Connect with us

Ohio

Proposed Ohio bill would charge teachers, librarians with felonies for 'pandering obscenity' • Ohio Capital Journal

Published

on

Proposed Ohio bill would charge teachers, librarians with felonies for 'pandering obscenity' • Ohio Capital Journal


A Republican-led bill just introduced in the Ohio House would charge teachers and librarians with a felony offense for distributing material deemed “obscene.”

The problem is, the bill does not explain what materials would be considered obscene, despite laying a fifth-degree felony on the feet of teachers and “public school librarians” who may possess or share such material.

Ohio state Rep. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon. (Official photo from the Ohio House website.)

State Rep. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon, put forth House Bill 556 last week, a bill that would “create criminal liability for certain teachers and librarians for the offense of pandering obscenity,” according to the language of the bill.

Librarian, in this sense, is defined as “a librarian employed by a school district, other public school … or chartered nonpublic school and a librarian employed in a school district public library.”

Advertisement

Teachers and school district librarians would be barred from creating, reproducing, publishing, promoting or advertising “obscene material.” They are also prohibited from creating, directing or producing “an obscene performance,” the bill states.

But what falls under “obscenity” is not clear from the initial language of HB 556, which has yet to receive committee consideration in the House. The word “obscenity” only appears three times in the six-page bill: in the title of the proposed legislation and twice referring to the title of the criminal offense.

“Obscene” shows up eight times in the bill, but only accompanying “material,” “performance,” “articles” and in a clause about giving notice about “the character of the material or a performance.”

HB 556 aims to amend existing statutes in the Ohio Revised Code, and pulls exact language from those statutes — for pandering obscenity and one explaining legal “presumptions in obscenity cases” — but neither of those statutes lay out what is considered obscenity either.

It’s that lack of clarity that is giving teachers and library groups hesitation on the bill.

Advertisement

The Ohio Education Association said it is still reviewing HB 556, and Ohio Federation of Teachers president Melissa Cropper said the group has not taken a position on the bill, but she is “concerned with the vagueness of the bill and the ability for it to be weaponized by bad faith actors who are focused on attacking public schools and libraries, not on protecting children.”

“We also question whether there is need for this new bill or if existing laws can address the concerns behind HB 556,” Cropper said in a statement. “We plan to discuss this bill and these concerns with legislators and with our members.”

Questions beyond the motivations of the bill are still coming up as well, including whether or not “school district public libraries” can include the libraries of a community that are also classified as school district libraries.

The Ohio Library Council’s executive director, Michelle Francis, said the group does “have concerns with the legislation.”

“We reached out to the sponsor and we look forward to meeting with him soon,” Francis told the Capital Journal.

Advertisement

The bill includes an “affirmative defense,” meaning if the person accused of pandering obscenity can prove the material or performance was “for a bona fide medical, scientific, religious, governmental, judicial or other proper purpose,” they can use that as a defense against the charge. The word “educational” was struck from the language in the proposal as reasoning for an affirmative defense.

As part of the affirmative defense, the material must also have been given by or to a “physician, psychologist, sociologist, scientist, health or biology teacher, faculty member, person pursuing bona fide studies or research, librarian other than a school librarian, member of the clergy, prosecutor, judge or other person having a proper interest in the material or performance.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ohio

Ohio speaker loses control of campaign spending authority in latest GOP drama – Washington Examiner

Published

on

Ohio speaker loses control of campaign spending authority in latest GOP drama – Washington Examiner


A judge ruled Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens does not have authority over the GOP caucus’s campaign fund, handing a win to the speaker’s colleague and rival, state Rep. Derek Merrin.

Last October, Merrin filed a lawsuit against his Republican colleague in a bid to control $1 million in campaign funds. The campaign fund, called the Ohio House Republican Alliance, supports campaigns for state Republican lawmakers. In his lawsuit, Merrin alleged a closed-door vote by the majority of the House GOP caucus made him the chairman of the alliance last year. Consequently, Merrin said he should be in charge of the campaign funds. 

Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Mark Serrott agreed. Serrott said in his ruling on Friday that Merrin holds the majority of support from his caucus and consequently should control the campaign’s checkbook. 

Ohio House Speaker Jason Stephens speaks to members of the media. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

“The speaker does not have a majority of the caucus,” Serrott said. “The speaker is never going to call a meeting [of the caucus]. Why would he? He doesn’t have a majority vote. … We’re at a stalemate. The court has to do something or it will never get resolved. … That’s untenable.”

Advertisement

Stephens said that as a speaker, he maintains control of the alliance fund and vowed to appeal the decision “swiftly.” 

“It is imperative for the integrity of the institution of the Ohio House of Representatives that control of the campaign committee not be able to be leveraged against the highest elected official in the House on a whim,” Stephens said in a statement. “The decision potentially sets a concerning precedent that any member at any time can call a vote that undermines the control of the campaign funds.”

Legal experts told the Associated Press that Ohio law does not necessarily require the speaker and caucus leader to be the same person. 

Stephens and Merrin have been at odds ever since battling each other to be speaker in the state House. In January 2023, Merrin lost the fight, while Stephens received more votes from Democrats than Republicans to clinch the victory. After his loss, Merrin urged his Republican colleagues in the House to weaken the speaker’s power by changing House rules. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Advertisement

Merrin isn’t the only lawmaker Stephens is sparring with. Last fall, the speaker rejected efforts from fellow GOP lawmakers to strip the court’s power to protect the voter-passed measure to enshrine abortion access into the Ohio Constitution.

More drama went down with Ohio Republicans last September. State Republican Rep. Bob Young wrote a letter to Stephens saying he would step down after being arrested twice in a domestic violence case. His announcement came after Gov. Mike DeWine (R-OH), Stephens, and more than 30 Ohio House GOP members joined Democrats in calling for his resignation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Why Justin Haire left Campbell to be Ohio State baseball coach: OSU ready to ‘turn the corner’

Published

on

Why Justin Haire left Campbell to be Ohio State baseball coach: OSU ready to ‘turn the corner’


Two years ago, Justin Haire was not considering leaving Campbell University to take over the Ohio State baseball program. 

When former Ohio State baseball coach Greg Beals was fired after the 2022 season, Haire was leading the Fighting Camels to a Big South Championship and into an NCAA regional. He never reached out to Ohio State. Ohio State never reached out to him. 

“It just didn’t line up,” Haire said. 

But two years later, when Haire began to hear rumblings that the Ohio State baseball job was opening up again, the Hamilton, Ohio native couldn’t pass up the opportunity. 

Advertisement

“I told my wife the night before, ‘Hey, this might be going down,’” Haire said. “‘If it is, I think it’s something I’m going to try to go all in on. I just feel like the timing’s right.’” 

One week after Bill Mosiello resigned to return to TCU as an assistant coach, Haire was announced as Ohio State’s 13th baseball coach in program history. 

Haire spent 10 seasons as Campbell’s baseball coach. The four-time Big South Coach of the Year led the Fighting Camels to 317 wins, five NCAA Regionals and seven NCAA Tournament wins. 

In the interview process, Haire said incoming Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork made it clear he wanted a baseball coach who is “excited about the program how it is, and has a vision of how we can grow it organically and sustainably.” 

Advertisement

But Haire said Bjork did not sugarcoat the baseball program’s standing compared to past programs the athletic director has been a part of. 

“A big piece of knowing who you are is knowing who you’re not,” Haire said. “Mr. Bjork’s been at Texas A&M and Ole Miss. He’s been in some of those SEC places. And he was just very honest, like, ‘Hey, we’re wanting to compete and be at that highest level. But the resources are not that. The NIL capability for baseball is not the same as it is at some of those SEC places.’ ”

Bjork is already beginning to make his mark on Ohio State athletics. 

While his tenure as athletic director officially begins July 1, Bjork has already been instrumental in the hiring of Jake Diebler to lead the Ohio State men’s basketball program, Miami University’s Kirin Kumar as the university’s new softball coach and Haire. And while Haire said that reality brings pressure, “it’s a good pressure.” 

“Of all the people that were interested in this job, that understand that Ohio State baseball is a sleeping giant and ready to, hopefully, turn the corner, (Bjork) gave me this opportunity,” Haire said. “And he believes in me and what will eventually be our staff, and the vision that we have. Because I think he has a vision for what he thinks it might look like too.” 

Advertisement

How Justin Haire introduced himself to Ohio State baseball

Haire said he held a Zoom meeting with 10-to-15 Ohio State baseball players Friday morning. And after the week the program had with an unexpected coaching change, he took a step back and started as simply as he could. 

“That’s really my first question is just like, ‘Hey man, how are you?’” Haire said. “‘Like how are you doing? How has the last week been for you? Where are you at mentally?’ Because it is a lot. And there’s a lot of people that have a lot of opinions about what these 18-to-22, 23-year-old kids should be doing, what staff members should be doing. And that’s uncomfortable.” 

Through those questions, through authentic opening conversations he said would continue into the weekend, Haire said he wanted to make sure the players he’s inheriting know they are wanted at Ohio State.

“It’s my job to assure them that I’m here for their benefit and the benefit of Buckeye baseball, and trying to make sure we marry the two and try to build some excitement back into what they are doing and why they’re here,” Haire said. 

In the past two seasons under Mosiello, Ohio State had a record of 60-51. But the Buckeyes won 21 of their 48 Big Ten games. 

Advertisement

The next step is where Haire comes in. His job, he said, is to put together the best possible product he can, to identify the right players for his program, to keep the best Ohio high school baseball players in state, and developing a program that is “an avenue for pro ball.” 

Haire wants Ohio State baseball to be a program people are proud of. And that process, he said, has already begun. 

“We’re tasked with trying to leave this place better than how we found it every single day,” Haire said. “And today’s day one of what I hope is a very long career here of trying to do that every single day.”

 cgay@dispatch.com 

@_ColinGay

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Judge blocks Ohio Speaker’s access to campaign money

Published

on

Judge blocks Ohio Speaker’s access to campaign money


View a previous report on the lawsuit within the Ohio Republican Party in the video player above.

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WMCH) — A Franklin County judge blocked Speaker of the Ohio House Jason Stephens’ (R-Kitts Hill) access to campaign money raised in the Ohio House Republican Alliance (OHRA) fund.

Reps. Phil Plummer (R-Dayton), Derek Merrin (R-Monclova), and Ron Ferguson (R-Wintersville) brought the lawsuit forward against the Republican speaker. 

The complaint cites the Ohio Revised Code, which states, “Each legislative campaign fund shall be administered and controlled in a manner designated by the caucus.”

Advertisement

The plaintiffs argue that Stephens was never elected to have control of the fund, though control of OHRA has historically been with the elected speaker. But a faction was created because the speaker was not elected by a majority of republican members.

On April 10, lawmakers held a meeting to vote on OHRA fund control and designate Plummer as chair.

In the decision, the judge writes that the April 10 meeting was scheduled for a date most members would be in Columbus, as it was the governor’s State of the State address, and the invitation was sent five days in advance.

“Speaker Stephens testified he did not receive the meeting invitation but confirmed it was sent to his correct email address five days prior to the meeting. Nonetheless, Speaker Stephens admitted he was aware of the meeting prior to it occurring and chose not to attend.”

This is the latest development in ongoing Republican infighting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending