Connect with us

North Dakota

Summit Carbon Solutions asks North Dakota to reconsider pipeline route denial, seeks new path around Bismarck

Published

on

Summit Carbon Solutions asks North Dakota to reconsider pipeline route denial, seeks new path around Bismarck


BISMARCK, N.D. — After having its carbon pipeline route permit rejected by North Dakota regulators, Summit Carbon Solutions is asking them to reconsider.

Included in Summit’s

Petition for Reconsideration

is an alternate route around Bismarck, farther east and north of the city.

Advertisement

Summit Carbon Solutions outlined a new alternative route around Bismarck with the North Dakota Public Service Commission.

The

Public Service Commission on Aug. 4 denied Summit’s application

Advertisement

for a route through the state, the last leg of a 2,000 mile, five-state pipeline project to capture greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol plants.

The PSC had asked for an analysis of a route south of Bismarck to get an underground storage site west of Bismarck.

In its petition, Summit is asking the PSC for a one-day rehearing “for the limited purpose of presenting witness testimony in support of this petition.”

In a news release, Summit say its petition also addresses these issues:

  •  Avoidance areas: Summit has rerouted or planned drills to avoid areas of concern, including game management areas and areas that may present a geological risk, such as a landslide.
  • Cultural resource surveys: Summit is working with the State Historic Preservation Office to document the results of cultural surveys and is confident no historic or archeological sites will be affected by the project. Summit says it has completed cultural surveys on approximately 90% of the pipeline route. 

Summit says the project will benefit the ethanol plants and corn growers, but some landowners have been resistant to provide a voluntary easement for the project.
Summit says nearly 80% of the right-of-way for the pipeline route has been secured through voluntary easements from landowners, including parts of the new pipeline route.

Advertisement

LeeBlank.jpg

Lee Blank, CEO of Summit Carbon Solutions

Courtesy of Summit Carbon Solutions

“Addressing the concerns of the ND PSC is a top priority for us, and we’ve worked diligently to revise our application accordingly,” Summit Carbon Solutions CEO Lee Blank said in a news release. “Our aim is to work collaboratively, listen to everyone’s input, and align our project with the long-term vision that North Dakota has for its energy and agricultural sectors. We are confident that our efforts will contribute positively to North Dakota’s future, and we’re excited to be part of this journey.”

Summit’s pipeline would connect ethanol plants in five states — Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota and one in North Dakota, the Tharaldson Ethanol plant at Casselton.

Advertisement

A Tharaldson Ethanol sign stands in front of the company ethanol manufacturing plant west of Casselton, N.D.

The Tharaldson Ethanol plant at Casselton, North Dakota, was built in 2008.

Mikkel Pates / Agweek file photo

Summit will begin a permit hearing in Iowa on Aug. 22, and in South Dakota later this year. It has begun the permit process on part of its route in Minnesota. There is no state agency with permitting authority in Nebraska.

An opposition group in Minnesota, CURE (Clean Up the River Environment) has

formally petitioned

Advertisement

the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to halt its review of the Summit CO2 pipeline in Otter Tail and Wilkin counties. That section would connect the Green Plains ethanol plant at Fergus Falls to a branch of the pipeline in North Dakota.

“North Dakota’s denial sends a clear message to the other states’ regulators reviewing this project — it is not ready for prime time and poses significant threats to the environment and human health that cannot be mitigated,” Sarah Mooradian, CURE’s government relations and policy director, said in a news release. “Continuing the permitting process here in Minnesota for Summit’s half-baked plan would be illogical and irresponsible.”

A map of the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline route

Reach Agweek reporter Jeff Beach at jbeach@agweek.com or call 701-451-5651.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Port: Make families great again

Published

on

Port: Make families great again


MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.

It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.

The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.

North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.

Advertisement

How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,

House Bill 1491

would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.

Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.

State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed

Advertisement

a $66 million child care package

focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.

Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?

The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.

According to data from the state Department of Health,

Advertisement

the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.

Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.

This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.

When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.

These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN

Published

on

North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN


LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.

Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.

The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.

North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.

Advertisement

——

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes' support

Published

on

National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes' support


BISMARCK, N.D. — A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.

The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.

“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”

The National Park Service oversees national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.

Advertisement

Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump ‘s incoming administration.

If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.

Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.

This undated image provided by Jim Fuglie shows Bullion Butte in western North Dakota. Credit: AP/Jim Fuglie

The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.

Advertisement

If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.

North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service, including national monuments. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”

North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending