Connect with us

North Dakota

Forum Editorial: North Dakota has the ability to end ‘lunch shaming.’ Does it have the will?

Published

on

Forum Editorial: North Dakota has the ability to end ‘lunch shaming.’ Does it have the will?


It’s essential to take a second to recollect the eye-opening realization that prompted the institution of the Nationwide Faculty Lunch Program.

This system began in 1946 after the army realized that many males had been unable to enlist in World Battle II due to the long-term results of childhood malnutrition.

In 2020, in keeping with the U.S. Division of Agriculture, 14.8% of youngsters reported being meals insecure up to now 30 days. Final yr, 140,000 folks — or one in six North Dakotans — sought meals help by way of the Nice Plains Meals Financial institution and its community of neighborhood meals pantries.

The issue of starvation is sadly all too widespread.
We all know that the college lunch meal is essential to pupil well being and well-being, particularly low-income college students. It ensures that college students have the diet they want all through the day to study.

Advertisement

Analysis exhibits that receiving free or reduced-price faculty lunches reduces meals insecurity, weight problems charges and poor well being. Faculty meal diet requirements can enhance the meals college students eat, particularly for vegetables and fruit.

If it has the need, North Dakota has the means to make sure that each pupil in public colleges has entry to meals for free of charge to their households.

The North Dakota Legislature is contemplating Home Invoice 1491

, which would offer meals for free of charge to all college students enrolled in public colleges throughout the state. The value tag for offering meals to the 115,000 college students attending North Dakota public colleges for 2 years can be $89.5 million.

That was the appropriation proposed in Home Invoice 1491 when initially launched. However after being heard by the Home Training Committee, the

Advertisement

invoice has been scaled again

to offer as much as a $6 million grant to the superintendent of public instruction for grants to high school districts to defray the bills of offering meals, freed from cost, for all college students at or under 200% of federal poverty degree enrolled in public colleges for the subsequent biennium.

For a household of 4, 200% of the federal poverty degree is $30,000.

That meager degree of help is insufficient to the dimensions of the issue, and a humiliation for a state as wealthy as North Dakota, flush with reserves and contingency funds and a Legacy Fund bulging with a steadiness of $8.5 billion.

As soon as once more, one in six North Dakotans obtained meals help final yr. For a pupil in a poor household, faculty meals can present the peace of mind of at the least one good meal each faculty day.

Advertisement

One other proposal,

Home Invoice 1494

, gives a fallback plan, one which doesn’t require any state appropriation however units insurance policies to eradicate what’s come to be referred to as “lunch shaming” — the denial of meals when the scholar can’t afford to pay.

Amongst different issues, colleges can be prohibited from serving alternate meals or denying meals for college students with inadequate funds; discarding a pupil’s meal due to an unpaid steadiness; figuring out a pupil with any kind of sticker or stamp; forcing a pupil to work off their debt by way of chores; or limiting a pupil’s skill to take part at school actions due to an unpaid faculty lunch debt.

North Dakota has the flexibility to do extra — far more — to make sure that college students have the diet they should carry out nicely at school and get a very good begin in life. The North Dakota Legislature ought to rise as much as meet this problem.

Advertisement





Source link

North Dakota

North Dakota State defeats South Dakota State 28-21 in FCS semifinals to advance to Frisco

Published

on

North Dakota State defeats South Dakota State 28-21 in FCS semifinals to advance to Frisco


North Dakota State and South Dakota State are tied at 14 apiece after the first half. It’s been a tightly-contested battle as most battles between the two rivals are.

South Dakota State has been able to lean on its running attack, gaining 111 yards to NDSU’s 53. Amar Johnson and Mark Gronowski have scored on the ground.

Meanwhile, Cam Miller has accounted for both North Dakota State touchdowns, scoring once with his legs and once with his arm. Miller also has been efficient, completing six of seven passes.

The biggest play of the first half was the lone turnover, a fumble by Amar Johnson that gave North Dakota State the ball in Jackrabbit territory. 

Advertisement

When play resumes, North Dakota State will receive the second half kick. See first half stats below.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Port: Tribal sovereignty is a two-way street

Published

on

Port: Tribal sovereignty is a two-way street


MINOT — The activists pushing for President Joe Biden to sign, in the closing days of his administration, a sweeping executive order creating a new national monument out of roughly 140,000 acres of western North Dakota tell us their initiative

is led by our state’s tribes.

They also talk a lot about the importance of tribal sovereignty.

Let’s explore this.

Advertisement

I’m not sure all of the tribes knew they were leading this project. That’s certainly not the impression I got after a discussion with Chairman Mark Fox of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation. “When the entities came before to request support for a national monument, we just thought that would be nice without considering any possible impacts in terms of policy,”

he told me.

“We’re going to reconsider,” he added.

Fox stressed that he and his fellow tribal leaders aren’t necessarily against the national monument concept. He expressed enthusiasm for the new opportunities for preservation and tourism. Fox is concerned about the possibility that the monument could inhibit land use in the area — specifically, energy development, which is of vital importance to the MHA Nation.

“Depending on how large the designation is, it could impact some of our drilling. That’s where we lack clarity,” Fox told me. “We really didn’t have any of that information.”

Advertisement

That’s not a great look for a coalition that has marketed this proposal as a tribal initiative.

What’s also unseemly are aspersions cast at Fox because of his diligence. State Rep. Lisa Finley-DeVille, a Democrat from Mandaree, a member of the MHA Nation, and a spokesperson for the national monument campaign,

told reporter Jeff Beach

“that misinformation is undermining the monument effort, including among tribal leaders.”

“They need to read the proposal,” Finley-DeVille said. “We’re not trying to take anybody’s rights away. We’re not trying to stop oil and gas.”

Advertisement

That’s a tough claim to swallow when your coalition includes the Sierra Club, an organization committed to stopping oil and gas production, but the jab at Fox is what’s notable.

Finley-DeVille often talks about the importance of tribal sovereignty, and I agree with the sentiment, but I’d note that sovereignty is a two-way street. If you only respect tribal sovereignty when tribal leaders take positions you agree with, you’re not respecting tribal sovereignty.

I don’t think Chairman Fox is misinformed. I think his concerns are valid.

“Some entities have used this national monument declaration to stop drilling and stop energy production,” he said, and he’s right. The Biden administration has used these declarations to block or inhibit development around Spirit Mountain, in Nevada, and Bear Ears National Monument in Utah. “We don’t want it stopped at all either for ourselves or the state,” Fox told me.

Finley-Deville says Fox has been misled, but who has been misleading him? Finley-Deville is pursuing a new land declaration of the sort that has been used to block energy development elsewhere while working side-by-side with a deep-pocketed national organization that sees blocking oil and gas development as its mission but expects us to believe that she and her partners are “not trying to stop oil and gas.”

Advertisement

Fox is skeptical. Can we blame him?

Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service with an extensive background in investigations and public records. He covers politics and government in North Dakota and the upper Midwest. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

FCS Playoffs Semifinal Preview & Prediction: No. 3 South Dakota State at No. 2 North Dakota State

Published

on

FCS Playoffs Semifinal Preview & Prediction: No. 3 South Dakota State at No. 2 North Dakota State


No. 3 South Dakota State travels to No. 2 North Dakota State in the semifinals of the 2024 FCS Playoffs. Kickoff is scheduled for 11 a.m. CT on ABC. The Bison defeated the Jackrabbits 13-9 in Week 8.

The winner will advance to the FCS National Championship game, where they will face the winner of No. 4 South Dakota at No. 1 Montana State.

2024 FCS Playoff Bracket

2024 Prediction Record: 174-45
2022-23 Record: 207-75

Kickoff: 11:00 a.m. CT (ABC)
Line: South Dakota State (-3)
Series History: North Dakota State leads 64-47-5

Key Players: North Dakota State

Cam Miller (QB): 226-for-310 (72.9%), 2,873 Passing Yards, 28 Passing TDs, 4 INTs, 417 Rushing Yards, 9 Rushing TDs

Advertisement

CharMar Brown (RB): 216 Carries, 1,081 Rushing Yards, 5.0 YPC, 14 Rushing TDs

Bryce Lance (WR): 60 Receptions, 839 Receiving Yards, 13.98 YPC, 13 Receiving TDs

Logan Kopp (LB): 59 Total Tackles, 6 TFLs, 3 Sacks, 3 INTs, 6 PBUs, 1 FF

Eli Mostaert (DL): 53 Total Tackles, 11.5 TFLs, 6 Sacks, 4 QBHs

Key Players: South Dakota State

Mark Gronowski (QB): 192-for-312 (61.5%), 2,515 Passing Yards, 22 Passing TDs, 7 INTs, 330 Rushing Yards, 9 Rushing TDs

Advertisement

Amar Johnson (RB): 178 Carries, 1,145 Rushing Yards, 6.4 YPC, 13 Rushing TDs

Griffin Wilde (WR): 66 Receptions, 1,081 Receiving Yards, 16.4 YPC, 12 Receiving TDs

Adam Bock (LB): 94 Total Tackles, 8 TFLs, 3 Sacks, 2 INTs, 4 QBHs, 1 FR

Tucker Large (DB): 30 Total Tackles, 1 TFL, 3 INTs, 4 PBUs, 1 FR

The stage is set for another epic battle in one of the most storied rivalries in FCS football. North Dakota State ended a five-game losing streak to South Dakota State earlier this season, but a trip to the FCS national championship is on the line this weekend.

Advertisement

South Dakota State’s defense continues to impress, holding opponents to 4.5 yards per play and only 2.9 yards per carry. The Jackrabbits are led by one of the best linebacker duos in the nation: Adam Bock and Caleb Francl. The defensive line has improved throughout the season, helping the Jackrabbits force a negative play on almost 10% of all defensive snaps. In the first matchup, South Dakota State failed to generate much pressure on Miller and only recorded two tackles for loss. It will be important for the Jackrabbits to keep the North Dakota State offense behind the chains.

North Dakota State could not find any consistency on the ground, but Cam Miller delivered in the biggest moments of the first matchup. He led a 92-yard game-winning touchdown drive and connected with RaJa Nelson for two key touchdowns. The Jackrabbits will have to find a way to make Miller uncomfortable in the pocket and limit his ability to make plays outside the pocket. Miller has completed 72.9% of his passes and ranks No. 2 nationally in passing efficiency.

The inefficiency of South Dakota State’s passing attack was one of the biggest differences in October’s matchup. The Jackrabbits have found their rhythm through the air, passing for 200 or more yards in three of their past four games. In the past three games, Mark Gronowski has thrown for over 500 yards, seven touchdowns, and zero interceptions. The Bison must limit wide receiver Griffin Wilde, who has recorded 181 receiving yards and four touchdowns in the first two playoff games.

The Bison defensive line made a massive impact in the first game, generating pressure on over 40% of dropbacks. North Dakota State’s pressure impacted Gronowski’s ability to push the ball downfield, which is something to watch this weekend. The trend has continued for the Bison, who enter this weekend with the highest pressure rate in the postseason. Defensive tackle Eli Mostaert leads the Bison with 11.5 tackles for loss and six sacks.

This game may be decided by which team can establish the run, which will be a challenge for both offenses. North Dakota State’s CharMar Brown has been a workhorse for the Bison, leading the team with 1,081 rushing yards and 14 touchdowns. South Dakota State enters the game with a more explosive rushing attack, averaging 6.4 yards per carry. Amar Johnson leads the Jackrabbits with 1,145 rushing yards and 13 touchdowns, but freshman Kirby Vorhees could be a player to watch due to his physical running style.

Advertisement

In the first matchup, I picked the Bison because they appeared to have all the momentum. However, things have changed, as the Jackrabbits have continued to improve down the stretch and seem to be playing their best football. The improvement of the passing attack and explosiveness of the offense will be the difference here as Mark Gronowksi leads the Jackrabbits to their third consecutive national championship appearance.

Prediction: South Dakota State (27-24)

Behind The Numbers: 2024 FCS Playoffs Semifinals Preview
2025 FBS-To-FCS Football Transfer Tracker
2025 FCS-To-FCS Football Transfer Tracker
2025 FCS-To-FBS Football Transfer Tracker
2024 FCS Playoffs: Official Bracket, Schedule, Scores

Follow FCS Football Central on social media for ongoing coverage of FCS football, including on XFacebook, and YouTube.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending