An Ohio man who claimed that Donald J. Trump was legally answerable for his determination to interrupt into the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and make off with a bottle of bourbon and a coat rack was convicted on Thursday within the first trial related to the riot to characteristic a protection that blamed the previous president.

The defendant, Dustin Thompson, an unemployed exterminator from Columbus, primarily based his complete trial protection on the argument that he had merely been following orders from Mr. Trump final yr when he walked as much as the Capitol after the previous president’s speech, broke into the constructing with a pro-Trump mob and stole the objects from the Senate parliamentarian’s workplace.

When Mr. Thompson testified in his personal protection on Wednesday, he tried to color a sympathetic portrait of himself, telling the jury how he had fallen down a “rabbit gap” of election misinformation beginning after he misplaced his job through the pandemic in March 2020 and culminating in his presence in Washington for Mr. Trump’s speech close to the White Home on Jan. 6.

He testified that he believed that he had been answering the president’s name to go to the Capitol and “combat like hell” when he joined the throng that swarmed into the constructing.

“If the president’s supplying you with nearly an order to do one thing,” he instructed the jury, “I felt obligated to do this.”

However the jury in Federal District Court docket in Washington took lower than three hours to reject that declare and discover Mr. Thompson, 38, responsible of all six fees he was going through. Essentially the most severe cost within the indictment accused Mr. Thompson of obstructing Congress’s obligation to certify the ultimate outcomes of the election, a depend that carries a most penalty of 20 years in jail.

Inside minutes of the decision being learn, Choose Reggie B. Walton, who oversaw the trial, ordered Mr. Thompson — who had been out on bail for months — to stay in jail earlier than his sentence was issued.

The choose mentioned he was offended by Mr. Thompson’s makes an attempt in charge Mr. Trump for his personal actions, calling the protection “disingenuous” and saying that he felt that the defendant had been neither “truthful” nor “honest.”

Although jurors had been apparently not swayed by the declare that Mr. Trump had been answerable for Mr. Thompson’s actions, Choose Walton steered after the jury was dismissed that he believed the relentless flood of conspiracy theories and lies stoked by the previous president had helped give rise to the riot, and continued to pose a hazard.

“I feel our democracy is in hassle,” he mentioned, “as a result of sadly we have now charlatans like our former president who, in my opinion, doesn’t care about democracy however solely about energy.”

From the beginning, Mr. Thompson’s Trump-made-me-do-it protection was a little bit of a stretch. Comparable arguments had failed to achieve a lot traction with judges at a sequence of pretrial bail and sentencing hearings. Mr. Thompson’s lawyer, Samuel H. Shamansky, tried the gambit largely as a result of he didn’t have many different selections.

Mr. Thompson had, in spite of everything, been caught on video illegally coming into the Capitol and later posed for a selfie exterior the constructing standing beside the vintage wood coat rack. The federal government additionally had a duplicate of a video he took of himself, hooting and hollering contained in the looted parliamentarian’s workplace.

Mr. Shamansky’s technique boiled all the way down to the query of Mr. Thompson’s way of thinking on Jan. 6. He stipulated upfront to just about each ingredient of the costs that his shopper was going through and sought to argue to the jury that Mr. Thompson had not knowingly or corruptly damaged the legislation, however fairly had been “so influenced — so used and abused” by Mr. Trump that he couldn’t be held accountable for his conduct.

However underneath cross-examination, Mr. Thompson was tripped up by a prosecutor, William Dreher, who obtained him to confess that he had identified it was illegal for him to be contained in the Capitol. Mr. Dreher additionally obtained Mr. Thompson to acknowledge that though Mr. Trump could have inspired him — and hundreds of others — to go to the Capitol, the previous president had not been at his facet, providing directions, when he broke into the Capitol and stole authorities property.

Throughout his closing argument on Thursday, Mr. Dreher known as the makes an attempt to maneuver the main target away from Mr. Thompson and onto Mr. Trump a “sideshow.” Mr. Dreher instructed the jurors that even when they didn’t like Mr. Trump — and even when they believed that he had inspired the gang to riot — they may nonetheless reject Mr. Shamansky’s arguments and discover Mr. Thompson responsible.

“He desires you to suppose you need to select between President Trump and his shopper,” Mr. Dreher mentioned. “You don’t have to decide on, as a result of this isn’t President Trump’s prison trial.”

The Justice Division has thus far gained all three of its jury trials related to the Capitol assault. In early March, Man Wesley Reffitt, a member of a Texas militia, was convicted of main a decisive advance towards the police exterior the constructing whereas carrying a pistol on his hip.

On Monday, a jury discovered a former Virginia police officer, Thomas Robertson, responsible of six counts, together with the obstruction of the official electoral depend by Congress.