Connect with us

North Dakota

​Sarah Vogel Investigates Bill Gates’ North Dakota Land Purchase

Published

on

​Sarah Vogel Investigates Bill Gates’ North Dakota Land Purchase


Information | August seventeenth, 2022

By Laura Simmons

laurasimmons2025@u.northwestern.edu

The previous North Dakota Commissioner of Agriculturehas nonetheless not obtained the Purple River Belief documentation she requested in late June.

Advertisement

Sarah Vogelsaid she will’t decide if Gates’buy of North Dakota land by means of the Purple River Trustis authorized below the Anti-Company Farming Lawwithout seeing correct documentation. This comes a couple of month after North Dakota Legal professional Normal Drew Wrigley, on Information & Views with Joel Heitkamp,mentioned Vogel was “uninformed” and claimed the documentation was both in his workplace or on the way in which.

“My ire is directed on the Legal professional Normal and his workplace as a result of it is their job to implement the Anti-Company Farming Legislation and I am actually not seeing any diligence or eagerness to implement it,” Vogel mentioned.

Vogel mentioned she grew to become curious after studying Mikkel Pates’Agweek articles investigating the Purple River Belief and Gates’ buy of land.

If Gates will not be the only beneficiary of the Belief, then the sale may probably violate North Dakota’s Anti-Company Farming Legislation, Vogel mentioned.

Gates would have been in a position to personal land with out going by means of a belief. Vogel mentioned North Dakota legislation permits an especially rich individual to purchase land and personal it in their very own title. North Dakota legislation additionally permits the land to be held within the title of a trustee who would handle it on behalf of a belief beneficiary who’s allowed to personal farmland in North Dakota, Vogel mentioned.

Advertisement

An legal professional for the Purple River Belief claims the belief’s sole beneficiary is Invoice Gates as a person, however Vogel says that assertion can’t be verified with out seeing and reviewing the belief doc.

Vogel mentioned Gates’ lawyer advised using a “certificates of belief,” below which the trustee, Peter Headley, would make varied sworn statements in regards to the belief and its phrases.

“I do not assume even an affidavit from Peter Headley is sufficient,” Vogel mentioned. “You’ve acquired to see the belief. What does the belief say?”

Vogel mentioned she has an issue with the hidden nature behind the Purple River Belief.

There are boundaries to taking additional motion, Vogel mentioned. For instance, with a view to do a non-public enforcement motion, the individual difficult the sale should be a resident of the county the land is in and in the event that they lose the case, they’d should pay the opposite aspect’s legal professional charges. On this scenario, they’d probably be paying the legal professional charges of one of many richest males on earth.

Advertisement

“So it is the Legal professional Normal or no person who’s going to implement the [Anti-Corporate Farming] Legislation,” Vogel mentioned.

The Anti-Company Farming Legislation was created in 1932 to maintain firms out of North Dakota by stopping them from proudly owning North Dakota farmland. This was to guard native, household farms.

Dakota Useful resource Council Govt Director Scott Skokos mentioned firms will be worse for the surroundings.

“As soon as company farms are available in, you’ve got degradation of panorama,” Skokos mentioned. “The land is considered extra like a useful resource to be extracted from reasonably than the panorama {that a} household’s gonna reside on for generations. So that you lose that stewardship as a result of it is extra about earnings and about appeasing their traders and shareholders.”

North Dakota Farmers Union President Mark Watne mentioned firms will be disruptive to native farmers. Watne mentioned firms would possibly make selections not within the curiosity of the area people with a view to decrease bills.

Advertisement

“[Corporations] generally compete at a stage that is not truthful with the individuals which might be residing on the land,” Watne mentioned. “And so they are inclined to convey a complete lot of capital to the scenario which permits them to be extraordinarily aggressive and it makes it much less possible that the subsequent generations of farmers and ranchers can come to the land.”

Skokos and Watne’s views are backed by College of North Dakota Professor Emeritus Curtis Stofferahn and present The Ohio State College Professor Linda Lobao’sresearch. They used a pool of 51 research to evaluate the detrimental results of industrialized farming of their paper “The neighborhood results of industrialized farming: Social science analysis and challenges to company farming legal guidelines.”

Their analysis discovered that 82% of circumstances had hostile results, together with increased earnings inequality, lack of native autonomy, higher affect of out of doors agribusiness and environmental issues impacting the air, water and human well being.

Nevertheless, the examine did present that 22% of research discovered proof of benign or useful results inside socioeconomic situations.

Stofferahn instructed the Excessive Plains Reader by means of e mail that this examine was utilized in 5 courtroom circumstances that challenged North Dakota’s Anti-Company Farming Legislation.

Advertisement

One case was the 2018 North Dakota Farm Bureau v. Stenehjem case the place the Farm Bureau challenged the constitutionality of the Anti-Company Farming Legislation. Then-North Dakota Legal professional Normal Wayne Stenehjem and the North Dakota Farmers Bureau each claimed victory.

North Dakota Farmers Bureau President Daryl Liessaid by proscribing the form of buildings allowed to have firms in North Dakota, the federal government is selecting winners and losers.

“We have had a longstanding coverage in opposition to the Anti-Company Farming Legislation in North Dakota,” Liessaid. “We predict that every one farmers ought to have the chance to do enterprise with who they want and make the most of any form of financial construction or enterprise construction that they want. An organization simply occurs to be considered one of them.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Plain Talk: 'I'm bringing people together'

Published

on

Plain Talk: 'I'm bringing people together'


MINOT — Sandi Sanford, chair of the North Dakota Republican Party, joined this episode of Plain Talk from the GOP’s national convention in Milwaukee, where, she said, “the security plan changed drastically” after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

Republicans have been focused on unity at this event — two of Trump’s top rivals during the primaries, Gov. Ron DeSantis and former ambassador Nikki Haley, endorsed him in speeches at the convention — but Sanford acknowledged to my co-host Chad Oban and me that this may be a heavy lift.

