Connect with us

North Dakota

Bills would increase North Dakota's interstate speed limit, but 1 would cost farmers

Published

on

Bills would increase North Dakota's interstate speed limit, but 1 would cost farmers


BISMARCK — North Dakota may increase the interstate’s speed limit to 80 mph, but one of the bills suggesting the long-requested change could cost farmers.

The House Transportation Committee heard testimony Thursday, Jan. 23, and Friday on two bills that would bump up the speed on Interstates 94 and 29 by 5 mph.

House Bill 1298

would increase the speed limit from 75 mph to 80 mph without a minimum speed.

Advertisement

That bill faced less opposition than

House Bill 1421,

which would set the minimum speed for I-29 and I-94 at 40 mph and the maximum at 80 mph. It also would require farmers who move large equipment on interstates to buy an annual permit, which would cost $25 for each tractor.

The bill initially called for a $100 permit, but the committee changed it to $25.

That fee drew the ire of several agricultural advocates, including the North Dakota Farmers Union and North Dakota Stockmen’s Association.

Advertisement

“HB 1421 raises taxes on farmers, creates farm operational inefficiency, provides unwarranted and unworkable mandates, is unenforceable and does nothing to improve public safety,” the North Dakota Grain Growers Association said in a letter.

The full House voted 69-22 to pass HB 1298 on Friday. HB 1421 has not made it to the House floor, but the Transportation Committee recommended in a 14-0 vote that the bill be killed.

If one of the bills becomes law, the increase would be the first since 2003, when North Dakota upped the speed limit from 70 to 75 mph. Other states, including South Dakota and Montana, have 80 mph speed limits on their interstates.

The I-29 and I-94 crossing in Fargo on Friday, Jan. 24, 2025.

Chris Flynn / The Forum

Advertisement

Minnesota’s interstate speed limit is 70 mph.

At least five other states, including Indiana and New York, also have proposed legislation to up their interstate speed limits to 80 mph.

North Dakota has tried but failed several times over the last decade to increase the interstates’ speed limit, most recently in 2023. Rep. Ben Koppelman, a Republican from West Fargo who introduced HB 1298, wrote the same bill two years ago.

The Legislature passed the bill, but then-Gov. Doug Burgum, a Republican, vetoed it over concerns of speeding-related deaths. He also said he could not support the proposed legislation without a “primary seat belt law.”

Advertisement

The House passed a bill requiring all occupants of a vehicle to wear a seat belt the day after the veto, sending it to Burgum’s office for final approval. The Legislature did not have enough votes to override Burgum’s rejection of the speed limit increase.

Koppelman told The Forum that he feels his bill has at least as much support as it has had in the past.

“This year, we won’t have a governor who’s going to veto what we passed last year as a threat to encourage the passage of the seat belt bill,” he said. “Last session, we did not quite have veto-proof majorities, but we had reasonable margins of victory in each chamber.”

North Dakota

Gov. Kelly Armstrong

Advertisement

has not expressed his view on increasing the speed limit.

“The governor generally doesn’t comment on bills (other than those he’s proposed, of course) before they reach his desk,” said Armstrong spokesman Mike Nowatzki.

In testifying in support of the bill, Geoff Simon said motorists need consistency on interstate. Simon is the executive director of the Western Dakota Energy Association but testified as an individual resident of the state.

No one spoke against HB 1298 when the committee held a hearing on Thursday, though there were letters against it saying it would present safety concerns.

Koppelman said the North Dakota Department of Transportation would prefer a minimum speed limit with a maximum. Rep. Eric Murphy, a Grand Forks Republican who also signed on to Koppelman’s bill, has put his name on such a legislation in the form of HB 1421.

Advertisement

“That was the poison pill that killed the bill that year because the farmers don’t want a minimum speed limit,” Koppelman said of the minimum speed. “I think that’s what is going to likely make my bill to the finish line and not Rep. Murphy’s bill.”

Murphy acknowledged the DOT’s recommendation for a minimum speed. He told The Forum his concerns about tractors not being allowed if a minimum speed is set.

Most modern tractors can drive a maximum of 25 mph.

“Clearly, they should seek other alternatives, but there are some farmers out there who literally have to use the interstate,” Murphy said.

He added language into HB 1421 that would give exceptions to farm tractors, but it would come at a cost.

Advertisement

Along with the $25 permit, a vehicle with flashing hazard signals would have to follow the tractor on the interstate. It also could not let debris fall onto the highway.

“That would allow them to move equipment well below the 40 mph speed limit,” Murphy said.

HB 1421 would also give the North Dakota Department of Transportation the ability to reduce the maximum limit in “a high accident zone,” such as extreme curves in the interstate, to 60 mph, Murphy said. The DOT could reduce the speed when weather impacts travel, according to the bill.

Ag producers use the interstate rarely and as a last resort, said Brent Baldwin, president of the Red River Valley Sugarbeet Growers Association. The bill could open the door to additional fees, he added.

For farmers to get across rivers, particularly at the North Dakota-Minnesota border, the only option is the interstate, said Pete Hanebutt, public policy director for the North Dakota Farm Bureau. Weather can flood roads and force farmers to take the interstate, he said.

Advertisement

“I think there are an awful lot of holes in this bill,” Hanebutt said during a House Transportation Committee hearing on Friday.

Koppelman said HB 1421 is an attempt at a compromise that does not leave anyone happy. There is no reason to support that, he said.

“We don’t need to do that at the expense of farmers,” he said.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Amid Rural EMS Struggles, North Dakota Lawmakers Weigh Solutions

Published

on

Amid Rural EMS Struggles, North Dakota Lawmakers Weigh Solutions


North Dakota lawmakers are exploring using telemedicine technology to ease staffing strains on rural emergency medical services, a potential solution to a growing shortage of paramedics and volunteer responders across the state.

Though some solutions were floated and passed during the 2025 legislative session, lawmakers are working to understand the scope of the problem before proposing additional legislative changes in 2027.

The state has been facing a societal decline in volunteerism, which strains traditional volunteer firefighter and emergency medical services that support rural communities, said Sen. Josh Boschee, D- Fargo. Adding to pressure, when a rural ambulance service shuts down, the responsibility falls to neighboring ambulance services to answer calls in the defunct ambulance service’s coverage area.

How could telemedicine ease strains on rural EMS staffing?

Advertisement

One idea presented to the Emergency Response Services Committee on Wednesday to potentially alleviate some of the stress on rural ambulances is expanding access to technology in the field for emergency medical personnel.

Emergency medicine technology company Avel eCare presented to the committee its system, which allows ambulance personnel to be connected by video with emergency medicine physicians, experienced medics or emergency nurses in the field wherever there is cell reception. The company already operates its mobile service in South Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska and Kansas, according to the company’s presentation.

Avel eCare said this allows medics and paramedics to have any questions they have answered and provides a second person to help document actions taken when there is only one person in the back of an ambulance with a patient, which they say is increasingly common in rural areas. This allows one medic or paramedic to put more focus on the patient.

The company said it is innovating the ability to also bring medical personnel into the call from whatever care center the ambulance is heading to, allowing the care center to better prepare for the ambulance’s arrival.

Lawmakers said they were interested in the system and could see how it would provide a benefit to thinly stretched EMS personnel.

Advertisement

Boschee said the state should consider funding the system, citing its potential to support local EMS providers and help retain volunteers.

Avel eCare did not provide a cost estimate for North Dakota, but offered South Dakota as an example. That state used general fund dollars to provide the Avel eCare service free of charge to agencies. The state paid $1.7 million in up-front costs for equipment — enough to outfit 120 ambulances — and an annual subscription cost of $937,000 to provide their services to 109 ambulances serving 105 communities in the state.

“I think specifically … how affordable that type of solution is for us to not only support our local EMS providers, but also to keep volunteers longer,” he said. “Folks know that they have that support network when they’re in the back of the rig taking care of a patient. That helps add to people’s willingness to serve longer. And so I think that’s a great, affordable option we have to look at, especially as we start going in the next couple months and continue to talk about rural health care transformation.”

Rural EMS shortages go beyond pay, state officials say

There are 28 open paramedic positions in the state, according to Workforce Services Director Phil Davis’ presentation. The difficulty in filling these positions is not just about money, though that certainly plays a factor in recruiting people, his report said.

Advertisement

“I’ll just speak from my experience with my own agency,” Davis said. “After 18 years, it’s very hard for us to even recruit individuals into Job Service North Dakota because of the lower wages.”

Davis showed that 2024 salaries for emergency medical technicians were fairly even across the eight regions Workforce Services breaks the state into, with a roughly $6,500 gap between the highest and lowest averages. Law enforcement officer pay varied by about $8,320, while firefighter salaries were the biggest outlier, with a $20,000 difference between regions. While state wages may lag nationally, other factors are making rural recruiting particularly difficult.

Davis said it was largely a lifestyle change; people are not seeking to live rurally as often.

“We’re starting to see the smaller communities, for the most part — not all — starting to lose that population. And it is tougher to get individuals to move there or to be employed there,” Davis said.

Job Service North Dakota is holding job fairs to try to recruit more emergency services personnel, with some success, he said, and has nine workforce centers across the state working directly with small communities to help with their staffing shortages.

Advertisement

Davis advocated for more education in schools about career paths in emergency services and the openings that are available in the state.

© 2025 The Bismarck Tribune (Bismarck, N.D.). Visit www.bismarcktribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Found guilty of manslaughter: Dickinson man to spend only about four and a half more years in prison

Published

on

Found guilty of manslaughter: Dickinson man to spend only about four and a half more years in prison


DICKINSON — A 70-year-old Dickinson man

charged with murder in 2024

was sentenced on Tuesday to 15 years in prison after the charges against him were dropped to manslaughter. According to court documents, he will only be in custody for about four and a half more years.

Nine years were suspended from Jeffrey Powell’s sentence along with 532 days or about one and a half years for time already served.

Advertisement

Barring future developments, Powell will be incarcerated at the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for

the death of 59-year-old Christopher Volney Ische

for about four and a half more years.

That’s just months more than the four-year minimum sentence, according to the Stark County State’s Attorney Amanda Engelstad.

The initial incident happened on July 3, 2024. Police said the shooting, which resulted in Ische’s death, happened around 7 p.m. in a residential neighborhood in Dickinson after a verbal altercation. Police also said Powell had stayed on the scene of the shooting and talked with officers.

Advertisement

At the time of Powell’s arrest, police said they presumed Ische’s death was an isolated incident. He has been held at Southwest Multi-County Correctional Center (SWMCCC) since the incident with a $2 million bond.

Powell

was initially charged with a Class AA felony

, which could carry a maximum sentence of life in prison. On Tuesday, Dec. 16, Powell was found guilty of manslaughter of an adult victim, which is a Class B felony.

Powell pleaded guilty to the manslaughter charge.

Advertisement

Engelstad said to The Press that the difference in charges was based on evidence presented in the trial and was an “appropriate resolution.”

Different sentencing rules applied to Powell, however, because of how North Dakota law interprets the use of a firearm in cases like this.

During the trial, the court found that Powell was a dangerous special offender pursuant to NDCC 12.1-32-09. This portion of North Dakota law allows the court to sentence above normal charges. In Powell’s case, a class B felony typically carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. With the dangerous special offender finding, the sentence can be a maximum of 20 years.

Engelstad said the State had argued for a sentence of 20 years.

“I’m disappointed in the outcome,” said Engelstad.

Advertisement

Additional terms of Powell’s sentence include five years’ supervised probation, along with no contact with the family of the deceased for the same length of time.

If Powell does not violate these terms, his probation will end in 2035. He is scheduled to be released from custody June 23, 2030.

A total of $775 in fees for Powell’s case, including criminal administration, facility admin and victim witness fees, were waived. He may be required to pay restitution. The State’s Attorney’s office has 60 days from the date of judgment to file an affidavit of restitution.

Advertisement
Originally from rural South Dakota, RubyAnn Stiegelmeier is the editor of The Dickinson Press. Through her work, she celebrates the unique voices and achievements that make this region vibrant. For story tips or inquiries, you can reach RubyAnn at 701-456-1212 or rubyann@thedickinsonpress.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Blizzard warning issued in Dakotas

Published

on

Blizzard warning issued in Dakotas


The view through a North Dakota Highway Patrol squad’s windshield. (Facebook)

Blizzard warnings are in for parts of both North and South Dakota, creating hazardous conditions for drivers on Thursday morning.

Blizzard warning in effect

Advertisement

What we know:

In North Dakota, the blizzard warning covers most of the northern two-thirds of the state, stretching into northwest Minnesota.

In South Dakota, the blizzard warning only covers three counties in the far northeast part of the state, including Day, Marshall, and Robert counties.

Advertisement

The National Weather Service is only forecasting between one and four inches of snow in North Dakota and two inches of snow in South Dakota, but whipping winds up to 70 miles per hour will greatly reduce visibility and cause damage to trees and power lines.

READ MORE: White-out conditions reported in NW Minnesota

Advertisement

What they’re seeing:

North Dakota Highway Patrol shared photos showing the blizzard conditions along Interstate 94 just east of Bismark. In the photos, it appears you can only see a few feet past the front bumper of the squad.

Another post shows snow whipping in the high winds in Grand Forks County. Troopers are urging residents to stay home in North Dakota if they are able.

Advertisement

Travel restrictions in place

Big picture view:

A travel alert is in effect for western parts of North Dakota while no travel is advised for central and eastern parts of the state. Troopers have restricted oversized loads from roads in the northwest and northeast regions of the state as of 5:30 a.m. and empty or light-loaded high-profile vehicles due to the high winds and icy conditions.

Advertisement

In South Dakota, officials warn that there are reports of multiple downed powerlines and trees blocking roadways. No travel is advised in Day and Marshall counties.

The Source: This story uses information from the North Dakota Highway Patrol and the National Weather Service.

Advertisement
WeatherNorth DakotaSouth Dakota



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending