North Dakota
Port: President Obama should apologize to North Dakota

MINOT — It’s been a long time coming, but North Dakotans are getting some justice for what was perpetrated on them by left-wing extremists during violent protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
First, a jury in Morton County found Greenpeace civilly liable,
to the tune of some $660 million,
for assisting the frequently unlawful protests. The plaintiff in the case was Energy Transfer Partners, the company that built and operates the pipeline.
Now, a federal judge has found the federal government, then under the control of President Barack Obama,
liable for more than $37 million in costs
incurred by the state of North Dakota while responding the protests (the court awarded roughly $28 million, subtracting a $10 million grant awarded during President Trump’s first term in office).
Judge Dan Traynor excoriated the federal government in his ruling. “The United States left North Dakota alone to defend itself from the violent and tumultuous protests,” he wrote.
“While North Dakota was drowning in the chaos of the Protests, the United States dropped an anvil into the pool and turned up the turmoil,” he continued.
The Obama administration “encouraged [and] supported protesters to remain and be at the DAPL Protests,” and because of these things, the federal government is liable for the heavy costs incurred by North Dakota taxpayers as a result of the months-long demonstrations.
Traynor found that the federal government allowed protesters to occupy federal land illegally, against its policies, despite being fully aware that the land was being used to launch violent and unlawful attacks against the pipeline project and law enforcement.
The Obama administration did not intervene to assist our state in putting a stop to the violence, despite apparent unlawful activity and a clear federal nexus. They didn’t enforce the law when protesters used federal land as a launch pad for their attacks. The Obama administration even
refused to send federal law enforcement resources to assist.
This was a dereliction of duty on par with President Donald Trump watching,
on television,
his supporters violently assault Congress on Jan. 6, 2021. But the Jan. 6 riot went on for a day. The Dakota Access Pipeline protests lasted for months.
Nor was it only the Obama administration that chose to stand aside while North Dakota burned. Our state’s law enforcement resources were completely overrun, yet when our state put out a call to other states for personnel, many states with Democratic leadership refused to assist,
bowing to pressure from left-wing activists.
“Early on, we had a number of states support our request for peace officer support,” Maj. Gen. Al Dohrmann of the North Dakota National Guard
told me in a December 2016 interview
. “Unfortunately, all jurisdictions that supported us were subject to protest in their own cities and capitols for providing support to North Dakota, along with intense pressure from various groups to not support North Dakota’s efforts to maintain the peace and rule of law.”
President Obama could have helped put an end to the protests swiftly and peacefully, but he didn’t.
As the nation’s top elected Democrat, he could have urged state-level Democrats to put politics aside and help, but he didn’t.
For that, he owes North Dakota an apology.

North Dakota
Obituary for Ella Suzanne Pederson at Thomas Family Funeral Home

North Dakota
North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong hammers down 7 partial vetoes in final round of bill approval

BISMARCK — North Dakota Gov.
Kelly Armstrong
is exercising his right to line-item veto legislation as six bills were substantially changed — one of them twice — on Monday, May 19, while undergoing final approval.
The state constitution gives the governor the authority to veto a portion of long budget bills, a power typically reserved for cutting spending items.
In over half of the veto letters, Armstrong emphasized that parts of budget bills pertaining to policy changes, not direct appropriations, should not be immune to line-item vetoes.
Allowing
the Legislature
to “shoehorn” policy into budget bills “undermines” the system of checks and balances and violates the “longstanding principle of separation of powers,” Armstrong wrote.
Among the six line-item vetoed bills was the state’s Ethics Commission budget. Armstrong eliminated a section granting lawmakers immunity from prosecution if they disclose conflicts of interest in voting on a bill.
“Public confidence in government is built on the belief that no one, especially elected officials, is above the law,” Armstrong wrote in the veto letter.
He said the vetoed section, which isn’t attached to a specific appropriation, “sends the wrong message to North Dakotans: that legislative disclosure, however minimal or selective, is enough to avoid the legal consequences that any private citizen would face under similar circumstances.”
Under the attorney general’s budget, Armstrong vetoed a portion attempting to bar judges from being able to waive 24/7 sobriety program fees. The section was added to the budget at the last minute after the original, stand-alone bill to restrict judges’ authority failed.
Participation in the program, which has been in place since 2008, is often ordered by the court for people with drug or alcohol-related offenses.
“It (the addition) invites a constitutional challenge and will only increase the costs and jail overcrowding for counties,” Armstrong wrote in the veto letter.
He also cut a $150,000 grant that would have funded a Native American homelessness liaison position in the Industrial Commission’s budget.
He called for a long-term, statewide approach to
homelessness
and housing insecurity instead of “a piecemeal approach” that risks “fragmentation, inefficiency and duplication of effort.”
In the same bill, he scratched a section mandating the Bank of North Dakota allocate $250,000 to study post-oil economic development in western North Dakota communities.
He called the action premature, saying it sends the wrong idea about the “strength” and “longevity” of the state’s energy industry.
In the Parks and Recreation Department’s budget, Armstrong vetoed a section that would have required the agency to receive approval from the Legislature to rename state parks, a provision that also had no direct appropriation.
Such a requirement is so far-reaching, it could lead to unnecessary, top-level deliberation and “not only encroaches on the executive branch’s function to faithfully execute laws passed by the Assembly but also leads to absurd results,” the veto letter states.
Another $350,000 was taken out of the Department of Commerce’s budget that would have gone to the State Fair Association for sanitation restoration projects.
The funding wasn’t included in the State Fair Association’s individual budget, where Armstrong said it “rightly belonged.”
Further, the state Legislative Council will stay in its second-floor office in the state Capitol building in Bismarck after its bid to move to the 15th floor was rejected by Armstrong. The agency, which received funding for 25 more employees, oversees the Legislature’s operations and is staffed by attorneys, researchers and accountants.
Under the provision in the Legislative branch’s budget, the space occupied by the Department of Career and Technical Education would instead be used by Legislative Council. However, the Legislature neglected to consult with proper channels — namely, the public and the department itself, Armstrong wrote in his veto letter.
He said his administration is “more than willing” to help Legislative Council accommodate its growing staff.
“Requiring the acquisition of a specific floor of the Capitol building via state law is superfluous and undermines our ongoing efforts to find ways to better utilize the Capitol building’s square footage to reduce costs and save taxpayers money,” he added.
When the 2025 legislative session adjourned, lawmakers sent a total of 601 bills to the governor, 597 of which were signed, with four vetoed in their entirety — a
library materials bill,
a
private school voucher bill,
a
tax credit for prisons
and another impacting
state employee health insurance.
To overturn a governor’s veto, the Legislature would have to meet for a special session. Legislative leaders have not announced whether they will reconvene to push back on any line-item vetoes.
Budget bills go into effect on July 1. Policy bills take effect Aug. 1.
“Through limited use of my line-item veto authority, we’ve reduced spending, protected the integrity of the budgeting process and preserved executive branch authority to ensure that state government remains efficient and transparent,” Armstrong said in a Monday release.
North Dakota
ND Dem-NPL reacts to Biden cancer diagnosis

FARGO, N.D. (Valley News Live) – The North Dakota Dem-NPL is reacting to former President Joe Bidens cancer diagnosis.
“For a half century, through personal and political triumphs and setbacks, President Biden sacrificed of himself to do what’s right for our country. This announcement is heartbreaking. Our prayers of healing and strength are with President Biden and his family,” said North Dakota Democratic-NPL Chair Adam Goldwyn.
If you would like to read more about the former Presidents cancer diagnosis, click here.
Copyright 2025 KVLY. All rights reserved.
-
Technology1 week ago
Mexico is suing Google over how it’s labeling the Gulf of Mexico
-
Politics1 week ago
DHS says Massachusetts city council member 'incited chaos' as ICE arrested 'violent criminal alien'
-
Education1 week ago
A Professor’s Final Gift to Her Students: Her Life Savings
-
Politics1 week ago
President Trump takes on 'Big Pharma' by signing executive order to lower drug prices
-
Education1 week ago
Video: Tufts Student Speaks Publicly After Release From Immigration Detention
-
News7 days ago
As Harvard Battles Trump, Its President Will Take a 25% Pay Cut
-
Culture1 week ago
Test Yourself on Memorable Lines From Popular Novels
-
News1 week ago
Why Trump Suddenly Declared Victory Over the Houthi Militia