“People know that what we’re dealing with in North Dakota with the different factions,” she said, initially calling the populist wing of the party the “far right” before correcting herself and describing them as “grassroots.”

The NDGOP delegation to the national convention

Advertisement

wasn’t necessarily behind Gov. Doug Burgum potentially being Trump’s running mate

(Burgum himself was passed over for a delegate slot by the NDGOP’s state convention), but Sanford said she felt the delegates were “really confident in Donald Trump and his pick.”

“It gets dicey,” she said of intraparty politics. “It can get cruel,” but Sanford said her job is to keep the factions united. “I’m bringing people together.”

Sanford also addressed a visit to the North Dakota delegation from Matt Schlapp of the American Conservative Union (the organization which puts on the Conservative Political Action Conference). In March, Schlapp paid

a nearly half-million settlement

Advertisement

to a man he allegedly made unwanted sexual advances toward. “My delegation wanted to hear from CPAC,” she said, adding that Schlapp was “on a speaking circle” addressing several state delegations.

Also on this episode, we discuss how the assassination attempt on Trump might impact the rest of this presidential election cycle and whether Democrats will replace incumbent President Joe Biden.

Want to subscribe to Plain Talk? Search for the show wherever you get your podcasts, or

click here

for more information.

Advertisement
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Sale of Ponzi scheme cattle company could benefit burned investors

Published

on

Sale of Ponzi scheme cattle company could benefit burned investors


(North Dakota Monitor)

BY: JEFF BEACH

KILLDEER, N.D. (North Dakota Monitor) – A North Dakota investor says the purchase of a financially-troubled meat company is progressing with a percentage of the profits being used to pay back investors in the alleged Ponzi scheme over several years. 

Advertisement

Wylie Bice of Killdeer, who is among those who lost money by investing in Texas-based Agridime, told the North Dakota Monitor that a price has been agreed upon to buy the company. 

“Our offer is reasonable,” Bice said. 

But several steps remain before the deal can close. 

The court-appointed official overseeing the company said in a July 8 update on Agridime.com that federal law requires three separate appraisals for each parcel of property being sold, “which is not a quick process.”

The update did not say a deal has been reached, but when it is, it would be submitted to the court for a 30-day review and objection period before it can close. 

Advertisement

Bice said the final agreement would likely include a percentage of the profits of the company be used to pay back investors over a designated period of years. 

“There’s always a chance they might get more than they had invested if things go really good,” Bice said. 

Investors in several states, including a high-concentration in North Dakota, lost millions of dollars by investing in Agridime. Agridime bought cattle, had them brought up to market weight at feedlots and processed in retail cuts of meat. The company then direct-marketed the beef through its website. 

It also sold investments in calves, promising as much as a 30% return on investment without having to do the work of ranching. 

The Securities and Exchange Commission in December accused the company of operating as a Ponzi scheme by taking money from new investors to pay off previous investors instead of investing that money into cattle. 

Advertisement

The North Dakota Securities Department said a Killdeer-based sales agent, Taylor Bang, earned $6 million in commissions from illegal cattle investment contracts through Agridime. 

Bang told the North Dakota Monitor in December that the figure was “way high.” 

While it is under investigation, a slimmed-down version of the company has continued to operate as American Grazed Beef. 

Bice said that if the deal is approved, he and his partners would likely keep the American Grazed Beef name. 

The investments in calves, however, would not be a part of the business plan. 

Advertisement

“No, I don’t think they’ll fall for that twice,” Bice said. 

Bice, Bang, and other North Dakota investors lost an estimated $40 million in the Agridime scheme. 

Overall, investors in at least 15 states are out an estimated $191 million. 

The July 8 update also says investors should be notified by the end of the month with a calculation of what they are owed. 

Investors will have 30 days to review these calculations and notify the court-appointed receiver  of any issues. 

Advertisement

“There were approximately 40,325 transactions made by Agridime between 2021-2023, and it took a bit of work in the company’s bank records to determine what amounts were being paid to whom,” the update said. 

It also said a motion will be filed with the court outlining the forensic accounting analysis of Agridime between 2021 and December 2023. The motion “will provide insight into the company’s operations during that time period and whether the company was paying returns on older investor contracts with money received from new investors.”



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ND Rural Water Systems Association celebrates 50 years

Published

on

ND Rural Water Systems Association celebrates 50 years


BISMARCK, ND (kxnet) — Members of the North Dakota Rural Water Systems Association (NDRWSA) celebrated their 50th Anniversary on Tuesday, July 16, at North Dakota’s Gateway to Science in Bismarck.

The association was established with a mission to ensure that all North Dakotans had access to affordable and clean drinking water. It was founded the same year that the 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Gerald Ford.

Since then, the NDRWSA has helped many rural areas across the state with funding and construction of water systems, giving clean and affordable drinking water to many North Dakotans living in rural communities across our state.

“So, even after 50 years, there’s still people out there, in Rural North Dakota that are hauling water. There’s still people in small communities that drink sub-standard water,” said Eric Volk, Executive Director of NDRWSA.

Advertisement

Volk says the association still has more important work to do in the coming years to ensure other rural communities are not forgotten. “There’s partnerships out there, between the State of North Dakota, the Federal Government, and the local entities. I think we all can accomplish our goal,” of expanding access to more rural communities he said.

Volk adds that a little over 300,000 people in North Dakota receive their drinking water from rural water systems, that serve 268 towns across the state.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending