North Dakota
North Dakota lawmakers to propose Legacy Fund Transparency Act
BISMARCK — Three Republican lawmakers from District 12 plan to bring legislation during the 2025 legislation session to require the state to publish all investments of Legacy Fund money online.
The Legacy Fund was established by a constitutional amendment approved by North Dakota voters in 2010. It’s supported by the state’s oil taxes and is intended to be a source of perpetual revenue for the state. As of June, the fund’s value was nearly $11 billion.
The State Investment Board currently does not disclose specifics about all of the Legacy Fund’s investments.
Sen. Cole Conley, Rep. Bernie Satrom and Rep. Mitch Ostlie, all of Jamestown, said they’re concerned the money could be supporting governments or businesses that oppose North Dakota’s interests, and that this legislation is needed in order to bring such information to light. In 2022, the State Investment Board voted to divest public money including Legacy Fund dollars from Russia.
“When we invest our principal, we need to have principles,” Satrom told the North Dakota Monitor.
In response to a records request asking for all of the Legacy Fund’s foreign and domestic investments by Bismarck attorney Tory Jackson earlier this year, the state disclosed it had roughly $160 million of the fund invested in what it called the “Emerging Markets Region,” more than $520 million in the “Global Region” and nearly $46 million in the “International Region,” among other holdings.
Jackson requested an attorney general’s opinion regarding the response to his request.
“The public and the media should not have to file a formal open records request to see where their money is being invested all around the world,” Conley said in a statement.
The state Retirement and Investment Office administers the Legacy Fund, following the direction of the State Investment Board.
Retirement and Investment Office Executive Director Jan Murtha on Monday said she hadn’t seen any proposed legislation, so she could not comment on it.
“It is the role of the Legislature to create the state laws applicable to the Legacy Fund, and the Retirement and Investment Office adheres to the law and will adhere to any changes to the law,” she said.
Murtha told the North Dakota Monitor previously that the state already publishes a lot of Legacy Fund-related data, but some information must be kept under wraps in order to protect the state’s ability to invest. For example, it cannot identify the investments of specific fund managers because that could expose those managers’ investment strategies, which is considered confidential commercial information.
She also noted that the Legacy Fund’s holdings are always changing, so if the state were to publicize all of its investments, it would have to update the list constantly.
Lt. Gov Tammy Miller, who chairs the State Investment Board, has also disputed the claim that the Legacy Fund is not transparent.
In a gubernatorial debate with U.S. Rep. Kelly Armstrong in April, Miller noted that North Dakotans can already find a lot of information about the Legacy Fund online. The office publishes monthly financial statements and performance reports.
“We have great transparency with the Legacy Fund,” she said at the time.
Armstrong has said during debates that the public should not need to make an open records request to access information about the Legacy Fund.
The North Dakota Legislature passed a bill in 2021 requiring the state to invest a certain amount of the Legacy Fund into the state.
North Dakota’s current target is to invest up to $1.3 billion of the fund in-state.
Satrom and Conley both said that while they consider the in-state investment program a step in the right direction, they both want to see even more of the Legacy Fund put back into the state’s economy.
“We should be investing in our future,” Satrom said.
The lawmakers are still working on a bill draft, Conley said in an email.
District 12 encompasses most of Jamestown as well as land east and northeast of the city.
The three lawmakers are all running for reelection for their respective seats this election season. The House members are running unopposed. Democrat Olivia Schloegel is running against Conley for Senate.
This story was originally published on NorthDakotaMonitor.com
______________________________________________________
This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.
North Dakota
North Dakota approves $30.4M for water infrastructure projects
BISMARCK, N.D. (Valley News Live) North Dakota communities will receive more than $30 million to upgrade aging water systems and expand infrastructure to meet growing demand.
The $30.4 million in cost-share funding will support municipal and rural water supply improvements, flood protection, and data collection initiatives. The State Water Commission approved these projects on Tuesday, Dec. 16.
“State investment in projects like these ensures our communities will have the reliable water supplies, flood protection, and other critical infrastructure needed to support existing users and accommodate future growth, all while reducing the local cost burden,” Lt. Gov. Michelle Strinden said.
The East Central Rural Water District received the largest share of funding with two projects totaling more than $25 million. The district will use $15.9 million to expand its Hillsboro Area Water Treatment Plant and $9.5 million for supply, transmission and distribution improvements. The treatment plant expansion also leverages more than $12 million in federal loan forgiveness.
Valley City will receive $2.5 million to replace its Northwest Standpipe.
Other projects include water system expansions in Ramsey and Cass County, a regionalization project connecting Parshall to White Shield, and improvements to low-head dams in Ward County.
The commission also approved $550,000 for the Department of Water Resources to launch Phase 1 of a 3D Hydrography Program for North Dakota.
The funding comes from North Dakota’s Resources Trust Fund, which receives 20.5% of the state’s oil extraction tax revenue.
Copyright 2025 KVLY. All rights reserved.
North Dakota
North Dakota’s delicate electricity price balance faces challenges
BISMARCK — As an energy exporter blessed with abundant supply, North Dakota consistently ranks among the cheapest states in the country when it comes to residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates.
Exploding costs of transmission, the build out and replacement of transmission infrastructure and the increase in energy load have helped push residential electricity prices modestly higher in recent years, however.
Average residential per kilowatt-hour of power increased by nearly 30% in the state between 2020 and 2024.
A recent study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory showed North Dakota actually had the largest decrease in average retail industrial and commercial electricity prices in the country over that span, with flat or slightly lower rates for residential users, when adjusted for inflation.
Most of the real cost rise is due to the increased expense of transmission as well as materials, build outs, generation and transportation needed to keep up with energy demand and to replace aging systems.
Take transformers for example: they cost 70-100% more now than five years ago, according to International Energy Agency data. Aluminum and copper wiring is up to 50% more costly. Labor costs have also increased by around 20-40%.
“Four or five years ago, it was $400,000 a mile to build a transmission line. Now it’s $2 million a mile,” said Josh Kramer, executive vice president and general manager at North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives. “Generation used to cost about $800 a kilowatt. Now it’s $2,700 a kilowatt.”
The cost of nearly every input into the energy transmission and maintenance system rose, on average, as much as 50%, he said.
State Sen. Dale Patten, R-Watford City, said replacement and upgrade costs of infrastructure are also one key component, particularly to improve resilience against severe weather events in rural areas.
“A lot of the existing infrastructure is old, 50-, 60-, 70-years-old in some cases, and the cost of replacing it is not cheap,” said Patten, who chairs the Legislature’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
Contributed / North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives
Population growth and shifts in that growth toward the main cities in the state are also a driver, he said.
“You have to build the infrastructure to support that population growth and that corresponding economic growth,” Patten said.
Another major driver is transmission costs.
“As we look at the regulated utilities when they come in for rate cases, it seems like one of the areas where their costs are exploding the most is transmission,” said Public Service Commission commissioner Randy Christmann. “Transmission costs are exploding.”
Christmann said some of the blame goes to build out of remote renewables projects in the wider region, as well as the closure of coal fired power plants around the county leading to increased load on North Dakota power providers as regional transmission organizations spread costs around.
In 2024, North Dakota exported around 32% of generated electricity and exported 85% of natural gas extracted, according to the Department of Commerce.
Adding large loads onto the grid across the country at the same time as all of these other cost increases has spiked energy prices in most other locations.
So far, North Dakota has dodged that for the most part, even as its lower electricity rates are attractive to industrial operations looking to add large loads in the system.
Large loads can include everything from operations like data centers, to oil refineries, to agricultural processing facilities and even the capital complex in Bismarck. Currently, there are 23 larger data centers in North Dakota.
When it comes to data centers, North Dakota has managed to add those large loads without jacking up electricity prices for consumers.
There are concerns about whether that can continue to be the case.
“I have seen them have very adverse impacts and very positive impacts,” said Christmann. “It depends on the details of the specific data center.”
Managing that going forward will be a challenge for the commission and legislators.
State Rep. Anna Novak, R-Hazen, is currently leading the Legislature’s interim Energy Development and Transmission Committee to study large loads such as data centers and try to find a way to balance attracting those projects without overburdening other electricity consumers.
“We need to strike a balance of making sure that we’re open for business, but that we have a strong vetting process,” Novak said. “I think that the vetting process is getting better.”
Besides cheaper electricity prices and available power, the policy and regulatory climate in the state is also attractive for tech companies looking to site a data center.
Chris Flynn / The Forum
Data centers are also attracted to North Dakota’s readily available water supply and cooler temperatures, which cut operating costs.
Novak said cost savings for data centers choosing to locate here can amount to the billions.
“We are certainly a desirable place to put a data center,” Novak said.
The most well-known data center in the state, Applied Digital’s facilities near Ellendale, has become a case study for how to add a large load while keeping the local impact minimal and also providing benefits across the state.
By tapping into stranded power that was not being adequately used and making the capital investments on that instead of passing it to the utilities, the project has been able to actually decrease electricity rates for Montana-Dakota Utilities consumers across the state.
“We had involvement in that, in making sure that this big additional load was not only going to just not be detrimental to customers, but actually be very beneficial.” Christmann. “Every single MDU customer in North Dakota is benefiting because of that facility on their electric rate.”
Contributed / North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives
Darcy Neigum, vice president of electric supply for Montana-Dakota Utilities, said that customers saved around $70 last year because of the facility, and once it is fully built out, savings could come out to around $250 per year per customer.
“We’re very aware of the rates we’re charging to our customers and the rate impacts,” Neigum said. “The approach that we took (with the Ellendale facility) was to try to find some way to create value instead of just putting costs on customers.”
Insulating consumers from costs
Investor-owned utilities like MDU as well as electric cooperatives like Basin Electric Power and Minnkota are all trying to figure out how to manage large loads going forward.
Basin Electric adopted a large load program in June as a way to minimize rate impacts for cooperative members and reduce the risk of stranded assets that come with single projects looking for 50, 100 or more megawatts of power in the future. Minnkota Power Cooperative has also adopted a similar policy.
“So, when we have those inquiries coming in, whether it’s a large tech company or a large industrial load, we’re saying we want to serve you, but to do that you’re going to have to bear the costs associated with it,” Kramer said. “That goes for if they need to add more infrastructure or generation or engineering studies.”
MDU’s Neigum said the company doesn’t have a formal policy yet, but the uptick in interest in adding large loads may necessitate one.
“We do have a process we go through, and we’re kind of formalizing some of that, because there are just so many requests,” Neigum said.
One delicate aspect in all of this is putting into place policies that protect consumers or co-op members from additional costs without scaring quality projects away from the state.
Kramer said that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
“It’s probably helped separate the wheat from the chaff a bit,” Kramer said.
The North Dakota News Cooperative is a non-profit news organization providing reliable and independent reporting on issues and events that impact the lives of North Dakotans. The organization increases the public’s access to quality journalism and advances news literacy across the state. For more information about NDNC or to make a charitable contribution, please visit newscoopnd.org.
This story was originally published on NewsCoopND.org.
____________________________________
This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.
North Dakota
As ACA tax credits expire, a North Dakota rural hospital braces for 2026
BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – With federal health care tax credits set to expire, rural hospitals in the state warn the ripple effect could strain their budgets while they are already operating on thin margins.
The Emergency Department at Jamestown Regional Medical Center is gearing up for more patients to come into their doors, uninsured, starting Jan. 1.
“We could be affected as early as January of the coming year. So it would happen very, very quickly. And nobody really knows what’s going to happen,” said Mike Delfs, the CEO of Jamestown Regional Medical Center.
Many rural residents are on the Affordable Care Act marketplace. Since premiums are predicted to spike significantly, some people will drop insurance, and they will be forced to go to the ER when they get sick. Hospitals cannot refuse emergency patients, and will have to shoulder the cost on thin margins.
“We would be looking at anticipated bad debt, but to what degree we don’t even know, and it is kind of scary to think about,” said Delfs.
Hospital leadership and staff say that the uncertainty is wearing on them, on top of the common stressors rural providers have to deal with.
As of now, they say their best bet is to hope that Congress can put aside partisan differences and come up with a solution.
“We have real people who are either going to lose their insurance or its going to get so expensive they literally can’t afford it. And the downstream effect of that is now you are endangering hospitals in rural locations just by their mere viability,” said Delfs.
According to hospital leadership, without congressional action in 2026, the end of the year could leave the hospital with nearly one million dollars in unpaid medical bills.
North Dakota’s Republican congressional delegation says the Rural Health Transformation Fund will greatly benefit rural hospitals and blames democrats for voting against their healthcare plan.
Copyright 2025 KFYR. All rights reserved.
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Maine17 hours agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster