchell, close loss to Lincoln and road win over O’Gorman.

“Before the Lincoln game, we knew we really had to try at practice,” Grant said. “Practice just got better. Even our scout team started to step up and give us better looks. There’s days where the scout team is playing 10 times better than us. They’re key to our success.”

This Tea Area team thrives on its tough mentality and youthfulness. The Titans have showed that time and time again this season, and are anticipating more chances to prove their mettle with games left against Sioux Falls Jefferson, Sioux City East, Harrisburg, Brandon Valley, Sioux Falls Washington and Marshall.

Advertisement

“I’ve got a tough group of kids, that’s for sure,” Weber said. “Mental toughness in that game really showed.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending