Connect with us

Missouri

Missouri environmentalists worry bill undermines law meant to boost renewable energy

Published

on

Missouri environmentalists worry bill undermines law meant to boost renewable energy


Environmental advocates are elevating considerations {that a} Missouri regulation enacted final 12 months to hurry up utilities’ transition to renewable power might quickly be modified to make it simpler for firms to maintain coal crops partially open.

Final 12 months, Missouri and Kansas enacted legal guidelines permitting electrical utilities to “securitize” getting old coal crops and retire them early with out taking a monetary hit to allow them to flip round and put money into renewable power. It was a uncommon compromise that introduced collectively utilities and environmental and shopper advocates.

However this 12 months, lawmakers are contemplating a change that environmentalists such because the Sierra Membership argue may make it simpler for utilities to learn from securitization with out totally shuttering their coal crops.

Advertisement

“It’s basically a gaping gap with the entire concept,” mentioned Henry Robertson, an legal professional who retired from Nice Rivers Environmental Regulation Heart and serves as power chair for the Sierra Membership’s Missouri chapter.

Missouri utilities, nevertheless, say the proposed change — which is included in a invoice heard final week by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Shopper Safety, Vitality and the Surroundings — merely cleans up language from final 12 months’s laws.

In a press release, Evergy spokeswoman Gina Penzig mentioned the change was not sought by the utility, “however by senators who wished to tighten language handed final 12 months.”

Securitization basically permits utility firms to refinance the debt they took on to construct or enhance coal-fired energy crops, very like somebody would refinance their mortgage. A 3rd celebration points bonds to repay the utility’s funding within the facility, and ratepayers pay again these bonds at a decrease rate of interest than the utility was initially set to earn on the funding.

By eradicating coal crops that environmental teams say are typically dearer to function, the utility firms can liberate funds to put money into extra renewable power.

Advertisement

Beneath the Missouri securitization regulation because it was handed final 12 months, Missouri regulators can allow utilities to maintain charging prospects to maintain coal crops round to offer capability throughout excessive climate occasions, just like the chilly snap that compelled energy outages throughout the Midwest final 12 months.

The amended language, nevertheless, takes some discretion away from regulators, Robertson contends.

“They couldn’t actually take the ability away from the fee to do it,” Robertson mentioned, “however they’ve weighted it closely.”

An Ameren spokesperson mentioned: “This provision goals to offer the Missouri Public Service Fee with the correct authority to make sure buyer reliability requirements are met within the occasion of a extreme climate scenario.”

Marc Poston, public counsel for Missouri ratepayers, mentioned the amended language eliminated some discretion from the PSC however that it seemingly wouldn’t alter practices a lot.

Advertisement

If the fee decided below current regulation that it was “simply, cheap and mandatory” for a utility to maintain a coal plant in its charges, Poston mentioned he couldn’t see a state of affairs the place they’d exert discretion to not enable it.

“From a buyer perspective, it most likely has no significance,” he mentioned. “From a utility perspective, it establishes extra certainty concerning what commonplace they should meet.”

The invoice’s sponsor, Rep. Michael O’Donnell, R-St. Louis County, mentioned the PSC nonetheless has the last word authority.

“If the utilities aren’t being prudent with it, they will basically cease that,” he mentioned.

Each Ameren and Evergy pledged to achieve net-zero carbon emissions within the coming many years with out securitization. However they supported the laws final 12 months.

Advertisement

Andy Knott, central area director for the Sierra Membership’s Past Coal Marketing campaign, mentioned even the language in final 12 months’s laws permitting utilities to securitize however not totally retire coal crops was a difficulty. The securitization invoice, he mentioned, was not good.

However this 12 months’s proposed change would “sweeten the pot” for utilities.

“Principally, it gives extra profit to the utilities and their shareholders and takes away profit to the shoppers who’re speculated to be saving cash below securitization,” he mentioned.

The proposal has already been permitted by the Home. The Senate committee took no motion on it final week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Missouri

‘Enough is enough’: Missouri voters form bipartisan group to quash Republican initiative petition changes

Published

on

‘Enough is enough’: Missouri voters form bipartisan group to quash Republican initiative petition changes


JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (KY3) – Missouri Republican lawmakers have once again put forth efforts to curtail the process for citizen-led ballot initiatives following successful campaigns to enshrine abortion rights, raise the state’s minimum wage, and create a legal sports wagering market.

In response, a newly formed political group called the “Respect Voters Coalition” is sponsoring a 2026 initiative to prevent state officials from meddling in the process altogether.

The group’s argument is rooted in the very first section of the first article of the state’s Constitution, which reads as follows:

“[We declare] that all political power is vested in and derived from the people; that all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.” – Missouri Const. of 1875, Art. I, Sec. 1.

Advertisement

Ben Singer, who leads Show Me Integrity, co-founded RVC to oppose efforts to roll back the IP process. He noted that both parties have pushed this when they were in the majority.

“When Democrats were trying to attack the citizens initiative process because they didn’t like the Conservatives, who also used the citizens initiative process, Governor Ashcroft vetoed the Democrats’ attack on the ballot initiative process,” Singer said.

Ashcroft issued that veto in June 1992, writing the following in his explanation:

“It is through the initiative process that those who have no influence with elective representatives may take their cause directly to the people. The General Assembly should be reluctant, therefore, to enact legislation which places any impediments on the initiative power which are inconsistent with the reservation found in the Constitution.” – Gov. John Ashcroft, Veto Message, June 27, 1992.

Efforts to reform the state’s initiative petition process consumed much of the 2024 legislative session, including days-long filibusters by a faction of 6 Republicans demanding the issue be given priority and Democrats working to block it from passage. The process arguably deprived the House and Senate of sufficient time to review and amend the $51 billion state budget.

Advertisement

“These politicians who’ve taken an oath to protect the Missouri Constitution need to be reminded of that, and so that’s why groups and citizens across the state, in unbelievable momentum I’ve never seen before, are banding together to say enough is enough, and we are going to stop politicians from attacking the will of the people once and for all,” Singer said.

The Missouri House and Senate will convene on January 8 to begin the 103rd General Assembly’s first regular session.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri voters form bipartisan group to quash Republican IP changes

Published

on

Missouri voters form bipartisan group to quash Republican IP changes


ST. LOUIS (First Alert 4) — Missouri Republican lawmakers have once again put forth efforts to curtail the process for citizen-led ballot initiatives following successful campaigns to enshrine abortion rights, raise the state’s minimum wage, and create a legal sports wagering market.

In response, a newly formed political group called the “Respect Voters Coalition” is sponsoring a 2026 initiative to prevent state officials from meddling in the process altogether.

The group’s argument is rooted in the very first section of the first article of the state’s Constitution, which reads as follows:

“[We declare] that all political power is vested in and derived from the people; that all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.” – Missouri Const. of 1875, Art. I, Sec. 1.

Advertisement

Ben Singer, who leads Show Me Integrity, co-founded RVC as a measure to push back against efforts to roll back the IP process which, he noted, have been pushed by both parties when they’ve been in the majority.

“When Democrats were trying to attack the citizens initiative process because they didn’t like the Conservatives also used the citizens initiative process, Governor Ashcroft vetoed the Democrats’ attack on the ballot initiative process,” Singer said.

Ashcroft issued that veto in June 1992, writing the following in his explanation:

“It is through the initiative process that those who have no influence with elective representatives may take their cause directly to the people. The General Assembly should be reluctant, therefore, to enact legislation which places any impediments on the initiative power which are inconsistent with the reservation found in the Constitution.” – Gov. John Ashcroft, Veto Message, June 27, 1992.

Efforts to reform the state’s initiative petition process consumed much of the 2024 legislative session, including days-long filibusters by a faction of six Republicans demanding the issue be given priority and Democrats working to block it from passage. The process arguably deprived the House and Senate of sufficient time to perform a final review and amendment of the $51 billion state budget.

Advertisement

“These politicians who’ve taken an oath to protect the Missouri Constitution need to be reminded of that, and so that’s why groups and citizens across the state, in unbelievable momentum I’ve never seen before, are banding together to say enough is enough, and we are going to stop politicians from attacking the will of the people once and for all,” Singer said.

The Missouri House and Senate are set to convene on January 8 to begin the First Regular Session of the 103rd General Assembly.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Iowa vs. Missouri Prediction, Odds and Key Players for Music City Bowl

Published

on

Iowa vs. Missouri Prediction, Odds and Key Players for Music City Bowl


Missouri and Iowa meet in the Music City Bowl, the standalone game on December 30th bowl coverage. 

Both teams ended their respective regular season with rivalry game victories in the final moments and will look for a bowl win to build momentum towards the future. In a closely lined spread, and some key players opting out, how should we bet this one? 

We have you covered with our Music City Bowl betting preview below!

Spread

Advertisement

Moneyline

Total: 40.5 (Over -110/Under -110)

Odds courtesy of FanDuel Sportsbook

Missouri

Brady Cook: This will be Cook’s final game with the Tigers after he returned from a mid-season injury to lead the Tigers to late-season wins against the likes of Arkansas in the team’s regular-season finale. While it wasn’t as productive as the year prior, Cook put up solid numbers this season for Mizzou, passing for 2,248 yards with 14 total touchdowns and only two interceptions. 

Iowa 

Brendan Sullivan: The hope is that Sullivan is back from injury for this one, the team’s primary backup that showed some upside in the Hawkeyes offense in wins against Northwestern and Wisconsin. Overall, this is a run-first Iowa offense that will be without star running back Kaleb Johnson, putting more pressure on Sullivan as a runner and to create with his arm. He completed more than 68% of his passes in a limited sample this season (35 passes). 

Advertisement

There are two notable players out in this game with NFL upside, one for each team. 

For Missouri, Luther Burden opted out of this game to prepare for the NFL Draft, which is a blow to the Tigers’ offense, but not as impactful as Iowa’s Kaleb Johnson, who was sixth in the country in rushing yards this season. 

Johnson was a big part of the Hawkeyes offense that was 93rd in the country in EPA/Pass and 85th in overall success rate. Without the threat of the standout running back on the field, Iowa will rely solely on its defense to stay competitive in this game. 

With that in mind, I’ll lay it with the small favorite in Missouri. 

While the Tigers fell short of lofty goals set by a strong 2023, the team still has a versatile offense that includes a sturdy run game and a consistent unit that ranked top 50 in success rate. Further, the team can keep up with Iowa in the battle for field position as it ranks top 10 in havoc allowed and is 11th in Pro Football Focus’ special teams grade. 

Advertisement

I question how Iowa puts up many points on the board in this one and while the under looks like a worthwhile bet, I’d rather side with the Tigers to win this game by more than a field goal. 

PICK: Missouri -3

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

Follow Reed on Twitter @ReedWallach and get all his college football bets on betstamp @rw33

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending