Connect with us

Oregon

$5 Christmas tree permits for Oregon’s national forests on sale now

Published

on

 Christmas tree permits for Oregon’s national forests on sale now


The holiday season is right around the corner, which means the hunt for the perfect Christmas tree is on.

For those looking to bring home a real tree at an unbeatable price, $5 permits are now available for all Oregon national forests.

Christmas tree permits are available for purchase online at recreation.gov. On the website, just search for the name of the national forest, like Willamette National Forest, and “Christmas tree permit.”

Permits are $5 each (with an added $2.50 processing fee charged by the website). Each permit allows the cutting of one Christmas tree. Households can purchase a maximum of five permits.

Advertisement

Some local businesses and some but not all U.S. Forest Service offices will also sell the permits in person.

Where should you go to get a Christmas from a national forest in Oregon?

The closest national forests depend on your location. For Salem or Eugene, you could head east to Willamette National Forest or west to Siuslaw National Forest. If you’re coming from Portland, the closest option is probably Mount Hood National Forest.

There are Christmas tree hunting maps open to download when you get a permit on Recreation.gov.

Advertisement

Things to know during your Christmas tree hunt

Here are some things to remember for a successful Christmas tree hunt.

Remember the rules: Each national forest has specific guidelines on which trees can be cut down and taken, so be sure to check out the forest’s rules online before cutting your tree.

In general:

  • Do not cut on private land, wilderness areas, research natural areas, scenic areas, or areas with rare, threatened or endangered plants.
  • Do not cut trees within 300 feet of campgrounds or administrative sites. 
  • Do not cut trees within 50 feet of trails and paved roads. 
  • Do not cut trees within 200 feet of highways.
  • Do not cut trees within 100 feet of streams or lakes.

Know the size of the tree you can cut: Each forest has limitations on the size of the tree you can cut and the species of trees that are permitted.

In general:

  • Tree height: 15 feet maximum
  • Stump height: 6 inches maximum
  • Take the whole tree. Do not remove the top of the tree; cut down the entire tree
  • If snow is on the ground, remove it from around the stump so you can accurately measure the stump and tree height.
  • Do not cut the following tree species: whitebark pine, Pacific yew, western white pine.

Prepare for the weather: Be sure to dress appropriately as you’ll be hunting in the forest. Snow and ice conditions can also make traveling on the forest roads very dangerous. Make sure your vehicle is equipped to handle road conditions.

Know what tree you want: Noble, Pacific silver, Douglas and grand firs are typically the varieties you’re allowed to harvest and are best for a tree, so you want to be able to identify the trees. Many of the most sought-after firs only grow above 3,500 feet in Oregon.

Advertisement

Sno-park permits: If you’re headed to the higher mountains and snow, you’ll need a permit if you park at a sno-park, which are plowed and feature marked routes out into the forest.

When you get home

After you find your perfect tree, keep your tree fresh and safe with these reminders.

Cut and water your tree: Once you get your tree home, cut half an inch off the stump to help with water uptake, and make sure to water your tree daily. Well-watered trees keep their scent longer.

Get the right tree stand: Use a sturdy tree stand that holds at least 1 gallon of water. Make sure you refill the container daily, as an average tree may consume 1 to 4 quarts of water daily.

Advertisement

Place your tree away from heat sources: Do not place your Christmas tree within 3 feet of any heat source, like a radiator. Live tree fires outnumber artificial tree fires by 3-1.

Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 18 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. He can be reached at zurness@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6801. Find him on X at @ZachsORoutdoors and BlueSky at oregonoutdoors.bsky.social



Source link

Oregon

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over $114K

Published

on

Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over 4K


PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A former Oregon corrections officer received a lifetime hunting ban on Wednesday after pleading guilty to several poaching-related charges.

Christopher Mason, 49, of Umatilla, was sentenced in two separate court cases to 24 months of probation and 300 hours of community service. He was also fined over $114,000 and was required to forfeit his firearms.

Multiple big game hunting items were seized from Christopher Mason’s possession (OSP)

Oregon State Police said they began investigating Mason in 2024 after receiving information that he had been poaching big game animals.

“In February 2025, OSP served a search warrant, and multiple big game animals and firearms were seized as evidence. Sixty-seven criminal charges were referred for prosecution,” officials said. “The charges spanned multiple counties.”

Advertisement

Mason pleaded guilty to four counts of unlawful take of buck deer and three counts of unlawful take of black bear on June 18. In a separate case on June 26, he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, unlawful possession of a silencer, unlawful possession of multiple wildlife and unlawful take of mule deer.

“This is another example of serial poaching which rises to the level of felony conduct based solely on the repeated poaching conduct and impact of one individual on Oregon’s game mammals,” prosecutor Jay Hall said. “The conduct across the several counties amounts to one of the highest damage amounts done to Oregon wildlife by any singular actor.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4

Published

on

Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4


With national firefighting resources already stretched to their limits, statewide fire restrictions remain in effect for all Bureau of Land Management public lands throughout Washington and Oregon, with some local regions also implementing additional emergency closures.

As the Independence Day holiday weekend approaches, officials warned that people responsible for starting wildfires could face up to $100,000 in fines, 12 months in prison, and liability for all firefighting suppression costs.

SEE ALSO | Washington braces for earlier wildfire season due to low snowpack: ‘Worse than normal’

“There are serious consequences for starting a wildfire, including fines and possibly imprisonment, which we hope everyone can avoid through careful choices,” said Josh O’Connor, Northwest Geographic Area Fire Chief for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service. “We have already experienced excruciating loss this season. I cannot stress the gravity of the situation enough. Please help protect our firefighters and communities.”

Advertisement

Officials urged visitors to research their destinations in advance, noting that local restrictions can determine when power tools may be used, what kinds of stoves or campfires are allowed, and what safety equipment is required.

The BLM said the following items remain strictly prohibited on all BLM lands in Oregon and Washington: fireworks and sky lanterns; exploding or metallic targets; tracer or incendiary devices; and steel component ammunition, including core or jacket.

“Lighting a firework or leaving a smoldering campfire creates significant wildland fire risk. Under the right conditions, they easily start wildfires,” said Kim Prill, BLM Oregon/Washington acting state director. “Don’t risk it. Let’s work together to prevent every wildfire possible.”

More information on seasonal fire restrictions and fire closures is available HERE.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon

Published

on

What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon


The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.

The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.

Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.

The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.

Advertisement

“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.

While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.

“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.

SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots

Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.

Advertisement

Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.

“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.

According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.

“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.

She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”

Advertisement

Oregon leaders respond

House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.

The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.

In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”

“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.

KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.

Advertisement

The governor’s office had not responded by publication.

Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.

“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.

She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending