North Dakota
North Dakota to Face Federal Government in Trial
Seeks to Recoup $38 Million for Destructive 2016 DAPL Protests
Sen. Kevin Cramer release
WASHINGTON – For five years, North Dakota has been involved in a legal battle with the United States regarding the federal government’s negligence associated with the unlawful Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protests from August 2016 to March 2017. Throughout the protests, which spanned 233 days, activists illegally occupied federal lands and engaged in unlawful, destructive, and violent acts.
These activities, aided and exacerbated by the Obama administration’s negligence, left local and state law enforcement on their own to maintain order. Due to the U.S.’ rejection of the state’s efforts to cooperate and mitigate the protests, North Dakota was left without assistance to protect public safety and clean the very land the activists sought to protect. The federal government and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) failure to contain the protests or assist law enforcement resulted in more than $38 million in damages to North Dakota.
Two months ago, U.S. District Judge Daniel M. Traynor issued an order stating the federal government would have to face North Dakota’s claims at trial for the emergency response costs and agreed the federal government owed a “duty of care” to the state.
The lawsuit’s bench trial is scheduled to begin on Thursday, February 15, and will be overseen by Judge Traynor at the William L. Guy Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Bismarck. By statute, there will be no jury and all decisions of fact and law will be determined by Judge Traynor.
“Eight years after the rest of the country moved on from the DAPL protests, North Dakota finally has the opportunity to take the federal government to court and fight for financial compensation for the havoc enabled by the Obama administration,” said Cramer. “Instead of containing the illegal protests, the federal government condoned them and instead of assisting North Dakota with law enforcement efforts, it stood by and did nothing. I look forward to an acknowledgment of federal negligence and the resolution of this case in North Dakota’s favor.”
North Dakota originally brought the five-count Complaint against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The Complaint seeks to recover damages incurred from the costs related to the DAPL protests in 2016 and 2017, including damages to the state property, law enforcement vehicles, and for work to repair damages to the Backwater Bridge. Not only is it incredibly rare for a state to sue the federal government under the FTCA, none have prevailed at trial.
The USACE’s failure to enforce mandatory permitting procedures to conduct protests on federal lands compounded the problem by enabling the unlawful occupation. According to court documents, these trespassers “fired guns, shot arrows at an aircraft, threw Molotov cocktails, rocks, sticks, frozen water bottles, cans and feces at officers, and slashed their vehicle tires.” Throughout the nearly eight months of illegal occupation, law enforcement made a total of 761 arrests, with only 51 of those being from the state. In response, North Dakota was required to enforce the law and protect public safety by mobilizing all of the major state law enforcement and emergency response agencies, the National Guard, and relied on support from local law enforcement and first responder agencies. Additionally, the state was forced to rely on the assistance of law enforcement from 11 other states. North Dakota’s reasonable response to this emergency cost $38,005,071.66.
Since 2017, the 1,172-mile-long underground DAPL has been safely operating and delivering oil from North Dakota to Illinois. Despite this, the pipeline has faced scrutiny under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) three times, including a 1,261-page Environmental Assessment from 2016 which found no significant impact and a 2017 court-ordered remand analysis.
The North Dakota delegation has led many efforts to ensure the pipeline remains operational, including sending a letter to the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, requesting uninterrupted operation of DAPL. Additionally, the delegation explained it was in the nation’s best interest to conclude this “seemingly endless” EIS process. In December, North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum explained the pipeline “is an essential part of North Dakota’s and the nation’s energy infrastructure. It plays a pivotal role in ensuring energy security and affordability for the entire nation while providing enormous positive economic impact that touches every North Dakota citizen.”
#
North Dakota
Armstrong opens application period for Governor’s Band/Orchestra and Choral programs
BISMARCK, N.D. – Gov. Kelly Armstrong today announced the opening of the application period for school, community and church bands, orchestras and choirs across North Dakota to apply to serve as the Governor’s Official State Band/Orchestra Program and Choral Program for the 2026-2027 school year.
The Governor and First Lady will select the two groups from the applications received based on musical talent, achievement and community involvement. The governor may invite the groups to perform at official state functions held throughout the 2026-2027 school year, including the State of the State Address in January 2027 at the Capitol in Bismarck.
Interested groups should submit an application with a musical recording to the Governor’s Office by 5 p.m. Monday, May 4. The Governor’s Band/Orchestra Program and Governor’s Choral Program will be announced in May. Please complete the application and provide materials at https://www.governor.nd.gov/governors-chorus-and-bandorchestra-program-application.
North Dakota
Greenpeace seeks new trial, claiming jury pool biased in case over Dakota Access Pipeline
Greenpeace has asked for a second trial after a judge entered a $345 million judgment against the organization in a landmark case brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The case “threatens to result in one of the largest miscarriages of justice in North Dakota’s history,” attorneys for the environmental group wrote in a brief filed last week.
After a three-week trial roughly a year ago, a Morton County jury directed Greenpeace to pay Energy Transfer about $667 million, finding the environmental group at fault for inciting illegal acts against the company during anti-pipeline protests in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017 and for publishing false statements that harmed Energy Transfer’s reputation.
Greenpeace denies Energy Transfer’s claims and maintains that it brought the lawsuit to hurt the environmental movement.
Southwest Judicial District Judge James Gion in October slashed the jury’s award to $345 million, though he didn’t finalize the award until late February.
Greenpeace is now taking steps to fight the judgment, which includes its motion for a new trial.
The environmental group’s reasons for the request include claims that the jury instructions and verdict form contained errors, and that Energy Transfer was allowed to present unfair and irrelevant evidence to jurors. The group also alleges the jury pool was biased.
Greenpeace says the jury’s award assumes that Greenpeace was entirely responsible for any injury Energy Transfer sustained related to the protests. Jurors were not given the opportunity to consider whether Greenpeace was only at fault for a portion of the damages, the organization wrote in its brief.
Attorneys for Greenpeace also referenced the mailers and other media circulated to Mandan and Bismarck residents before the trial that contained anti-Dakota Access Pipeline protest and pro-energy industry content.
The environmental group seeks a new trial in Cass County, arguing in part that the jury pool in the Fargo area would be more fair because its residents did not directly experience the Dakota Access Pipeline protests and because the local economy is less dependent on the energy industry.
If Greenpeace’s request for a new trial is denied, it plans to appeal the case to the North Dakota Supreme Court, the organization has said.
Greenpeace previously asked for the trial to be moved from Morton County to Cass County in early 2025, which Gion and the North Dakota Supreme Court denied.
The lawsuit is against three separate Greenpeace organizations — Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund.
Energy Transfer as of Wednesday morning had not submitted a response to Greenpeace’s motion for a new trial. Previously, the company has defended the jury’s verdict and disputed Greenpeace’s claims that the court proceedings were not fair.
Energy Transfer has indicated it may appeal Gion’s decision to reduce the award to $345 million.
Greenpeace will not have to pay any of the $345 million judgment for at least a couple of months, Gion ruled Tuesday.
Court documents indicate that the organization could have to pay a bond of up to $25 million while appeals proceed, though the environmental group has asked the judge to waive or reduce this amount. Gion has not decided on this motion.
He noted that obtaining such a large bond will be challenging.
“The magnitude of this matter defies simple decisions,” Gion wrote.
Energy Transfer in court filings urged the judge to require Greenpeace to post the full $25 million.
Any bond money Greenpeace provides would be held by a third party while the appeals proceed, according to Greenpeace USA.
Greenpeace International has filed a separate lawsuit in the Netherlands that accuses Energy Transfer of weaponizing the U.S. legal system against the environmental group. Energy Transfer asked Gion to order that the overseas suit be paused while the North Dakota case is still active, which Gion denied. The company appealed his ruling to the North Dakota Supreme Court, which has yet to make a decision on the matter.
North Dakota
Minnkota Says Cost of Data Center Power Project Rises Won’t Affect Customers
(Photo by Jeff Beach/North Dakota Monitor)
(North Dakota Monitor) – The cost of the power line and substation needed by a data center north of Fargo has risen from $75 million to $110 million, but developers say the data center company will still cover the entire cost of the project.
Applied Digital needs the project to power its data center being built between Fargo and Harwood. The data center requires 280 megawatts of power at peak demand.
Applied Digital will pay for the project but it will be owned by Grand Forks based, Minnkota Power Cooperative.
The North Dakota Public Service Commission held a hearing in Fargo on what is known as the Agassiz Transmission Line and Substation.
-
Atlanta, GA2 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
South-Carolina1 week agoSouth Carolina vs TCU predictions for Elite Eight game in March Madness
-
Movie Reviews5 days agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Vermont1 week ago
Skier dies after fall at Sugarbush Resort
-
Politics1 week agoTrump’s Ballroom Design Has Barely Been Scrutinized
-
Politics1 week agoJD Vance says he was ‘obsessed’ with UFOs, believes aliens are actually ‘demons’
-
Entertainment5 days agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium
-
Politics1 week agoJeffries declines to break with indicted Democrat after ethics panel’s guilty verdict