North Dakota
Port: PERS board chair at the center of pension drama lobbied lawmakers against reforms
MINOT — Earlier this year, Gov. Doug Burgum asked for the resignation of the chair of the board overseeing North Dakota’s public workers pension.
Given the actions and machinations of the chair, whom he appointed in the first place, he was right.
North Dakota’s political leadership has decided to end our state’s defined-benefit public worker’s pension, with its nearly $2 billion in unfunded liabilities, and replace it with the sort of defined contribution retirement plan that most of us in the private sector enjoy.
They passed legislation to do that earlier this year. The transition will keep employees vested in the current pension whole while moving new hires over to the new plan.
But our elected leaders — including Burgum and a majority in the Legislature — are not confident that the board charged with overseeing the Public Employees Retirement System will faithfully carry out the reforms.
Mona Tedford Rindy, the current chair of the PERS board, disputed this in
a recent letter to the editor
responding to my reporting on this issue. “Any assertion that the PERS board and staff are somehow dragging their feet or sabotaging the pension closure process is blatantly false,” she wrote.
“The PERS board (led by me) and PERS staff (led by Executive Director Scott Miller) are ‘all in’, and have been ever since the legislation to close the pension passed,” she continued.
This isn’t accurate.
Immediately after the pension reform legislation passed and was sent to Burgum for his signature, Miller, who Tedford Rindy would like us to believe is “all in” on executing it,
said this to the Bismarck Tribune:
“At over $4 billion difference, HB 1040 is about to be the most expensive mistake in the history of the state of North Dakota.”
“All in,” indeed. Tedford Rindy didn’t mention those comments in her letter.
There is also good reason to doubt Tedford Rindy’s own commitment to the pension reforms. During the legislative session, she lobbied to defeat the reforms.
“I urge you to thoughtfully consider the complexities and downfalls of these proposed bills, and not succumb to the more knee-jerk-type reaction that the best way to fix an underfunded [defined benefit] plan is to close it,” she wrote in a January 13, 2023, letter sent to lawmakers.
That letter was provided to me by several lawmakers (I’ve redacted Tedford Rindy’s personal contact information).
Not only did Tedford Rindy take no action to rein in Miller, who has cultivated a toxic relationship with reform-minded lawmakers, but she now falsely claims that both she and Miller support the reforms.
There is nothing wrong with Miller and Tedford Rindy opposing the decision to close the defined-benefit pension, whatever you or I might think of their position.
But, simultaneously, there is also nothing wrong in thinking that Miller and Tedford Rindy might not be the right people to carry out those reforms, given their openly expressed hostilities toward pension reform.
Under the leadership of Tedford Rindy and Miller, the PERS board has not been “all in” on following the Legislature’s directives. They have been opposed to pension reform. They even initiated a lawsuit against the Legislature over changes made to the PERS board makeup.
The Legislature, wanting more oversight to ensure that the pension reforms are carried out, created two more positions for lawmakers on the board.
The PERS board sued, making a separation of powers argument, and got a victory from the state supreme court, albeit on an unrelated issue — lawmakers have been blatantly violating the state constitution’s prohibition on multi-issue bills for years,
and the courts have finally called them on it.
Lawmakers must now convene in a costly special session to address this — that’s their own fault — but Miller and Tedford Rindy aren’t likely to be successful in the long run in their separation of powers argument.
In a concurring opinion, Chief Justice Jon Jensen wrote that the reforms to the PERS board “do not violate the separation of powers between coequal branches of government.” When the court gets around to ruling on that issue, specifically, it’s probable they’ll come down on the Legislature’s side.
But even if the courts do happen to conclude that the Legislature violated the separation of powers provisions of the state constitution by putting four lawmakers on the PERS board, there is no legal challenge to the pension reforms themselves.
Whatever happens in the courts, we still need leadership at the PERS board we can count on to carry out those reforms.
That’s not Mona Tedford Rindy, and certainly not Scott Miller.
This is not a new problem. Former state Rep. John Dorso, a Republican who served as majority leader in the 1990s, told me the current headaches with the PERS board mirror those he and his colleagues faced previously.
“I gave up because I couldn’t see a way to overcome [PERS board’s] ability to get their way,” Dorso told me.
“I hope the Legislature can not only make the change to the retirement plan but undo the seemingly impossible situation the state has to endure with the laws concerning this board,” he continued, referencing the fact that the governor, who appoints members of the board, cannot remove them, even when they’re actively opposed to his agenda.
Burgum and the Legislature support pension reforms. They’ve made those reforms law. They want to ensure that the government board in charge of overseeing those reforms carries them out in good faith.
Tedford Rindy refused Burgum’s request that she resign from the position he appointed her to.
That’s arrogance unbefitting a public servant.
We cannot abide a situation that allows bureaucrats and appointees to thwart the policies set by elected leaders.
North Dakota
Port: Make families great again
MINOT — Gov.-elect Kelly Armstrong is roaring into office with some political capital to spend. I have some ideas for how to spend it during next year’s legislative session.
It’s a three-pronged plan focused on children. I’m calling it “Make Families Great Again.” I’m no marketing genius, but I have been a dad for 24 years. There are some things the state could do to help.
The first is school lunches. The state should pay for them. The Legislature had a rollicking debate about this during the 2023 session. The opponents, who liken this to a handout, largely won the debate. Armstrong could put some muscle behind a new initiative to have the state take over payments. The social media gadflies might not like it, but it would prove deeply popular with the general public, especially if we neutralize the “handout” argument by reframing the debate.
North Dakota families are obligated to send their children to school. The kids have to eat. The lunch bills add up. I have two kids in public school. In the 2023-2024 school year, I paid $1,501.65 for lunches. That’s more than I pay in income taxes.
How much would it cost? In the 2023 session,
House Bill 1491
would have appropriated $89.5 million to cover the cost. The price tag would likely be similar now, but don’t consider it an expense so much as putting nearly $90 million back in the pockets of families with school-age children. A demographic that, thanks to inflation and other factors, could use some help.
Speaking of helping, the second plank of this plan is child care. This burgeoning cost is not just a millstone around young families’ necks but also hurts our state’s economy. We have a chronic workforce shortage, yet many North Dakotans are held out of the workforce because they either cannot find child care or because the care available is prohibitively expensive.
State leaders haven’t exactly been sitting on their hands. During the 2023 session, Gov. Doug Burgum signed
a $66 million child care package
focusing on assistance and incentives. We should do something bolder.
Maybe a direct tax credit to cover at least some of the expenses?
The last plank is getting vaccination rates back on track.
According to data from the state Department of Health,
the kindergarten-age vaccination rate for chicken pox declined 3.76% from the 2019-2020 school year. The rate for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is down 3.72%, polio vaccines 3.54%, hepatitis B vaccines 2.27%, and the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis 3.91%.
Meanwhile, personal and religious exemptions for kindergarten students have risen by nearly 69%.
This may be politically risky for Armstrong. Anti-vaxx crankery is on the rise among Republicans, but, again, Armstrong has some political capital to spend. This would be a helpful place for it. A campaign to turn vaccine rates around would help protect the kids from diseases that haven’t been a concern in generations. It would help address workforce needs as well.
When a sick kid can’t go to school or day care, parents can’t go to work.
These ideas are practical and bold and would do a great deal to help North Dakota families.
North Dakota
North Dakota 77-73 Loyola Marymount (Nov 22, 2024) Game Recap – ESPN
LOS ANGELES — — Treysen Eaglestaff had 23 points in North Dakota’s 77-73 win over Loyola Marymount on Friday night.
Eaglestaff also contributed five rebounds for the Fightin’ Hawks (3-2). Mier Panoam scored 16 points and added seven rebounds. Dariyus Woodson had 12 points.
The Lions (1-3) were led in scoring by Caleb Stone-Carrawell with 17 points. Alex Merkviladze added 16 points, eight rebounds, four assists and two steals. Will Johnston had 15 points and four assists.
North Dakota went into the half ahead of Loyola Marymount 36-32. Eaglestaff led North Dakota with 12 second-half points.
——
The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.
North Dakota
National monument proposed for North Dakota Badlands, with tribes' support
BISMARCK, N.D. — A coalition of conservation groups and Native American tribal citizens on Friday called on President Joe Biden to designate nearly 140,000 acres of rugged, scenic Badlands as North Dakota’s first national monument, a proposal several tribal nations say would preserve the area’s indigenous and cultural heritage.
The proposed Maah Daah Hey National Monument would encompass 11 noncontiguous, newly designated units totaling 139,729 acres (56,546 hectares) in the Little Missouri National Grassland. The proposed units would hug the popular recreation trail of the same name and neighbor Theodore Roosevelt National Park, named for the 26th president who ranched and roamed in the Badlands as a young man in the 1880s.
“When you tell the story of landscape, you have to tell the story of people,” said Michael Barthelemy, an enrolled member of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation and director of Native American studies at Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College. “You have to tell the story of the people that first inhabited those places and the symbiotic relationship between the people and the landscape, how the people worked to shape the land and how the land worked to shape the people.”
The National Park Service oversees national monuments, which are similar to national parks and usually designated by the president to protect the landscape’s features.
Supporters have traveled twice to Washington to meet with White House, Interior Department, Forest Service and Department of Agriculture officials. But the effort faces an uphill battle with less than two months remaining in Biden’s term and potential headwinds in President-elect Donald Trump ‘s incoming administration.
If unsuccessful, the group would turn to the Trump administration “because we believe this is a good idea regardless of who’s president,” Dakota Resource Council Executive Director Scott Skokos said.
Dozens if not hundreds of oil and natural gas wells dot the landscape where the proposed monument would span, according to the supporters’ map. But the proposed units have no oil and gas leases, private inholdings or surface occupancy, and no grazing leases would be removed, said North Dakota Wildlife Federation Executive Director John Bradley.
The proposal is supported by the MHA Nation, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe through council resolutions.
If created, the monument would help tribal citizens stay connected to their identity, said Democratic state Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, an MHA Nation enrolled member.
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum is President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service, including national monuments. In a written statement, Burgum said: “North Dakota is proof that we can protect our precious parks, cultural heritage and natural resources AND responsibly develop our vast energy resources.”
North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven’s office said Friday was the first they had heard of the proposal, “but any effort that would make it harder for ranchers to operate and that could restrict multiple use, including energy development, is going to raise concerns with Senator Hoeven.”
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science4 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology5 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle6 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World5 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government